Chelsea Come Lately

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: barneysnk @ 02/11/2008 3:33:25 AM

    sean2002, could your declare your exact affiliation with the Clinton campaign? You seem to have dedicated yourself to responding to every comment, often with a long-winding reposte, and always in favor of the Clintons. Is this your campaign task for the day? Because it is laborious and grating and it is not working. And the past tense of shrink is shrunk, not shrinked. Now, have your say and leave other folks to have theirs, too.

  • Posted By: tompetitjean1 @ 02/10/2008 8:28:37 PM

    Chelsea can reach the younger voters better then her mom can.

  • Posted By: davethedummy @ 02/10/2008 7:01:28 PM

    I recieved so many calls from Hillery (or someone claiming to be her) via a recorded message during the last week, my wife thought I had something going on with a "Hillery" After the Washington State convention, she has not called again. Maybe, Hillery is a love em and forget em women?

    Dave

  • Posted By: Carthage @ 02/10/2008 12:48:59 AM

    Again, the Clintons are trying to have it both ways... What are Chelsey's qualifications for calling super delegates? When the campaign decides to "use" her, they should be willing to take the heat for that. And the use of a singly somewhat off-color word is far less than what Pres. Clinton put our families through a few years ago - where was the outrage of what they put our children, and Chelsey, though? I still see Sen. Clinton laughing and clapping when Bob Johnson was sliming Sen. Obama, father of Sasha and Melila. Enough already - don't let the circus back in town!

    • Posted By: sean2002 @ 02/10/2008 8:59:57 AM

      By the way, first of all, you spelled Chelsey incorrectly. (Is this the way for you to show your disrespect for Chelsea?).

      Chelsea's only needed qualification is that she is Clinton. She calls on behalf of her mother. Why not? If my mother is running for office and she is too busy, I would do the same on her behalf.

      The campaign doesn't "use" her. I don't consider a daughter helping her beloved mother for the most important race of her life should be called "use."

      You obviously hate Clinton. As a result, you don't sound logical.

      There is no such circus you are talking about. The only circus has always been created by the mainstream media.

      Why not just call on the mainstream media. They should shut up, including that guy called Schuster.

  • Posted By: DSCHINZ @ 02/09/2008 10:55:33 PM

    JUST LIKE MOM .. COLD AND CALLOUS .. SOMEONE NEEDS TO ASK MSNBC 'WHATEVER HAPPENED TO FREE SPEECH" .. ? DAVID SHUSTER WAS JUST STATING A FACT .. THE TRUTH HURTS .. THEY ARE PIMPING THEIR DAUGHTER .. HILLARY WILL USE ANY DIRTY TACTIC THERE IS OUT THERE TO WIN .. SAD .. HOPEFULLY WE'LL SEE THE LAST OF THIS DISFUNCTIONAL FAMILY VERY SOON ..

    • Posted By: sean2002 @ 02/10/2008 1:35:28 AM

      No politician is perfect. In order to counter the above Hillary hater's irrational scream, the following is from the syndicated columnist Bonnie Erbe:

      "The "phenom" phase of Sen. Barack Obama's campaign may be ending. The shine may be starting to deflect off the star. Yes, it's still a tight race for the Democratic presidential nomination between the junior senator from Illinois and the junior senator from New York. But up to this point, Obama has had the distinct advantage (and disadvantage) of being less well known. That era will soon be behind him.

      Most damaging to Obama so far is a New York Times article published several days ago showing that while in Iowa during a stump speech Obama claimed to have "passed" a bill regulating nuclear power plants.

      Trouble is, that measure never was approved by the Senate. The bill was to have required nuclear power plants to alert citizens if even minor leaks of radioactive waste were discovered. Under current law, only significant leaks must be made public.

      While Obama claimed to have "passed" a bill that never did pass, he also participated in negotiations that watered down the measure to the point of meaninglessness. That, however, didn't stop him from claiming the mantle of being pro-environment and anti-nuclear pollution while campaigning. Is this another case of "I invented the Internet"?

      What's worse, he took campaign contributions worth hundreds of thousands of dollars from Exelon executives and employees. Exelon is the company that owned a plant that kept smaller leaks quiet. According to its own Web site, it is also the largest nuclear power provider in the nation.

      We can all expect to see more of the same as reporters dig deeper into Obama's record. For example, are the young and/or upscale ultra-liberals who form the core of his voter base going to be thrilled by comments he made while in Idaho, trying to portray himself as pro-gun rights?

      According to The Washington Post's Web site, the following happened while he made a visit to Boise State University's Taco Bell Arena before a roaring crowd of thousands:

      "Obama was not shy about tailoring his stump speech for the setting, adding a line to rebut any fears that he is aggressively pro-gun control, an issue he almost never mentions on the trail. He urged the crowd not to listen to 'people who say, "He doesn't believe in the Second Amendment." We've got a lot of hunters in Southern Illinois and I've got no intention of taking away people's guns.' "

      How are the ultra-liberals going to feel when they learn their shining star is hunter- and gun-friendly? Is this guy a friend of Mitt Romney -- liberal while campaigning in blue states and conservative while in red states?"

      Obama is young as a result without much baggage, even so, he is not perfect either as this article depicts.

      The link to the original article: http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/350296_erbe07.h

    • Posted By: sean2002 @ 02/10/2008 1:33:52 AM

      This typical Hillary hater's biased, negative and irrational scream.

      You have every right to support Obama, but please don't do it at the expense of distoring Hillary.

      Obama's politician too.

  • Posted By: "Martin Edwin "Mick" Andersen @ 02/10/2008 12:54:41 AM

    REPUBLICAN DISINFORMATION ALERT ...

    On MSNBC tonight, an exit poll in Louisana showed that 50 percent of Obama supporters said that they would be dissatisfied with Hillary Clinton as the nominee, while roughly two thirds of the Clinton voters said they would be dissatisfied with Obama as the party standardbearer.

    There was no racial breakdown of who in each camp would be dissatisfied.

    However, GOP strategist Pat Buchanan said that the Democrats should fear Obama getting the nod because the two thirds of the Clinton supporters who were potentially dissatisfied with an Obama nomination were probably Caucasians, or white.

    In other words, this former Richard Nixon operative is raising the spectre of "white flight" from the Democratic Party if Obama is the nominee.

    However, Buchana's argument is mathematical horse pucky, as the total number of people voting in the Louisiana Democratic primary who say they would be dissatisfied if their candidate's opponent won the nomination is roughly the same.

    Remember, Barack Obama won 56 percent to 37 percent, in Louisiana.

    That means that approximately 28 percent of his voters would be dissatisfied if Hillary is the nominee.

    Of Hillary's 37 percent of the total Democratic vote, two thirds of that would be roughly 24 percent of the total votes cast in the primary.

    In other words, the disenchantment potential on both sides is statistically a wash.

    Given the Clintons' penchant for race coding, they are likely to parrot the Buchanan argument, as least privately.

    Don't be fooled.

    MARTIN EDWIN ANDERSEN
    Churchton, Maryland

  • Posted By: sean2002 @ 02/10/2008 12:17:20 AM

    Why the writer chose only a quote saying Chelsea is ":too intellectual for college kid's taste." I assume there must be another college kid who will say "Oh, Chelsea is simply so intelligent and so wonderful." The writer really can selectively choose his/her quote to send different message.

    • Posted By: Carthage @ 02/10/2008 12:50:55 AM

      exactly - free speech - the Clinton machinery cannot control it all (yet). Sen. Clinton may call her campaign a "movement", too - again, free speech, but that does not change the reality.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse