The Clintons’ Patronizing Strategy

Right now he's being tickled by the Clinton's compared with what the Republican attack machine will do. Wait till the Republicans bring up Obama's drug use. He's doesn't know a presidential campaign until he gets swifted. Imagine the commercials of someone snorting coke in a back alley and then of Obama. It's not going to be pretty for him or the Democrats. -- I've seen it before. It's going to happen.

I'll support whoever the Democratic nominee is, Clinton, Edwards or Obama. I am a staunch Democrat. However what the Clinton's said in regard to Obama's comment in regard to Republicans is not a lie. He did say that the Repunlicans were the party of ideas. It was a positve statement weather or not he used the word "good." When I first heard those comments I knew he was going to be trouble for that, A Democratic candidate should never invoke them name of Reagan in a positive way.

This guy has published at least two articles to support Obama and criticize Clinton--in an unfair way. Seems like whatever Obama did, it's right, whatever Hilary did, it's wrong. So who is this guy? A staff of Obama campaign?

Barack Obama is an excellent choice for president and Clinton fails in electability. Against any possible republican nominee she'll be tossed to the wind and the Democratic Party will suffer further. While it's a wonderful thought to have a woman as a President, Mrs Clinton isn't that woman - and there are dozens of other women who could take that dream and progressivly build upon it. *08 Obama* The Clintons are less then democratic, when members of your own party tell you your out of line and need to shut up, something serious is happening - those who fail to see that are also less than intelligent.

The Chicago Tribune: "Beyond the heated sound bites is a story of a more complex relationship that long boosted Obama's political fortunes but now could prove a campaign liability. For years after Rezko befriended Obama in the early 1990s, he helped bankroll the politician's campaigns. Then, after Obama's election to the U.S. Senate, Rezko engaged him in private financial deals to improve their adjoining South Side properties. Those arrangements became a source of lingering controversy after the Tribune first reported them in November 2006.???

???Now Rezko's federal corruption trial is scheduled to begin Feb. 25. As Obama stumps for votes, coverage of the high-profile proceedings could bring fresh, unwelcome reminders for Obama of Rezko's influence in the same Illinois political world that propelled the senator to a serious run at the presidency."

Rezko was a lot more than what Obama is trying to say and to paint Rezko onto the Clintons is ridiculous. Tony Rezko SERVED on OBAMA's finance committee for US Senate. He had a hand in raising a lot more money than what Obama is returning/donating to charity.

We are witnessing a campaign like no other before. With the Clintons every word, thought and deed is considered, they bully, cajole and manipulate every political process to gain an advantage, pitting individuals, groups, races and religion against one another. No lie is too ridiculou, no fact so solid that they can't twist it to meet their ends. It hasn't come to legal challenges yet but as surely as the sun rises in the east they have contingencies for that and those contingencies as so planned that they will offset them as petty grievances by their opponents or if complex, they will say it was forced on them by their opponents. If they perceive they will slack off briefly knowing full well that an issue will pop up that they can use to their advantage. They surely have studied Sun Tzu's The Art of War, especially the part about knowing your enemies and knowing yourself. If nothing else they have set new standards for political campaigns, that would be there is no limit to the use of devious and overbearing tactics, and that no morals, principles or scruples apply and sheer gall does. We are learning how people can be manipulated by force of personality and implied and real intimidation. Somewhere in the nether world, Hitler, Stalin and Mao, amidst the fires, are celebrating, knowing their tactics have not gone out of fashion and, in fact, are being practiced today by our silver haired present day Caligula and his shrill harridan of a wife.

What about twisting the words of Hillary Clinton about MLK and LBJ to create a racial backlash by Obama camapaign ... you want Obama to be the nominee so the Republicans can really run a racially surcharged election and win easily ... I think ... Hillary will beat McCain .. saying we need to change the Iraq war direction ...

Are you sleeping? Obama Hussein? He is an arab. What difference does that make? Obama is an inexperienced newbie and is not politically capable of handling the presidency of the United States. The evidence is his 'present votes', his 300k deal with 'the slum landlord' on his south side mansion with the adjoining lot. The evidence is in 4 separate interviews (ABC Invesigative news) he denied knowing Resko, when in fact, he wrote letters endorsing him and his now questionable fund raising tactics. Are you kidding? The Clintons have been investigated for 10 years to the tune of 70 million dollars and not one allegation of inappropriate dealings was ever charged. Are you kidding? His plan for health leaves 15-20 million people uninsured. His fiscal recovery plan announced 12 days after Mrs Clintons plan has been judged the worst plan by many independant financial advisors with no party affiliation. Are you kidding? Mrs Clinton is brighter, more experienced and actually has an energy plan to combat global warming. She has been an advocate for at least 15 years before Barack was even involved in politics. Are you kidding? Baracks largest contributor to his campaign is the company that wants to dump nuclear waste in Nevada. Mrs Clinton has fought that dump site for 20 years. Just what do you base Obamas qualifications on? His association with Oprah Winfrey? Are you kidding? Mrs Clinton has actually worked all over the world-not just in Africa- for children and womens rights. Their right to get an education that is goode and in all of the United States, not just a 40 million school where only the brightest girls are invited to go. Are you kidding? America needs help-not Iraq-not Africa-America needs healthcare for all-America needs a redo on infrastructure and modern factories to compete with other countries. How will Obama accomplish that when he dreams of these things and can not get past his race issues? If he can't work with all people-all colors and all religions-how can he accomplish anything? Are you kidding?

For the uneducated, politics is like a high school popularity contest; for the educated public, a contest of merit; and for the politicians and lobbyist it most often appears to be a contest of graft. Therefore, a good strategist will attempt to run a campaign of balanced tactics in order to create a subset environment producing a majority of support. It should be of no surprise that the candidates will make no mistake in ignoring any of the groups.

Bush, Clinton, Clinton, Bush, Bush, Clintons, Clintons.

No thanks.