SPONSORED BY:

The Editor’s Desk

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Holly Bailey, at least, is not stunned by Mike Huckabee's surge. Holly, who coauthored our cover profile of Huckabee with Michael Isikoff, has been following the former Arkansas governor and Southern Baptist minister for months. "The fact that Mike Huckabee is rising in the polls isn't a surprise to me or many of the reporters who have been covering his campaign since the summer," Holly says. "The first time I ever interviewed Huckabee was at the Iowa State Fair, when he was basically written off as a candidate. It was 105 degrees out, just miserable, and almost 100 people showed up to hear him speak, which was a pretty great crowd for a guy considered at best a long shot. He didn't sound like a typical Republican: he railed on his party for selling out to Wall Street and corporate interests and talked up arts and music education. And he came across as just a regular nice guy. Afterward, I trailed him as he tried to figure out what he could eat at the fair without violating his diet. He didn't have a big campaign entourage keeping reporters away, so I stood there and grilled him on food options. Corn dogs and fried Twinkies, he said, were out. And when I brought up the fair's more exotic menu, including its legendary Hot Beef Sundae, he looked disgusted. 'Even in my fattest days that didn't sound appealing to me,' he said. In the end, he chose a pork chop on a stick. Those were the easy days for Huckabee. Now he's on top of the polls in Iowa and with that comes a lot more scrutiny of his record back in Arkansas, including ethics problems and positions on immigration and taxes that could hurt him with Republican voters. Huckabee was still the nice, accessible guy from the fair when I spoke to him last week about his critics, but from the tone of his voice, I could tell he doesn't particularly like talking about this stuff."

"This stuff" also includes matters of religion, a subject Mitt Romney addressed last Thursday in College Station, Texas. The battle for Iowa on the GOP side has taken on a religious cast, with many likely evangelical caucusgoers (46 percent in the NEWSWEEK Poll) saying Romney's Mormon faith makes them less likely to support him. Huckabee, by contrast, is surging among such voters, who may make up as much as 40 percent of the electorate in Iowa on Jan. 3.

A word of disclosure. Early last week it was reported that Romney was "rereading" a book I wrote in 2006 on the American tradition of religious liberty, "American Gospel." In the book and in an essay for this week's issue, I argue that religion is important but not all-important in our politics and public life, and that the Founders gave us a republic in which many may believe but none must. Religious adherents, in my view, should be the most ferocious defenders of liberty of conscience, including the rights of those not to believe, for if God himself, in theological terms, does not compel obedience, then no man should try. The night before the speech, Romney called to talk about what he was going to say (for more on all this, see "The New American Holy War," beginning on page 30). In College Station, Romney addressed an important subject, but did not, in my opinion, define religious liberty as broadly as the Founders did: their understanding of it extended to those who were not choosing among denominations but were altogether skeptical of religious traditions. Then, in a follow-up interview with me on Friday evening, the governor finally did acknowledge that religious liberty includes those of no religious belief.

Facebook

It is not too much to say that the clash between Romney and Huckabee in Iowa touches on the most fundamental things about America. Whoever wins, let us hope that Lincoln's "better angels of our nature" will prevail.

© 2007

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: sullylawman @ 12/19/2007 4:26:52 PM

    This is in response to the article entitled concerncing Mike Huckabee and Mitt Romney. I read the article at the library today as was intrigued at the not so subtle way you attacked religion and promted yout secular, anti-religion, atheistic view. Please if I am wrong in my assesment, I will stand corrected. You obviously a liberal who votes democrat, hates the war in Iraq, Goerge Bush, and of course as I stated before is anti-religious. That said you are incorrect time and time again in your articel. You are the editor of this magazine correct? Again if I am mistaken please correct me. First your incorrect to ridicule Romney for not addressing the so called irrleligious or anti-religious. His speech was referencing the history of America and the faith of our founding fathers. Our country was founded on faith and religious freedom. It was freedom to worship God in whatever way you wished. Not worshiping God would have been a minority view in their time and is also today if your look at any statistic polling the subject. Mitt was connecting with what our country was founded upon and should still be today. Criticizing hime for not mentioning those like yourself who would I am sure like to forget the faith of our fathers, was uncalled for and unprofessional. Secondly you refer this Republican race to a holy war. In a time when so called "liberals" want tolerance and peace and unity for all faiths, you're going around stirring up a holy war. That's something we would all like to remeber and relive. This is nothing like a holy war it's called a presidential race. There both competing for the presidency of the United States. You seem to be attempting to polarize republicans and also to keep any democrats or undecided voters from going onto their side. Finally you use quotes from our founding fathers to prove some awful point about how our republican candidates should try gaining the vote of maybe 5 % of our population, depending on how mamy journalists and professors are in the US at any given time. John Jay was a historic figure in the founding of our country. The very first chief justice of the US Supreme Court.. He is quoted as saying "Providence has given to our people the choice of their rulers. It is the duty, as well as the privilege and interest of our Christian nation to select and prefer Christians for their rulers." We needed to religious test because it was the rule of the day that people would and should elect Christians to properly govern a Christian nation. Please be advise Sir, that your view is incorrect, is completly contradictory with our American heritage and is way to obvious. And oh by the way, please refer me to a country or nationsthat has had great success promoting freedom for all, apart from a religious and moral law, Thank you for your time.

  • Posted By: vchewy @ 12/13/2007 12:25:19 AM

    Why did'nt you put Mitt on the cover. He had all of the international attention this past week . He is the only candidate that I would be proud to show off to the international community. People can say what they want about him, but nobody has a resume like Romney! Amazing family, two Harvard degrees, great morals, no skeletons in the closet, great looks, fantastic background, etc. He has proven that he is not corrupted by all of this! He is cast right out of a Hollywood movie. If he is not in the race, I will vote democrat. Go Mitt!!!!!

  • Posted By: CharlieMentor @ 12/11/2007 7:21:06 AM

    If Mitt Romney is an example of a Mormon then I have little regard for that religion. He gives used car salesmen a bad rep. He believe that to be a president you have to be a christian. His world view keeps changing over and over and has little tolerance for anyone who disagrees with him. Why any evangelical would be swayed by this snake oil salesmen is beyond me. But then people will believe what they want to believe....all those bible myths come to mind

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now