- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next Page »
The U.S. Economy Faces the Guillotine
"Our growth is not export driven," India Trade Minister Kamal Nath told NEWSWEEK. "It's driven by domestic demand. We have not been growing on the back of the United States." He says that China has displaced the U.S. as India's largest trading partner, and that exports to the U.S. are concentrated in areas like information technology and pharmaceuticals. Exports, while important, make up about 23 percent of India's gross domestic product. Still, Shankar Acharya, an economist with the Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, suggests that a recession in the United States could cut growth by 0.5 percent in India this year.
Chinese economists are similarly sanguine about their country's prospects. "China is in a good fiscal position, and we have strong domestic demand," said Yu Yongding, director of China's Institute of World Economics and Politics. Due to falling demand for exports to the United States, China's overheating economy will likely slow, however. Yu believes China's growth rate will fall in 2008 to 9 or 10 percent, down from the current rate of about 11 percent, "and I'm very conservative."
To be sure, Chinese manufacturers of toy cars who export all their production to the U.S. could be hurt. But manufacturers of real cars in China—and elsewhere—are producing for the emerging markets. In 2007, for the first time, Audi sold more cars in China than in Britain or the U.S.; it has set up its first joint venture in India. "We've worked on diversifying our export markets away from being dependent on just one major region," Audi chief executive officer Rupert Stadler told NEWSWEEK. He is confident "growth in the emerging markets is going to compensate for slower regions elsewhere."
Not everyone is convinced that the economies of the United States and the rest of the world are headed for divorce. "The headwinds facing the U.S. economy right now are mainly the housing downturn, capital market turmoil and rising energy prices," David McCormick, Treasury under secretary for international affairs, told NEWSWEEK. "For the decoupling theory to work, you'd have to make the case that these issues are not, at least to some extent, ones impacting economies outside the U.S. I don't think that case can be made."
One thing that is certain is that the United States is now dependent on the kindness of foreigners, instead of the other way around. With the dollar sagging, many American businesses are being buoyed by exports. "At least up to the end of 2007, exports compensated for the drag on growth coming from the housing sector," said Edward Gresser, trade project director at the Progressive Policy Institute. Exports have risen from $980 billion in 2002 to $1.62 trillion last year, up 65 percent. Nina Kaplan, founder of Summit Metals Recovery Corp., a scrap-metal dealer in Leonia, N.J., saw her income double last year, thanks to booming demand from China, and just hired a Mandarin speaker. "Right now there is an insatiable demand for scrap metal due to globalization and worldwide industrialization," she said.
But the increase in exports hasn't stopped the slide in the U.S. economy, which is why Washington has had to step in to deliver a jolt. Under the bipartisan deal between President Bush and the House, taxpayers making less than $75,000 as individuals or $150,000 as families will receive $300 per person and $600 per couple, plus $300 per child. In addition, some 35 million families that don't pay federal income taxes would also receive checks for $300; the checks should push $100 billion into the hands of tapped-out consumers. Companies would receive $50 billion in tax cuts in the form of a temporary increase in deductions for certain business investments. The plan also boosts for one year the size of loans Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac can buy, from $417,000 to $625,500, which will translate into lower mortgage interest rates for many homeowners.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next Page »


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: Nins @ 07/10/2008 7:29:35 PM
Comment: Know why McCain wants to distance himself from former Senator Phil Gramm? It is not just because of Gramm's recent obnoxious remarks calling Americans "a nation of whiners" and that unemployed Americans are in "a mental recession." In fact, those remarks were so obnoxious that I wonder if they were engineered just to provide McCain an excuse for publicly distancing himself from Gramm. This issue is a lot deeper than it looks on the surface.
When Gramm was a Senator he was chair of the Committee on Banking, and in that capacity he was able to push through the legislation now known as the "Enron Loophole." This loophole allowed US investment banks to bypass the Federal regulations governing futures trading, and is the reason why the investment banks were able to falsely inflate the prices of oil, wheat, corn and other commodities through massive futures trading, causing your costs of gas, heating oil and food to go through the roof.
Gramm was a member of McCain's campaign team, but now Gramms' name is turning to mud. In addition to the Enron loophole, Gramm pushed through the Gramm-Leach-Biley Act in 1999, which got rid of the laws that seperate banking, insurance and brokerage activities in America. Essentially, this Act did away with all of the good laws written after the Great Depression to protect us from another Wall Street/Banking Industry collapse. That's right, Gramm stripped the system of it's safe guards nine years ago, and guess what? The value of the dollar has nose-dived, Wall Street is highly unstable, and we are in the midst of a recession.
Now you could say that this is not Gramm's fault, that he didn't know what the outcome of his actions would be. However, it turns out that the same investment banks that benefited from the Enron loophole and from the Gramm Act gave more than a million dollars to Gramm's campaign. Uh oh. A Congressional hearing is going to be convened to investigate this. And McCain wants to have noting to do with Gramm, wants us to forget that Gramm has been a key player on McCain's campaign team. Gramm was McCain's campaign CO-CHAIR and LEADING ECONOMIC ADVISER.
With Gramm in the driver's seat as his leading economic adviser, now you know why economists and analysts are saying that McCain's economic policy plans are untenable.
Posted By: jessieflower @ 04/17/2008 8:56:40 AM
Comment: I know we are going to be okay. It's rough out there but it could be worse. We could be starving right now having all sorts of chaos. We just need to stop feeding this presidential popularity contest and aim our vote towards the best possible candidate to get us back on track. We all know who wants us to die fighting in Iraq and we know "race" is not going to improve the economy. Stop the maddeness and think.
Posted By: David Donar @ 04/15/2008 3:33:14 PM
Comment: The government sat on its butt while the economy ran amok. Just like feral dogs roaming the street, we have no control and now a recession plagues us.
http://politicalgrafitti.blogspot.com/2008/04/feral-reserve.html