‘Look At My Record’

Howard Hugh's supposed three inch thick Last Will was left at the Mormon Temple in Utah after he died. It was proven a forgery after extensuve testing. Who do you think forged it?The Mormon 's have the largest documented information on almost everyone in the U.S. and beyond in their data base in Utah. Plus hundreds of CIA agents working in Washington D.C. Please America, Read and study about these fanatics before you vote.

Romney is amazing.

McCain graduated at the bottom of his class at West Point and shouldn't even be able to talk about the war, let alone the economy. Romney was at the top of his class at Harvard and has had a consistent record of major successes, from Staples to the Olympics to bringing back the upside down economy of Massachusetts.

What has McCain done? He survived in Vietname for five years. He has been a Washington politician with a very mixed record on the things that matter to Republicans. He doesn't get the economy, by his own admission.

Romney is the completely obvious choice for President. McCain has peaked, and will soon be under the bus where his unfortunately misguided campaign belongs.

In relation to one comment:: on the defence issuse; Bush did have a highly qualified military offiicial, "I.E. Collin Powel, and other advisers (Prior to the Iraq and after). Please do not compare Mitt Romney to President Bush; they both come from 2 very different backgrounds, and both have had very different experiences. A lot people graduate with a college degree, but in the end it really depends on the way in which they graduated and what you did with that degree in relation. And in that relation, Mitt Romney's record and success precede him. Not only in relation to the way in which he finished his college career, but also in what he has done as a business man. All things considered, every candidate has different things to offer, but what you also have to think about is there ability in which they consult and make decisions. Ronald Reagon, before he was elected, was viciously accused of being inexperienced and weak on foreign policey. I think we all know what happened during his term as president. He would say, "smart people surround themselves with smarter people." Ronald Reagen did so well on foreign policey not just for the fact that he was inteligent, but because he saw the inteligence in other people. He was a great decision maker becuase of his ability and humility to bring other people in on the decision making policies. Mitt Romney, As a very succesful ceo and business man; has had to do this his whole business life, and attests to it. He worked as governer in a predominate ly liberal state, and has had liberals sign on his programs( i.e. TED KENEDY, Social Security reform). Mitt Romney has always staunchly considered himself a Reagon conservative, and that can be seen in his decision making process escpecially. Out of the GOP field he has the most conservative support, and current has the most deligates. I believe he is the best choice for president becuase of his experience, and for his ability as a decision maker.

Too one of the last posters: You are someone who would apear to paint all republicans the same. Yes, Romney stated his support for how Bush has protected the home land from terrorist attacks, but it was nothing more than that. People often jump to conclusions about things too often. On generally most issuses both men are very different. I dont think you have a basis for most of what you said besides from what you just feel. Romney has always said that he wanted to make washington responsible, and that he wanted to fix Washington. Romney's economic and policey making record couldn't more different than Bush. The man fixed social security in his state as governor, noteabley willingly and able to work with a predominately liberal state; Ted Kenedy himself signed on the bill. The example of his ability to involve people in the decision making processes arent just seen in his time as governor, but for all the years he was one of the most successful business man in america-- rescueing companies from Financial destruction. He with out a doubt, is the best prepared to confront the economic issues that we have today. Also: people try to pin him as weak on defence, but they tryed to do the same thing to Ronald Reagen, and we all know what happened in his term of service. Reagen always said," smart people surround themselves with smarter people." From his track record, and his experience with working with others; i know Romney will be the same way. He has had to consult and gather people together his whole business life. People also try to paint him as a some "flp-flopper"; the only issue he has changed in the least is his stance on abortion. That was an issue that goes back years ago; i would always prefer a man that is willing to admit his misstakes and that he has learned; rather than a man that says he has never made any. I dont think you guys could be more wrong about Mitt Romney's qualifications as president.

You better check your history book, misterharban. Reagan changed his positions too. Romney is a natural leader and just what our country needs. He is successful both personally and professionally.

Romney has been getting better at his profession however he is not fooling anyone. HOW CAN YOU BE A CANDIDATE OF CHANGE and agree with BUSH's economic plan. He says there is no money to cover everyone health care but there's billions to prolong the war. He praised Bush's policies and then says that Washington needs to be changed and that he is that catalyst.
ONCE this guy gets into power he will represent the same interest that are running Washington TODAY. The insurance companies, drug companies and War capitalists are all supporting Romney. You can tell he is running a BUSH CAMpaign and is obviously getting advise from KARL ROVE.
He has taken OBAMA's message and has somehow convinced himself and his followers that he his the candidate of change and that he is going to "turn WASHINGTON upside down". This is why McCain laughed at him during one of the debates after ROMNEY declared himself the candidate of change. In a way he is right on the mark. He changes positions so quickly that no one even recognizes the flip flops any more. It is like the line has been completely blurred. The Bush machinery is behind Romney. If you earn over two hundred thousand dollars a year then Romney is your candidate, you will be able to afford his Health Care plan. Although Romney might want to help the Middle Class he will not be able too because of the interests that fund his campaign, the BUSH technocrats.
WE need real change not ROMNEY CHANGE. IF ROMNEY SUpports a War tax which charges oil companies and private contrating firms as well as War profitters twenty per cent of their profits in order to fund the war then I might consider listening to his AGENDA. Unfortunately tax payers are not profiting of this war.
Romney had a really good debate in Florida the other night and was I was impressed by his demenour and answers. Although I am against Romney's agenda I will give him credit for his performance during the Florida debate.

Romney's comments are a scream.So Republicans are fighting dirty? What did you expect? The only way Republicans can win elections is by fighting dirty,smear campaigns (like calling Obama by his middle name) or rigging elections (Voter ID cards is the latest attempt at vote suppression.) Bush's 953 lies about Iraq are par for the course, so are didrty tricks and smear campaigns. And Karl Rove is salivating for red meat like a dog one one of Pavlov's infamous experiements. If you want people who try to fight clean - vote Obama

Mitt Romney is an exemplery MORMON. If the climate for your beliefs and doctrines are politically unpopular, you just change your views and doctrines. Then you explain to the world that you have been mis-interpreted. A MORMON as President? GOD FORBID!!!

Romney is right for America!
Romney will fix the economy and stabalize the country.
Romney has my trust and my vote!