Joe, I find it rather humourous that you carp about the "those radical conservatives" and how they've been running things for the last 7+ yrs. Has the conservative base, of which I'm proudly one, really been running things, there wouldn't have been the Harriet Myers debacle, nor McCain's sellout of excellent judicial nominees with his "Gang of 14" nonsense. There wouldn't have been McCain-Feingold, it would have been vetoed out of hand rather than signed into law with the lame hope that the courts would over turn it, Good luck with that happening with the court dominated by the likes of RBG and David David Breyer. Had the conservatives been truly in control, there wouldn't have been an effort to sneak McCain-Kennedy through, in some backroom deal, literally in the dead of night. Had the conservatives been firmly in control, there wouldn't be the possibility of McCain-Leiberman and all the cap and trade destruction of our economy to pander to global warming religion zealots.
It's your "Centurist Republicans," more commonly known as "RINO's," to the rest of us that are responsible for all that, and so much more, Trying to overturn the ban on partial birth abortion, suing Wisconsin Right to Life, to force them to shutup, to McCain stating that he wouldn't have nominated Samuel Alito because he "wears his conservatism on his sleeve." As if Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Renquist didn't wear their conservatism on their sleeves. McCain's recorded statement of Roberst and Alito being the benchmark for justices in the future means what exactly; that they're too conservative and so he'll nominate more moderate judges so he can pander to his buddies "Chappaquidick" Ted Kennedy, Dick "Turbin" Durbin, Patrick "Leaky" Leahy, Dianne "War Profiteer" Feinstein, "Up"Chuck "Schemer" and Hitlery Rottenhams Klintoon? Given his Senate track record, I'd bet a month's salary that is what he really means with his benchmark statement.
Regards,
Mike









Discuss