Accounting 101: The Clintons

In a fresh sign of trouble for Hillary Rodham Clinton, one of the former first lady's congressional black supporters intends to vote for Barack Obama at the Democratic National Convention, and a second, more prominent lawmaker is openly discussing a possible switch

Who cares where she got the money. Hillary gets elected Bill has the biggest intern 'pajama"party of his life while Hillary is out of town dealing with the crap she inherited fromBush,. Obama wins he has to deal with some crazy redneck from Arkansas or someone else trying to end his life because they don't believe in ???change". How could that ni**er think that he can tell me what to do or what is best for my family? The truth is yet to be told in heavily white supremecist power bases in these coming weeks. We can even add a few blacks into the fray who would love to lynch Obama. Don???t believe the hype of all this unity and niceness. The Clintons are not nice people. Obama is a nice man. Herein lies the difference. Hillary told Bill after the fiasco with his friend the intern you will make this up to me. Bill is tired of hearing the bitching. It???s a deal made with the devil. The only problem is that both of them want their own name at the top of the Marquee. This race for Hillary is about vindication, of a husband who did her wrong, of so many swept under the carpet lies that make her stay awake at night. The days of old are not gone they are still here???Hillary represents the fact that white entitlement lives...while she remains completed reeled by the absolute indignation of a black man to actually want to heal our country that brings all of our true beliefs to the surface. This isn't about experience, it's not about class--its about power. If the voices of the American people are truly heard perhaps we will move forward toward regaining the pride in being an American. Right now it???s downright embarrassing. It's unfortunate that the lies continually perpetuated by the Clintons may translate into the same old S**T just another day syndrome that America needs to free itself from. Since when does throwing a party at the White House while your husband is being serviced by an intern qualify you to be President. A woman scorned is a very dangerous one. She is bitter and pretending to be nice and America is waking up to the continued fake rhetoric. I don't know who has experience being the President until they take the oath of office. Certainly experience is not the issue--power, money, prestige and entitlement with the Clintons stands prominent. Senator Obama is the real deal --and I hope and pray that he had no Judas to be found.

Who cares where she got the money. Hillary gets elected Bill has the biggest intern 'pajama"party of his life while Hillary is out of town dealing with the crap she inherited fromBush,. Obama wins he has to deal with some crazy redneck from Arkansas or someone else trying to end his life because they don't believe in ???change". How could that ni**er think that he can tell me what to do or what is best for my family? The truth is yet to be told in heavily white supremecist power bases in these coming weeks. We can even add a few blacks into the fray who would love to lynch Obama. Don???t believe the hype of all this unity and niceness. The Clintons are not nice people. Obama is a nice man. Herein lies the difference. Hillary told Bill after the fiasco with his friend the intern you will make this up to me. Bill is tired of hearing the bitching. It???s a deal made with the devil. The only problem is that both of them want their own name at the top of the Marquee. This race for Hillary is about vindication, of a husband who did her wrong, of so many swept under the carpet lies that make her stay awake at night. The days of old are not gone they are still here???Hillary represents the fact that white entitlement lives...while she remains completed reeled by the absolute indignation of a black man to actually want to heal our country that brings all of our true beliefs to the surface. This isn't about experience, it's not about class--its about power. If the voices of the American people are truly heard perhaps we will move forward toward regaining the pride in being an American. Right now it???s downright embarrassing. It's unfortunate that the lies continually perpetuated by the Clintons may translate into the same old S**T just another day syndrome that America needs to free itself from. Since when does throwing a party at the White House while your husband is being service by an intern qualify you to be President. A woman scorned is a very dangerous one. She is bitter and pretending to be nice and America is waking up to the continued fake rhetoric. I don't know who has experience being the President until they take the oath of office. Certainly experience is not the issue--power, money, prestige and entitlement with the Clintons stands prominent. Senator Obama is the real deal --and I hope and pray that he has no Judas to be found.

Investigate Obama, Investigate Clinton, Investigate McCain, investigate yourself. If you dig deep enough, dirt will show up on anyone and everyone. It's not relevant. What does matter is who can get our economy back on track and our men and women back home, and repair and restore our social and economic ties with the rest of the world.

All candidates have good and bad points. Clinton has estabished resources, name recoginition, experience in The White House. Drawbacks, Old Politics, White Water. She also authorized a war which cost this country billions of dollars which should be going toward education, transportation, and health care and other important national issues in OUR country. The decision also contributes to the recessions that most of the country is currently experiencing. Obama, inexperienced period. Pros.. The guy out raised a 20 year established political machine by twice the rated (Anyone who can raise that kind of money from a grass roots movement is probably more than capable of devising a plan to jump start the american economy).
He also has better odds at converting Red States, and Moderate Republican and Independants.
So, America needs to make a choice based on issues that matter not irrelevant distractions and inconsistancies that all politicians and humans beings all share. Lets vote on "The Real Issues."
Who are we going to benefit more from, and suffer less with. Who can provide the best win win situation
for everyone or at least come closest to the idea.

Why Newsweek only investigated Clinton's finance? Why Newsweek doesn't investigate Obama's link to Nuclear Power Company.

As syndicated columnist BONNIE ERBE???s article ???Chameleon Obama changes hue to match color of state he's in??? indicates:

???...But up to this point, Obama has had the distinct advantage (and disadvantage) of being less well known. That era will soon be behind him.
Most damaging to Obama so far is a New York Times article published several days ago showing that while in Iowa during a stump speech Obama claimed to have "passed" a bill regulating nuclear power plants.
Trouble is, that measure never was approved by the Senate. The bill was to have required nuclear power plants to alert citizens if even minor leaks of radioactive waste were discovered. Under current law, only significant leaks must be made public.
While Obama claimed to have "passed" a bill that never did pass, he also participated in negotiations that watered down the measure to the point of meaninglessness. That, however, didn't stop him from claiming the mantle of being pro-environment and anti-nuclear pollution while campaigning. Is this another case of "I invented the Internet"?
What's worse, he took campaign contributions worth hundreds of thousands of dollars from Exelon executives and employees. Exelon is the company that owned a plant that kept smaller leaks quiet. According to its own Web site, it is also the largest nuclear power provider in the nation.
We can all expect to see more of the same as reporters dig deeper into Obama's record. For example, are the young and/or upscale ultra-liberals who form the core of his voter base going to be thrilled by comments he made while in Idaho, trying to portray himself as pro-gun rights?
According to The Washington Post's Web site, the following happened while he made a visit to Boise State University's Taco Bell Arena before a roaring crowd of thousands:
"Obama was not shy about tailoring his stump speech for the setting, adding a line to rebut any fears that he is aggressively pro-gun control, an issue he almost never mentions on the trail. He urged the crowd not to listen to 'people who say, "He doesn't believe in the Second Amendment." We've got a lot of hunters in Southern Illinois and I've got no intention of taking away people's guns.' "
How are the ultra-liberals going to feel when they learn their shining star is hunter- and gun-friendly? Is this guy a friend of Mitt Romney -- liberal while campaigning in blue states and conservative while in red states?
Clinton certainly has major issues of her own: Whitewater, Lewinsky, the list goes on. But she has been about as fully vetted as any candidate for any office has ever been. The chance of a major surprise is slim. But Obama's record and list of positions are full of surprises, which is why it's dangerous for any voter to fall in love with any candidate before really getting to know him or her.???

Listen up all of you... We as the average Americans are the puppets. The old School politicians in this country have us all duped....I'd go so far to say much of what we perceive as an election is already planned out, the powers that be already have their agenda and you will see another supreme justice/electoral college end to this election with the status quo staying. I'd put money on it, and it scares me to death. I say if there is not a drastic change via the next election, i.e all old school out and issue in a new era, we should all rise up and say enough! Time for a revolution!

I wonder how much of Obama's money comes from outside the US. As we all know, there is no restriction to prevent foreign citizens from donating to a US political campaign.

While everyone here is complaining about where this money came in, has anyone noticed at this point that the DAY AFTER she released this news to the press, she magically recieved 7 million in contributions from god knows where? I would be apt to believe that there never was a 5 million dollar loan, just a very slick ploy to get more campaign donations that seems to have worked out well. I doubt it'll work twice though.