Romney and Religion

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: AmericanPatriot @ 02/08/2008 10:01:42 PM

    just look very closely at the early years of mormonism, including the 'dictation' of the Book of Moron, and you'll see what a silly cult it is. Basically a good way for Joseph Smith to acquire a harem of 12-15 year old virgins to fornicate with. By the way, the Morons don't really want you to look closely at their early history, lest one see the obvious fraud. lets export them all to China.

    • Posted By: nyborn @ 02/09/2008 7:23:16 AM

      I'm sorry American Patriot but I would like some actual documentation of these facts that you claim to have. Joseph Smith was nothing besides a founder of the Mormon Faith. You'd be surprised who is LDS. Try Dale Murphy, the Osmonds, Marriot and others. Oh, just to make sure you are referencing the right religion, we are called MORMONS, but I guess you just forgot how to spell.

  • Posted By: spomonti @ 02/09/2008 1:33:12 AM

    I am LDS. However, I probably wasn't going to vote for Romney. I disagree with him on too many points. Even so, I had high hopes to see America give him a fair chance. America, you have dashed my hopes, and I am truly saddened

  • Posted By: GreatDane @ 02/08/2008 8:27:06 PM

    I have no problem with Mr. Romney's religion. I have a BIG problem with Mr. Romney's dishonesty about his religion, wanting to pass it off (or hoping it will be passed off) as just another version of basic Biblical Christianity. It is anything but. He can worship purple rocks for all I care, but he needs to then boldly say, 'Hey, folks. I worship purple rocks. Is that ok?" And I (an evangelical Christian) would say, "Shoot, of course that's ok. As long as you don't plan to put through a constitutional amendment saying I have to worship purple rocks." His personal dishonesty for political gain is what I never could get past.

    • Posted By: 66custom @ 02/09/2008 1:32:11 AM

      I have a BIG problem with Evangelical Christians being the arbiters of who can claim to be a Christian. Evangelical Christians have pedantically limited the meaning of Christianity. It is disingenuous to act as though the Christian world is so completely in agreement on anything. To Romney his brand of Christianity is "just another form of Biblical Christianity" since he believes in both Christ and the Bible. Why can't we just live and let live. McCain says it isn't amnesty. I say it is. We can agree to disagree on the semantics of the arguement. The same should apply here. Romney is a Christian, just not your kind of Christian. Let it go man!

  • Posted By: bigbrewhaha @ 02/09/2008 1:27:59 AM

    Romney lost for one reason and one reason alone it wasn't because mccain was more qualified it was because Americans are scared of Mormons.

  • Posted By: tmswain45 @ 02/07/2008 10:09:58 PM

    Lets see, most active Mormons live by their convictions. They also have better health than most. They have stronger family values than most. Best of All, Romney has no past to through in his face. He is a Honest upstanding business man, in a world of coruption. To me it doesn't matter the religion, it matters if you are true to live it. I hope Obama is really a christian. Or is he playing us for a fool. I would like him debated on his choice of attending a all black church. Good Luck to all of us. Also next time any disaster happens in the world, the mormons are there, where is the catholics, and others who call them christians, There only worried about getting paid to preach.

    • Posted By: n3naicc @ 02/08/2008 10:00:20 AM

      (tmswain45 said: Also next time any disaster happens in the world, the mormons are there, where is the catholics, and others who call them christians, There only worried about getting paid to preach)

      Your statement is not true. The Catholic Church and many other Christian Churches have given millions of dollars in aid to hurricane victims , etc. Check the facts before making such a statement. If you want to see the figures go to: http://www.ministrywatch.com/

      • Posted By: PMcAllister @ 02/08/2008 11:40:57 PM

        n3naicc-What a blessing it is that so many people in our country, regardless of their religion, are so charitable and generous with their means to help people they probably will never meet. It reminds me of the often quoted line that has been attributed to Alexis de Tocqueville and his book "Democracy in America":

        "I sought for the greatness and genius of America in her commodious harbors and her ample rivers - and it was not there . . . in her fertile fields and boundless forests and it was not there . . . in her rich mines and her vast world commerce - and it was not there . . . in her democratic Congress and her matchless Constitution - and it was not there. Not until I went into the churches of America and heard her pulpits flame with righteousness did I understand the secret of her genius and power. America is great because she is good, and if America ever ceases to be good, she will cease to be great."

        It will take a concerted and unified effort by members of all of America's religions to make sure that America's greatness endures.


    • Posted By: magic823 @ 02/08/2008 10:08:40 AM

      Yes, let's look at how the mormons do charity. In England, where charities and churches have to report their finances, it looks like the mormon church accepted donations for the tsunami and then kept them.

      • Posted By: guitarplayer @ 02/08/2008 10:15:27 AM

        Nonsense. Nothing more than unfounded rhetoric based on folklore amongst the ignorant. Prove up!!

        • Posted By: magic823 @ 02/08/2008 10:31:22 AM

          I got them from the financial statements themselves (see links). Please keep in mind the tsunami in question hit in December 2004. So, the donations would have most likely occured in both December 2004 and throughout 2005.

          Here they are:
          * 2004: http://www.charity-commission.gov.uk/registeredcharities/ScannedAccounts%5CEnds51%5C0000242451_AC_20041231_E_C.pdf
          On page 15 of 26, Humanitarian Aid is discussed:
          - 2004 Restricted Income on the Humanitarian Aid = 252,000 U.K. pounds
          - 2004 Direct Charitable Expenditure for Humanitarian Aid = 51,000 U.K. pounds

          * 2005: http://www.charity-commission.gov.uk/registeredcharities/ScannedAccounts%5CEnds51%5C0000242451_ac_20051231_e_c.pdf
          On page 14 of 26, Humanitarian Aid is discussed:
          - 2005 Restricted Income on the Humanitarian Aid = 509,000 U.K. pounds
          - 2005 Direct Charitable Expenditure for Humanitarian Aid = 34,000 U.K. pounds

          Based on these figures:
          In 2004, the Mormon church would have donated 20.23% towards Humanitarian Aid from the total income they received for Humanitarian Aid in the U.K.

          In 2005, the Mormon church would have donated 6.67% towards Humanitarian Aid from the total income they received for Humanitarian Aid in the U.K. On page 17 of 26, the report states: "HUMANITARIAN AID FUND. These funds are donated by the members to help fund the programme of Humanitarian Aid approved by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The amount expended in 2005 was in respect of projects in the United Kingdom and Ireland."

          Assuming this is true, NO monies went to the tsunami victims., the Mormon church only donated a fraction of the income they generated from Humanitarian Aid (in the U.K.) to Humanitarian Aid...and ALL of the Humanitarian Aid went to people in the U.K. and Ireland. Where is the accounting for ANY funds donated to the tsunami victims?

          • Posted By: djs444 @ 02/08/2008 11:11:51 AM

            Magic823: If you're going to making accusations or even loaded insinuations about the charitableness of the LDS Church, you should do your homework more thoroughly. As a registered religious organization, the LDS Church is tax-exempt in most, if not all, of the countries it operates in, including Great Britain. That tax-exempt status requires it to organize and conduct its affairs very carefully in each of those countries. As a result, the LDS Church has strict rules of operation and accounting practices that require it to keep most of the funds that it receives in that country. I don't know the exact numbers, but I do know that the LDS Church donated millions of dollars worth of humanitarian aid, mostly goods, directly to the Tsunami Victims, and tens of millions indirectly through the Red Cross. The vast majority of these funds would have come through the donations of its members in the U.S. Closer to home, the LDS Church was far and away the fastest, most active and most generous religious organization to mobilize and provide actual, tangible and financial assistance to victims of Hurricane Katrina, and there are dozens of news reports and thousands of victims' testimonies to prove it. I recall reading one quote from a victim who lost everything who said something to the effect of "No one else came or else they've already left, except the Mormons." Finally, the LDS Church provides hundreds of millions of dollars in money, goods and services, again sometimes directly and other times indirectly through the Red Cross, its preferred charitable donee. Most of those funds are spent in Africa, with one of the higher-profile programs being country-wide measles vaccinations that are having a huge impact in eradicating that disease over there.

            As you can probably tell, I'm LDS. I am not polemic, I respect others' religious views (which is, by the way, a fundamental tenet of LDS beliefs -- see the 11th Article of Faith) and like everyone else I have problems that I need to work out. However, I couldn't be more proud of my church, its members and leaders. This pride comes not just from our commitment to humanitarian causes, but our exemplary record in that regard plays a large part in why I feel as proud as I do. I hope that you can say the same about an organization -- religious or otherwise -- to which you give as much of your time, talents, energy and money as I and my family give to the LDS Church.

            • Posted By: magic823 @ 02/08/2008 12:10:04 PM

              Look at the accounting. Oh, you can't because the morg church doesn't publish it (like they have to in England where they have got caught for cheating).

              • Posted By: PMcAllister @ 02/08/2008 2:03:58 PM

                Magic823-
                How do you figure "they have got caught for cheating" in the UK? Where does it say in your data that the "Humanitarian Aid" donations collected were intended for Hurricane Katrina?

                As a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, who makes charitable donations to the church, I am aware that unless I specify a particular emergency fund that has been set up for a particular contemporary humanitarian crisis, that the donations I make on a regular basis are used in my local ward and stake (same as parish or diocese) to address humanitarian welfare needs among my neighbors first. If that money is not needed by those where I live, it is transferred to church headquarters where it is redistributed to other parts of the world where there are greater needs and inability or decreased ability by local members to make donations. For a worldwide church, only unfounded accusations can be made from your statistics, which only show charitable income and expenditure for a part of the world that has the most valuable currency in the world and a strong economy.

                If you could see the same statistics for third-world countries like those in Central America and Africa, you would see a counterbalance. The members in those countries are able to give very little, and they receive a great deal of humanitarian aid. That is the nature of Christianity. Members of the LDS church are taught that regardless of whether we are rich or poor, all that we have comes from God and we are all dependent on Him. That doctrine is found in the Book of Mormon (see below) as well as in the Bible.

                "16 And also, ye yourselves will succor those that stand in need of your succor; ye will administer of your substance unto him that standeth in need; and ye will not suffer that the beggar putteth up his petition to you in vain, and turn him out to perish.
                17 Perhaps thou shalt say: The man has brought upon himself his misery; therefore I will stay my hand, and will not give unto him of my food, nor impart unto him of my substance that he may not suffer, for his punishments are just???
                18 But I say unto you, O man, whosoever doeth this the same hath great cause to repent; and except he repenteth of that which he hath done he perisheth forever, and hath no interest in the kingdom of God.
                19 For behold, are we not all beggars? Do we not all depend upon the same Being, even God, for all the substance which we have, for both food and raiment, and for gold, and for silver, and for all the riches which we have of every kind?" (Mosiah 4:16-19)"

                • Posted By: magic823 @ 02/08/2008 6:40:30 PM

                  I put up the docs. Where is your proof? Where is the accounting from the US church? The morg church is a corporation masking as a religion.

                  Your church is shrinking due to the Internet. Coverts are fleeing. As people find out about the lies they are quitting. The only places you are growing are third world nations were access to the Internet is hard to get and even there you lose over 75% of your converts.

                  I was a morg for years, raised in it (BIC), Duty to God Award, 4 yr seminary, mission, married in the temple, and a Bishop. I was sicken my the lies I had been taught all my life. The mormon church was started by a pedophile that married and had sex with 14 year olds and other men's wifes. This is documented by people like Emma Smith (his wife) and Oliver Cowdry and by the church's own website (www.familyhistory.org)..

                  • Posted By: PMcAllister @ 02/08/2008 11:10:26 PM

                    magic823-Sincerely my heart goes out to you for the pain that you have in your heart. It is clear from the venom that drips from your indictment of the LDS Church that you may have left the church, but you can't leave the church alone. The truly sad thing is that you will find no solace in your efforts. Peace is contrary to the nature of anger and hate and will not be found in revenge.

                    I have no desire to argue with you, nor do I feel the need to do so. You forget that by being the one who has made the claims that "the mormon church accepted donations for the tsunami and then kept them." and that the Mormon church has been "caught for cheating" in the UK, that the burden of proof is on you, not on me.

                    Unfortunately, the "docs" you put up, are roughly equal to one of hundreds of footnotes to a single line of an income statement. You can't reasonably make assumptions about cheating without having the whole income statement in front of you. When you have evidence like that, and can illustrate that on a global scale, the revenues and expenditures of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints don't add up, then you will have a case. Until then, you are just trolling websites, looking for opportunities to spew angry rhetoric with a sparse smattering of patchwork "facts" that can be manipulated to suit your appetite for anti-Mormon polemic.

    • Posted By: Hermana @ 02/08/2008 9:56:31 AM

      Let's not fault Obama for attending an all black church. I grew up Catholic, in Chicago, and the church I attended is just a few blocks from the one he attends now. My Catholic church was also all black. Why? Because the neighborhood is all black. Chicago is an extremely segregated city, even today. In fact, the first integrated church I ever attended was when I was first investigating the LDS church. LDS wards and branches are integrated, but most Protestant and Catholic churches are not, especially in cities like Chicago. Isn't 11:00am on Sunday the most segregated hour in America? Sadly that true for almost all U.S. congregations, except for LDS and a few others.

  • Posted By: Dan Maloy @ 02/08/2008 10:39:45 PM

    My apologies to my good Southern friends. In my post below I wrote "To these kind of good people...". That should be "To these kind and good people....".

    Sorry for not proof-reading it closer.

  • Posted By: Dan Maloy @ 02/08/2008 10:30:37 PM

    Wow, absolutely amazing how incredibly, incredibly quick we are to condemn one another in American society today. How tragically sad. So many, many millions are so confused and lost they have no idea what "good" even is any more. I've lived in the southeast for 9 years: Louisiana (twice), Mississippi (twice), Alabama, and Georgia, and I've met some of the kindest, most down-to-earth, Christ-like people I've ever known. To these kind of good people, my comments are not meant. However, there are others in our midst who are so blinded by selfishness, evil and blatant stupidity they hardly have the know-how, spiritually speaking, to tie their shoes. Was Romney the absolute perfect candidate for the Presidency? No. But guess what? NO ONE WAS and NO ONE ever will be!

    We are so critical and so quick to judge that if someone makes a single mistake (or even a perceived mistake) our society immediately starts tying a hangman's noose. So Romney didn't include comments about athiests or agnostics in his speech in Houston. People!, it was a speech about faith! Not faith in gravity or Mickey Mouse but faith in God! Give me a break!...when you talk about faith in God to athiests and agnostics, they often TELL YOU they're offended (obviously moreso with the athiests) but when you DON'T include them in a religiously-based speech, they get offended?! Does that even come close to passing the common-sense test?

    When Romney finished his "Faith In America" speech I was aboslutely dumbfounded when self-appointed "political pundits" (a fancy term typically meaning "criticizing idiot") almost immediately started whining "He left us out! He's not a unifier! He hurt our feelings! Whaaaa!!!"

    So Romney used the term "Mormon" only once in his speech. Do you know why? He was trying to emphasize he shares a commonality with evangelicals as a Christian so he tried to assure listeners that he truly had a belief in Jesus Christ as his Savior. (something the hard-core evangelicals immediatley accused him of pandering over....)
    That is why he DIDN'T say "Mormon this" and "Mormon that". How well do you critics think that would have gone over if that's all he said?

    The Book of Mormon teaches that it is wrong to "make a man an offender for his words", meaning, it is morally wrong to purposely twist what someone has tried to say into something that you believe to be wrong. Now if someone has indeed spoken a lie or mistruth, then they have sinned. But for them to speak the truth as best they know, with no intent to offend or mislead, and for it to be purposely twisted into something that is obviously not what they meant, then we are guilty of dishonesty ourselves.

    Yes, I am a Mormon and I'm proud of it. I believe in Christ and I especially cherish the company of those who do as well, but blatant stupidity?....if you're swimming in it, no thanks.

  • Posted By: eddiewhere @ 02/08/2008 10:20:50 PM

    MITTS MISSION IS OVER. HE was the REINCARNATION OF BUSH but with NO comPasiion. HE WOULD HAVE LEFT MILLIONS WITHOUT HEALTH CARE and his immigration Plan scared half the AMERICAN PoPulation. I HAD A TOUGH TIME FIGURING OUT WHO WAS THE BIGGEST CLOWN ROMNEY OR RUDY. HAND DOWN RUDY. HOWEVER ROMNEY COMES IN A CLOSE SECOND. THIS GUY FLIP FLOPPED ON EVERY MAJOR ISSUE. HE IS A NUT. HE NEVER LIVED IN THE REAL WORLD. HE has no idea what many AMERICANS GO THROUGH. HIS AGENDA WAS TO FEED THE BUSH BACKER's GREED.

  • Posted By: eddiewhere @ 02/08/2008 10:20:29 PM

    I noticed you criticized Benson for supporting the JOHN BIRCH SOCIETY. BUT you never criticized him. Benson doctrine is what the MAJORITY of Mormons live by. I would like to see you go to your church and criticize Benson. As mentioned I back my statements up with facts.
    There are many reasons Mormons will not come forth even though they know of the corruption in the Mormon church. One is due to their belief in Mormon scripture which they associate with the Mormon church. The leadership has usurped power and authority over this scripture. Thus, the members of the Mormon church think that God expects them to support their misguided leaders. This is much the - rationalization that many Americans make about our government. They all know of the corruption, but rationalize that it is unpatriotic to talk against the government or ungrateful to complain when they enjoy superficial prosperity."

    THE LINK BETWEEN BUSH FAMILY AND ROMNEY IS HENRY TAFT BENSON. CO FOUNDER OF THE RUSSEL TRUST aka. SKULLS N BONES SOCIETY.

  • Posted By: rogerdpack @ 02/08/2008 10:15:52 PM

    Ok I'll admit it. I'm a Mormon and happy with it :)
    Cheers.
    -Roger

  • Posted By: waltermy @ 02/08/2008 11:21:29 AM

    BillBub, what you don't understand is that no religion is worth its salt unless it has a factual basis. Period. So any educated person who has checked into the history of Mormonism can readily verify that on a genetic and historical basis the Mormon faith is false. Now that is not to say Mormons aren't wonderful people with an excellent value system, but the truth is that they trade heavily on borrowed Christian capital, while adding other doctrines in the mix that are inconsisent with Christianity. As I stated, this is readily available information and anyone can look it up for themselves. So while I'm sure there are some evangelicals that "bash" Mormonism out of ignorance, there are those who do so out of knowledge.

    • Posted By: PMcAllister @ 02/08/2008 10:15:38 PM

      Waltermy- I am sincerely curious to see this "genetic and historical" evidence that irrefutably proves that Mormonism is false. By that, I don't just mean a lack of evidence to support archeological, historical, or genetic claims that opponents of the Book of Mormon state are made therein. Remember, the lack of irrefutable empirical evidence of the truth of something is very different than irrefutable empirical evidence of its falsehood.

      For that matter, I am equally interested to see ANY evidence that irrefutably proves that Christianity (or any other religion for that matter) is true. While you are digging for that irrefutable evidence of the falsehood of the LDS Church, could you also find irrefutable archeological evidence of the Tower of Babel, or irrefutable genetic evidence that Jacob and his family lived in Egypt prior to the Exodus?

      The only "truth" is that there is no irrefutable evidence of the truth or falsehood of religion. If such evidence existed there wouldn't be so much time wasted on boards like this with people impugning each others' beliefs. The truth would be evident and there would be nothing to refute.

      When it comes to absolute truth, the burden of proof is not a preponderance of evidence or even proof beyond a reasonable doubt, because absolute truth is not judged or defined by man. So, actually, religion, whether you think it is worth "salt" or something much more valuable, doesn't need to have an empirically "factual" basis. It must have a basis in eternal and absolute truth as defined by God. So, instead of arguing about this fact or that fact, why don't we all use our time more productively, and go the the true Source to verify truth. I challenge you to do that with your own religion and any other you may encounter. Get on your knees, after an honest, open-minded study, and ask God if what you have studied is true or not, and stop wasting your time trying to find empirical evidence for religion. Until you do that you will only be living evidence of Paul's prophecy of those in the "last days" who would spend their time "Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth." (2 Timothy 3:7).

  • Posted By: SharedThought @ 02/08/2008 1:39:57 PM

    I admit that I'm somewhat puzzled about the exact beliefs of Mormonism. But, does anyone really believe that, if Romney became president, he had any notion that he could use the office to bring about Mormon control over Americans or our government or our society? IF his political views are compatible with socially conservative, politically conservative evangelical Christians, then WHAT exactly was the objection that any of them had against Romney?

    • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 02/08/2008 7:38:52 PM

      YES!!! He is a Salt Lake Templr prostitute.

  • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 02/08/2008 7:37:43 PM

    NO TO MORMONS!!! NO TO MOHAMMED!!!


    One down and one to go.

  • Posted By: TELLTHETRUTH @ 02/08/2008 6:18:35 PM

    AADI35 u are so incorrect its comical. the biblical word "perfect" means.........mature, complete, capable. in NO WAY does it mean "absolutely, undeniably flawless". a uman being cannot become undeniably flawless spiritually. but they can attain maturity spiritually. im shocked u have no grasp at all at the rightly dividing of biblical "english". only Christ is absolutely, undeniably flawless in his spirituality. and becauce Christians "are in Him" he declares us righteous or undeniably flawless. the bible tells us to renew our minds and in context thats a continual, ongoing process. and a true Christian if renewing their minds by reading and studying Gods word consistently and prayer will attain a mature level of spirituality. there is no reason for Christ IF a hu,man being can match his undeniable falwlessness. Jesus is termed "hosios" in hebrew language whci hmeans absolute holiness. pure holiness> thats reserved for Him and not humans.
    humans will attain that when the mortal body puts on immortality and is glorified by nonne other than the Father. meanwhile a mature Christian responds to any conviction of sin due to their "missing the mark" and repents and overcomes THAT area. (thats doable). when a person that SAYS they are Christian but just sinning and sinning and only getting remorseful when in church or something thats a person not renewing their minds with consistent study of the bible or prayer or fellowship with other believers. theres much nonsense here relative to what people are being told as well. one commenter says her pastor told the congregation DONT vote for Romney. that man isnt a political advisior and has NO business endorsing or not endorsing a candidate from a pulpit. Gods pulpit. the pasgtor is weak-willed. thousands of innocent civilians have been killed and countless servicepersons have lost their lives or are permanently maimed because a "christian' george w bush was in office. is that pastor nuts? as lond as they are supposed christian its ok to run the country in the ground? i'll smack your pastor in the face for u. how about i dont vote for the pastor because he's stupid and ignorant? how bout that? GRANDMAZUSIE u need an authentic relationship with Jesus and let your relationship to being baptist have a lower priority. are u saying there is a chance youd convert to being a Mormon? can u elaborate on that?

    • Posted By: aad135 @ 02/08/2008 7:28:09 PM

      Telly - that is your "educated" opinion, however it is not what is meant throughout the scriptures - but that also is my "educated" opinion. "Perfect" = "Mature"; what is the difference? It is all semantics, yet it means the same thing. Be "perfect" in Him; yes, I agree with that thought-line. Completeness can only be obtained through Christ - no agrument there. He can, and will "declare us righteous and undeniably flawless" - in your words, again, I don't deny this. There is a need for Christ to help us imperfect humans to become righteous "in Him". But if we cannot attain His degree of righteousness, why would it be necessary for us to become perfect "in Him", why would we need a Savior if there were no chance for us to become like Him? I want to thank you for helping me completely show that this is unfailing doctrine. Perfect = capable, capable of what (becoming like Him, which is in His Divine Nature to want everyhting for us that He has). Thank you for agreeing with me; in a totally unusual way..! Peace!

  • Posted By: drake77 @ 02/08/2008 9:46:56 AM

    You allege that Mormons believe that "As man is, God once was; as God is, man may be." That's a great help, only it isn't true. Yes, one prophet said it. No, it is *not* church doctrine. It is not taught in our churches or temples, it is not taught in our literature, it is not taught by our current prophets and apostles. If every other church were held to task for every statement that has ever been said, that faith would appear a bit odd as well (to say the least).

    • Posted By: aad135 @ 02/08/2008 5:57:15 PM

      Who was the prophet that said it..? Joseph Smith. Don't minimalize this doctrine by referencing "one prophet". Many other have said it, and continue to teach this doctrine. See my other comments on this board for more information, based on solid scriptural reference and study.

    • Posted By: gards76 @ 02/08/2008 10:52:01 AM

      drake77 it is church doctrine. See the Gospel Principle manual section 47 on exaltation. Read D&C 132:. and 84:38 or do a search on LDS.org and you will see that it is taught.
      If anyone is interest in learning about The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints please refer to church's website and its missionaries.

  • Posted By: Zigzig @ 02/08/2008 10:44:58 AM

    Hey drake77, you are an outright liar. I just asked my active mormon co-worker, and he tells me that becoming a God is part of mormon doctrine, and I quote "it is one of the most beautiful tenents of mormon belief". Soooo you people tend to pick and choose what tell everyone about what you believe? Dependin on the situation. That is sooo Romneyesque! lol

    • Posted By: drake77 @ 02/08/2008 1:08:01 PM

      Oh wow! You asked your co-worker. Geeze...I wouldn't disagree with that authority. You are so right. I'm so glad you take the time to make decisions in such a reflective manner. I don't know *what* my years of study would have meant without your helping me out. Thanks so much. I would *never* disagree with your *co-worker*.

      • Posted By: aad135 @ 02/08/2008 2:51:07 PM

        Drake - quit acting like a fool and behave yourself. Zizag, I have to apologize for my fellow Mormon's actions. I'll be one to say that, yes, this doctrine is taught, and it is also true doctrine. Think about it rationally, will you for just a moment. Where do you believe God came from, did He just wink into existence the same way the universe "Big-Banged" it's way in? Think about this, in your core of beliefs, what is your view of the after-life - what is the common Christian understanding of what we will be doing in the eternities? Seriously think about it and what you belive. Woldn't a loving God want for each of His children the same, if not more than everything that He has? As a mortal father, isn't that what you wnat for your children? THink about it, and get back with me soon...

        • Posted By: aad135 @ 02/08/2008 5:33:21 PM

          Addendum: Look up Matthew 5:48, " Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven perfect." What did Jesus mean by this verse? He was commanding us to become spiritually perfect, even as the Father is perfect. This is part of His Sermon on the Mount, where He outlines Godlike attributes that we need to strive to be like; but why, if we are not to become like Him..? This is a sound Gospel doctrine, taught by the Savior Himself. He would not command us if there were not a purpose or provided a way for us to keep that commandment.

  • Posted By: Grandmazusie @ 02/08/2008 4:27:15 PM

    Our congregation was told by our Pastor not to vote for Romney because he is a Mormon.., a disgrace, I am ashamed to be a Baptist. He repeatedly mentions Mormons and calls them a cult. I looked up the word on google ...you should too. All churches are a cult. He believes sone of us will investigate the church.... Our pastor is afraid he will lose his paying job if we all convert. Mitt was the only one that sounded like he was educated.

  • Posted By: Grandmazusie @ 02/08/2008 4:18:03 PM

    I can imagine what many of the Huckabee supporters would say if Utah was hit by a huge bunch of off season tornadoes and a lot of destruction and death followed their voting for Romney, as it did in Huckabee territory after those states all voted for Huckabee. They would almost surely say God was punishing the Mormons, it???s very predictable, like thier knee jerk reflex. I???ve seen this kind of garbage from these hateful types before. But note, no one else would dream of saying this about those who are in those area???s ??? because they are better people than some of the half baked fascist nuts who follow Huckabee purely because of a religious affiliation with him.

    Now I???m not saying this about the level headed people who do follow Huckabee and live lives with a love of their fellow man, but there are many fanatical loons from the South who bring discredit on the group, and on Christians as a whole.

    Note how Romney bowed out of the race for the good of the country? Note how Huckabee could care less about the country, he want???s what he wants. Huckabee could take example from Romney, in more ways than one.

    Now it looks like we will get one of the democrats , because McCain can???t really win this, neither could Huckabee, and Romney really could have.

    We may get 2 more stinking activist Ginsburgs on the Supreme Court, and with that our country will be under Judicial democrat activist control, and the democrats will be practically dictators, because that???s what their chosen judges do, as we have so clearly seen.

    This is coming because Huckabee was to self serving to bow out when he was done, so even though most republicans want Romney, they won???t get him as their candidate. Huckabee is too selfish and willing to put himself above his country to do what Romney did, to do what Huckabee asked Thompson to do ???

    Romney had the class and concern for his country to put his self interest in this aside for all of us, and Huckabee is not MAN enough to do it.


  • Posted By: Grandmazusie @ 02/08/2008 4:13:12 PM

    Bigotry is alive in America.

  • Posted By: Gwyneth30 @ 02/08/2008 4:10:52 PM

    I don't think his being a Mormon was really a problem, it was just something extra to dislike him for for people who wanted to "go there", so to speak, who didn't like him to begin with. My problem with him is that he just seemed fake. I felt like I was being snowed every time I heard him speak. His speech ending his campaign seemed so over the top to me. It felt disingenuous, and he's acting like a martyr and people just lapped it up like puppies. I mean, you have to pay attention to more that what people say, its their non-verbals, which speak way more volumes. It's very, very difficult to hide your non-verbals unless you're a good actor. He acted like he had something to hide. If that is not the case, it came off that way

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse