Chelsea Come Lately

I think Obama should find some new friends to surround himself with. Oprah is a talk show host -- not a political analyst - he needs people around him that care about the issues of the people in this country -- help our poor and our neglected (there are plenty of them) Ted Kennedy is "old school" Washington and NOT the best example of morality. Lastly, I'm sure if and when Senator Obama becomes the Dem Nominee the Republican attack dogs will find plenty of dirt under the rug to "swift boat" him just like they did John Kerry in 2004. The question is -- does he have the strength and stamina to stand up against it like Hillary has for over 20 years. I just have to wonder. All I know is we must elect a Dem presdient this fall and if he falls apart at the seams against the pressure of the attack dogs -- Lord Help US!!!!! We will be doomed to spend at least the next 4 years fighting a war that we have already won.

I have to agree with Cecilpau and Massie. I have a daughter too. She, at 17, if a remark was made against her I would perhaps comment but I would expect her to fight her battle. The Schuster thing was handled so very incorrectly. How much better would it have been for Chelsea to call an interview with Shuster, on air and explain what she was doing and who she is.

I see the Clintons time and time again using the "I am above all that" philosophy. I see Hillarys campaign as something to fulfill HER dreams. I picture Hillary during her stay at the White House sitting in the Oval Office late at night thinking Bill is such a jerk I would be so much better at this. I sense a rage in Hillary that is frightening.

We are in a unique historical election and I wonder why these 3 and 1/2 people left to choose from are even there. We have on one side an undeniably aged POW that holds war on his offering plate like a prized turkey at Thanksgiving. A preacher that reminds me of the days children were made to kneel on rice to show their respect for the lord. A woman surrounded by so much negative controversy and has ruthlessly waded and twisted through it to meet her objective. A man that holds peoples hearts and promises change and hope. If this is the best they can offer us then I want change and hope.

To me our president first and foremost should have one very important quality. Class. Where is the class in not allowing Chelsea to respond to Shusters remark? I want someone who is well spoken and level headed after the last 16 years of embarrassment. We are a country of many issues, discrepancy and fears. All of the candidates address the issues, some address the discrepancy BUT with the exception of Obama, all create fear.

I could go over everything, every maneuver every sentence every statement made by our candidates point by point but why? We have all been watching and listening. My opinion isn't worth more then yours. I have the same one vote you do. My vote is going for class, for hope and for change.

Comment:













ATTENTION HILLARY SUPPORTERS!!!!



Just because Sen.Obama does not walk around like a "know it all" or "encyclopedia brown" does not mean he doesnt have meat or substance or that he is not informed about the issues. I think too many Clinton supporters are buying into this hype of experience. If we want experience lets just give the election to McCain or Dick Cheney or Donald Rumsfeld or HEY how about a 3rd term for Bush!!! these campaigns and their slogans of experience v. change suck. Because Obama's does have experience he has longer public office experience, he has experience actually taking on national important issues such as immigration, nuclear proliferation, ethics reform and he has experience actually passing bills. What about his experience outside of washington I mean sure he wasnt on the board for Wal-Mart or didnt have a cabinet job through his spouse but he was a constititutional professor, civil rights attorney and a community organizer where he made 13,000 dollars a year. He has made a name for himself (a funny name) doesnt take lobbyist or PAC money his message of transparency and pragmatism is powerful. While cynics want to pass cynicism as wisdom anyone who has checked both candidates thoroughyl will notice their is not much differences on the issues BUT there is a huge difference on the politic style.













just because Sen.Obama does not walk around like a "know it all" or "encyclopedia brown" does not mean he doesnt have meat or substance or that he is not informed about the issues. I think too many Clinton supporters are buying into this hype of experience. If we want experience lets just give the election to McCain or Dick Cheney or Donald Rumsfeld or HEY how about a 3rd term for Bush!!! these campaigns and their slogans of experience v. change suck. Because Obama's does have experience he has longer public office experience, he has experience actually taking on national important issues such as immigration, nuclear proliferation, ethics reform and he has experience actually passing bills. What about his experience outside of washington I mean sure he wasnt on the board for Wal-Mart or didnt have a cabinet job through his spouse but he was a constititutional professor, civil rights attorney and a community organizer where he made 13,000 dollars a year. He has made a name for himself (a funny name) doesnt take lobbyist or PAC money his message of transparency and pragmatism is powerful. While cynics want to pass cynicism as wisdom anyone who has checked both candidates thoroughyl will notice their is not much differences on the issues BUT there is a huge difference on the politic style.

The Obama campaign has not used the Clinton's past to further their campaign, much to his credit. If she is the nominee, the republicans will not be as kind. They had better get used to it! All the backroom deals, pragmatic moves, dishonest tricks, ect. Remember slick Willy?

I have to agree with Cecilpau. I have a daughter too. She, at 17, if a remark was made against her I would perhaps comment but I would expect her to fight her battle. The Schuster thing was handled so very incorrectly. How much better would it have been for Chelsea to call an interview with Schuster, on air and explain what she was doing and who she is.

I see the Clintons time and time again using the "I am above all that" philosophy. I see Hillarys campaign as something to fulfill HER dreams. I picture Hillary during her stay at the White House sitting in the Oval Office late at night thinking Bill is such a jerk I would be so much better at this. I sense a rage in Hillary that is frightening.

We are in a unique historical election, and I wonder why these 3 and 1/2 people left to choose from are even there. We have on one side an undeniably aged POW that holds war on his offering plate like a prized turkey at Thanksgiving. A preacher that reminds me of the days children were made to kneel on rice to show their respect for the lord. A woman surrounded by so much negative controversy and has ruthlessly waded and twisted through it to meet her objective. A man that holds peoples hearts and promises change and hope. If this is the best they can offer us then I want change and hope.

To me our president first and formost should have one very important quality. Class. Where is the class in not allowing Chelsea to respond to Shusters remark? I want someone who is well spoken and level headed after the last 16 years of embarrassment. We are a country of many issues, discrepencys and fears. All of the candidates address the issues, some address the discrepencys BUT with the exception of Obama, all create fear.

Just because Sen.Obama does not walk around like a "know it all" or "encyclopedia brown" does not mean he doesnt have meat or substance or that he is not informed about the issues. I think too many Clinton supporters are buying into this hype of experience. If we want experience lets just give the election to McCain or Dick Cheney or Donald Rumsfeld or HEY how about a 3rd term for Bush!!! these campaigns and their slogans of experience v. change suck. Because Obama's does have experience he has longer public office experience, he has experience actually taking on national important issues such as immigration, nuclear proliferation, ethics reform and he has experience actually passing bills. What about his experience outside of washington I mean sure he wasnt on the board for Wal-Mart or didnt have a cabinet job through his spouse but he was a constititutional professor, civil rights attorney and a community organizer where he made 13,000 dollars a year. He has made a name for himself (a funny name) doesnt take lobbyist or PAC money his message of transparency and pragmatism is powerful. While cynics want to pass cynicism as wisdom anyone who has checked both candidates thoroughyl will notice their is not much differences on the issues BUT there is a huge difference on the politic style.

In response, Obama in a book he wrote, admiited that he was an ex drug user, that was made public knowledge when he published the book. this does not equate to what The Gender biased statements made towards the lady Clintons, by supposed to be fair and balanced, non-biased. MSNBC new anchors, who are in the position of influencing public opinion, one way or the other. In my opinion thye should be fired. If that was Obama's wife being attacked in the manner, the public would demand these news casters be terminated. People are only voting for Obama because he have dazzled and mesmerized hthem with has preaching style speeches, not really on substance,because it's very much lacking in his messages. Royalty is not the issues here, but who has a stronger grasp on the issues and the most experience and qualfications to make change, unity and stirr this country in the right direction, Hillary should not be denied the right of becoming Presidnet just because her husband was, that would be fair to her either.

I vote for Hillary is a vote for the past. It's for a vote that makes US look like some third world country. 35 years of experience? As what? First Lady? A leader who followed Bush's war drums to Iraq?
Hillary's supporters are delusional to think anything is going to change is she is elected. We're talking about a former board member for Wal-Mart here. She's going to do whatever her big money donors tell her to.

Looks like the "Super Delegates" are going to steal the election for Hillary anyway, so what's the point?

If she does not want to give interviews, that is her right. I don't care who is stumping for who anyway as it goes in one ear and out the other.

I'm so glad Chelsea is making such a positive impact on her mother's Presidentilal bid to the White House, she's a breath of fresh air as well, because recntly their has been negative comments made towards her and her parents by MSNBC new Anchors that was very gender-biased and down right mean, but Chelsea is a champion and workhorse with thhick skin , she is able to take the heat just like her mom and dad she takes a licking and keeps on ticking, She has substance to her messages, as oppose to Obama who just speaks chants, one-liners and poetic phrases like an Holiness or Baptist Preacher, getting people all emotional and excited to vote for him on Inspiration, Hope, and Change, but not discussing his related experiences, indepth knowledge and describtion of the issues that negatively affect this country. He's also failing to fully explain in laymen's terms how he's going to tackle and fix America's ills starting on Day One of his Presidency, Hillary is; with Chelisa's and Bill 's assistance.