Quantcast
 
 
 
INTELLIGENCE

Back on the Tape Trail

 
Sponsored by
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

 

Newly released documents suggest that the U.S. government videotaped more Qaeda suspects than it has publicly disclosed. Court filings unsealed last week show that federal prosecutors recently informed a judge about videos depicting the questioning of a key figure in the case of convicted Qaeda operative Zacarias Moussaoui. Although the witness's name was redacted, a U.S. official (who asked for anonymity discussing sensitive matters) acknowledged that it was Mohammad al-Qatani, the reputed "20th hijacker," who has been detained at Guantánamo Bay since 2002. A Qatani video could create problems: his treatment was the subject of an extensive investigation by the U.S. Southern Command. The probe, whose results were released in 2005, found that he'd been forced to wear a bra, stand naked in front of female guards, wear a leash and "perform a series of dog tricks." The Southern Command report concluded that while these practices were "abusive and degrading," they did not rise to the level of "inhumane treatment" barred by law. But the existence of video footage could become a factor if, as The New York Times reported last week, Qatani is among those likely to face charges by the Pentagon for his alleged role in the 9/11 plot. "This is critical to determining the lawfulness" of Qatani's interrogation, said ACLU lawyer Jameel Jaffer. The ACLU plans to file a motion demanding that the Pentagon release the tapes.

Qatani may not be the last witness to turn up on interrogation tapes. Another newly released document shows that the State Department permitted foreign intelligence services to question Gitmo detainees in June 2002 under the condition that the United States would record audio and video. It's unclear how many of those tapes still exist. A spokesman for the U.S. military at Gitmo told NEWSWEEK that base officials are "not required to tape interrogations and did not routinely do so."

© 2008

 
Discuss
Member Comments
  • Posted By: breit1 @ 02/12/2008 10:11:14 PM

    Comment: So you are trying to be correct like Kennedy, Kerry, Caroline etc.

    Consider you???re self as intellectually overloaded.

  • Posted By: breit1 @ 02/10/2008 11:10:26 AM

    Comment: Calling me crazy, for saying that Obama???s family is 100% Muslim, pointing to his white mother. Only one who has, often been called crazy, can utter those words, she chose to disregard, was he as vocal against the war launched against Christian Serbia? So obsessed, was she, not to realize that Obama???s family on his fathers side is 100% Muslim so he had an ulterior motive. To vote against the war. Yes I must spell it out, a Muslim nation. He new that otherwise he would not be able ever to face his father???s family! He is the second former Muslim trying to sneak in to the white house.

  • Posted By: breit1 @ 02/10/2008 10:56:03 AM

    Comment: Unmasking Obama: Voting not to invade a Muslim state, (it would also upset his fathers 100% Muslim family) was he, as vocal against invading a Christian state Serbia? He says his first appointment is to talk the enemy in Iran, it is like saying the next will be Osama!

Sponsored by
 
 
 
The Peek
 
 
SPORTS

Speedo's new and controversial high-tech LZR suit is helping swimmers smash dozens of records. How the company plans to capitalize on Olympic gold.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
AFRICA

These are among the ruling party's weapons against opposition voters. Still, the population clearly didn't cooperate in Friday's vote.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu