SPONSORED BY:

The Internet? Bah!

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: diertac @ 11/18/2009 7:06:53 PM

    Actually, it was much more vile and vitriolic back then. FB and Twitter are far more civilized than Usenet, a medium where moderation was impossible, anonymity was easy and stalking/threats/hate speech were common. The Internet has become much more civilized, although forums and bulletin boards of today can get pretty close to the anger that abounded on Usenet, if there are lax moderators.

  • Posted By: cobaltblue1975 @ 11/13/2009 5:52:04 PM

    ???It is apparent to me that the possibilities of the aeroplane, which two or three years ago were thought to hold the solutions to the [flying machine] problem, have been exhausted, and that we must turn elsewhere.??? ???Thomas Edison, 1895

    At least Mr. Edison gets somewhat of a pass since airplanes and aerodynamics was new and there wasn???t to be any examples of a viable fixed wing flying craft for another 8 years. At the time he said this no one even had the foggiest idea of how to make something heavier than air fly.

    True enough the internet in 1995 was just getting ready to move into the mainstream. The possibilities for it are and remain endless and even the dimmest bulb could extrapolate possibilities. I was there and remember the excitement. This article was very short sighted even taking into account the time it was written. It is the equivalent of someone looking at a blank canvas and declaring that no one will ever draw anything on it. I think its amazing how utterly wrong this guy was about nearly everything with the exception of some social ramifications. What???s more astonishing is how sure he was about it. He doesn???t get the same pass Mr. Edison got because he had all the knowledge to extrapolate the exact opposite but chose the easier naysayer route rather than use his imagination.

    Its for this reason that I get a hearty laugh out of most skeptics and naysayers. Every new idea or technology will either fail or bring the world to an end according to them. There simply can't be anymore big thoughts or amazing discoveries to be made in their minds. For them we are always living at the height of what our species can do and anything new is unnecessary or a threat (mostly to their narrow view of the world). I imagine these people have been around since modern humans first stepped on to the scene, they probably doubted fire would have any practical use.

  • Posted By: NotSoBigMac @ 11/12/2009 9:44:57 AM

    What he was (and is) right about is, that when everyone is shouting, few are listening. That is very true.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now
 
The Greediest People of All Time
From Bernard Madoff to AIG, Wall Street has reinvented excess. But the Masters of the Universe didn't invent greed. A look at the despots, robber barons and others who made our shortlist.


 
 
PHOTOS
Wall Street's problems have captured the attention of Congress, the White House and the media. But on the country's Main Streets ordinary folks are wondering if anyone is paying attention to them. A look at how Americans are coping with the economic crisis.