The Truth Will Out

Bush officials finally come clean about waterboarding.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: vpucsekberman @ 03/06/2008 6:01:17 PM

    From what I've read waterboarding does not produce credible evidence and is considered by most countries to be a form of torture. The folks at CSIS aren't exactly James Bonds but at least they recognize that any "intelligence" from torture is suspect. Neither Canada or the US have agents who can infiltrate these groups to get any real info. The last guy working for the US who had such skills was fired for being gay. You don't torture or sit at desk to learn what terrorists are planning.

  • Posted By: yardmama @ 03/06/2008 7:34:52 AM

    The iraq war started from the Reagan administration, research the Iran-Contra situation. it's so simple but i would say 90% of americans refused to open their eyes to the facts.
    1.Ronald Reagan admins. sold weapons to iran and gave the procedes to the Contras that's a fact.
    2.The CIA smuggle drugs to america from the Contras to California.
    3.Bush 41 sent Rumsfeld to meet Saddam while supplying and train the taliban with weapons (trained by the CIA ) and started a new drug trade with them out of afghanistan.
    4. There was a falling out with Bin Laden and they (Bin Laden) tried to assassinate Bush 41 over their money dealings.
    5 The now prez Bush's gunning for payback, the 9/11 people were already caught months after the attack.
    read this book POWDERBURNS and research the IRAN-CONTRA PROBE.

    The Bush administration should be charge with crimes against humanity, this is for people with an open and unbias mind. world peace

  • Posted By: sjbrock80 @ 02/07/2008 3:02:39 PM

    Everything is considered to be "torture" and "cruel and unusual" by somebody, somewhere.

    Eventually, it will get to the point where calling the enemy names is "cruel and unusual" and punishable by prison time.

    Maybe we should start tickling captured terrorists or making them run with scissors until they snap. Waterboarding is not torture. It is an interrogation technique that may be a bit uncomfortable, just like waiting in a police interrogation room for a couple of hours without being granted a potty break.

    We've become way too liberal and sympathetic in the US to making anyone feel the slightest bit of discomfort. This notion of making everyone happy and comfortable all the time is absurd.

    • Posted By: tc125231 @ 02/09/2008 5:03:55 PM

      Did you ever study the Constitution? Did you have the slightest clue what they meant by "cruel and unusual punishment"?

      Do you claim to be a Christian? Where in his teachings do you derive these novels insights from?

      Or are you just scared, poor baby?

      • Posted By: yardmama @ 03/06/2008 6:54:26 AM

        have you ever tried waterboarding? or tortured anyone?

  • Posted By: bbednarz @ 02/22/2008 7:08:41 PM

    ..Isn't It Interesting "We Don't Torture" - Question Is Whom Is He Talking About - Him Personally ? ? ?
    .
    ..His Trusted Attorney General Gonzales Is Now Gone Along With His MEMOs On Torture.
    ....GEE, I "Really" Don't Remember - RAY-GUN was the first to claim that, Gonzo Also Claimed The To The CONGRESS Of The UNITED STATES.
    ..Bush says the matter is closed to discussion - move-on - old-news NEXT QUESTION
    ..McCain Says matter of ethics is closed - move-on old-news NEXT QUESTION

  • Posted By: windber84 @ 02/07/2008 12:59:40 PM

    I'd like to see a large number of americans go to another country and live for a while, then we'd see how much they complain about how terrible it is to live in the US. You don't know what you have until you see it through the eyes of those who don't have it. I recommend you visit another country for a while, and then decide where you'd prefer to live.

    Sgt. Jones, USMC - Washington, DC

    • Posted By: tc125231 @ 02/09/2008 5:07:52 PM

      I adnire your military service, but I have to ask you why you think it is better to live here? Do you think it might have something to do with the fact that our parents and grandparents fought WWII and the Cold War without assuming the nehavior patterns of the enemy?

      And on that basis, do you think --maybe, just maybe --people have a right to be concerned when our government appears to adopt the same moral low ground as our enemies?

      Maybe you don't think so. Maybe you think anyone with a strong army has a nice country to live in.

      It's not true. Read some history.

  • Posted By: kdkapoor @ 02/07/2008 6:11:29 PM

    What the U S is dealing with is not the conventional soldiers in uniform who deserve the protection of the Geneva Convention. We are dealing with terrorists who would laugh at the Geneva or other conventions. They would kidnap and kill without a second thought. We have wasted a lot of money and sleep over semantics. Time and again these bad guys have proved to us and the rest of the world that they live and die by their own rules. We should just as easily kill them without a second thought.

    • Posted By: tc125231 @ 02/09/2008 5:01:11 PM

      Are these the teachings of your religion? Or did you think up this moral non-code all by yourself?

  • Posted By: vclayson@msn.com @ 02/07/2008 8:26:59 PM

    I thought this childish plaint about waterboarding being torture was over but here it is again and it comes with the comment that the truth is now out, some Newsweek gloating so to speak. It isn't exactly the same as medieval torture racks or even filmed Muslim beheadings, it's more like that infernal water device dentists use to cool their drill while grinding your teeth, a little bit of the water that escapes the suction device gives you the feeling you are about to drown. We should stop waterboarding, a more devious torture would be to force prisoners to listen to Hillary Clinton and that terrible flinty voice rising to a crescendo every few minutes,. Now, that would be cruel but we have to hear it around the clock, why not those SOBs.

    • Posted By: tc125231 @ 02/09/2008 4:59:29 PM

      Obviously spoken by someone who has no idea what they are talking about.

      Wrong about everything?

      Must be a conservative Republican.

  • Posted By: Samlee @ 02/07/2008 11:47:53 PM

    Let us also remember what the terrorists that people are so upset about being mistreated have done to innocent Americans and others around the world forever adding fear to daily life and a real and unknown threat of further murderous actions.

    • Posted By: tc125231 @ 02/09/2008 4:57:40 PM

      Yeah, let's tell our makers at the time of judgement that we did terrible things because there were BAD people, and we were SCARED....

      I am just sure that will go over well....

  • Posted By: tc125231 @ 02/09/2008 4:56:05 PM

    Quote from a much better slack article on this mess:

    "Charting that progression is almost not worth doing anymore, so familiar are the various feints and steps. First, the administration breaks the law in secret. Then it denies breaking the law. Then it admits to the conduct but asserts that settled law is not in fact settled anymore because some lawyer was willing to unsettle it. Then the administration insists that the basis for unsettling the law is secret but that there are now two equally valid sides to the question. And then the administration gets Congress to rewrite the old law by insisting it prevents the president from thwarting terror attacks and warning that terrorists will strike tomorrow unless Congress ratifies the new law. Then it immunizes the law breakers from prosecution."

    http://www.slate.com/id/2182348

  • Posted By: jncc1701 @ 02/08/2008 1:15:43 PM

    are we serious that a bunch of cave dwellers will cause us to change our legal traditions? and constitution - we are giving them way too much credit and shows a true surrender of our secular values.

  • Posted By: GIJoe1234 @ 02/07/2008 11:40:32 AM

    Moral high ground? Say anything? where are you people from? I have spent the last years of my life chasing these people with at least 4 somewhere else. The beleive it is perfetly acceptable to kill you, your family, and anyone else who may be near as long as they get you. They will kill you solely because you beleive in a god which is differnet than theirs. The difference can be as slight as eye or hair color, they don't care. As long as your god is different in any way shape or form than theirs you are an Infidel and killing you is acceptable in the eyes of their god. They believe driving a truck full of explosives into an elementary school is justified if even one person in that school is an infidel. The others are only matyrs to the cause. You obviously do not comprehend the fanaticism of these people. Given the opportunity they will kill your child openly on the street for reason such they are Shia you are Sunni. Imagine if the Amercian people condoned the open killing of baptist by catholics. This terror is coming it is only a matter of time. Then you will begging the US government to do anything, anything at all to stop it before your family is killed in a car bomb outside of Walmart.
    Waterboard them, electricute them, what ever I dont care they are a plague on the whole world. Spain, Britian, Pakistan, Phillipines, Thailand, all are suffering these attacks. Why are there none on US soil?
    I have seen their work with my own eyes and the devastation it causes, I pray my son will never have to live the way they do.
    And yes I went to SERE too, so what? The Hague and even the Geneva Conventions were written in a world where they beleived in you could fight a war and still play like gentlemen. And the earth is flat.
    On soldiers opinion, not that the US congress gives two sh**s about the soldiers, just steroids and halloween costumes.
    I would line up B52s wing tip to wing tip if that what it would take to eradicate this disease from the earth

    • Posted By: skrekk @ 02/07/2008 2:10:03 PM

      GIJoe1234, if in fact you went through SERE training as you claim, I would respectfully suggest that you failed to comprehend the nature of that training, and why it was being done. You also clearly failed your class in the military code of conduct.

  • Posted By: Shrinedog @ 02/07/2008 3:41:53 PM

    My Question is....What do you think the CIA should do if they suspect there is a plot to smuggle a nuclear weapon into NYC and they suspect someone in custody has information that might help? Maybe we should ask nicely? Appeal to their sense of reason? Seriously, if you have a better idea let's hear it.

    Let's be honest here. We're not talking about lead pipes to the knee caps or power drills to the head. No one was killed. No one was permanently injured. If there is even a CHANCE this could save the lives of American servicemen or American citizens, I say dunk'em. One man's right not to be tortured does not outweight many people's right to live.

    And for all you people who like to feel morally superior by saying things like "It's the pricipal of the thing and what does this say about our country, etc..." I say principles are all well and good until you start pulling the bodies of women and children out of buildings that were deliberatly attacked to cause.......the deaths of women and children.

    We are fighting people who purposely attack our civilians because they know that will hurt us the most, and they hide behind their civilians because they know we will do everything in our power not to harm them. If you can't figure out who the good guys are and who the bad guys are in that situation you need serious help.

    As long as there is war there will be torture. There is the world we would like to see and the world that is. Living in denile of that fact will get you killed.

    • Posted By: Sahran @ 02/08/2008 7:57:09 AM

      What is disturbing about your argument is that it's been used before by some bad peaple to justify torture: Its been used by the Nazis to get information about resistance fighters. Its been used by the French to justify torture of anticolonialist fighters and its been used by many unsavory dictators to suppress their opponents all in the name of protecting innocent lives.

    • Posted By: sjbrock80 @ 02/07/2008 4:15:14 PM

      Amen to that. Well stated post.

  • Posted By: pwilso24 @ 02/07/2008 2:26:27 PM

    Why is everyone so upset about waterboarding ?

    Rarely-used it worked against stubborn 9/11 conspirators Abu Zubaydah and Khalid Sheik Mohammed. Their revelations helped capture at least 10 hardened terrorists ??? including the architects of the deadly U.S.S. Cole and Bali nightclub bombings ??? who collectively had murdered 3,216 and wounded 8,795.

    In Dec.2007 CNN's Anderson Cooper interviewed an ex-Navy Seal Larsen about waterboarding. Says it was a terrible thing truely torture.
    Strange though... this guy has volunteered TWICE to be waterboarded !

    In 2006, he agreed to be videotaped and on UTUBE you can watch him endure 24 MINUTES yes 24 MINUTES of waterboarding ! But get this... it was the Producer of the video who finally said enough is enough and stopped it... not Larsen...

    Anyways... I know our guys are tough but 24 minutes ? Abu Z. apparently cracked after 35 SECONDS and the famous KSM (AQ #3) lasted a brutal 90 SECONDS. Where does Bin Laden find these WIMPS ?

    • Posted By: sjbrock80 @ 02/07/2008 3:05:04 PM

      Even though I agree 100% with your post, being waterboarded willingly wouldn't be nearly as scary as being made to do it.

      If you do it willingly, you know they will stop at your earliest request and would take away the effect.

      • Posted By: Sahran @ 02/08/2008 7:45:54 AM

        The next time you are waterboaded by your friendly CIA intelligence expert, remember this: He is not allowed to drown you, so don't panick, have a good drink and remenber, it's just soft torture and he doesnt mean no (permanent) harm.

  • Posted By: Sahran @ 02/08/2008 5:46:33 AM

    Cozying up to countries where torture is a common practice is just as bad as doing it. The U.S considers Egypt, Saudi Arabia and most gulf states as allies and tacitly accept their practice of torture even against legitimate political opponents.

  • Posted By: windber84 @ 02/07/2008 11:44:09 AM

    Look, what everyone needs to understand is that this is happening all over the world. It's not like the US is the only country on the face of the earth using this and many other techniques that can be considered torture. This is much like the debate over the hundreds of treaties so many countries have signed limiting types of weapons, the number of weapons, whom you can sell/buy weapons from/to, so on and so forth. Of course, other treaties focus on other things, but these are the most easily understood. Most well known, and relevant to this situation, is the Geneva Convention which contained restrictions on how to treat enemy prisoners.

    The big problem with these treaties is... the countries that should be signing them aren't! The US has signed treaties saying we won't torture enemies of war, but what do you think happened to our POWs in Iraq? Do you think the females captured were treated with respect? No. They were sexually abused. No one in Iraq signed this treaty, which means they can still do whatever they want to our captured military.

    Of course in the US, being a more civilized country we respect individual's rights and honor them to the best of our abilities. But what do you do when someone you know was shot down and you see his battered, and obviously tortured, face on the television saying he hates his country and military because they are murderers? Would you not be willing to pour water down another man's throat so he'll tell you where your relative/friend/fellow citizen is being held?

    All in all, there are certain levels of force needed. Now, to distinguish between those levels is nearly impossible. It is a huge gray area that will never be resolved. The most we can do is trust that the levels only increase as deemed necessary. Regardless of how these people are treated, they are enemies trying to harm our way of life, and they are criminals trying to, essentially, take away the rights of innocent people.

    Sgt. Jones, USMC - Washington, DC

    • Posted By: Chaotician @ 02/07/2008 10:28:51 PM

      It is ridiculs and besides the point to claim everyone is doing it, so that makes it "legal" for us to do it. That didn't work for your Mom and it cuts no credit with me either. The fact that it has been declared to be worse than useless means it is being done for sadistic reasons only!

  • Posted By: Chaotician @ 02/07/2008 10:22:40 PM

    Waterboarding has been illegal under American and International law, it is illegal now, and it will continue to be illegal in the future. Gerge and his minions have broken the law and this is only 1 of 6 reported illegal and immoral actions by this criminal regime. All officals including current ones which aid and abet the perpatrators of these crimes are guilty and need to be prosecuted to the full extent of the law...which in this case demands impeachment to prevent the illegals from hiding behind their offices!

  • Posted By: belljp@rcn.com @ 02/07/2008 8:29:51 PM

    Dear Mr. Isikoff and Mr.Hosenball : please keep on carrying this torch towards freedom :What is torture for on e is not neccessarily toture for another ? and my worst kind of torture is watching "lil bush "in action ,knowing full well that Poppy is behind him threatening any and everyone that tries to interfere with his full 8 years ,The bush family history is one of brutality while # 41 plays the "gentle role "of one who lets the guillotine slice your head ... If you wrote "FIASCO " i must commend you on that book ,my son sold me his copy for 20$ american money ,but that;s okay because i massacred the poor thing ,making notes ,etc, cutting out pages to make copies .. My only problem ,and that goes for all the books like Wayne Marsden "Jaded guilt "?is that NO ONE thinks that Barbara Bodine should have been interviewed by the 911 Commission >She should have been first with her experience going back to gulf war with # 41, serving thru USS Cole ,and knew bin Laden married a young Yemeni woman ,etc. etc ..Where is April Glaspie ,Wolfowitz 's arch enemy ..She pissed him off tremendously . and Bodine worked for her in Iraq , with Joe Wilson ... The John Hopkins University connection between ,Wolfie, Prince Bandar , April Glaspie ,Eliot Cohen , and some one named SAAD ,whose last name escapes now ,but i believe it started with A. LIBBY was a student of Wolfie in DC somewhere. ,Jerome Hauer , Bloomberg cannot be ruled out ,nor can Roland Betts , Texas Rangers and Chelsea Piers where Jamie Gorelick is now on that board ... (above youhave (related ,Mukasey,Hayden ,Al-Qaeda <> he is innocent compared to those other two GOONs Zales ... I could go on but this type of activity wears me out ,at 73 and a Navy veteran 1952-1956 I cannot say ,oohhh say do you see by the Dawns early lite ,our bombs bursting from planes killing women and children out of hatred and greed for oil ... joseph p. bell belljp@rcn.com

  • Posted By: Jack Ramsey @ 02/07/2008 7:11:37 PM

    To all would-be torturers: you are morons deluded by a fifth grade fallacy: aka, the ticking time bomb scenario. Sorry, 99.9% of our terrorist detainees have nothing to do w/any NYC II plot. Nor do they know a thing about one. But they'll happily concoct such scenarios, ripe with details for their interrogators when H20 is dripping in their lungs. And the info they give out will be bunk--worth nothing, according to our own intelligence officials. It will actually waste our time researching the crap they'll churn out. And for what? Your precious security? If you were actually concerned about security, you would bother to inspect global-goings-on with a more scupulous moral eye and cast your civic ballot accordingly, instead of sacrificing principles and ideals--the only thing, in the end, America is built on--for your petulant peace of mind. Why don't you go watch some Jack Bauer.

  • Posted By: pwilso24 @ 02/07/2008 2:20:13 PM

    Tuesday, Senate Democrats demanded a criminal investigation into waterboarding by government interrogators after the Bush administration acknowledged for the first time that the tactic was used on three terror suspects.

    Are they aware that the WPost has reported in the past that in
    2002 Nancy Pelosi and her Congressional Intel committee colleagues got a virtual CIA tour and approved of the techniques including waterboarding. Apparently no objections were raised. Instead, at least two lawmakers in the room asked the CIA to push harder !!

    What next ? Impeach House Speaker Grandma Pelosi ?

    Heck I suspect even Hillary wants to keep waterboarding as an option to keep ole Billy in line at the White House.

  • Posted By: pwilso24 @ 02/07/2008 2:10:52 PM

    Some one on a blog remarked today that we now know more media people and anti-war/anti-torture types subjected themselves to "waterboarding" than the CIA did to actual terrorists (apparently 3)

    I laughed out loud !

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse