Soldier, Savior, Strongman, Crook
The death of Suharto, architect of Indonesia's authoritarian 'New Order,' draws a muted reaction from the nation he once dominated.
He ruled with an iron grip for a generation then spent the last decade of his life dodging prosecution for alleged human-rights crimes and corruption. On Sunday, Indonesia's former strongman Suharto, once one of Asia's most influential leaders, died peacefully in a Jakarta hospital from multiple organ failure. He was 86.
Indonesia's reaction to the passing of its longest-ruling president was muted, and paradoxical. During the final weeks of his life, elder statesmen from across the region paraded past Suharto's sickbed to pay their respects. Yet several prominent domestic visitors emerged from Jakarta's Pertamina Hospital to declare that official investigations into alleged extrajudicial killings and ill-gotten family wealth should proceed even after the former strongman's death. From the halls of power to the streets, Indonesians praise today's democratic system without
vilifying the leader ousted in a student-led uprising back in 1998. Suharto "made mistakes," said former president Abdurrahman Wahid, who was democratically elected and held the nation's highest office from 1999-2001. "But he also did a great service to the nation."
Suharto loyalists credit him for rescuing the country and, by extension, greater Southeast Asia from chaos in the mid-1960s by establishing what the strident cold warrior himself called a "New Order." Its aim: build a modern, unified, anti-communist Indonesia. Its salient features included political repression of most dissent, discrimination against the country's ethnic Chinese merchant-class, virulent nationalism and a strong military hand in politics. In all, Suharto served seven terms as president and remained Indonesia's supreme leader for more than 32 years before being forced to resign after mass street demonstrations engulfed the capital Jakarta amidst the 1997-98 Asian financial crisis.
Ten years on, democracy has put down such firm roots in Indonesia that the post-Suharto political transition is largely complete. "The real story is that his death will have virtually no political impact," says Douglas Ramage, head of the Asia Foundation in Jakarta. "The country is so dynamic, and has gotten so much right in the past few years, that [Suharto's passing] is being greeted with a collective yawn."
Many Westerners know the backdrop to Suharto's rise from Peter Weir's 1982 film "The Year of Living angerously," a romance between an Aussie journalist and a British diplomat (played by Mel Gibson and Sigourney Weaver, respectively) set in Jakarta in 1965. That year, following an abortive communist uprising, Suharto led a military clique that deposed Indonesia's founding father and left-leaning "President for Life" Sukarno. In the months that followed, soldiers and vigilante groups loyal to the new regime massacred as many as a million communist sympathizers in what Goenawan Mohamad, founding editor of Tempo magazine and opposition figure during Suharto's rule, considers "the greatest violence to have ever occurred in the archipelago."
The ledger on Suharto's reign is long and contentious.
In the positive columns, he held together a fractious empire spanning three time zones, containing more than 17,000 islands and speaking hundreds of languages. He also took measures to ensure that the world's largest Muslim country by population remained secular. One was to promote rapid development with new ports, roadways, mines and manufacturing zones that by 1990 had turned the impoverished nation into a budding "tiger" economy. Until its rotten underpinnings were exposed, Indonesia's growth model was hailed as a blueprint for the rest of the developing world. In 1996, the International Monetary Fund included Indonesia in its list of top 10 emerging economies, lauding its 8 percent annual growth.
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: creaminstrawbs @ 02/04/2008 9:43:18 AM
Comment: Suharto was a crook.. there should be no sorrow felt for his passing. The blatant corrupt way he ruled Indonesian. The world did basically nothing, if anything, he was a yankie puppet... His family is left clinging to power and the millions that he stole. Scum doesnt change. Just because its dead scum. I spit on him, his cronnies and his family as millions are held in dire conditions in a country rich with natural resources.
Posted By: pablito @ 01/28/2008 9:56:34 PM
Comment: What???s glaringly missing here is mention of the any of the Western nations intimately involved in Suharto???s crimes. Suharto was a violent dictator comparable to Saddam Hussein. Like Saddam Hussein his greatest crimes involved direct and informed subsidy and backing from the US, the UK and Australia. Unlike Saddam, though, he continued to obey the rules set out by the US and remained a friend till his own people (oppressed by US made military equipment) took to the streets.
Suharto's murderous takeover of Indonesia in 1965-6 became "the model operation" for the American-backed coup that got rid of Salvador Allende in Chile seven years later. Suharto also provided a convenient way of advancing the US war on people by wiping out up to a million communists (and anyone else who may have vaguely sympathised with the communist party) in the country which at the time had the highest communist party membership outside a communist state.
Suharto???s crimes are partially our (and here I refer to the Australian involvement) crimes and it sickens me to see Australian leaders (past and present) continuing to support the man Margaret Thatcher described as ???one of our best and most valued friends.??? Ignoring western involvement in the crimes of murderous dictators allows us to justify continued bombardment of third world countries. It is irresponsible journalism.
Posted By: nawawimohamad @ 01/28/2008 2:22:34 AM
Comment: Let him face his Maker.