The Clintons’ Patronizing Strategy

As ususal, your commentary is another example of the biased media coverage of the campaign. If you believe that the public is "too dumb" when it comes to the Clintons, then you must be doubly aware that we are not "too dumb" when it comes to your partisan coverage. The public is well aware that the majority of media outlets from "Hardball with Chris Matthews", CNN, NBC, CBS and ABC are pushing the "Obama" agenda. Those of us, and there are many if not most are well aware the covert subtefuge being perpetuated by the media as well as the Obama camp. Why don't you start reporting on the real "Obama" and bring him off the pedastal you're all so fast to place him on. As Obama stated yesterday, "those who are voting for him will not vote for Hillary, however, her supporters will vote for him". Here's a newsflash... If he's the candidate, as an independent vote, I'm voting for McCain.

The Bill and Hillary show is disgraceful. Now I realize what the Republicans gave been so infuriated about . Ironically as they fragment the Democrats, their nominatioin would unify the Republicans. Will the democratic primary voter figure this out in time are will they blow another chance at the White House.
Obama is the only logical chioce for 2008.

Here we go. Another pro-Obama, anti-Clinton article. Get over yourselves, Newsweek - and MSNBC for that matter. This is politics !

You do not invoke Reagan or the Republican party as the party of idea the last 10-15 years DURING A DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY !!! (As I recall, it was Senator Edwards who attack Senator Obama first on his Reagan comment.) You do not attack Senator Clinton during a debate with a Wal-Mart jab and not expect to get gut punched in return with the Rezko roundhouse. Senator Obama is not running against Alan Keyes here, people. He expected to be coronated not only as the Democratic nominee, but as President if he had won the NH primary. That didn't happen. This also shows how uneducated, untested and unready Senator Obama and his campaign is in this election, if he thinks he can just talk his way into the Oval Office.

You know what, if Billary's dirty tactics work and she gets the Demo nomination, I will, for the first time, vote Republican. I am stunned that I even uttered the word...Republican. This is pretty strong stuff and Billary needs to know how much they are offending lifelong Demos.

Hillary has pulled the so-called negative radio ad that is referred to in this article. Has Obama pulled his negative ad as of yet?

As a dedicated Democrat who has spent the last 7 years watching the Republicans outmaneuver my party, I will glady vote for the Democratic nominee gladly, whether that be Clinton, Obama or Edwards. I am leaning toward Clinton because I wateched the Clinton(s) outmaneuver and outflank the Republicans at virtually every turn throughout the nineties. I am deeply concerned that should we nominate Senator Obama, he will be unable to withstand what we all know is a formidable Republican attack machine. I don't agree with everything the Clintons have said and done throughout this nasty primary, but I have little doubt that they can easily defeat any Republican nominee this fall. Call me cynical, but I want to win this fall badly. A Republican victory this fall would likely lead to at least 4 more years of Bush Lite; a proposition that terrifies me.

Mr. Alter: I suggest that you reread Obama's original statement and Hillary's response. Obama mentions Reagan and then praises the Republicans of the last 10-15 years. Reagan left office19 years ago. Now look at Hillary's statement about it. She doesn't mention Reagan either, and there is no reason to believe she refers to him. It's just that, at this point in the debate Obama starts defending his Reagan statements. He's smart. He knows he can't defend his statements about Republicans of the last 10-15 years (you know: Newt, Cheney, DeLay, W, Larry Craig).
So, should we all vote for Obama because he can fool even smart people like you?

The only reason Obama made that statement about Reagan was because he didn't want to give any credit to Bill Clinton. He's not speaking the truth. That's why they're calling him out and it's about time someone did.

So now we're not only racists for voting for Hillary, but we're idiots too. Alter, you got a lot of nerve. Will the press stop at nothing? NEWSFLASH it always seems like the Clintons are distorting Obama's position, because HE NEVER STATES IT HIMSELF. You never challenge him. You're the guilty ones if that man gets into the White House and makes an ass of himself.

Why Hilary the Goldwater girl had her law school memoir sealed?

PEOPLE, NO MATTER WHERE YOU FROM OR WHICH ALLEGIANCE YOU HAVE, WE SHOULD ASK FOR HER LAW SCHOOL MEMOIR TO BE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC SO WE CAN BETTER TRACK HER PAST. BECAUSE, BACK THEN, SHE WAS A FIERCE OPPONENT OF THE CIVIL RIGHT MOVEMENT AND A STRONG SEGREGATIONNIST.
HILARY! IT'S ALL AGAINST CHANGE