To those who support McCain, I ask you to please examine the integrity of McCain today. I say "today" because there's no question that your candidate had tremendous integrity when confined as a P.O.W. I salute him for that. However, since he came home in the early 70's I think he has gradually allowed himself to be seduced by continual compromises in which he slowly abandoned his integrity in the name of political progress or trying to "get things done".
A recent example of this is last week's GOP debate. He claimed that Mitt is a "flip-flopper" because he raised (essentially) "taxes" in the form of "fees" though Romney pledged to not raise taxes. Did Romney raise millions for Massachusetts in the form of fees? Absolutely. Romney's answer? The "fees" in question had not been increased for many years, some of them for decades, and the fees were things that did not affect everyone. In other words, all MA citizens did NOT have to pay these fees. He gave an example of a fee for the state installing a McDonald's sign on the side of an interstate.
McCain gave numbers about the cost of Massachusetts' state-mandated health care program. Romney's answer? McCain's number was incorrect (it was too high) AND McCain was also using numbers of the CURRENT cost of the program AFTER Romney left the office of governor. Romney clearly said that his successor (a Democrat governor) had added expensive options / "bells and whistles" to the health care program that Romney would not have added were he still governor.
McCain used multiple statistics attacking Romney on the status of Massachusetts' economy. Romney's answer? McCain was using numbers that INCLUDED a period of time BEFORE Romney took office. When Romney gave McCain the statistics from his time in office, (surprise) McCain's iron-clad "facts" were nowhere near as bad as McCain claimed.
The incidents above occurred within the first 30 minutes or so of the debate. Go search on the internet and watch the debate yourself.
So McCain is either: A) very uninformed and altogether ignorant of the facts needed to effectively debate Romney or B) he knows the facts which Romney easily refuted (BTW, no one in the press has been refuting Romney's facts) but he purposely tried to misrepresent Romney's leadership.
This means McCain is either unintelligent (doubtful) or he lacks the integrity to portray his opponent as he really is. You be the judge.
Please, please look at the man you are supporting. Would McCain protect America from terrorists? Yes, I believe he would. However, Romney can do that too (you don't have to be a mechanic to know how to drive a car....yes, that's an over-simplified example but you get my drift) and MORE. Romney has integrity and a graciousness / public "smoothness" that America desperately needs in our next President because as our leader he will undoubtedly have to work with









Discuss