SPONSORED BY:
TECHNOLOGY

Is Yahoo Worth $44.6 billion?

Microsoft is paying a premium to catch up to Google.

 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

After what may have been a two-year flirtation, Microsoft is trying again to tie the knot. On Friday morning, CEO Steve Ballmer announced that the company initiated a $44.6 billion takeover bid for Yahoo! It's the second time Microsoft has made a play for the online service. But its current bid is the firm's boldest move yet and is clearly designed to close the gap created by Google, which increasingly dominates the paid search and online advertisingbusiness. But in its attempt to catch up, is Microsoft paying too much?

Microsoft's announcement injected some drama into the online ad environment that in recent weeks has left both investors and advertisers worried about the effects a weakening global economy may have on the industry. Still, Microsoft's $31 per share offer amounts to a 62 percent premium over Yahoo's Thursday closing price of $19.18. Never mind that according to recent report by eMarketer, Google's share of the paid search advertising market was 75 percent last year, up from 60 percent from 2006. Yahoo's share in 2007: a meager 9 percent.

For Ballmer, Yahoo clearly seems like a relative bargain considering what he hopes to gain from the deal. "Microsoft and Yahoo should be aligned in some way to create a more effective competitor in the online marketplace," wrote Ballmer in a letter to Yahoo's board of directors. He added that "the market is increasingly dominated by one player who is consolidating its dominance through acquisition. Together, Microsoft and Yahoo can offer a credible alternative for consumers, advertisers and publishers." In response to the offer, Yahoo, which earlier this week reported a 23 percent drop in fourth-quarter profit and announced it would layoff 1,000 employees, said its board "will evaluate this proposal carefully and promptly."

Investors applauded Microsoft's bid, sending shares of Yahoo up nearly 50 percent during early-Friday trading. But the backdrop of the news is an Internet advertising market that has significant potential for growth but still faces some uncertainty. Google this Thursday reported fourth-quarter earnings that failed to meet Wall Street expectations.

Still, Google owns the lion's share of online-ad revenues. Last year, U.S. advertisers spent a total of $20 billion on the Web, a relatively small chunk of the $250 billion ad market overall. Global online advertising is estimated to reach $49.5 billion, a 22 percent increase. "Even though the Internet will likely be more resistant to a downturn than other places, it's far from immune," said David Hallerman, senior analyst at eMarketer.com, which tracks Internet ad spending. "Unless people click on the ad, there's no money. If there is a recession, and consumers pull back, people will be searching less for things to buy."

One potential bright spot in Yahoo's arsenal is a relatively strong display-ad business--those costlier banner or drop-down ads that companies use to heighten consumer awareness of a brand, considered the holy grail of advertising efficacy. "Yahoo is not an insignificant player in display advertising. Neither is Microsoft. We shouldn't bow to Google too early," said Tim Beyers, a senior analyst for Motley Fool. "You have to look at this as an arms race for most properties … to be the dominant provider of advertising in the digital world and advertising, period." Google, however, has been increasingly aggressive in broadening its reach beyond search. Last year it struck a $3 billion deal to acquire DoubleClick, a display- and banner-advertising giant. The Federal Trade Commission has approved the deal, but it will only be finalized if European regulators decide to sign-off in April. Meanwhile, on Friday, the U.S. Department of Justice said it is "interested" in reviewing any potential merger between Microsoft and Yahoo.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: gabriel1133 @ 02/19/2008 10:27:56 PM

    Dear Stockholders,

    We have no choice but to accept Microsoft's offer. I don't want our company to be involved in a proxy war which will just end up Microsoft winning it by a mile. I have suggested to name the company Yahoo by Microsoft so as not to lose our identity and brand. Either way, if they insist on putting their name together with Yahoo then I am not considering MicroWho? because it is a kitchen appliance like a Microhood. I like the idea of naming it Yahoo by Microsoft or YAHMIC! This way, our brand Yahoo will always come first.

    This will be a great company and we are moving quickly to make it come true.

    Billy Yang,

    YahMic! Inc.

  • Posted By: roulej @ 02/05/2008 11:16:34 AM

    Is Yahoo worth $44.6 billion? Of course not!

    However, it is worth $44.6 billion to prevent a company renowned for aggressive, if not monopolistic, strategies. Microsoft's control over Yahoo's current services will only reduce choice and, yes, raise risks (if not prices) for consumers. The problem is that only advertisers know how much money can be generated from Yahoo properties. The click count is practically irrelevant now that data mining has become the fundamental purpose of the internet. Google bought Doubleclick so that it can bolster its dossier on every consumer (or at least, their IP address) who searches for anything. Microsoft, likewise, wants to know more about you than your own mother.

    Why isn't Yahoo raking in billions in profits every year like these two gorillas of the industry? Simple - it's not playing from the same MS / Doubleclick dirty underhanded trick book. Given the well-documented Windows vulnerabilities on a personal computer, who in their right mind would entrust a new, bigger MSNahoo with all their private information? At least Google ads and cookies can be blocked by savvy internet users. If Microsoft leverages itself to own more internet properties, Windows users will have no defense against Redmond's inquisitive prying eyes.

    This Yahoo customer will immediately unsubscribe if MS prevails in its hostile takeover bid.

  • Posted By: marshalltaylorbicycles @ 02/03/2008 8:46:56 PM

    $44.6 Billion?! Wow Microsoft ain't playin.

    Check out my blog at: http://marshalltaylor.blogspot.com

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now