Barack + GOP = ‘Obamacans’

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: schubert1970 @ 02/02/2008 6:16:54 PM

    The Gallup and Rasmussen tracking polls have both moved back toward Clinton today (yesterday's numbers in parenthesis):

    Clinton: 46.5% (43.5%)
    Obama: 39.0% (39.0%)


    This could be due to any number of factors, including the debate, the inevitable fading bounce, superior Clinton campaigning, or even the demographics of Friday polling. (Considering the age gap between Clinton and Obama supporters, who do you think is more likely to be at home on a Friday night?) Whatever the cause might actually be, it could not come at a better time for Clinton, since Obama had pulled to within just two or three points in the days immediately after the departure of Edwards from the campaign. It also seems to be rippling into state level polls, as Rasmussen also shows Clinton leading in Missouri by nine, and in Alabama by five (Alabama is a must-win for Obama, and it should be noted that the previous Rasmussen poll of Alabama put Clinton up 15).


    As far as big momentum changers in the final days go, it does not appear that either Edwards or Gore will endorse. If Clinton does win the nomination, it will be despite established media, progressive media, and conservative media, all of whom have given more favorable coverage to Obama. It is impressive that she has been able to turn back Obama's momentum, despite having comparatively few allies in virtually every media outlet.

    • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 02/02/2008 6:27:51 PM

      Didn't Rudy have that big bounce.. only to come up miserably short. I will support Obama for a run later down the line but just not now ... the future is too important to give to a rookie.

      • Posted By: schubert1970 @ 02/02/2008 6:34:48 PM

        Yes Rudi did, but that was a drop over 60 days, this is a 3 day race and she is pulling away. Look at all the polls on realpolitics .com before making silly statements.

  • Posted By: FJR in LA @ 02/02/2008 6:33:34 PM

    I support Obama because I remember how little The Clintons delivered for our core DEM constituencies:

    The working poor (growing thanks to The Clintons & The Bushes) were sold short by the Welfare Reform Act which Gingrich Republicans wrote that permanently stripped away several layers of social safety net in exchange for temporary workfare jobs like Walmart jobs today;

    Labor was short-shifted by NAFTA, the policy that, while ensuring the extension of the economic rally, also initiated and institutionalized the outsourcing of American jobs that all the candidates, including Mrs. Clinton, decry today;

    Woman business-owners were sold cheap by silent surrender of Affirmative Action. This affected unemployment greatly in minority communities because REPS targeted federal govt contracts to minority- and women-owned businesses which are 90% more likely to hire other minorities.

    Mostly young people, particularly Blacks and Latinos, were sold down the river by the Clinton Crime Bill that removed discretion from judges and imposed mandatory sentences resulting in unprecedented growth of the prison population.

    And Gay & Lesbian activists found the Clintons short-sighted for giving us that brokered and butchered compromise known as "Don't Ask/Don't Tell", which remains ineffectual leaving the issue unresolved over 15 years later with today's servicemen and women still challenged by a conservative administration to weigh the relative costs/benefits of lonely, individual disclosures.

    A ???burnt??? steak will be served browned on both sides and completely raw in the middle. This preparation requires extreme heat for a short amount of time which sums up The Clintons??? political dealmaking and resulting spin to claim victory. Because it is not enough for them to prepare us a raw steak; they have to convince us it's well done.....when it was so obviously half-baked.

    For example; everyone knows why HRC voted the way she did on Iraq; but in an almost Nixonian and frankly GW-way, she seems to have successfully convinced herself of some other rationale, after the fact. More disturbingly, she appears exasperated that we are not buying it.

    Moreover, DEMS have slowly realized that a 2nd Clinton Administration will likely never produce any truly progressive legislative victories. It is not them and it never was them.

    Elizabeth Edwards was right on in articulating how and why her husband would be a more effective advocate for women's issues than Sen. Clinton due to these limitations on her effectives both self-imposed and external.

    I am certain the lagging Latino and single-gender, hardcore feminist voters will soon join-in, completing a 90%+ transformational majority for Obama among core DEM voters. It will be due to the progressive evolution of all our individual regrets, disappointments, and resentments into a decisive and unified expression of hope???.hope for a homerun and not the drumbeat of singles that The Clintons have historically

  • Posted By: "Martin Edwin "Mick" Andersen @ 02/02/2008 5:53:44 PM

    FOR THOSE CLINTON BLOGGERS WHO CLAIM RFK'S BROOD IS SUPPORTING HILLARY, A PRE-SUPER TUESDAY GIFT ...

    ETHEL KENNEDY, BOBBY'S WIDOW, ENDORSES OBAMA ...

    Why I'm Supporting Barack Obama
    Posted February 2, 2008 | 05:07 PM (EST)

    Over these past few years, I've watched Senator Obama inspire Americans from all walks of life to believe in real change and a new sense of hope and possibility. He's a magnetic force, drawing the nation together for the common good and galvanizing us all to help shape our country's future.

    Barack is so like Bobby, who struggled for the rights of the poor in the Mississippi Delta and Appalachia, traveled to California to stand in solidarity with Cesar Chavez and farm workers and fought to end another war that cost so many lives.

    Today, we crave a leader with vision who can help us regain our lost humanity and rekindle our inherent generosity. With courage, caring and charisma, Senator Obama is leading us toward a kinder, gentler world.

    Senator Obama's candidacy sends out "ripples of hope" that can build a "current which can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance." I am proud to support Barack Obama, and look forward to him leading this country toward a brighter, more hopeful future.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tag/barack-is-so-like-bobby

    MARTIN EDWIN ANDERSEN

    • Posted By: schubert1970 @ 02/02/2008 6:03:51 PM

      Just my last thought....what will it look like when Mr. Hussien pulls all of our troops out of Iraq???? I'm sure the Muslims will love the fact that someone named Obama just threw out the white flag and gave up. It would look like a huge victory for the terrorists. This is what you will hear from the GOP. Then he will lose the election. All to easy.

      • Posted By: VAChris@FC @ 02/02/2008 6:31:21 PM

        Wao! Really shocking to see there are such closed-minded people as you, no disrespect. Wake up and catch the whiff of change. Your comment smacks of the tired old ways of life, less about politics and the issue of the day than of status-quo. People like you, no offence, are of the dark ages, of a divisive time in America when in lieu of what's right people chose what's popular, therefore helping put a stranglehold on the country. Luckily, todays' is a world, and in particular a country ready to put the past behind, embrace change for what it's worth, and move on. It's rather shocking that for all the evidence of how wrong, how diversionary the Iraq war was, and remains, that there are still people of your view point who think it's more patriotic to have our young killed eveyday in Iraq than bring them home. Some of them have served more than two tours of duty. Understandably change happens and it's not for anyone who refuses to embrace it. But sometimes even those who refuse to embrace change are embraced by change - talk of taking the mountain to Mohammed!
        vachris@fc

    • Posted By: schubert1970 @ 02/02/2008 6:00:52 PM

      BFD???? You must also think that Ted Kennedy will bring in all this Latino votes, or maybe Oprah will???
      Go look at a few polls today, I don't care if you dig up JFK himself....Reality is setting in if you got the guts to click this link and see the truth.

      http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/2/2/132935/7717/376/436944

  • Posted By: DCSteve @ 02/02/2008 10:38:10 AM

    You know when I will have hope? When there are no Republicans left. Until then I want someone that can beat them in the trenches at their own dirty games, and get stuff done despite their best efforts. A few hundred Republicans is not going to change a fragmented electorate. This country is still more 48/48/4 with the 4 holding all the power. Nor will it change a Washington where you have a well disciplined Republican party trying to do everything they can to block every move you try to make.

    Who has proven as a Democrat they can win in that environment? Not Kerry. Not Teddy -- he couldn't even make it out of the primary against a pathetic Carter. No sign Barack can -- remember he ran all but unopposed to the Senate.

    May I dare mention the Clintons? People may not like their politics, but Bill is the only 2 term Democratic President in the last 50 years. You may not like some of the deals he cut with the Republicans but he generally outfought them when they had a majority of both houses. He put good justices in. He got better than he gave. Putting a neophyte in Barack Obama up as our choice in November is madness.

    • Posted By: FJR in LA @ 02/02/2008 6:28:25 PM

      The Clintons certainly got better than they gave. But our core DEM constituencies did not.

      The working poor (growing thanks to The Clintons & The Bushes) were sold short by the Welfare Reform Act which Gingrich Republicans wrote that permanently stripped away several layers of social safety net in exchange for temporary workfare jobs like Walmart jobs today;

      Labor was short-shifted by NAFTA, the policy that, while ensuring the extension of the economic rally, also initiated and institutionalized the outsourcing of American jobs that all the candidates, including Mrs. Clinton, decry today;

      Woman business-owners were sold cheap by silent surrender of Affirmative Action. This affected unemployment greatly in minority communities because REPS targeted federal govt contracts to minority- and women-owned businesses which are 90% more likely to hire other minorities.

      Mostly young people, particularly Blacks and Latinos, were sold down the river by the Clinton Crime Bill that removed discretion from judges and imposed mandatory sentences resulting in unprecedented growth of the prison population.

      And Gay & Lesbian activists found the Clintons short-sighted for giving us that brokered and butchered compromise known as "Don't Ask/Don't Tell", which remains ineffectual leaving the issue unresolved over 15 years later with today's servicemen and women still challenged by a conservative administration to weigh the relative costs/benefits of lonely, individual disclosures.

      A ???burnt??? steak will be served browned on both sides and completely raw in the middle. This preparation requires extreme heat for a short amount of time which sums up The Clintons??? political dealmaking and resulting spin to claim victory. Because it is not enough for them to prepare us a raw steak; they have to convince us it's well done.....when it was so obviously half-baked.

      For example; everyone knows why she voted the way she did on Iraq; but in an almost Nixonian and frankly GW-way, she seems to have successfully convinced herself of some other rationale, after the fact. More disturbingly, she appears exasperated that we are not buying it.

      Moreover, we have slowly realized that a 2nd Clinton Administration will likely never produce any truly progressive legislative victories. It is not them and it never was them.

      Elizabeth Edwards was right on in articulating how and why her husband would be a more effective advocate for women's issues than Sen. Clinton due to these limitations on her effectives both self-imposed and external.

      I am certain the lagging Latino and single-gender, hardcore feminist voters will soon join-in, completing a 90%+ transformational majority for Obama among core DEM voters. It will be due to the progressive evolution of all our individual regrets, disappointments, and resentments into a decisive and unified expression of hope???.hope for a homerun and not the drumbeat of singles that The Clintons have historically delivered.

    • Posted By: FJR in LA @ 02/02/2008 6:08:43 PM

      The Clintons certainly got better than they gave. But our core DEM constituencies did not.

      The working poor (growing thanks to The Clintons & The Bushes) were sold short by the Welfare Reform Act which Gingrich Republicans wrote that permanently stripped away several layers of social safety net in exchange for temporary workfare jobs like Walmart jobs today;

      Labor was short-shifted by NAFTA, the policy that, while ensuring the extension of the economic rally, also initiated and institutionalized the outsourcing of American jobs that all the candidates, including Mrs. Clinton, decry today;

      Woman business-owners were sold cheap by silent surrender of Affirmative Action. This affected unemployment greatly in minority communities because REPS targeted federal govt contracts to minority- and women-owned businesses which are 90% more likely to hire other minorities.

      Mostly young people, particularly Blacks and Latinos, were sold down the river by the Clinton Crime Bill that removed discretion from judges and imposed mandatory sentences resulting in unprecedented growth of the prison population.

      And Gay & Lesbian activists found the Clintons short-sighted for giving us that brokered and butchered compromise known as "Don't Ask/Don't Tell", which remains ineffectual leaving the issue unresolved over 15 years later with today's servicemen and women still challenged by a conservative administration to weigh the relative costs/benefits of lonely, individual disclosures.

      A ???burnt??? steak will be served browned on both sides and completely raw in the middle. This preparation requires extreme heat for a short amount of time which sums up The Clintons??? political dealmaking and resulting spin to claim victory. Because it is not enough for them to prepare us a raw steak; they have to convince us it's well done.....when it was so obviously half-baked.

      For example; everyone knows why she voted the way she did on Iraq; but in an almost Nixonian and frankly GW-way, she seems to have successfully convinced herself of some other rationale, after the fact. More disturbingly, she appears exasperated that we are not buying it.

      Moreover, we have slowly realized that a 2nd Clinton Administration will likely never produce any truly progressive legislative victories. It is not them and it never was them.

      Elizabeth Edwards was right on in articulating how and why her husband would be a more effective advocate for women's issues than Sen. Clinton due to these limitations on her effectives both self-imposed and external.

      I am certain the lagging Latino and single-gender, hardcore feminist voters will soon join-in, completing a 90%+ transformational majority for Obama among core DEM voters. It will be due to the progressive evolution of all our individual regrets, disappointments, and resentments into a decisive and unified expression of hope???.hope for a homerun and not the drumbeat of singles that The Clintons have historically delivered.

    • Posted By: nefertiti @ 02/02/2008 5:30:00 PM

      most insightful comment i've read. right after 12 reagan-bush years, in 91 as young college graduate i happen to hear bill clinton very early in presidential candidacy and became inspired and enthusiastic about the elections for the first time. i i voted first time @ 18 in 84 but i never related to politicians in general. bored by politic and didnt understand the process. but the first time i heard him, he seemed down to earth. a politician i could actually talk to AND understand. most important HE DISCUSSED REAL ISSUES that related to my concerns as a young black woman starting a career and raising child. he laid out an agenda i could understand and really care about! for the first time i followed a candidate from start to finish learning political process along the way. he inspired me also learn my local civics and i began voting in every election i was eligible. the clinton years were the best of my life. I supported Gore however I did not support Kerry. i didnt thing he was capable long before swiftboating. I might have voted Edwards if he'd been given a chance either time....

      i welcome anyones comments http://my2008vote.blogspot.com/

    • Posted By: nefertiti @ 02/02/2008 5:29:12 PM

      DCSteve, most insightful comment i've read. right after 12 reagan-bush years, in 91 as young college graduate i happen to hear bill clinton very early in presidential candidacy and became inspired and enthusiastic about the elections for the first time. i i voted first time @ 18 in 84 but i never related to politicians in general. bored by politic and didnt understand the process. but the first time i heard him, he seemed down to earth. a politician i could actually talk to AND understand. most important HE DISCUSSED REAL ISSUES that related to my concerns as a young black woman starting a career and raising child. he laid out an agenda i could understand and really care about! for the first time i followed a candidate from start to finish learning political process along the way. he inspired me also learn my local civics and i began voting in every election i was eligible. the clinton years were the best of my life. I supported Gore however I did not support Kerry. i didnt thing he was capable long before swiftboating. I might have voted Edwards if he'd been given a chance either time....

      i welcome anyones comments http://my2008vote.blogspot.com/

  • Posted By: schubert1970 @ 02/02/2008 4:21:51 PM

    If Obama wins and MacCain wins, does it reakky matter who you vote for? Not really both of these guys are sell outs. Look at Rasmussen and realpolitics the man has peaked. Just do the dang math. He's only leading in 3 or 4 states.........REALITY CHECK. Oprah can't even save him. Oprah is holding a rally on Super Sunday....what a joke. GAME OVER and all you Obamacrates your highs are high but your lows will be even lower.

    • Posted By: Publius McPeters @ 02/02/2008 5:46:30 PM

      Hey, Schubert... Hillary may very well win the battle as you and all of the other Democratic sellouts might like... As for me, a TRUE liberal? Well, I will vote for Obama, because he represents real change for our very real times... Hillary represents the Washington of old, the 'bd' old days of his wifes administration... Obama represents the uncorrupted future, the future of the here & now...

      I will leave the democratic party & vote for Bloomberg over 8 more years of billary... I will vote for ralph that traitor nader over hillarious... & I will vote for McCain, if necessary, over bill again being president of this country... Because, the fac of the matter is we must actually change our leaders if we are to change our country!!

      • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 02/02/2008 6:22:40 PM

        What can I say ... but wow ... to think of a politician and incorruptible is ludicrous. Go a head vote for Bloomberg or Nader ... I will be voting for McCain if Obama is nominated.

      • Posted By: schubert1970 @ 02/02/2008 5:55:42 PM

        Or, you can just vote for Oprah

  • Posted By: rjmbawalling @ 02/02/2008 5:03:03 PM

    I am one of many democratics that puts international terroism at the forefront. I believe an exodus is forthcoming. McCain has, at a minimum, transformed a hardcore democrate into an Republican leaning independent.

    • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 02/02/2008 6:15:38 PM

      I agree with you in that I'm a more moderate/independent leaning Democrat now than I have in the previous elections. I don't think Obama has the credentials to lead us out of Iraq. Democrats for McCain!

  • Posted By: markci @ 02/02/2008 2:05:53 PM

    *** I'm sure the Clinton campaign has a ton of dirt on this guy, but don't want to destroy him. ***

    Wow, you're an idiot. Those sleazes would pimp out their own mothers to be back in the White House.

    • Posted By: JenniferAmelia @ 02/02/2008 2:09:41 PM

      Another Obama supporter, callng names, lashing out. Boy you people seem filled with hatred!

      • Posted By: markci @ 02/02/2008 2:13:44 PM

        And you are full of bullshit.

        • Posted By: JenniferAmelia @ 02/02/2008 2:18:53 PM

          Oh you are JUST TOO CUTE! Hey you didn't read the playbook: you're supposed to say "And you are a RACIST and you're full of b*llsh*t!"

          • Posted By: LSD4u2 @ 02/02/2008 5:59:07 PM

            That's telling him, Jennifer. Maybe his mother will let Markci vote when he grows up.

          • Posted By: karcer @ 02/02/2008 3:16:43 PM

            I don't agree with spewing names to make a point, but I also don't agree with your portraying of the words of one person in an anonymous post as indicative of Obama as a candidate and leader. And as with the ugly bringing up of race, it was totally unneccesary, consider no one made the charge. I could say that is a typical clinton campaign tactic.

        • Posted By: frjiles1 @ 02/02/2008 2:39:27 PM

          No.... that would be you and you are showing that you can't take opposition and heat and react in an immature way just as Obama..................

          Markci,, you need to grow up!!!! There is nothing wrong with disagreeing however, disagreeing should not turn into insults and vulgarity.................GROW UP!!!!!! Unless you are 10 years old.......start acting your age andnot your shoe size!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 02/02/2008 2:12:43 PM

      Wow, and if you think Obama or any politician wouldn't pimp their own mother or sister to get in the White House then your delusional.

      • Posted By: markci @ 02/02/2008 2:16:34 PM

        *** Wow, and if you think Obama or any politician wouldn't pimp their own mother or sister to get in the White House then your delusional. ***

        An excellent illustration of the level of cynicism and denial it takes to be a Clinton supporter.

        • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 02/02/2008 2:41:58 PM

          Yeah pretty much. You call it cynicism, I call it pragmatism. I supported Bill for 8 years my first vote ever was for Bill Clinton. Did you? How many people posting here voted Bill back into office? Now you vilify him like he is a leper. If it took a Clinton to get us through 12 years of Republican rule then, then it might take another Clinton to get us through 8 years of Bush.

  • Posted By: schubert1970 @ 02/02/2008 4:34:18 PM

    Rasmussenreports.com
    Hillary 8+ over Obama and leading in every state but 2. Reality has set in. You can't make up enough ground in 3 days and the media will be all over the Super Bowl. I wish more of you would look at the damn numbers. Heck, he could win Cali, but will get beat in AK, NY, NJ, MASS (this one is funny because of Kennedy) MIS, ARK, KY, NM, AZ, ETC. Obama has ILL, ID, COL, GEO. nuff said.

    • Posted By: Publius McPeters @ 02/02/2008 5:54:14 PM

      To anybody who doesn't know of good 'ole schubert: He is an embittered repubifacist, just stumping in this room for Hillary because he believes that Hillary willbe easier meat for his party. He will NOT in any way be supportive of any Democrat, (much less Hillary Cliton) in the fall!

  • Posted By: frjiles1 @ 02/02/2008 1:55:20 PM

    People Please wake up!!!!!!!!! The Media and the Republicans are supporting this man for one reason........they want him to get the nomination and then destroy him once he get it. Why do yall think the Republicans and Media are currently giving him a free ride.

    The only way their hidden agenda will be shown is if he gets the nomination or is on the ticket for VP. I am sure both are sitting on a stack of dirt on this man as we speak. Obama will become a liability to the Democrat party which will ultimiately hurt our quest for change.

    I don't know if he write his own speeches but he can deliver a speech but other than his speeches,what has he done during his campaign to show that he really is the "agent" of change. Is it me or is he starting to become a little cocky?

    People, don't be fooled by the hype........just ask yourself why there is so much hype and why is he getting a free ride? Look beneath the surface.........

    • Posted By: karcer @ 02/02/2008 3:32:48 PM

      And they won't come after Hillary with every piece of dirt they can scrounge up? They'll use the same dirty tactics against whoever is the nominee.

      • Posted By: frjiles1 @ 02/02/2008 5:34:20 PM

        It appears to me that that have already been attacking Hillary with just about everything they can find. Just the other day, my co worker who is a Republican and is not in favor of Hillary, printed out and asked me to read every single scandal her same is associated with.

        Why do you think they haven;t done that with Obama yet? And believe me, it is NOT because there isn't any dirt on him. I watch the news channels and I have repeatedly heard the analyst and news casters always bringing up dirt on both Clintons.........and not Obama. Why not..........What logical and realistic reason can you come up with as to why they haven't done it with him yet?

  • Posted By: VAChris@FC @ 02/02/2008 5:16:01 PM

    Everyone, something is definitely happening in American politics. And it is a GOOD THING! To see and read of republicans speaking good of an opposing party's candidate for the party nomination, without regard to party loyalty and possible wrath from fellow party members is a good thing. That's the sort of political marturity that will definitely get some of us tuned in. It is really exhilarating to behold a political discussion without the familiar rancour, attacks and branding that has come to represent years gone-by. Obama, whether or not he wins the nomination, and ultimately the presidency has definitely brought about the kind of turn-around this country needs to get more and more people once again interested in the whole democratic process. Obama's speech, always devoid of hate and name calling always centers on unification and oneness of a country in need of that. The divide and conquer politics of old is tiring, and exclusive. The kind of electric Obama brings to the political process can only be seen as inspiring. Every now and then you read of how some teenager, inspired by Obama has all of a sudden become very interested in politics. And, personally, I have NEVER cared a thing about politics or nomination for that matter as I do now, and I'm not a teenager! The wind of change is blowing, anyone who cares to crack open their window will feel its effect, and those who open their window will surely be swept away by it. Change is for this time and this time is for change.
    vaChris@Fc

  • Posted By: schubert1970 @ 02/02/2008 4:58:53 PM

    Comment: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/2/2/132935/7717/376/436944

    Click the link above for a dose of reality Obamacans

  • Posted By: VAChris@FC @ 02/02/2008 4:55:24 PM

    Everyone, something is definitely happening in American politics. And it is a GOOD THING! To see and read of republicans speaking good of an opposing party's candidate for the party nomination, without regard to party loyalty and possible wrath from fellow party members is a good thing. That's the sort of political marturity that will definitely get some of us tuned in. It is really exhilarating to behold a political discussion without the familiar rancour, attacks and branding that has come to represent years gone-by. Obama, whether or not he wins the nomination, and ultimately the presidency has definitely brought about the kind of turn-around this country needs to get more and more people once again interested in the whole democratic process. Obama's speech, always devoid of hate and name calling always centers on unification and oneness of a country in need of that. The divide and conquer politics of old is tiring, and exclusive. The kind of electric Obama brings to the political process can only be seen as inspiring. Every now and then you read of how some teenager, inspired by Obama has all of a sudden become very interested in politics. And, personally, I have NEVER cared a thing about politics or nomination for that matter as I do now, and I'm not a teenager! The wind of change is blowing, anyone who cares to crack open their window will feel its effect, and those who open their window will surely be swept away by it. Change is for this time and this time is for change.
    VaChris@FC

  • Posted By: VAChris@FC @ 02/02/2008 4:54:55 PM

    Everyone, something is definitely happening in American politics. And it is a GOOD THING! To see and read of republicans speaking good of an opposing party's candidate for the party nomination, without regard to party loyalty and possible wrath from fellow party members is a good thing. That's the sort of political marturity that will definitely get some of us tuned in. It is really exhilarating to behold a political discussion without the familiar rancour, attacks and branding that has come to represent years gone-by. Obama, whether or not he wins the nomination, and ultimately the presidency has definitely brought about the kind of turn-around this country needs to get more and more people once again interested in the whole democratic process. Obama's speech, always devoid of hate and name calling always centers on unification and oneness of a country in need of that. The divide and conquer politics of old is tiring, and exclusive. The kind of electric Obama brings to the political process can only be seen as inspiring. Every now and then you read of how some teenager, inspired by Obama has all of a sudden become very interested in politics. And, personally, I have NEVER cared a thing about politics or nomination for that matter as I do now, and I'm not a teenager! The wind of change is blowing, anyone who cares to crack open their window will feel its effect, and those who open their window will surely be swept away by it. Change is for this time and this time is for change.
    VaChris@FC

  • Posted By: VAChris@FC @ 02/02/2008 4:54:09 PM

    Everyone, something is definitely happening in American politics. And it is a GOOD THING! To see and read of republicans speaking good of an opposing party's candidate for the party nomination, without regard to party loyalty and possible wrath from fellow party members is a good thing. That's the sort of political marturity that will definitely get some of us tuned in. It is really exhilarating to behold a political discussion without the familiar rancour, attacks and branding that has come to represent years gone-by. Obama, whether or not he wins the nomination, and ultimately the presidency has definitely brought about the kind of turn-around this country needs to get more and more people once again interested in the whole democratic process. Obama's speech, always devoid of hate and name calling always centers on unification and oneness of a country in need of that. The divide and conquer politics of old is tiring, and exclusive. The kind of electric Obama brings to the political process can only be seen as inspiring. Every now and then you read of how some teenager, inspired by Obama has all of a sudden become very interested in politics. And, personally, I have NEVER cared a thing about politics or nomination for that matter as I do now, and I'm not a teenager! The wind of change is blowing, anyone who cares to crack open their window will feel its effect, and those who open their window will surely be swept away by it. Change is for this time and this time is for change.
    VaChris@FC

  • Posted By: rottimom @ 02/02/2008 4:42:18 PM

    If McCain gets the nomination, a lot more will be flying to Hillary and Obama. Its not because of anyones record..it's because of McCain!!

    • Posted By: schubert1970 @ 02/02/2008 4:45:39 PM

      I don't agree, I think the GOP would tear down Obama. The Clinton canpaign has been holding back info, the GOP won't do the same

  • Posted By: schubert1970 @ 02/02/2008 4:38:45 PM

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/2/2/132935/7717/376/436944

    Click the link above for a dose of reality Obamacans

  • Posted By: GeoFul @ 02/02/2008 4:19:51 PM

    This article has helped to know what I am. Now when asked about my party affiliation I don't have to explain that I'm a white 52 year old male who usually votes republican. I can simply state I am an Obamacan.

    Obama makes a point that Optimism transcends gender, race, ethnicity, age, or party lines.

    Here is the main point, a president can only do so much, regardless of which side of the isle they are on. But they BETTER be able to inspire optimism. THAT is perhaps the single biggest job of the president. Obama, thankfully backs up his optimism with intelligence and a keen command on policy.

    McCain? I hear a mono-tonal approach to politics as usual. Nothing inspiring there. He's a great man who just might put us to sleep.

    • Posted By: schubert1970 @ 02/02/2008 4:35:36 PM

      I'm an American.......shame your Obamacan.

    • Posted By: schubert1970 @ 02/02/2008 4:24:39 PM

      Command of policy???????????? I thought he was going to let others handle the policy since he more of a hands off guy. Give me a break

  • Posted By: GeoFul @ 02/02/2008 4:20:19 PM

    This article has helped to know what I am. Now when asked about my party affiliation I don't have to explain that I'm a white 52 year old male who usually votes republican. I can simply state I am an Obamacan.

    Obama makes a point that Optimism transcends gender, race, ethnicity, age, or party lines.

    Here is the main point, a president can only do so much, regardless of which side of the isle they are on. But they BETTER be able to inspire optimism. THAT is perhaps the single biggest job of the president. Obama, thankfully backs up his optimism with intelligence and a keen command on policy.

    McCain? I hear a mono-tonal approach to politics as usual. Nothing inspiring there. He's a great man who just might put us to sleep.

  • Posted By: markci @ 02/02/2008 2:07:39 PM

    *** Just head to realpolicitcs.com and look at the polls, the bubble has burst. ***

    Lies, and easily verifiable as lies. National polls show a close race with Obama surging.

    • Posted By: JenniferAmelia @ 02/02/2008 2:13:45 PM

      I wonder why the supporters of the "peaceful uniter", the holier than thou Obama are SO ugly! Hmm..... I think a politician's supporters say a lot about what he/she really is!

      • Posted By: schubert1970 @ 02/02/2008 4:17:08 PM

        Please read the Rassmusen report, obama has ver been closer than 8 points. The n look at the primary states. He's gained ground........but it's come to a halt. He's peaked. GAME OVER! Just a fact. Read the report before you made silly comments.

      • Posted By: markci @ 02/02/2008 2:17:36 PM

        Again, more hot air bullshit.

        • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 02/02/2008 3:03:20 PM

          Excellent point! Now you are starting to sound like Ann Coulter.

  • Posted By: vlnzang @ 02/02/2008 4:05:09 PM

    It is nice to be inspired and t o find that the country can have vision and hope not seen since the 1960's , party lines aren't blood lines and Obama is showing us that the country can have a vision and a purpose thats why the Rnc and caniddate clinton are attacking with all they have , because he threatens the establishment and the standard hate politics that have dominated the last 30 years , time for change time for Barack Obama !!

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse