The Fight for Iran’s Freedom
It is easy to criticize U.S. policy toward the Middle East today: Washington's militaristic approach has contributed to the growth of fundamentalism and helped strengthen dictatorial regimes. Still, Iran's fundamentalist rulers often use such criticism as a way of disguising their own ineptitude and their responsibility for Iran's deplorable conditions— including the suppression of civil society, which is undergoing another severe crackdown as I write.
The mullahs' strategy is simple. To retain power, they need an enemy. They thus seek to keep their country on a perpetual war footing by playing up the notion that the Bush administration is conspiring to overthrow them, destroy the Islamic republic and undermine Islam itself. Nonviolent activists, human-rights defenders and intellectuals are labeled enemy agents. And Iran's deteriorating economic conditions are attributed to U.S. sanctions rather than to Tehran's chronic mismanagement.
Internationally, Iran calls on the great powers to practice benevolence, justice and brotherhood, yet it routinely violates these ideals itself. The Islamic republic has a deplorable human-rights record. In the summer of 1988, it executed thousands of political prisoners in disregard for even Iran's own legal procedures. In the 1990s, Intelligence Ministry agents assassinated dozens of Iranian dissidents at home and abroad under a project that later became known as "the serial killings." When this project was exposed during Mohammad Khatami's presidency, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei blamed a few rogue officers. Yet the people who had ordered the killings went unpunished, and many now serve in senior government posts.
Under President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the repression has intensified. Dozens of newspapers have been banned, Web sites blocked, proponents of greater rights for women and ethnic and religious minorities suppressed. Books are severely censored. In November, an academic journal, Madreseh, was banned for daring to publish the views of Mohammad Mojtahed Shabestari, a distinguished dissident cleric. In all, more than 100 such independent publications have been shut down in recent years. Meanwhile, religious scholars who question the government's line, such as Mohsen Kadivar, Hassan Yousefi Eshkevari and Ayatollah Hussein Ali Montazeri, have been jailed or placed under house arrest. So have workers, such as Mansour Osanloo, who have tried to form independent trade unions. Students who criticize government policy are taken to jail, where they are forced to confess to crimes they have not committed.
Beginning last summer, Ahmadinejad's government launched what it calls a "societal-security project." On the pretext of combating manifestations of immorality, police have beaten innocent women and youngsters in the streets for displays of "immodesty," such as holding hands or wearing tight-fitting or stylish clothing. They have detained many others. The "project" is having tragic consequences. On Oct. 13, for example, a physician named Zahra Bani Yacoub was seized for daring to walk unescorted alongside her fiancé; a few days later, police handed over her corpse to her family, with no explanation. Iran's rulers constantly speak about protecting women's dignity, yet they violently suppress Iranian women. The regime preaches religious, moral and spiritual values, yet it practices the antithesis of these values.
Meanwhile, thanks to Khamenei's nuclear ambitions, Iranians now face the possibility of new sanctions and an unwanted and ruinous war. Iran's reformists oppose the nuclear program, which they have criticized in open and confidential letters to the government, calling on Tehran to suspend the enrichment of nuclear fuel. Nobel laureate Shirin Ebadi and other human-rights activists have insisted that the government hold a referendum on its nuclear policies so the public's real views can be established. But the government, unsurprisingly, has refused.
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: the_shelton @ 05/01/2008 1:29:16 PM
Comment: I agree with Qumars. Just because there are things happening in the world that are less than ideal, does not give us the right to come in and try to show them how great we are. We can work with other countries to help with ideas, comments, examples and such but war is not the answer. On the whole, we have chosen the wrong side in these disputes throughout history in about 80% of the cases. Sadam was one of ours, Noreiga, Castro and how many more have we trained and backed and then watched in horror as they went down the wrong path.
What is the role of the United Nations, to have tea parties and look at how good Iceland is doing? Make it do what it is supposed to do, start acting like a body that has some influence in this world or start another organization that does.
Until the folks from within start to make a determined effort to get out from under the rule of a bunch of religious goofballs who think that we should not have progressed since the fourth century, then they are going to be suppressed and held back. Wake up, stand up, look around and start to act like you belong in the world community.
Posted By: fariborz @ 03/01/2008 8:07:17 PM
Comment: Some are still naive to think that people in Iran revolted in 1979 and chose so called "islamic republic" and here they are again, shouting at us that they want some sort of change within regime itself. it sounds to me, they suggest that current Islamic criminals to let some brand new Islamic criminals to get control of power!
Sir I am familiar with your approach and the same pattern that have been used in the world so far and it has not worked. "Biological solution" rings a bell? Some Cubans have asked for biological solution, why? Because they had almost same sort of reasons and fears. What happened then? Nothing! Dictatorship transferred to a new one! in Iran's case, some of you in IRGC have thought about "biological solution" during Khomeini era but it didn't help either and now here we come again, the same approach that Cuban spies have injected the poisons idea of "waiting for within democracy" in dissident's society. It???s same game that Fidel Castro has played to stay in power for almost half a century. What can we expect from mullahs with communist background?! Nothing but Castro???s game plan!
One more thing; Democracy without world support is the beginning of a new dictatorship and that support should be there at the beginning. and for those who still think they made "Islamic Republic", just I should say think again.
Fariborz Shamshiri
http://www.rottengods.com/
Posted By: nawawimohamad @ 02/15/2008 3:12:05 AM
Comment: Those Iranians who seek the US for help to restore democracy in Iran are traitors. They are selfsh, self-centered, short-sighted, dumb, have no dignity and double headed snakes. The world's history has shown that it was and still are the traitors who played the crucial role in the downfall of any country through foreign interventions. These kind of people residing in the US are also detrimental to the US security and should be marked as dangerous.