A Gene That Helps the Abused | Newsweek Health

The Resiliency Gene

Newsweek Web Exclusive

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

SPONSORED BY

Ressler and other researchers now face the daunting task of figuring out how those genes are interacting with the newly identified one. They don't know yet what the functional difference is between the different forms of the gene, or how the actual receptors vary in children with those forms. Furthermore, they don't know how many dozens of other genes may be involved in similar processes in the brain. "Maybe at the end of the day there will be a list of 10, 20 or 30 such genes," says Insel. "I think that's not too far off in the future." Scientists will also have to look closely at families to figure out if the genes are part of the reason for the cycle of abuse—if kids who don't get the "resilient" forms of the gene are more likely to become abusers themselves. Finally, they'll want to start looking at compounds that target the CRH1 receptor, which could eventually be used as drugs. No antidepressants currently on the market affect the receptor. Drug companies, consider this your opening.

« Prev Page

I will not deny that those that are abused, oppressed, mistreated in any way either by one person or a whole system of people may have some negative emotions. Most do have some most negative feelings, and sometimes possibly even devastating lifelong reactions to and consequences from these memories. They are all "bruised" and or being "exploited" to some extent when we are talking about people that have been victimized, adult or child. However, I think social skills and social roles play a big part in all of this. In training, upbringing, and personalities more so then anything. What we are looking at perhaps as abuse is perhaps more of a perception in some instances?

I don't want to excuse any actual violence or abuse, that is not my intention. Accidents do happen to the best of people. While rough and tumble can sometimes be termed abuse, which it really may not be according to who is looking at it and how. While in other situations rough and tumble is not thought of as abuse, take for instance kids sports and other activities, and also the resulting injuries that are possible. Yet, we do not call these sports injuries abusive for the most part. Certainly welting a child or beating it to death or sexual exploitation is.

As rules of how to live in a society change, perceptions often change. Some of these changes may not always be for the best, they may at times simply take away the ability to teach behavioral coping or adjusting mechanisms? Therefore, the range of perceptions about what abuse is may be so broad now that it causes some necessary life skills to change and some of the things that have made humans buoyant and flexible over time in order to adapt to life events may be getting lost in the shuffle.

Even people that do have what looks like an easy life, who have never been abused, can have wildly different resiliency levels. Take for instance two stock brokers that have had everything in life, in the depression both with the same factors one of them then jumped and the other went back to start all over and succeed, right? That is resiliency right, but I don't ever think it will be known exactly why? Sure different life events impact people in different ways and teach them different things about how to cope with life.

Member Comments

- Reply
- Report Abuse
Posted By: Toteblume @ 05/14/2008 11:02:39 PM

i am a whore.
- Reply
- Report Abuse
Posted By: Toteblume @ 05/14/2008 11:02:22 PM

you are such a cry baby. everything that has ever happened to you has been your fault. take responsibility for it. whore.
- Reply
- Report Abuse
Posted By: news_editor @ 02/11/2008 2:53:54 PM

I will not deny that those that are abused, oppressed, mistreated in any way either by one person or a whole system of people may have some negative emotions. Most do have some most negative feelings, and sometimes possibly even devastating lifelong reactions to and consequences from these memories. They are all "bruised" and or being "exploited" to some extent when we are talking about people that have been victimized, adult or child. However, I think social skills and social roles play a big part in all of this. In training, upbringing, and personalities more so then anything. What we are looking at perhaps as abuse is perhaps more of a perception in some instances?

I don't want to excuse any actual violence or abuse, that is not my intention. Accidents do happen to the best of people. While rough and tumble can sometimes be termed abuse, which it really may not be according to who is looking at it and how. While in other situations rough and tumble is not thought of as abuse, take for instance kids sports and other activities, and also the resulting injuries that are possible. Yet, we do not call these sports injuries abusive for the most part. Certainly welting a child or beating it to death or sexual exploitation is.

As rules of how to live in a society change, perceptions often change. Some of these changes may not always be for the best, they may at times simply take away the ability to teach behavioral coping or adjusting mechanisms? Therefore, the range of perceptions about what abuse is may be so broad now that it causes some necessary life skills to change and some of the things that have made humans buoyant and flexible over time in order to adapt to life events may be getting lost in the shuffle.

Even people that do have what looks like an easy life, who have never been abused, can have wildly different resiliency levels. Take for instance two stock brokers that have had everything in life, in the depression both with the same factors one of them then jumped and the other went back to start all over and succeed, right? That is resiliency right, but I don't ever think it will be known exactly why? Sure different life events impact people in different ways and teach them different things about how to cope with life.