So Much for a Warm Welcome

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Sapphira @ 02/10/2008 11:13:00 PM

    John McCain is a maniac! Everyone simply needs to see that. Just watch him. The guy has "Crazyman" written all over him.

    Sapphira Kelly

  • Posted By: sparkling @ 02/10/2008 11:01:17 PM

    Huckabee is the only genuine conservative that can be trusted.

  • Posted By: prueter @ 02/10/2008 10:45:36 PM

    I can not understand what credentials these people have to say anything to which anyone should give credence. This whole aspect of commentary gives me the willies. Are they experts in the field of diplomacy? Do they have academic credentials which elevate them above the common folk such that the common folk should be willing to take notice? Are they steeped in the history of american political philosophy? What we have are commentators without credentials consulting other commentators who also lack credentials. Weird.

  • Posted By: Teka10 @ 02/10/2008 10:32:06 PM

    The NeoCons, who consider War the major business of the Republican Party and who have seized control of that Party for a Platform, don't want to crush the conservatives or the evangelicals. To do so would ensure that none of them would ever be elected again. The RHINOS know their limitations. They have to have the base of the Party to continue their reign of power, to establish McCain's International Military Strike Force with the USA fighting with other foreign nations wherever McCain and the NeoCons thought they were needed. If you think I am making that up, read the AP story on it in McClatchy Newspapers today.

    The conservatives are just disgusted with the NeoCons. Their insane spending. Their Imperialism. Their compulsion to work with the most liberal Democrats and rub the noses of the Republican base in it. Abortion is an issue as is Gay Marriage. You might not agree with that and Kennedy has enough Hate Crimes passed about it to put us all away for five years, but just as Democrats put diversity and multiculturialsm on a pedestal even to the point of wishing English to be our National Language, the parties differ. The RHINOS like McCain are usually with the Democrats. Bush's White House through the EOEC has sued over 200 USA companies, including the Salvation Army, because they wanted employees to speak English on the job. McCain and the other RHINO"S will continue that push to make us a bi-lingual nation and are firmly behind the move for NAFTA.

    If you like your job and do not wish to see it outsourced, if you agree that the invasion of Afghansitan was the right thing to do and we have won in Iraq and it is time to bring out troops home..from there and Germany and Korea and England and Japan..we have 900 overseas bases and the Pentagon will not issue a cost statement on how much we pay for them. Then those NeoCons who get thier jollies by the power they get from this military empire, get in your face and tell you there is no money for affordable health care.
    Romney, who was a conservative, had a health care plan in MA that satisfied most everyone.

    Bush is a NeoCon. McCain is a NeoCon. All of the people endorsing him and standing with him are NeoCons. If you like the last eight years...he is your man. If not..if you want someone like Reagan...Hucklebee is your man. It is your choice.
    And no...thought the NeoCons claim Reagan as their own...Reagan's While House Chief of Staff is out managing Hucklebee's campaign. I promise you...they are not with McCain.

  • Posted By: trussellc @ 02/10/2008 10:05:36 PM

    This is great, these so called conservatives are tearing up the Republican party to the point the Democrats could have a cartoon character run for the White House and they would win. Not one of them heard Senator McCain speech on pulling together. It is the likes of these talk show goons that drove me from the Republican party.

  • Posted By: trussellc @ 02/10/2008 10:03:35 PM

    This is great, these so called conservatives are tearing up the Republican party to the point the Democrats could have a cartoon character run for the White House and they would win. Not one of them heard Senator McCain speech on pulling together. It is the likes of these talk show goons that drove me from the Republican party.

  • Posted By: QuillMoreTeKKsans @ 02/10/2008 9:49:27 PM

    don't you worry you guys, in 2004 52 million voted for bush, if this goes on, 12 milliion will vote for mccain in the primaries. Do you really believe that those 40 million won't come to the polls in november? If you're stupid, like democrats, then go on beleiving that, but come november, everybody will rally around McCain, because infighting is what republicans do best, before uniting.

  • Posted By: doctorfixit @ 02/10/2008 9:12:06 PM

    McCain and his stooges are so obvious in their disgust for conservatives. I have no doubt that McCain would try to settle a lot of old scores - but he is never going to get the chance, thank God. The entire Republican establishment and AIr Force One fulll of lipstick will not make any difference. You would have to drug every conservative and brainwash them to make them believe or forget McCain's treachery. And when they woke up, he;d still be there smirking, the little sawed off runt.

    • Posted By: sfcret @ 02/10/2008 9:40:34 PM

      Hannity, Limbaugh, Coulter, & other conservative talk shows wouldn't know a Reagan Conservative if one bit them in the rear end.

  • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 02/10/2008 2:03:55 PM

    I think the "conservative" leaders are pissed off that Josef Stalin is not available to nominate. I've voted Republican since Reagan, but have become disallusioned with the far right. They are no better than Pelosi/Reid. A bunch of quacks. Thank you John McCain.

    • Posted By: doctorfixit @ 02/10/2008 9:30:07 PM

      Stalin was a liberal socialist. He would be a Democrat, as would Hitler and Mussolini. And McCain, another psychotic megalomaniac.

  • Posted By: idobbs @ 02/10/2008 5:01:11 PM

    "......so dogmatic that it might choose purity over victory."
    What the hell good is a victory if upon achieving it you turn around and implement the same agenda of the statist liberals that you fought against in the first place? My lack of interest in "fighting climate change " isn't because the Democrats are in favor of doing so; it comes from my belief that a struggle against universal dynamism is an idea too stupid to quantify in terms of magnitude.Said idea doesn't become any less ridiculous when advocated by a Republican. Fighting is only justifiable when there is something worthwile to gain, and as of Romney's departure from the race, this fight is over. I see no scenario by which someone competent and qualified becomes the next president. If not wanting to vote for an ill-tempered halfwit that would equate oil drilling in the ANWR to drilling for oil in the Grand Canyon, then God save us.

    • Posted By: doctorfixit @ 02/10/2008 9:27:43 PM

      There is no victory in surrender to the liberal fascists.

  • Posted By: jfenh @ 02/10/2008 5:26:40 PM

    The venom reflected in this story is instructive about what is wrong with America today. Each side cares more about ideology and attack than it does about attacking the real problems we face as a nation - problems that grow more pressing with each year that we fail to take action: health care, energy, the war in Iraq, education, and the national debt, to name only a few. If we do not put aside our differences and resolve these problems, we will sufffer the consequences.

    • Posted By: doctorfixit @ 02/10/2008 9:27:04 PM

      I agree we should resolvethe differences. The liberal fascists need to surrender. They will be given safe passage to Venezuela, Cuba, or some other Socialist country. Those who do not surrender will be shot. That will greatly reduce greenhouse gases.

    • Posted By: rminden @ 02/10/2008 8:21:39 PM

      I agree, oh, and we are in a Democratic Congress indused Recession.

      • Posted By: Cazador72 @ 02/10/2008 9:06:06 PM

        Er, no. Where was the oversight for the housing predatory lending? Why were we taken to war without a war tax? Why did Bush never oppose any of the outrageous budgets Republicans put forth under Tom Delay? Why did they increase the size of the government without having any way to pay for it? Or is it that reality has a "liberal bias"? Republicans made this mess, plain and simple, only weasels or simpletons would say it's not.

  • Posted By: QuillMoreTeKKsans @ 02/10/2008 9:26:58 PM

    Sometimes, when in fantasyland, I envision coulter and limbauw during a televised debate over gunpriviliges. They end up gunning each other down because they can't agree who is the more neokkkon talkshow host, and they turn the debate into who is the best shot with a fully automatic ... ;) just kidding you guys!! McCain is republican pain.

  • Posted By: idobbs @ 02/10/2008 5:00:44 PM

    "......so dogmatic that it might choose purity over victory."
    What the hell good is a victory if upon achieving it you turn around and implement the same agenda of the statist liberals that you fought against in the first place? My lack of interest in "fighting climate change " isn't because the Democrats are in favor of doing so; it comes from my belief that a struggle against universal dynamism is an idea too stupid to quantify in terms of magnitude.Said idea doesn't become any less ridiculous when advocated by a Republican. Fighting is only justifiable when there is something worthwile to gain, and as of Romney's departure from the race, this fight is over. I see no scenario by which someone competent and qualified becomes the next president. If not wanting to vote for an ill-tempered halfwit that would equate oil drilling in the ANWR to drilling for oil in the Grand Canyon, then God save us.

    • Posted By: Cazador72 @ 02/10/2008 9:19:29 PM

      Is "universal dynamism" a mindless, unfocused predation of the same environment we need to live in? The unrestrained spending we engaged in for almost eight years? The lack of oversight and planning in Iraq because we were so focused on "victory" we forgot about winning? The lack of proper oversight in imports because we are so focused on profit? Then "universal dynamism" sounds like a euphemism for irresponsibility and recklessness. Read about the demise of the Roman empire, the Aztecs and the accounts of Spanish conquistadors about Rapa Nui (Easter Island) and then contemplate if that type of shortsightedness is what you want. Progress takes a little more thinking about.

  • Posted By: benvictor @ 02/10/2008 8:02:29 PM

    I am a Hillary democrat. If Hillary falters given the onslaught by all those in the party, I will become a republican. I want to start promoting the ideal ticket: John McCain and his running mate, Michael Bloomberg. John for foreign affairs/Iraq/terrorism and Michael to fix the broken economy. I am so charged, and not alone as I talk with my friends.

    • Posted By: doctorfixit @ 02/10/2008 9:18:17 PM

      Bllomberg "fix" the economy? You mean fix, as in rig an election? I agree, as a socialist Bloomberg would be an ideal mate for McAmnesty, who is himself a big-government socialist.

  • Posted By: wdeyle @ 02/10/2008 8:59:10 PM

    How many votes could Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, and others of that ilk get if they were running for office?Answer -- The support would be minimal so that should tell us something about the credibility of their views on John McCain - or anyone else.

  • Posted By: Judy Lee @ 02/10/2008 5:52:02 PM

    I have voted for the democratic candidate in every presidential election since I was 20 years old and I am now a 70 year old female retired college administrator. I am leaning toward Senator McCain (however, there are still 8 months left for me to mull this over). I honestly believe in that 4 to 8 years when Senator Obama has more experience he would make a good president. Although I am somewhat of a feminist, I do know that Senator Clinton has too many enemies in and out of Congress to be effective. Although the President is the leader of the free world, he/she is not the only leader of the United States. It will take someone who can compromise, who is respected, and who is experienced and wise to undo the damage that President Bush has done to the morale of the citizens of this country.

    • Posted By: Cazador72 @ 02/10/2008 8:56:52 PM

      Good comment Judy, although I'd say that the people who rant against Hillary are just expressing their own self-hate inside. Do this experiment, assuming you know the issues, find someone who claims to hate Hillary and simply ask them why. Just listen and look at their reactions, you are likely to hear nothing specific among the "er... uh... well... you see..."
      I think you overestimate the amount of respect that McCain would get. In the last several years he has managed to erase most of his appeal with independents (including me) because he cozied up to Bush after they disgracefully insulted his record and when he should have stood up to the runaway spending. If he was the same man he was eight years ago, he would doubtless win, but he is not.

  • Posted By: Phil Byler @ 02/10/2008 8:56:18 PM

    The Newsweek readers should be informed that there are plenty of conservatives who have denounced Ann Coulter and turned off Rush Limbaugh because of their nitwit attacks on John McCain.

  • Posted By: midnight05 @ 02/10/2008 8:50:31 PM

    The late Ogden Nash had a wonderful verse about cannibals.

    Among the anthropophagi/One's friends are ones sarcophagi.

    I don't know if it's a consolation that the people eating you are your relatives

  • Posted By: Cazador72 @ 02/10/2008 8:36:01 PM

    You guys couldn't possibly be serious! Bush and his corrupt lackeys in congress were the ones who bankrupted our economy! The ran irresponsible deficits and even took us to war, for the first time in history, without a war tax. They asked sacrifice from our troops but not from us at home. But don't believe me, actually LISTEN to McCain, he's saying the same thing. Bush and his congress put "everything on the card" and are leaving this debt for our kids to pay. Shame on them!
    Last time I remember, under Clinton we had a surplus, not a deficit and we were paying of the debt, not increasing it. You people are willfully blind.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse