How to Train a Husband

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: nonagsallowed @ 02/17/2008 10:19:37 PM

    My last girlfriend was hiding a copy of "Why Men Marry ***." While not identical to this approach, both books subscribe to the notion that men are idiotic neanderthals who can somehow be saved by their wive's manipulative behavior.

    Two weeks after finding the book, and an honest discussion about the dangers of the recommendations, I chose to end the relationship.

    If I wanted to be manipulated, or nagged, I would have married my mother.

    nonagsallowed

  • Posted By: jimbomcdaniels @ 02/17/2008 10:19:36 PM

    People are so over-sensitive. People ARE animals. We respond similarly. You guys are all getting so bent out of shape about the comparison between people and animals, all because of the tone of the article. The simple fact is - reacting positively to good things and overlooking bad things is the fundamental component of a healthy relationship - you can twist any human behavior into looking like manipulation if you try hard enough.

  • Posted By: Infectious @ 02/17/2008 10:19:32 PM

    I find this article offensive at so many different levels. I wounder how she would feel if someone wrote an article about how to train a wife, I am sure heads would role even for suggesting such a title. The truth is no body is trained to do any thing but one changes for the people you love. Its unbelievable the kind of things that get published these days.

  • Posted By: bobbylax @ 02/17/2008 10:19:30 PM

    There's an easier way to get what you want from a man...

  • Posted By: kestrelk8 @ 02/17/2008 10:19:27 PM

    Let me remind you people that we as human beings do belong to animal kingdom although some of YOU would like to think otherwise. It's evolution, baby -- so its no wonder than similar methods used on other animals work on us as well. Behavior in any creature and ESPECIALLY humans is directly correlative to the reaction it gets from other people. If those other people react in a way that's pleasing to the person doing the behavior, then that behavior will continue because that person is being satisfied/rewarded. If it is ignored then it will stop because that person is not satisfied or rewarded. This is because we are a pack oriented species. Through out history both our species and our ancestors lived in communities. If you don't exhibit behavior that the pack identifies with you're out. And there's not a big chance of survival on those terms. Applying this psychology to marriage is just on a slightly smaller scale. In addition, I don't think this author is meaning to say that you're "training" your spouse as literally as all of you are taking it. It's more coaxing a behavior out of someone one not really training them to be some way.

  • Posted By: wssemm @ 02/17/2008 10:19:22 PM

    This type of thinking further reinforces a gulf of disrespect between spouses. Reducing a relationship to the level of "training", as one would an animal, negates the basic premis of what a healthy coupling ought to be. Marriage is, unless I'm living in a fantasy, an equal exchange of love, ideas, support and understanding between a couple. My assumption is that ready-for-marriage couples understand they're agreeing upon an arrangement of (hopefully) lifetime mutual respect, support, communication and concommitant growth within which they may choose to raise a child or children. To do anything different negates the very premise of the institution.

  • Posted By: Eslake @ 02/17/2008 10:19:17 PM

    Something to Think about..

    If a man enters a relationship with ideas of "training" the woman, he is controlling and masogynistic. There are even treatments for his "condition" of seaking weaker - easy to control - women.

    But it is perfectly acceptable for women to do the same thing?

    I know the article says it works both wasy but...
    What if a man wrote the same thing in regards to training Women as Animals? Can you imagine the outcry? It would never find a publisher for one thing, because there would be legal liabilities. Odd that in a supposedly "Equal" society, things are so unequal.

  • Posted By: harrisonm43 @ 02/17/2008 10:19:16 PM

    Women are somehow able to get away with this sort of thing with total impunity, but heaven forbid a man suggest that any woman anywhere could use some improvement. Men can't even write something as innocuous as The Dangerous Book for Boys without being labeled as sexist and exclusionary. We've been good sports for a long time now but I think it's time media scales back on the constant barrage of imagery and stories that show men as nothing but stupid, lazy, incapable, buffoons while every woman is a successful career woman and super mom who haplessly puts up with her husbands inadequacy. Why don't we just start treating each other like real people for once.

  • Posted By: respectfulofmyman @ 02/17/2008 10:19:14 PM

    Have you been drinking too much alcohol or are you always so cold and unpassionate towards men. I never knew someone like you that would manipulate, disrespect and treat your husband and other victims like an animal. Your husband better hurry up and divorce you!!! You don't deserve him. give him my phone number. I will show you how to respect and treat my new man. 847-769-2068

  • Posted By: philmjr @ 02/15/2008 2:14:50 PM

    I can understand the concern over the demand for policital correctness, and even aknowledge that this demand may fall more heavily on men. I'm not saying that's right, just acknowledging the reality of it. But I don't feel the author has been complacent or tactless. If anyone has, it would be Newsweek for issueing an editorial that erroneously states that the author wants women to treat men as hapless animals to be trained. I don't feel that's what the author is stating at all, and Newsweek only represented it in that fashion to get a rise out of readers which obviously worked. The author wasn't reckless with her expressions, Newsweek was reckless with its representation of what the author's book was really about. And on top of that Newsweek was reckless intentionally and have recieved exactly the response they were looking for.

    • Posted By: tboneisme @ 02/15/2008 4:29:27 PM

      Well said! I think it is ridiculous that this has turned into a battle of the sexes with many posters making truly unbelievable generalizations about men and women. Actually, if you do more research on the book, you will find it is not exactly as this article makes it out to be. And I think people are getting their panties in a bunch because of the headline of this Newsweek article, when actually the book it focuses on is pretty innocuous. Have a sense of humor people! The husband of the author has a great one.

      Some of the comments on this board are sickening. We should all be thought of as individuals and those posters who think that all women are one way and all men are another really need to get out more!

      And yes, men are probably expected to be more PC than women in general. Tthis is because historically women have had to struggle for equal treatment. Therefore, for better or worse, we are much more sensitive to sexist comments.

      • Posted By: NormL33 @ 02/15/2008 8:53:28 PM

        Look at what you have spawned:
        How women are learning to control their men: operant conditioning ...
        From <em>The Independent</em>: Bring Your Husband to Heel is a new [BBC] six-part series which deals with a variety of problems such as how to motivate a man to do the washing up ...

        www.clickertraining.com/node/448 · Cached page
        ABC News: Husbands and Dogs: How Much Do They Have in Common?
        Husbands and Dogs: How Much Do They Have in Common? ... A New British Reality Show Says Husbands Can Be Trained Just Like Dogs

        abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=1060569

        • Posted By: Northof49 @ 02/17/2008 10:19:10 PM

          Oh, get over your historical victimhood, lady...both genders , people, want to be respected. Men just dont whine about it the way women do. We just go have sex with the secretary instead of our wives...
          Cee You Next Tuesday

  • Posted By: cyclicalretrogression @ 02/17/2008 10:19:09 PM

    I think this idea is a useful one not a very pragmatic one. It's called a mutual relationship, not a feudal relationship. If I were the husband, I don't think I would be very happy if I were treated like a dog. Sure, I might get accolades, but I don't think I would feel loved. Instead I would feel exploited, and eventually try and find another wife.

  • Posted By: AlphaLatro @ 02/17/2008 10:13:32 PM

    FUKU NEWSWEEK! I would never subscribe to any media that prints such ignorant articles!

    • Posted By: onefinephil @ 02/17/2008 10:19:08 PM

      I would agree with you on that. this lady has to be a great dick sucker . train me my azz.

  • Posted By: jowbeeeroobee @ 02/17/2008 10:19:06 PM

    LOL interesting.. i read something like this on finestimplants.com ?

  • Posted By: coolnan @ 02/17/2008 10:19:04 PM

    EXPLODESSSS!!!!!!
    EXPLLODDDESSSS!!!!!
    BOOM!!!!

  • Posted By: marcknofler1 @ 02/17/2008 10:18:56 PM

    Stupid *** should help him find the keys....WTF this is not groundbreaking!!!

  • Posted By: jowbeeeroobee @ 02/17/2008 10:18:55 PM

    LOL interesting.. i read something like this on finestimplants.com ?

  • Posted By: fdny7 @ 02/17/2008 10:18:47 PM

    Guys, Dont bother responding to this type of cruelty. Instead, boycott newsweek & yahoo. Go google!!

  • Posted By: bobbylax @ 02/17/2008 10:18:42 PM

    There's an easier way to get what you want from a man...

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse