The Expectation Gap

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: QuillMoreTeKKsans @ 02/13/2008 11:16:48 PM

    "he managed to convince members of every faction that he agreed with them,"
    I really grinned out load when I read that. That is NOT a bad trait to have, especially in a presidency. Yes, some people are gonna be unhappy, at the same time, adults ALL know that you can't always get what you want. That doesn't mean you can't be unhappy about that. You CAN! The best democracies are those where the interest groups are ALL equally somewhat unhappy, and where the general public is slightly bored. Slightly bored means, theres nt great injustice.

  • Posted By: Fever4life @ 02/13/2008 10:16:48 PM

    Compare the candidates by going to The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. (2008). 2008 Presidential candidate health care proposals: Side by side summary. Retrieved 2/12/08 from http://www.health08.org/sidebyside_results.cfm?c=5&c=11&c=16. Read the books "Dreams of My Father" and The Audacity of Hope" to know who Mr. Obama is before you make false, rumored and slanderous statements. You can also google and check wikipedia for quick details on the experiences of all candidates. Mr. Obama experience is adequate if you research his entire career. Hey former President Bill Clinton was a Governor in his 40's when he ran for 1992. Mrs. Clinton was in the White House as the first lady and then has served a few more years as a Senator than Mr. Obama. And if you apply yourself to do the research you can look up the rest of his career and education. Mr. McCain has the most experience in government but that does not necessarily mean he is suited for the executive office as indicated from previous runs for the office. This campaign is exciting and yet clean where the candidates so far have been respectful and sticking to the issues. Only the public through fear and lack of research will let rumors and slander slip from their mouths. Kkhan if you had listen to Mr. Obama speech in VA you might have heard him talk about the difficulties in "fixing" up things. Presidency for America's presents circumstance will be a difficult task for anyone brave enough to take the challenge. And of course we all benefitted from Dr. King's ground work yet to be finished. Did he not say "judge people not by the color of their skin but by the content of their character".

  • Posted By: Fever4life @ 02/13/2008 9:53:37 PM

    Obama is too good to be true. That is what all the "haters" are thinking. At least he is one of the brave and qualified people along with the others campaigning who cares about the future of this country. I can respect the men and woman of both parties without making ignorant statements. Look at the facts of the candidates and read about platforms. If you are disturbed by the charisma and character of Mr. Obama then I suggest you get to know him by reading his books "Dreams of my Father" and "The Audacity of Hope" to understand the way this man thinks. Also go to (The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. (2008). 2008 Presidential candidate health care proposals: Side by side summary. Retrieved 2/12/08 from http://www.health08.org/sidebyside_results.cfm?c=5&c=11&c=16.) to compare the candidates issues. This has been an exciting and so far clean campaign. The only unfortunate smearing I have seen has been from the fear of persons that do not take the time to do research. Also google & wikipedia works. Oh btw Kkhan if you listen to his speeches he realizes that fixing things will not be easy and yes hopefully we all have benefitted from the ground work of Dr. King. That is why we judge people by the content of character not the color of their skin.

  • Posted By: isondemuse @ 02/13/2008 9:37:15 PM

    So, Clinton is no saint. Obama's 'change' is a strategic message developed and fine-tuned through time and deliberately remained broad in meaning to hook as many hot head as possible, but apparently such a typical old hand in politics is considered sincere new change. When he talks it up bigger, it makes him the bigger liar.

  • Posted By: trock @ 02/13/2008 7:10:35 PM

    Obama sounds like he is preacher and is trying to round up a cult of followers who believe everything he says. We need substance and a backbone. Hilary is strong and generally wants to help. She isn't making us drink the koolaid ( :

  • Posted By: kkhan @ 02/13/2008 1:09:17 PM

    Obama for president - this has to be a joke & someone should stop this insanity. How could his supporters really believe that he is Mr. fix it, when in reality he has capitalized on the ground work of the famous Dr. Martin Luther King, a man of real substance. His success is based on the theory that a drowning rat will clutch at a straw & that's exactly the response of his supporters.

  • Posted By: MikeForHillary @ 02/10/2008 8:56:57 PM

    Good thoughts. Hillary is our best chance for Universal coverage. She has been tested. You don't put a rookie to start a game in the world series. You put the best you have.

    • Posted By: RetiredMarine @ 02/12/2008 9:13:42 AM

      In that case, Hillary would be on the bench for an awful long time. She has been tested? She can't even answer tough questions from reporters regarder where she stands on an issue without throwing a hissy fit. Yes, she is smooth in the media when she controls it, but give her a question where she has to make a decision and she withers..... It is amazing how weak minded Hillary worshippers really are

  • Posted By: ramone @ 02/11/2008 2:32:56 AM

    WHATEVER! av3who. The way you see change is very narrow-minded....by looking at people and not what changes they can bring about by their knowledge, experience and actions. It is also clear that folks like yourself have this big holier-than-thou attitude, who are pathological Clinton-haters and who expound the ridiculous and flawed reasoning that Hillary and Bill are the same. Even if thats true, Bill was a great president (except for his big moral-lapse while in office) who did a lot of good for this country in his 8 years in office. I am sure, if Hillary is President, she will best Bill and make amends for him even in the morality department!
    As for you folks, you might as well shut your senses off, listen only to the media without using your own heads and act like a flock of sheep following a shepherd! I am a Obama fan too, for your information. But I am not dancing to his tunes or acting all wonderstruck by his eloquence, oratory and charms. My firm belief is that for his great qualities Obama does not have the qualifications and the nerve to go the distance against John McCain, in spite of what the polls might suggest today. And, this country is most likely not ready for a sea-change in the political arena to place a relative novice like Obama in the White House.
    If am wrong, so be it!! But I don't think I'm going to be!!!

    • Posted By: RetiredMarine @ 02/12/2008 9:06:51 AM

      Narrow minded? Senses shut off? Flock of sheep? Sounds pretty self descriptive. Time to pull your head out of the sand, you have been brainwashed by the Clinton media machine. All Bill Clinton did during his administration is drag us down the path towards socialism. Hillary is looking to finish the job. Soon the US slogan will be "Viva la nouveau France" if she has her way

  • Posted By: jewel1325 @ 02/11/2008 9:06:04 AM

    The only reason the reporters describe Hillary as stubborn, etc. is because she is a woman. If a man shows tenacity and is unwaivering, he is considered courageous and committed. Our country economy was flourishing under the Clintons. Who cares about Lewinski! For JFK there was Marilyn Monroe. Why don't we hear anything about that? Hillary is the most competent candidate. Thank God she is not spineless!

    • Posted By: RetiredMarine @ 02/12/2008 8:53:08 AM

      You obviously have never personally met her

    • Posted By: kkhan @ 02/11/2008 10:42:24 AM

      These are very prudent comments - it should be posted for all Americans to read, it will certainly inject a fair amount of wisdom in choosing a presidential candidate. Anyone running for office of any kind ( politicans are no exception ), will base their campaign on issues that grips the attention of the electorate. As such, it is incredibly crucial for them to promulgate the magic word '' CHANGE ''. The promise to change things in times of crisis, inspires great hope in a nation overcome with frustation & disjust. Change should only be implemented if it will make a situation better than it is, not the opposite & this requires the control of someone with persuasive and concrete leadership skills. The capabilities to be an effective & efficient leader has to be developed by involvement & experience, not by observation & charm induced by excellent oratory talent. It is a shame that the American electorate, in their hunger for ''change'' has becomes victims of sensational promise.

  • Posted By: dunnhaupt @ 02/11/2008 10:32:22 AM

    The Clintons spent eight years in the White House and did not produce the "change" that Hillary has been promising -- as she says -- for 35 years. Her problem seem to be that she is convinced she alone is right, and will take no advice. When her campaign stalls, she blames it on the campaign manager, not on her own shortcomings. It is not the campaign manager's fault, Hillary!

    • Posted By: Phillyforever @ 02/11/2008 9:27:47 PM

      Actually, when the Clintons were in the White House, we had a budget surplus. Hillary is promising a change, just like Obama, from the Bush administration. Hillary has done a lot of things in her 35 years of service. She has done a lot for women's rights. That is why she was on the board of Wal Mart. She does not alone think she is right. Changing her campaign manager was a good idea.

      • Posted By: RetiredMarine @ 02/12/2008 8:49:53 AM

        One thing that liberals fail to mention is that the surplus came from the previous administration. During the Clinton reign, government agencies spent far more money than ever before. Case in point... When a Secretary of State (and her associates) can make trips to Milan and Paris on the taxpayer's dime - for nothing more than shopping sprees.... there is a problem.

  • Posted By: Phillyforever @ 02/11/2008 9:34:49 PM

    Great Article. It is about time people started realizing that even the Obama says he is going to bring change, he is working in the same system that has been in Washington since day one. Hillary '08.

  • Posted By: Joanne in Indy @ 02/10/2008 9:50:00 PM

    Great article, it enhances my reservations about Hillary and Slick Willie. I don't think they should ever be returned to the White House. Despite residing over a booming economy, Bill also brought disgrace to the office. I wonder if Hillary becomes President, will this be the first time a disbarred attorney lives in the White House?

    I don't think I could stand the stench. As an independent minded Democrat, I will go with either McCain or Obama.

    • Posted By: Phillyforever @ 02/11/2008 9:33:13 PM

      Clinton was disbarred? Whre did you get this information? I think it is a disgrace that Obama wanted the endorsment of Ted Kennedy, who not only cheated on his wife, let Mary Jo die in the river.

  • Posted By: hope-3 @ 02/11/2008 5:34:36 PM

    It has become obvious to me the clintons feel they can only win this thing if they can make it about race.If you listen to hillary and bills comments racial themes almost always come into play.

    • Posted By: Phillyforever @ 02/11/2008 9:22:58 PM

      Like what racial themes?

  • Posted By: Southern Bell @ 02/11/2008 1:37:56 PM

    I see Richard and Jonathan Alter got the Evan Thomas memo to start bashing HRC.

    We all know the boys in the media hate an uppity woman.

  • Posted By: Southern Bell @ 02/11/2008 1:36:37 PM

    I see Richard and Jonathan Alter got the Evan Thomas memo to start bashing HRC.

    We all know the boys in the media hate an uppity woman.

  • Posted By: Thevail @ 02/10/2008 6:14:44 PM

    Thanks for the great article, but I gota stick with Barrack. I'd love to see him be more specific about how he is going to do things, but I'd also like to see Hillary stop chanting the same old war cry of my way or the highway. Universal healthcare didn't get passed during the Clinton administration, and it didn't get through the Congress while she's been senator either. So why does she seem to think that the same old approach will work now?

    • Posted By: lamm01 @ 02/11/2008 12:33:09 PM

      Why should he start being more specific? No one asks or demands if of him/ Also, he has no intelligent or meaningful response. The media and the unfortunate fools who are following him seem to be blinded by the rhetoric, regurgitated homilies and arrogant assumptions. As for Ms. Clinton's proposals, wiat 24 hours and Senator Obama comes up with same on with a minor clarification. He can't seem to generate a single solitary original idea. So, if you're going on about Senator Clinton's failure to get legislation passed, doesn't it seem that if Senator Obama is proposing the same, the result will be the same?

  • Posted By: jewel1325 @ 02/11/2008 9:03:03 AM

    The only reason that these reporters claim Hillary was stubborn, etc. was because she is a woman. If a man shows tenacity and refuses to compromise his convictions (as she did) they would be described as courageous and unwaivering. Furthermore, our economy was flourishing under Clinton. So what about Lewinski! For JFK there was Marilyn Monroe, why doesn't anyone criticize him!

  • Posted By: eddiewhere @ 02/11/2008 4:50:12 AM

    CAPITALiSM WITH SOCIAL JUSTICE.

  • Posted By: eddiewhere @ 02/11/2008 4:48:10 AM

    WHO RUNS THE THIRTEEN TRILLION DOLLAR ECONOMY?
    THE SAME ENTITIES THAT HAVE BEEN RUNNING IT SINCE NINTETY EIGHTY. THE OWNERS OF CAPITAL...

  • Posted By: ramone @ 02/11/2008 2:29:50 AM

    WHATEVER! av3who. The way you see change is very narrow-minded....by looking at people and not what changes they can bring about by their knowledge, experience and actions. It is also clear that folks like yourself have this big holier-than-thou attitude, who are pathological Clinton-haters and who expound the ridiculous and flawed reasoning that Hillary and Bill are the same. Even if thats true, Bill was a great president (except for his big moral-lapse while in office) who did a lot of good for this country in his 8 years in office. I am sure, if Hillary is President, she will best Bill and make amends for him even in the morality department!
    As for you folks, you might as well shut your senses off, listen only to the media without using your own heads and act like a flock of sheep following a shepherd! I am a Obama fan too, for your information. But I am not dancing to his tunes or acting all wonderstruck by his eloquence, oratory and charms. My firm belief is that for his great qualities Obama does not have the qualifications and the nerve to go the distance against John McCain, in spite of what the polls might suggest today. And, this country is most likely not ready for a sea-change in the political arena to place a relative novice like Obama in the White House.
    If am wrong, so be it!! But I don't think I'm going to be!!!

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse