How to Train a Husband

Is the author inhaling *** from used colostemy bags, again? If I, a caucasoid male, would have written an article titled, "How to Get a Broad to Fetch for Her Man," I would be lynched (sic) via every "women's" organization known to man. In fact, new organizations would be created just for this. Damit, it's time to stop the male bashing...especially WHITE male bashing.

For the last five years, advertisers on television have made the WHITE male to be the goofish, hognostic, juxtaposed, even illicit individual in nearly every advertisement in this country. It's pigs like this author, who are asking for the backlash from hell... and it will happen... it's just a matter of time when enough of us eliminate WHITE GUILT....

WOW, If I wrote a book on that advocated training women like animals I'd have the National Organization for Woman picketing me. You can't say anything wrong of women but men are the constant buffoons. Watch any sitcom. and dont think she really advocates this for both genders.

so does this mean i should write a book "all women are *** and need to be trained to stay either in the kitchen or the bedroom"

I AM A WHITE AMERICAN MALE.

PLEASE TELL ME WHAT IS WRONG WITH ME AND I WILL SIT BY LIKE A *** AND TAKE IT.

This can work both ways...a woman can be trained as well.

www.dontdatethatgolddigger.com

that was great.BUT i have another problem..i'm 48 and my husband is42.we have been married for a yr.we don't have sex,i ask and ask he say's it's me not you..ok i am over weight,but he alway's wanted sex when he'd see my butt, i've always been overweight. now i understand why people always cheat..i have always been the cheater,we've been together for 3 and a half yrs, i have not cheated on him, but i sure want to...HELP thank you

This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen. I've always been shocked by the manner in which society belittles the intelligence of the world's male population. Anymore it seems that the way to empower women is to lessen the importance of the male's role in a relationship. I thought that things were bad when I watched dopey husbands stumble around in sitcoms after their much more attractive, far more intelligent wives, only useful as the comedic relief in the show when they made silly 'man mistakes'. However, this really takes the cake. The fact that it's acceptable to treat one's spouse as if they were your pet, is just revolting. What's even more revolting is that if the roles were switched, and it was a male writer telling men how to train women like dogs, it would probably be banned, or at least cause a huge outrage. Men aren't these stupid, blundering idiots that we're being taught to see them as: they're fallible human beings just like anyone else in the world (yes, even women, thought God forbid I say it lest I start an uprising). If this woman is having issues with her husband, it's more than likely because she's a domineering *** who has some serious issues with her own self-esteem, and not because her husband is this idiotic, ape-like creature she's portraying him to be. I can't imagine being her husband and knowing I was the source of such a degrading book. For God's sake, it's called equality: women (surprise!) don't know everything, and we certainly don't have the right to micromanage anyone's life because we're 'better' than them. Sexism works both ways, but some people are just too stupid to see it. Maybe someone should put a leash on her.

What a joke. Sounds like something that would be in Cosmopolitan. Same brain dead b.s. that is spewed ad naseum in that mag every month: how to manipulate men to get what YOU want. I can't believe anyone would take this advice seriously.

This bullshit

It is actually good advice, because in essence it is saying, Stop Nagging!! and that is good! and, it can go both ways, so it is not sexist! I am sorry, but you can not have a "perfect" relationship... there are always some problems at some point.. and nagging can cause more problems, so if not nagging works, then this is good advice!

This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen. I've always been shocked by the manner in which society belittles the intelligence of the world's male population. Anymore it seems that the way to empower women is to lessen the importance of the male's role in a relationship. I thought that things were bad when I watched dopey husbands stumble around in sitcoms after their much more attractive, far more intelligent wives, only useful as the comedic relief in the show when they made silly 'man mistakes'. However, this really takes the cake. The fact that it's acceptable to treat one's spouse as if they were your pet, is just revolting. What's even more revolting is that if the roles were switched, and it was a male writer telling men how to train women like dogs, it would probably be banned, or at least cause a huge outrage. Men aren't these stupid, blundering idiots that we're being taught to see them as: they're fallible human beings just like anyone else in the world (yes, even women, thought God forbid I say it lest I start an uprising). If this woman is having issues with her husband, it's more than likely because she's a domineering *** who has some serious issues with her own self-esteem, and not because her husband is this idiotic, ape-like creature she's portraying him to be. I can't imagine being her husband and knowing I was the source of such a degrading book. For God's sake, it's called equality: women (surprise!) don't know everything, and we certainly don't have the right to micromanage anyone's life because we're 'better' than them. Sexism works both ways, but some people are just too stupid to see it. Maybe someone should put a leash on her.

Stupid *** should help him find his keys!!! WTF this is Ground Breaking??? *** pleazzz

this is really stupid article by very stupid writer. not worth reading was turn off my the first sentence. really stupid.

This type of thinking further reinforces a gulf of disrespect between spouses. Reducing a relationship to the level of "training", as one would an animal, negates the basic premis of what a healthy coupling ought to be. Marriage is, unless I'm living in a fantasy, an equal exchange of love, ideas, support and understanding between a couple. My assumption is that ready-for-marriage couples understand they're agreeing upon an arrangement of (hopefully) lifetime mutual respect, support, communication and concommitant growth within which they may choose to raise a child or children. To do anything different negates the very premise of the institution.

It works both ways...women can be trained as well.

www.dontdatethatgolddigger.com

We,as partners, do not want to be treated as domesticated and obediant animals or childen. If I was to write a book about training my wife I would be ridiculed by millions until death. If an individual in a couple has a problem with their partner then a discussion is necessary. Why on Earth do they beleive that resorting to mind games will solve problems at all. Mind games build a faulty foundation for a relationship.

Maybe Amy needs to be trained herself, if there ever was a "training academy" for men there would also be one for women as well. That in reality will never happen considering that people are not animals, and never will be animals. This woman is a disgrace to the HUMAN RACE and should be ashamed at such ignorant nonsense.

This is horrible. If anything, this makes me not want to get married. What happened to loving a person for who they are? Should guys be able to "train" women to change the things they don't like about them? That wouldn't go over well. You actually think this is good for relationships? This is demeaning. A woman trying to control a man is a good recipe to end a relationship.

This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen. I've always been shocked by the manner in which society belittles the intelligence of the world's male population. Anymore it seems that the way to empower women is to lessen the importance of the male's role in a relationship. I thought that things were bad when I watched dopey husbands stumble around in sitcoms after their much more attractive, far more intelligent wives, only useful as the comedic relief in the show when they made silly 'man mistakes'. However, this really takes the cake. The fact that it's acceptable to treat one's spouse as if they were your pet, is just revolting. What's even more revolting is that if the roles were switched, and it was a male writer telling men how to train women like dogs, it would probably be banned, or at least cause a huge outrage. Men aren't these stupid, blundering idiots that we're being taught to see them as: they're fallible human beings just like anyone else in the world (yes, even women, thought God forbid I say it lest I start an uprising). If this woman is having issues with her husband, it's more than likely because she's a domineering *** who has some serious issues with her own self-esteem, and not because her husband is this idiotic, ape-like creature she's portraying him to be. I can't imagine being her husband and knowing I was the source of such a degrading book. For God's sake, it's called equality: women (surprise!) don't know everything, and we certainly don't have the right to micromanage anyone's life because we're 'better' than them. Sexism works both ways, but some people are just too stupid to see it. Maybe someone should put a leash on her.