What These Eyes Have Seen

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: dryheat091171 @ 02/14/2008 5:49:50 PM

    What these ultra conservative talking heads fail to realize is that they do not speak for the majority of Americans and probably never did. The ultimate political polls are election results. The fact that Republican voters rejected Mitt Romney shows that most of them do not agree with these right wing radicals.

  • Posted By: Shep @ 02/14/2008 2:24:55 PM

    Your cover showed a true American hero along with a group of egotistical 'haters'. The Ku Klux Klan, the Skinhead, and others of their ilk did not, or do not, have the power to spew hate the way this group of self-righteous, egomaniacal, obstinate, etc. etc. does. The USA would be better off without them having a voice.

  • Posted By: Sonia4Him @ 02/07/2008 9:14:59 AM

    I am a registered Democrat, but have been voting Republican for the US Presidency. I like them more, they are more Conservative and have more morals. Sadly this past Tuesday in NJ I did NOT vote for Clinton or Obama, they are definitely not much of a choice . I voted for Edwards and then found out that he was no longer running! But I do vote, I am voting for Huckabee.

    • Posted By: kcarizona @ 02/14/2008 7:53:36 AM

      Every day and in every way we vote!!!! it is not all about getting to the finish line and putting your hat up and going to the pool for 4 years it is about character - tried and true - come what may - rain or shine - we get the mail out - News Flash - The American Nurses Association endores Hillary Clinton - Go Hillary!!!!!!

    • Posted By: tc125231 @ 02/09/2008 4:07:14 PM

      You obviously too lazy to have actually investigated Huckabee's personal behavior. Talking about morality, and actually behaving like a decent person are quite different. Perhaps you've noticed?

      • Posted By: kcarizona @ 02/14/2008 7:51:04 AM

        it just reminds me i better keep sober and vigilant lest i too stumble.

  • Posted By: theblueroan @ 02/06/2008 10:58:42 AM

    Posted By: jalyma @ 02/06/2008 9:45:25 AM
    Comment: who cares?

    How about the whole US and quite a few in the rest of the world. A person's past tends to shape their future. I like McCain, if Hilary wins the Dem nomination I'll vote for him. Assuming he wins the Rep nom, of course, because I think he's the lesser of those 2 evils.
    That being said, I think the choices are less evil overall than they have been.

    • Posted By: jalyma @ 02/06/2008 12:36:45 PM

      my who cares comment was on the person correcting the author of the article for getting McCain's rank in the Navy wrong. I do care deeply about this country and hope and pray the past 8 years have not destroyed it.

      • Posted By: kcarizona @ 02/14/2008 7:49:35 AM

        faith the size of a mustard seed.......don't worry you are in GOOD HANDS WITH ALL 50 STATE 5-0 Flo.

  • Posted By: BackInTheSaddle @ 02/06/2008 11:32:07 PM

    What are the most important issues right now? Our falling dollar/out-of-control spending (2 sides of the same disastrous coin) and our dependence on foreign energy (which has recently hammered our dollar even more). John McCain is deeply committed to addressing those issues (check out JohnMcCain.com). No more Pork Barrel Spending under his watch. THAT'S WHAT WE NEED, FOLKS! All these other soft issues are just media noise. WAKE UP, THIS COUNTRY'S IN A SEVERE FINANCIAL CRISIS!!!!!!!!!

    • Posted By: jalyma @ 02/07/2008 8:29:31 AM

      I'm confused. The Bush tax cuts for the very rich were to stimulate our economy by trickeling down to us poor folks. Cuts not working? Golly. Also, do you think the billions we're spending every month in Iraq could be causing some of the problems? McCain wants to stay in Iraq for 100 years. Do the math. McCain was part of the majority senate for 6 years and therein lies the problem. No oversight. By the way - the war in Iraq was to increase oil prices to benefit rich republicans. Why people vote against their own interests is totally unfathomable. Are you better off now, after 8 years of republican power?

      • Posted By: kcarizona @ 02/14/2008 7:48:04 AM

        why aren't "We the People" making Billions in Iraq?????? We stepped up took all the heat all the risk and shed the best of the best of our best boys and girls blood and we are not getting compensated ???? who is pumping that Texas T out and where is it going and who is getting paid for what my momma and poppa got up early and went to bed late for?????

    • Posted By: kcarizona @ 02/14/2008 7:45:27 AM

      maybe true but as long as my coin has the God standard "In God We Trust" i am not too worried. Glory to God!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Posted By: ricehome @ 02/09/2008 6:09:15 PM

    You want arrogance? With McCain you can get it. Your February 11 story shows it.. There is a place for individual arrogance and McCain displayed it in his captive survival mode and his "maverick
    " performances in the Senate. But individual arrogance - as displayed by the current occupant of the presidency - is not what we need to lead our country. Thoughtful, itelligent and of course ultimate decisive action is what this country longs for.

  • Posted By: accuratedude @ 02/08/2008 9:52:48 PM

    What about Condoleeza Rice as possible VP?

    • Posted By: kcarizona @ 02/14/2008 7:35:31 AM

      Whatever Condoleeza Rice does she does with style.

  • Posted By: AltruisticOne @ 02/07/2008 5:37:50 PM

    I wouldnt worry about staying in Iraq for 100 years. The bank will not allow us to be there, regardless of what McCain wants. Arguing with McCain over 100 year stays in Iraq is like arguing over the color of the drapes in the house we built in Iraq thats about to be foreclosed on.

    • Posted By: kcarizona @ 02/14/2008 7:33:59 AM

      "the bank" and the Federal Reserve have long been outside of the heartland. They are illigitimate anyway. if they want to play they better play fair.

  • Posted By: mike35usmc @ 02/11/2008 3:23:58 PM

    Newsweek's cover story, "Becoming John Mc Cain" should have been titled, "Creating John Mc Cain."
    From the very first paragraph, Evan Thomas' article is filled with misinformation and deception, intended to glorify the Senator's unearned reputation. At the same time, Thomas completely ignores the wealth of government documents and historical news articles that show Mc Cain in a very different light.
    Many Vietnam veterans, myself included, hate Mc Cain and see him for the astoundingly arrogant, self-serving jerk he really is. Mc Cain's despicable performance while serving on the Senate Committee for POW/MIA's, is a graphic demonstration of the man's unbelievable dishonesty.
    John Mc Cain is a creation of the media. Had his father and grandfather NOT been naval admirals, there NEVER would have been a Mc Cain "war hero."
    I put Mc Cain in the same category as his buddy, John Kerry, another media "hero."

    • Posted By: kcarizona @ 02/14/2008 7:32:13 AM

      don't close your mind just yet. if you were to ever meet him in person you would sing a different tune and be proud like i am to live near a stud like him. Men like Mc Cain are why p####### like me go and sip coffee and can read the paper with contempt and freely say "that's despicable!!!"

  • Posted By: MelissaEw @ 02/12/2008 6:32:20 PM

    I am by no means a Republican, but I would vote for John McCain just to shut those facists up. I am so sick of these people (people who make irresponsible statements filled with hate) controlling how America thinks.

  • Posted By: kcarizona @ 02/14/2008 7:27:44 AM

    Ron Paul like other consumer advocates brings special attention to issues like only an underdog could. nothing to loose - the most dangerous kind - don't get desperate for one goal at all expense, see your contribution to the whole and equally important as any. Go Hillary!! You make many hearts glad on earth and heaven.

  • Posted By: kcarizona @ 02/14/2008 7:23:58 AM

    i endorse you too. thank you for your participation in the race for the oval office. healthy dialogue is important at all times. we have a divine appointment of checks and balances x3 President, Congress, Judiciary a so called Trinity. i thank God for good counselors and checks and balances that keep us safe. i look forward to your input and dialogue in the race.

  • Posted By: misterharban @ 02/11/2008 11:27:46 AM

    If you are one of those True Conservatives who can honestly claim that you opposed the war in Iraq from the beginning, ignore this. If you are one of the majority of True Conservatives who supported Bush and the war from the beginning, this message is for you.

    The upcoming election will be a referendum on many issues ranging from those which neither side will ever be able to effectively resolve to those which will be decisively resolved as soon as the votes are tallied. Of all the issues which may be decided at that time, none will be decided with more finality and immediacy than the war in Iraq. Have no doubt that a Democrat victory will result in our surrender in this conflict. This is what many in our country want. This is not what most True Conservatives have said that they want. They have articulated in every possible way their desire for a victory which will inure to the honor of the brave men and women who have sacrificed so much in that conflict.

    Yet now many True Conservatives are saying that they will not support the likely Republican nominee because of his disloyalty to them. This is a reasonable position for every issue except one: the loyalty that True Conservatives owe to the brave men and women they summoned to duty in Iraq. There is no equivalence between what True Conservatives want with regard toward immigration, sex and gender issues, life issues and the rest of the agenda and what they committed the country to when they declared war in Iraq. Most of the True Conservative issues are just that, issues. Things to be discussed, debated and perhaps legislated. Iraq was once simply an issue. It was discussed and debated. Largely at the behest of many of the True Conservatives who are now preparing to abandon it, it was transformed from an issue into an action, a war. We asked our young men and women to pledge everything, everything to the cause.

    True Conservatives should be perfectly clear on one thing. They are taking the position that their decision to not support the apparent nominee is a principled one, intended to allow them to go forward in the future and reform the country in their own image. Sometime in the future they hope to be able to say that they made this country a better place. But if they account for the margin of loss for the Republican nominee this fall they will also be immediately responsible for casting our entire military effort in Iraq into the trash heap of history. The horrible price we have paid to date in lives and dollars will be for naught. It is likely that our nation???s military might will never again be considered by those who would harm us to be a credible deterrent to their bad actions. We will become the new France.

    The legacy of True Conservative???s failure to support the Republican nominee will become their willingness to place their partisan concerns above the lives and honor of our soldiers in time of war. Disgraceful.

  • Posted By: rottimom @ 02/03/2008 3:40:49 PM

    Even though I do not support McCain, i look at him as a hero. I can not imagine what he has been through in the war.

    The problem here is, we are voting for a President, and unfortunately McCain can not be trusted. He has lied so many times and continues to do so. We have enough of a problem in the world getting other to trust us. We certainly do not need a man who has a history of being a liar leading our country. We need a peron who can be trusted to keep his word.

    The conservatives and those who love our country are going forward to support Mitt Romney. We will not be dictated to who we will vote for by the media or the powers of Washington crooks. Even sad stories, though
    striking, will not allow us to change our minds when it comes to integrity.

    • Posted By: pinkpanther87413 @ 02/03/2008 3:57:15 PM

      you can love your country and not Mitt Romney!

      • Posted By: voxdulcis @ 02/09/2008 11:27:17 PM

        What an incredible laugh! I am so ROFL! So, which Romney are we talking about? It is so hard to decide what he is all about, except getting in to office by any way or means or lie or half-truth. And that is why he is out of the running.

  • Posted By: voxdulcis @ 02/04/2008 12:14:25 AM

    There is no such thing as a perfect candidate. At least not this year. Here are our choices: we can elect Obama or Hillary and resign ourselves to a socialist future paid for by high taxes and our nation's security in the hands of one of those supremely unqualified candidates, or we can seek a path of military strength, fiscal conservatism, and keep the pressure on the feds to make the borders tight and shut down the sources of income for illegal aliens by electing a Republican. As for Romney: We have enough mormons in the FBI and CIA. We certainly don't need one in the presidency, even IF he is telling the truth about his stand on every issue, which he isn't. I would no more vote for Romney than Tom Cruise. McCain has much to recommend him: courage, intelligence and a strong history of supporting conservative causes, with the ability to compromise when necessary, since conservatives are not the only ones living in the US. I don't mind a bad temper when it's aimed at a fool or foolish idea. But, the best thing about McCain: he can save us, our children and our grandchildren from the disastrous effects of four years with Hillary or Obama.

    • Posted By: pinkpanther87413 @ 02/04/2008 11:14:02 AM

      THIS IS YOUR IDEA OF SAVED????? WHERE WAS HE WHEN THIS WENT DOWN, OH YA IN OFFICE KILLING OUR FURTURE KIDS, WITH THIS UNHOLY ALLIENCE! BUT HEAD
      Operation Cyclone was the code name for the United States Central Intelligence Agency program to arm the Afghan mujahideen during the Soviet war in Afghanistan, 1979 to 1989. The Program relied heavily on using the Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) as an intermediary for funds distribution. Along with funding from similar programs from Britain's MI6 and SAS, Saudi Arabia and the People's Republic of China, the ISI armed and trained over 100,000 insurgents between 1978 and 1992. Somewhere between $3???$20 billion in US funds were funneled into the country to train and equip troops with weapons, including Stinger man-portable air-defense systems.


      26 Aug 1988 SA-7On July 3, 1979, U.S. President Carter signed a presidential finding authorizing funding for anticommunist guerrillas in Afghanistan.[1] Following the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and installation of a more pro-Soviet president, Babrak Karmal, Carter announced "The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan is the greatest threat to peace since the Second World War".[2] American funding started with 20-30 million dollars per year in 1980 and rose to $630 million a year in 1987.[3]

      The US government has been criticized for allowing Pakistan to channel a disproportionate amount of its funding to controversial Afghan resistance leader Gulbuddin Hekmatyar,[4] who Pakistani officials believed was "their man".[5] Hekmatyar has been criticized for killing other mujahideen and attacking civilian populations, including shelling Kabul with American-supplied weapons, causing 2,000 casualties. Hekmatyar was said to be friendly with Osama bin Laden, founder of al-Qaeda, who was running an operation for assisting "Afghan Arab" volunteers fighting in Afghanistan, called Maktab al-Khadamat (MAK). Alarmed by his behavior Pakistan leader General Zia warned Hekmatyar that "It was Pakistan that made him an Afghan leader and it is Pakistan who can equally destroy him if he continues to misbehave".[6] According to a Newsweek article, in the late 1980s, Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, concerned of the growing strength of the Islamist movement, told President George H. W. Bush, "You are creating a Frankenstein". Author Gilles Kepel reports that American funding of Hekmatyar and his Hezbi Islami party was cut off immediately following the withdrawal of the Soviets.[7]

      The U.S. says all of its funds went to native Afghan rebels and denies that any of its funds were used to supply Osama bin Laden or foreign Arab mujahideen. It is estimated that 35,000 foreign Muslims from 43 Islamic countries participated in the war.[8][9][10][11]


      • Posted By: voxdulcis @ 02/09/2008 11:17:20 PM

        Ok, skimmed through your rant, looked like you're off-the-chart upset about something Carter (no McCain) did during the cold war with the USSR. No doubt this was something suggested to Carter by our CIA. And we know who's running that--a majority of the CIA are LDS. So, now... what is your question? And what does this have to do with McCain? You really need to relax! BTW, if you're going to clip and paste someones web page, with references, perhaps you should give the authors name and URL.

    • Posted By: urcoolnot @ 02/04/2008 12:57:29 AM

      I sure hope that bad temper is never aimed at somone with an armed Nuclear weapon.

      • Posted By: voxdulcis @ 02/04/2008 6:00:10 AM

        Really! Are you honestly afraid of that? That's a pretty extreme reaction to have! Are you often this fearful? Have you seen a doctor about your extreme anxieties? How often do you get like this? I suspect it's a temporary thing. You're just suffering from Romney-is-coming-in-second-anxiety. And instilling fear in others about McCain is all you have left in your pro-Romney propaganda bag. I think most voters are too smart to get sucked in to your ploy.

        • Posted By: Dan Maloy @ 02/04/2008 5:57:54 PM

          "urcoolnot", I appreciate you sticking up for the Church, but I agree that posting that McCain would rush to push "the big red button" is not very likely. Does McCain have a temper? No doubt. Just go watch clips from last week's GOP debate in CA to see that. He's a snide bugger, isn't he?

          Go Romney!

    • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 02/04/2008 12:18:43 AM

      THANK YOU for your post. Mormon doctrine makes Scientology look mainstream. McCain will make a fine leader of our Republic. Lets pray for the right VP candidate, complete the ticket.

      • Posted By: urcoolnot @ 02/04/2008 12:59:49 AM

        HolyRoller, it is aparent you are a relgious bigot and know nothing of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints except what others have told you. Please do better research and stop posting. And thanks for confirming that Huckabee is now only running for himself at the V.P. spot. I guess it was pretty obvious.

  • Posted By: tc125231 @ 02/05/2008 6:47:37 PM

    I think this article is criminal, and typical of reportorial fawning over McCain. The fact is that he has reversed his positions right and left lately, and told some fibs in the bargain. He may bristle at the suggestion he has not behaved honorably in recent times.

    That is too bad. If the shoe fits, you're stuck wearing it.

    This article makes no attempt to dwal with his many reversals of position, and fibs about why, or about his former position. He SOOO worried about vets, but has introduced not one piece of legislation to make his pal W. standup and see that they get proper medical care after they are injured. Now tax cuts increase federal revenues (a position not even the Cato Institute supports.)
    McCain "believes" it though, because it allows him to support war without end while supporting irresponsibible tax cuts.

    Might convenient. What message does it send our children when the man our press has annointed as our most "honorable" leader says there really is a free lunch.

    --Nobody has been more critical of the prosecution of the war than he was, he says. Yeah --where were the bills in 2003 and 2004 to get more boots on the ground. There sure weren't any coming from McCain.

    The fact that our press has anointed such a man as "Mr Straight Talk" merely demonstrates that they have no grasp of the nature of integrity. Lying when the truth is inconvenient is STILL lying.

    • Posted By: voxdulcis @ 02/09/2008 11:05:03 PM

      TC, were you this upset when Clinton lied? You know... when his lips were moving.

  • Posted By: accuratedude @ 02/08/2008 9:51:34 PM

    What about Condoleeza Rice as VP? I think she has all the qualifications - experience in foreign policy, etc.

  • Posted By: JBuzicky75@comcast.net @ 02/08/2008 7:56:00 PM

    Here are a couple more resources for researching McBu$h, oops McCain.
    Democracy Now did a good piece on him here:
    http://www.democracynow.org/2008/2/4/the_myth_of_a_maverick_matt
    and
    therealmccain.com/




  • Posted By: Payne23 @ 02/07/2008 9:12:56 PM

    It seems vox whatever is a prime example of one who misses the forrest because of all the trees. Where nationalizing corperations is ever referred to i'm not sure but asking them to actually have a social morality besides the bottom line does not seem like too much. Perhaps we should just become a facsist country where corperations and government control everything , giving only the allusion of democracy . That is where neo-cons asoire us to be. They despise workers rights and unions. They despise de-regulation of any kind, having us believe that while people lie and steal for a 100 dollars they would never for 100 million dollars, and they forever desire unlimited fairytale growth without acknowledging that the Earth is a finite place and resource. People of this ilk are dreamers of the worst kind. Their dreams have no upside, at least not for roughly 70% of the population.How can someone complain of unionbusting as if the devil yet disparage socialism which is the extreme of extreme of union orginization ideaology. It makes no sense unions are great socialism not so great cooperations can be great but most in a completely free market society will not be great.Why' because people will lie cheat and steal for 100's of millions of dollars who wouldn't, Ghandi Jesus. So neither is perfect but somewhere in the middle might be. Beware absolutists and those who add 2+2 and get 5 like voxwhatever.

  • Posted By: lynng1 @ 02/06/2008 7:57:56 PM

    Reading this article made me dislike McCain even more.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse