WORLD VIEW
Fareed Zakaria
The World Bails Us Out
The United States is in the beginning of a period of relative decline. This is not defeatism, it's math.
As global stock markets went wild last week, financial commentators resurrected an old metaphor about infectious diseases of the upper respiratory system. "When the United States sneezes, does the world catch a cold?" they asked. It's an intelligent question, the answer to which will largely determine whether the current slowdown turns into a worldwide slump. However it plays out, one thing is sure: the rest of the world will cushion America's slide. And that says a lot about the new global order.
As the American economy slows down, there are no indications that other countries are tumbling. In particular, the fastest-growing big economies in the world—China, India, Brazil—appear set to continue with their robust growth. While a sharp American downturn will surely slow them down somewhat, those emerging markets will all continue to expand—to buy, sell and trade—and this will help the United States.
The quarterly results of many large American multinationals (other than banks) show how. Their profits are growing extremely slowly in the United States—at best a few percent—but are surging by 15 or 20 percent abroad. Adding all these companies together, we can see why America's trade deficit—which ballooned for decades—has begun shrinking dramatically, by $100 billion over the past year. This trend will accelerate as the U.S. dollar's decline continues to make American exports more affordable across the world. A cheap dollar also encourages tourism and investment in America from foreign companies and individuals.
Another group of countries is bailing out the United States in a different way. The past few years have been very good to the world's energy-rich lands—Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Norway. Add to the list China and Singapore; they may not be big oil exporters, but they still have huge surpluses. These vast savings have to go somewhere, and sovereign wealth funds—the investment arms of these nations—have provided infusions of cash to otherwise desperate American financial firms. Imagine what the U.S. economy would look like without these investments. Many of its most illustrious banks and financial companies would have gone bankrupt, triggering cascades of gloom and doom across America. The fact that there are large pools of capital available to shore up faltering giants might actually add substantially to the stability of the system as a whole.
These trends represent a large, ongoing shift in the global economic order. Power is moving away from the traditional centers of the global economy—the Western nations—to the emerging markets. To put it more bluntly: the United States is in the beginning of a period of relative decline. It may not be steep or dramatic, but the fact that it's happening is clear. Even if one assumes a slowdown, the other big economies will still grow at two and three times the pace of the West. Over time they will take up a larger share of the global economy—and the United States and Western Europe will have thinner slices. This is not defeatism, it's math.
The math has political consequences. Consider how different the current crisis is from the panics of the 1990s. The U.S. economy may have been in a stronger position back then, but the real difference is the condition of the rest of the world. In the mid-1990s, Russia was on its knees, begging the West for aid. Today it's growing at 7 percent a year and setting up its own sovereign wealth fund. In the past, East Asian countries were at the mercy of the IMF and other Western institutions. Now they post huge surpluses. In fact, more than three quarters of the world's foreign-exchange reserves are now held by emerging-market countries. Wealth and success breed pride and confidence.
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: SunnyOutLook?? @ 01/30/2008 11:29:03 PM
Comment: We need to clear up our mess at home before we move to others backyards and judge their activities. The world has changed alot since 1990s. America used to be loved and respected by many nations and they cannot deny that America has done more good for the world and to to the world than any other nation we have seen. But this was in the past. Now emerging nations are growing richer and they no longer need America for their daily needs. So why dont we recognize this fact? Why cant we tend (more) to our own matters? The world is always there for us. Once we get our house in order, we can come back. Dont be spooked by politicians or even foreign statesmen (from Japan to Singapore) who say they need us and want to continue to 'engage' in Asia or Middle-east. On one hand they are saying these words to shore up our pride, on the other hand they are demonizing us as being a rouge nation. We have to recognize at best these nations only wany us to be the world's security guard to fend off their ugly neigbours and provide a big market for them to dump their goods so they can continue to pile up their reserves and buy up our banks. Why dont we just take a back seat and let them sort out their own problems? 20 years back, i would have agreed that we must be active and to play a big global leadership role. Today i no longer hold this view: the world doesnt want us (need us or not is another issue) to be the global leader. So why cant we recognize this and focus our attention on other things : tend to our domestic situation; rebuild our education standard and maintaining strong delevelopment in science and technology? Once we are strong enough (and once we are being missed sufficiently by the world), you will notice the world will come knocking at the door.
Posted By: rmabbott09 @ 01/30/2008 10:15:26 PM
Comment: The oceans of surplus cash circulating the world is the most important argument against the Republican delusion known as "supply side" economics. We need to give the super rich lots of tax breaks so that they will invest in productive enterprise, so the story goes. Or, put another way, we have deficient growth because the rich have suffered under tax rates, at about 35% at the upper end, and they haven't beeen able to invest in business. Moreover, Republicans don't risk the likelihood that "supply side" won't work, because Reagan and the two Bushes have added approximately $9 trillion to our national debt, $3 trillion of which has been loaned to us by other nations, $2 trillion of which has been borrowed from the Social Security Trust Fund. They've been "priming the pump," that old Keynesian saw that they hate so much, to beat the band.
Robert Abbott, Gilbert, AZ
Posted By: barry@shamrockthread.com @ 01/30/2008 9:54:18 PM
Comment: Barry O'Flanagan - St. Paul, Minnesoa
I tend to agree with this article. The US is still a major player in the world economy, but the balance of power is beginning to shift for the reasons stated. In addition to this, the current administration and congress are further weakening our economy and world position by spending money we do not have on a war most people believe we should not be in. If we attend to our economy and our citizens needs first, we will be in a better postion to deal with the changing world order and implement an appropriate (intelligent?) foriegn policy.