A Not-So-Sure Thing
Clinton, Obama lower expectations for Feb. 5.
As Hillary Clinton's top advisers tried to put a brave face on her thumping in Iowa five weeks ago, they buoyed themselves by looking forward to Super Duper Tuesday. "This thing will be over on Feb. 5," campaign chairman Terry McAuliffe assured reporters the day after Clinton's third-place finish in the Iowa caucuses. California, New York, New Jersey and other big Feb. 5 states were "Clinton Country," the thinking went. Once the media finished swooning over Barack Obama and voters took a harder look, Hillary would start raking in the delegates. Of the 2,025 delegates needed to win the Democratic nomination, some 1,700 are at stake on Feb. 5. But now that the fabled day has arrived, with Clinton and Obama all but tied in the polls, the Clinton camp is rolling out a new storyline. "The results are likely to be close and inconclusive," communications director Howard Wolfson said Monday. "Right now we are looking at a fight that will go on way beyond tomorrow."
For the flu-ridden and ill-tempered members of Clinton's road crew, who have been barreling around the country since early December, it's a ghastly scenario. Even Clinton's legendary stamina is wearing thin. Fighting a heavy cold, she grew teary Monday morning at an event at the Yale Child Study Center, where she once worked as a law student, as her old friend Penn Rhodeen described his first meeting with her, when she was clad in a sheepskin coat and bell-bottoms. "You looked wonderful and so 1972," he said.
"Well, I said I would not tear up," Clinton responded. "Already we are not on that path."
Hoarse and exhausted, she then hacked her way through events in Worcester and Boston, Mass., followed by evening appearances in New York with David Letterman and a syrupy Hallmark Channel town hall. No matter what the polls say, says her spokesman Jay Carson, "she will campaign as though she is 20 points behind." After voting early Tuesday morning, Clinton, her voice raspy, is scheduled to conduct more than 30 television and radio interviews with networks and with local stations around the country. Instead of planning a victory party for Tuesday night, the campaign has scheduled a nebulously named "election night celebration."
Having learned to dial back expectations after the disaster in Iowa and the thrill of the comeback in New Hampshire, the Clinton campaign is wary of "Front Runner Stumbles" headlines; they'd rather predict a muddle. In California, where Clinton has seen a 25-point lead evaporate since last fall, the backpedaling is in especially high gear. "We're going to lose," one normally upbeat staffer e-mailed from San Francisco. "How's that for managing expectations?"
Meanwhile, Obama and his team are doing everything they can to wrestle the dial in the other direction. It's not often that campaigns don't crow about the good news: in this case the fact that Obama raked in a record-setting $32 million last month—compared with only $13.5 million for Hillary, according to McAuliffe. In a memo to reporters, Obama campaign manager David Plouffe tried to steer attention away from his candidate's surge in the polls, his huge crowds and the effects of the Kennedy family's blitzkrieg on Obama's behalf—preferring instead to predict defeat. "We fully expect Senator Clinton to earn more delegates on Feb. 5 and also to win more states," Plouffe wrote. "If we were to be within 100 delegates on that day and win a number of states, we will have met our threshold for success and will be best positioned to win the nomination in the coming months." Campaigning in New Jersey Monday, Obama shrewdly compared himself to the upset Super Bowl champion New York Giants. "Sometimes the underdog pulls it out," he told the crowd. "You can't always believe the pundits and prognosticators."
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »



Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: falconer2 @ 02/14/2008 11:20:32 AM
Comment: When asked in the book Saddam???s Revenge ??? ???How can we have peace in the world????
Grandfather responded??? ???Leave behind you the baggage of yesterday and the fears for tomorrow. Strive for peace within you today and it will come to you, and as everyone joins you ??? to the world.???
Posted By: falconer2 @ 02/14/2008 7:22:34 AM
Comment: How is it that no one seems to be addressing the fact that Obama as president is a liability to this country.
It's not a point of "loving him", "Believeing in his vision of hope", "being the first Black president"... or "hating him" etc.
Rather he was a practicing Muslim as a child, and now claiming to be christian. This in itself, by Islamic law, condemns him to death. We in America, and most likely Muslims here and everywhere would not approve of this "law". It is in fact archaic. However we all know that radical Islamic Fundamentalists will grab hold of anything they can to attack the US.
How can Obama expect to be able to negotiate with Islamic Leaders who must return to their countries and face these radicals. Consider that they "by law" are not even allowed to speak to him. Rather they should be attacking him and condemning him as well.
So if you like him or hate him isn't the point... He IS a liability He IS condemned by Islamic Law. The only solution is that he return to islam, or is it that he admit to being Muslim. This brings up another question... is he a liability or is he lying and intends to come out of the Islamic closet... AFTER the election.
Either way do you want him as president under these conditions...
Posted By: Johnny1967 @ 02/13/2008 5:58:19 PM
Comment: A Obama/Hillary ticket makes much more sense than Hillary/Obama ticket. Hillary has obligations to too many lobbyist, corporations and countries. If Obama is VP, he would have to support the Clinton machine and Clintons rich backers. On the other hand, if Hillary is VP she would be relieved from supporting her rich supporters. Philosophically the two are champions to the lower to middle income people. Therefore, they can get more done if Hillary is the VP rather than vice versa.