Travels With John

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: PeteGio @ 01/30/2008 5:09:45 PM

    I think your statement, "it always struck me as just a bit off to watch Edwards, the handsome millionaire in a suit, with the sparkling teeth and the perfect hair, run as the champion of the working poor", is the most telling. I found Edwards the definition of hypocritical. If he was so concerned about the poor, why not do one pro bono case when he was actively practicing law ... because it didn't benefit him personally. Not exactly Mother Theresa, particularly when he is building a 28,000 square foot mansion. Edwareds failed because he was a complete phony.

    • Posted By: dewcooper @ 01/31/2008 10:03:52 AM

      Never understood a millionaire crying about 'two Americas'. Guess his state didn't either, has he can't even deliver their delegates...

  • Posted By: elton1111 @ 01/30/2008 4:48:13 PM

    Sorry-- I meant to say John Edwards, not Kerry.

    • Posted By: dewcooper @ 01/31/2008 10:02:09 AM

      Edwards doesn't need $300 haircuts!? He travels with his own makeup...

  • Posted By: elton1111 @ 01/30/2008 4:46:54 PM

    To say that Obama "folded a sense of morality and social justice" into his campaign because of Edwards is a bit misleading, making him sound like a johnny come lately on these issues, when clearly he has not been. If you have a chance to read Barack's books, one of which written before he considered political office, it is clear that these were and continue to be pressing issues for him. Barack happens to be a newer improved version of John Kerry, one who doesn't need 300 dollar haircuts to run for office.

    Barack may become one of the all time greats-- just judging for how he has inspired me on his campaign. Kerry is a good man, and I wish him and his wife the best.

    • Posted By: dewcooper @ 01/31/2008 10:01:10 AM

      If you think Obama wasn't considering political office when he wrote his books, you must have been smoking some of his crack.These books were a page straight out of the Clinton handbook. Even had to use the unoriginal 'Hope' in the title.

  • Posted By: suepw @ 01/31/2008 9:50:43 AM

    It was a huge disappointment to me when John's number started going down, and he was not making as good a showing as I always thought he should have. He really represents what I believe our candidate should represent, and I believe that he would make the changes he promised to make. Even though he has dropped out, he still has an enormous contribution to make to the future of this country, and the working class american's that deserve a voice. I'll keep watching for him. He still has my support, and I truly admire both he and Elizabeth.

  • Posted By: emncaity @ 01/31/2008 8:15:02 AM

    We've lost the best candidate, and it tells us what we need to know about the sorry state of American politics: We're lazy. We're ignorant. We need somebody to "inspire" us to get our thumbsucking selves off the couch, somebody with a great voice like Obama. We need a "narrrative" like Obama v. Clinton, first African American versus first woman, and them getting nasty with each other ("you will not beLIEVE what she said about him today!"), like the Paris Hilton story of the day. This nomination was never about experience versus change at all. The candidates of the greatest change were Kucinich and Edwards; of the greatest experience, Biden, Dodd, and Richardson. For too many people, it's about identity politics, not policy, and it's about "inspiration" and "making history." Where were all these voters when John Kerry ran under similar ideas about how the government should operate? How many people would be alive today if we didn't need a "leader" who "inspires" us? It really is pathetic. John Edwards had the substance, but not the identity; and the press, whose job it is to sell ad space and commercial time rather than to ensure the right result for the nation, barely covered him at all. It's a miracle he pulled as many delegates as he did, with so little money and so little coverage. Now it's over, and the press--and the mass of voters--has the "narrative" it wants. But the country is worse off for it.

  • Posted By: jojoc10 @ 01/31/2008 6:28:27 AM

    I truly appreciate everything that John brought to the campaign trail. That sense of urgency, fire and fight for his cause is very admirable. While I did not vote for him in the primary, I can certainly see how others did. I sincerely hoped that he would have strong showings after Iowa (even wished he won South Carolina) so that he could be the buffer between Obama and Hillary that the Democratic party so desperately needed. He embodied what both Obama and Hillary wish to represent, although due to their ties are unable to speak so unfiltered. I wish John and his family every blessing that I can offer for he added vitality to the race that otherwise would have just been a series of negative campaign ads. It's about time the American public recognizes his contributions.

  • Posted By: swf1960 @ 01/31/2008 5:09:26 AM

    EDWARDS: "I don't know how it started," he said. "I don't know when our party began to turn away from the cause of working people???" It started when we were forced to choose between Hillary and Obama! Edwards epitomizes the democratic party and yet we are forced to address an obstruction of unification. Dam Hillary - Dam Bill! Edwards suspends his campaign... I apologize for not walking precincts all over the nation for this guy! I am forced to address the immediate ill, the Clinton ILL, a divisive polarization within the democratic party. Although I love Edwards, I am thankful for Obama. He personifies unification and eloquence, and a sound mind! If we ever get past the primitive BS of polarization, perhaps we can progress towards issues like Universal Health Care and services for the poor. Obama, please bring on board Edwards. Please, please, please! We are ONE.

  • Posted By: DanLL @ 01/31/2008 3:48:43 AM

    Come on people. Look at the facts, not opinions. He decided to "suspend" not withdraw his campaign. Isn't it clear that he is only after the money?? You believe he really champion the poor and middle income against lobbists and business muscles that'll throw heaps of cash at him. Go Republicians.

  • Posted By: paigepro @ 01/31/2008 12:49:36 AM

    you should be ashamed for referring to the good-hearted people as "old ladies"

  • Posted By: paigepro @ 01/31/2008 12:48:33 AM

    I think you should remove the comment, "old ladies." How shameful of you.

  • Posted By: harmon @ 01/31/2008 12:18:19 AM

    good bye and good riddens to the slimey ,trial attorney john edwards . he loves the poor and littleman as long as he gets 40% of the settlement. health care sky rockets due to the practice of defensive medicine by doctors havingto order test to cover thier backs against creeps like edwards. he finished 3rd in his own birth state for good reasons because they truely knew him.go home now john to your 40,000 sqft home and lie your 400 dollar haircut slimey head and rest well. you will need your to chase more ambulances.

  • Posted By: outerbankergirl @ 01/30/2008 6:57:21 PM

    The thought that a man would actually run for President while his wife has terminal cancer is insane-he has to be the most narcissistic individual ever created, due to the fact that , if he really cared for her and the children, his energy, especially since he does have money could be focused on being with them. The few times I've seen her the past few months, she definitely has gone downhill. Additionally, what if he'd been elected, she dies and he all of the sudden realizes he lost his wife-what would true grief, if he is capable of it, do to him-many grieving individuals with the loss of a spouse experience a massive loss of energy-could the USA afford to wait for our president to recover from the loss-the Fundamental Islamists would love it-talk about having your guard down. i pray that this man will focus his energy on his family now and, hopefully, she will have the care she deserves. Its hard to believe she could really even love this guy but to each his own.

    • Posted By: GAMP @ 01/31/2008 12:12:13 AM

      I had no idea that the prognosis of a cancer patient could be made by a lay person via a television transmission. Elizabeth Edwards wants to live, not be a defeated victim to this sometimes curable disease. She has an abundance of love and good wishes from family and friends, not to mention the best care that can be purchased in America. I admire her immensley, but I don't pity her. Elizabeth wouldn't want it anyway. She's too busy living her life to the fullest. What a magnificient president she would make
      Gary Paquin

    • Posted By: shelleybear @ 01/30/2008 7:02:58 PM

      In much the same way as you have to wonder what sort of woman would stay married to a man like Bill Clintoon who was unfaithful to her in front of the entire nation.

  • Posted By: harmon @ 01/31/2008 12:04:21 AM

    john edwards is a typical slimey ,greedy trial attorney who takes his 40% and drives the cost of medicine up . 80% of test are ordered for prevention of being sued by the likes of bottom dwellers like john edwards.good riddens he be back on the streets chasing ambulances,for at least 40% of the cut!

  • Posted By: The Game 32 @ 01/30/2008 11:49:37 PM

    I was so disappointed to hear of John Edwards' withdrawl. He was the best of all the candidates. A Democrat will receive my vote, but I am not pleased with either of the two front runners.

  • Posted By: The Game 32 @ 01/30/2008 11:46:49 PM

    Edwards has my vote and respect. I've always been behind him, both in spirit and with campaign money. He really understands what is important in this country. It was truly a disappoinment to learn of Edwards' withdrawl today. The media has done a disservice to the campaigns of all candidates. I am appalled, as a Journalism major, with the way the news is reported in this day and age. Coverage appears to be determined by the almighty dollar rather than what is fact. Johnn already rec'd. my vote in CA because I have a mail in ballot, and it was sent in last week. It will be interesting to see what happens now. I'm not really pleased with either of the front running Democratic candidates. One of them will get my vote, but my vote would have meant much more had John Edwards been the candidate!

  • Posted By: Sevier5 @ 01/30/2008 11:13:58 PM

    I'm a Republican, who really could appreciate John Edwards. The Democrates would have had my vote, would have had it years ago if Edwards was chosen instead of Carey. There was finally a Democrate that earned my confidence, and the confidence of many Republicans, too bad he wasn't chosen by his own party! Guess I can stay true to my party now, cause no self respecting Republican would ever vote for Clinton and Obama has lost my respect the last few weeks in this never ending media fight with Hillary. Once Ted Kennedy jumped on the bandwagon, I knew that it's a bad idea to give up my vote to the Democrat's! Democrat's could have had the Whitehouse this next election, too bad they're not picking the right person to represent them. I guess we'll have to have another Republican president!!

  • Posted By: ingrid27 @ 01/30/2008 10:39:54 PM

    I love Edwards!He is an amazing person as well as a politician and family person yet down to earth.Obama has too much publicity with Oprah,the Kennedy family and such and Hillary is the one who is being scrutinized.Edwards had really good ideas yet I believe that will all the media,all the fuss, about who will win:an African American or woman they lost track of what was important.Even though he did not get all the respect or attention he deserved he invested so much time as well as personal experiences and what would make him a good president.He has had his head on his shoulders the whole entire time and I admire him for not bickering nor doing what Obama is doing since he seems too nice of a gentleman to do that.I would like to say that in the end,even though he did not make it in the top 2 for his party he has brought new ideas on the table,some which other candidates should take as an example:he focuses more on poverty than any other candidate because he knows how it is out there and even if he has an expensive house or fancy haircut that is not what matters.It is the person as a whole yet the media never gave him as much coverage or attention as the rest of the candidates but even so he proved to be a man of his word!

  • Posted By: Lauralinken @ 01/30/2008 10:34:12 PM

    The person quitted the president campaign shouldn't be John Edwards, should be Abama.

    He made his explicit effort to get republicans vote for him in Democrat caucus, created a ???famous dishonest??? and ridicule model in US president vote history, and established his particularly terrible reputation, finally he???ll permanently loose the honest voters??? support, as well as loose any chance in next president election, forever!!!

  • Posted By: Lauralinken @ 01/30/2008 10:27:08 PM

    Please wake up and watch up: actually, you know and we all know that any media support to Abama is obviously working for Republic Party, because Obama has zero plus super-zero stupid chance to bit any Republic president candidate. The time he wins democrat nomination is the time any Republic candidate defeats him in this election, and definitely Republicans win this president election by easily defeating Abama, a politician trash!!! So, this is the reason why republicans' media support Abama, temporarily, t-e-m-p-o-r-a-r-i-l-y only.

  • Posted By: John H. Collins @ 01/30/2008 9:37:05 PM

    Please people, learn how to spell! It just makes you look ignorant. Or maybe you just are ignorant and that's the end of that.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse