A Democratic Muddle

I???m an American of Mexican decent who lives in California. I find the ignorant comments made on Fox, ABC, and CNN news about why the majority of us chose to support Hillary to be pathetic! Do these bimbos really think that we are passionate about illegal immigrants getting drivers licenses? PLEASE, are they for real? They really are exposing their ignorance on why Hillary has gained so much support from Latinos. For the record, Latinos in California are quite cable of voting for candidates who we believe to be the most qualified, competent, and experienced. Regardless of their skin color or gender. Hillary Clinton has a plan for "change," and doesn't just offer a bunch of rhetoric! It???s evident that she is extremely knowledgeable on issues facing our nation, and is prepared with a plan to resolve them. She also articulates her plan extremely well to the public by devoting a time to questions and answers during rallies, unlike Obama. Why doesn't he anyway? If he were as confident and prepared to lead as he emulates, shouldn???t he be as eager to communicate solutions to vital issues facing our nation. A majority of us not only want to know a candidates plan on solving important issues, we require it before we will vote for them. Otherwise it all sounds like the same familiar rhetoric made by former politicians who make promises, but can???t or won???t deliver. Wake up and smell the ballot box!

The media stinks!!! They seem to be putting Obama ahead of Clinton and that is not true. She won more delegates than he did. Perhaps not a large amount but, just the same she has more!!
Media people, get your facts straight.

Confusing to me that anyone can listen to Hillary Clinton speak and not be able to imagine our country with her as our President. She's devoted her life to the cause of democracy and has certainly earned the points to be our leader. She's faced an uphill battle as a woman in politics and look how far she has come against all odds. She's overcome severe personal hardships but has surfaced as a woman who can deal with the difficulties of family and a political career. It isn't just time for a woman to be president, it's time for Hillary Clinton to be President.

Hillary loses to McCain !!! The experience argument goes away. Their votes on the war are nearly identical. McCain gets the independents. The surge in youth and African American vote disappears. Voter apathy will return with two of the oldest candidates ever running.

Why does hillary stay married to a sexual predator ?

obama has never done anything for white people nor has he ever supported poor white people - most blacks are voting for him becasue he is black - i suggest most whites vote clinton because she is white - if whites vote htis way its racism but we're silnet when blacks do it because they'll cry and burn things to the ground - VOTE WHITE VOTE RIGHT _n VOTE CLINTON

Take a look at the states Hillary won and take a look where McCain won.Take a look at the catholic vote take a look at several other factors. It looks like Obama is the candidate of yuppies. old political insiders'kennedy&kerry' and blacks but certinally not someone that can beat the maverick especially if he teams up with 'I like HUCKABEE'.
America has already rejected the too liberal kennedy kery brand. This teflon remake of a too old too liberal package wont cut the mustard let alone stand up to the republican attack dogs, which probally make Bills critisism look like childsplay.

THE LATINO'S HAVE SHOWN THER VOTING STRENGTH. OBAMA HAS been able to penetrate every part of the electorate except for the LATINO sector. THE REASON LATINO's are coming out in record numbers for HILLARY is because of her HEALTH CARE initiative.
WHEN SHE SAYS UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE THAT IS LIKE HITTING THE "BULL EYE" WITH the LATINO COMMUNITY. THIS ONE ISSUE HAS prevented OBAMA from making in roads within the LATIN COMMUNITY. EVERY LATINO FAMILY IS UNITED ON THIS ISSUE.
OBAMA CLEARLY DRAWS THE LINE AND STOps SHORT OF OFFERING UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE.
THE LATINO's ARE LOYAL TO HILLARY AND ARE THE X FACTOR IN THIS NOMINATION ie. TEXAS and in the presedential election in NOVEMBER. IF NOT FOR THE LATINO VOTE, OBAMA WOULD HAVE WON HANDS DOWN IN NEVADA AND CALIFORNIA and would have picked up more delegates in NEW YORK.
THE LATINO COMMUNITY CAME OUT FOR HILLARY THREE TO ONE. INCREDIBLE VOTING power.
THEY HAVE COMpletely nulified the "white man" vote as well as the black vote.

THERE IS NO DOUBT HILLARY OWES HER VICTORY TO THE LATINO ELECTORATE. OBAMA CAUGHT Up to HILLARY within every other group. WHITE MEN/WOMEN, AFRICAN AMERICAN, OLD AND YOUNG.
OBAMA CANNOT COUNTER UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE AMONG LUNCH BOX MIDDLE CLASS WORKERS AND LATINO VOTERS.

Check this out. HIllary is 13 points up from Obama in today's Gallup polls. But, that's not news of course: http://www.gallup.com/poll/104200/Gallup-Daily-Tracking-Election-2008.aspx

Obama is like Paris Hilton, an empty media created vacuum. I wonder if his supporters do know that he does not write his own speeches, but a white guy writes them? I wonder how African-Americans would feel about that.

About the youth vote: Hillary won youth vote in Cal and Mass, where is the highest saturation of smart youth vote (think Harvard, MIT, BU, Brandeis in Mass, Stanford, CALTech, UCLA, Berkeley). Those are so called brainy youths. So, Obama basically wins the dumb youths of this coutry who want to feel progressive and cool, but can't do your basic fact check research.

NEVER IN THE HISTORY OF EITHER party has a nominee lost both CALIFORNIA AND NEW YORK AND GONE ON TO WIN THE NOMINATION, despite proportional representation by district. OBAMA DOES NOT HAVE A CHANCE BECAUSE OF THE LATINO VOTE. IN ORDER FOR HIM TO WIN THE NOMINATION HE HAS TO WIN TEXAS. IT DOES NOT LOOK GOOD.
ALSO MICHIGAN AND FLORIDA HAVE put a monkey rench in the whole democratic nomination process. THIS rench could cause riots in the future. REMEMBER NINETY SIXTY EIGHT IN CHICAGO. I WASN"T BORN BUT SAW THE FOOTAGE.

Hillary is my first choice, but I also thought if Obama was to get the nominee I'd be fine with it too...that is until I heard his speech last night. Yes it was inspiring, but in my opinion he came across as arrogant and the speech was way too long and repetitive. It was as if he was on a pulpit and preaching and this is not how I want the next President of the US to represent this country.

Voting or not voting for someone based on a speech is a pretty bad idea. Don't you think it would be the issues that are important, would you rather have another Busch candidate as our president. I really don't care how our president sounds as long as he is getting done what needs to be done. The results will speak for themselves.