HEALTH MATTERS

Jerry Adler

No Way to Treat the Dying

Cancer, says Barrett, is 'a fertile field for exploitation because patients are so often frightened.'

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Crew90 @ 03/04/2009 1:49:56 AM

    DrShannon,
    You're missing the point of this article. I don't know how it got so wide spread, but this article was originally written to help my uncle Said get the message out that people need to seek other routes besides JUST the homeopathic route. My aunt Mary Kathyrn was probably never going to be cured, but had the doctor not given her false hope, she might have lived a little longer with regular treatments at a hospital. If anyone wants to see what my aunt looked like, to put a face on the article, go to my website (http://newyorksaint.com/page02.html) and click on the hidden link on the bottom right of the page. It's a breast cancer ribbon.

    Jae Maynard
    www.MySpace.com/crew9t

  • Posted By: DrShannon @ 02/18/2008 10:10:18 PM

    It certainly sounds true that for conventional medicine, this women's case was incurable. But to say she was incurable by any and all treatment modalities is something else. Since conventional treatments are not helping enough, our society should be open to alternatives, rather than condemning them before they've been adequately tested. Unfortunately, this article appears to paint homeopathy in a negative light, even though there is no discussion of this women even getting actual homeopathic treatment. Instead it sounds like she got a combination of many different approaches with a very high price tag. It's sad that she died in pain, and sad that this situation is being used to criticize homeopathy for no understandable reason (since she was not treated with homeopathy).
    In addition, using one dramatic case gone wrong to make a case against a whole healing paradigm is not honest. There are many more cases just like this with conventional medicine. One has only to look at the rate of iatrogenic mortality (death caused by conventional medicine - google it), to be shocked.
    The bottom line here is no one is the bad guy, conventional med, homeopathy, acupuncture, etc. We're all doing the best we can to help our patients. Criticism that isconstructive is useful, this is not. Hopefully one day, we will all come together as health care practitioners and ask each other for help when we are having difficulty. Instead, in this country, we seem to be working hard to make it look like there is "scientific" based medicine, and everything else. But I think many of us know otherwise.
    Peace,
    Tim Shannon, ND
    www.drtshannon.com
    drt@drtshannon.com

  • Posted By: DrShannon @ 02/18/2008 10:09:58 PM

    So from my perspective, the author was either himself strongly biased against homeopathy himself, and sought out a like minded fellow to add weight to the article. Or, he simply didn't do his homework on Stephen Barrett. The other doctor,Killen , also has not done his homework. Simply look at the research collected at this site to see for yourself: http://nationalcenterforhomeopathy.org/articles/research.jsp. There should be much to help you make up your OWN mind.
    As for treating cancer with real homeopathy, there are people who've had some success. Certainly many have been helped to die without painkillers when the cases were incurable. And in India, there is a doctor who's documented many cures with serious cancer cases. His book is "A homeopathic approach to cancer" is very even handed, not making any extensive claims, just talking about his own personal experience - often quite remarkable. His website is: http://www.drramakrishnan.com/index.php.
    However, it's important to keep in mind that many if not most cancer patients referred to homeopaths are late stage. We are very rarely the first provider to treat the disease. There is very little opportunity to see, especially in the US, just what homeopathy can contribute to grave diseases like homeopathy. This is true simply because most of the cases are very far along - both from the devastating effects of the disease as well as from treatment. Even though conventional medicine is not making great strides in increasing survival rates of the most common cancers, it is still the clear monopoly. Articles like this one serve to keep it that way rather than actually find out what other medical systems can add. It is a shame that we don't have a paradigm that trusts serious health care providers, but instead tries to find so many ways to undermine, question or marginalize alternative methods.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

 

Up and Coming Newsweek Stories on Digg

Discover more Newsweek content on Digg