"How should public resources be managed when dealing with celebrities? And, when it comes to Britney Spears, when is enough, enough?"
These two rhetorical, obviated questions, simply because they imply conceits that when fully tested with the reality of the situation, snap the reporter who asked them on the ass with a studded belt, a few hundred times. Behold the kind of stupid it takes to ask these two questions, in light of the calamity that is the coverage of Britney Spears in the national media, when it???s just so blatantly obvious that it was the press coverage that gave cause to an elevated police presence. This renders the first question, moot.
The premise of the question was the potential value of police resources being misallocated due to the fact that Ms. Spears is a celebrity. One stymied by such a conundrum is forced to reckon with the fact that it is due, in large part, to the fact that Ms. Spears is a celebrity that has caused the police to be summoned in such large number to wherever it is she has chosen to act out her panoply of irksome, attention seeking behavior and resultant suicidal ideation. One taking these two facts into their immediate consideration becomes consternated by the fact that the narcissist is wasting police resources.
Hence, the idiot with the press card tucked into the band on their fedora asks, ???And, when it comes to Britney Spears, when is enough, enough???? I???d say enough occurred, a while back, when press coverage of celebrities became so abundant that the press, themselves, lost the essential ability for self-awareness. Consider, if you will, the cat who sees its own tail and begins chasing it: The cat is not concerned with the fact that the tail belongs to it. The cat, in fact, believes the tail to belong to another cat and begins running in circles, wildly, and while it looks very cute, its owners have learned to accept the fact that their beloved pet is a complete dumbass.
Omitting the regard for the cat as one which is endeared, consider my regard for the press coverage of whatever celebrity du jour happens into the path of the next reporter to be that, roughly similar to the consideration of a complete dumbass. You???re all idiots of the worst variety, separated from reality by the very feedback loop they???ve facilitated. Utter stupidity has been made profitable by journalistic poseurs who would sooner mock logical conclusions than to abide by them. Your deleterious nature is so painfully apparent that even the editor of this trifling pap rag deserves contempt for the cheap, yellow journalism spewing like dysentery from the ass of an elephant gorged on Mexican tap water. You have broken the first rule of journalism, idiot(s)! Don???t become part of the story.









Discuss