So Much for a Warm Welcome

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Time for Change @ 02/11/2008 10:47:38 AM

    Even if I agree with some things Ann Coulter says, she is a divider and this is sad. Stop letting this woman sell hate! She's what America doesn't need.

    • Posted By: maria_dee @ 02/11/2008 5:32:32 PM

      Mann Coulter is becoming unhinged over this McCain thing, and "El Rushbo" especially so. Ilistened to Rush for about ten minutes today on my lunch break. It was long enough to hear him deliver a really low blow to John McCain, basically equating McCain to Norman Bates of "psycho" fame.

      Note to Rush: You are losing listeners in the Philadelphia metro - in droves. We don't want to listen to your personal vendetta against John McCain. The thought occurred to me today, after your most recent example of McCain derangement, that you may have tracked the Dominican Republic rumor to someone related to Senator McCain. You know the story - about you being stopped at the airport fully stocked with VIagra. The word was you were there to enjoy the little boy trade.

      Just sayin'

      • Posted By: gaelg @ 02/11/2008 5:58:38 PM

        Bear in mind that the Conservative Right represents the well-paid, well-fed, well-housed, and well-insured whose jobs still reside in the United States, plus the bacillus-brained Religious-Right, whose concerns begin and end with public school prayer, banning abortion and gay marriage.

        Rush Limbaugh did language a mighty service when he coined the phrase, "Femi-Nazi" then Ann Coulter assumed the role and defined it.

  • Posted By: sfcret @ 02/10/2008 9:53:46 PM

    Hannity, Limbaugh, Coulter and other so called social conservatives do not speak for the Reagan conservatives, in fact they wouldn't know a Reagan conservative if one bit them in the rear end. They are suffering from a ego trip. It was not only the social conservatives that got President Reagan elected, it was conservative democrats including rank and file union members, independents, etc.

    • Posted By: maria_dee @ 02/11/2008 5:35:03 PM

      I got a screeching e-mail from a fellow republican who knows I support John McCain. It had to do with the divorce from his first wife. My reply: I'm voting for POTUS< not Husband of the Year.

      BTW, wasn't Reagan divorced? The only reason Rush and Hannity lasted this long is because enough of their listeners actually believe what they say.

  • Posted By: wwilsonvpgc @ 02/11/2008 5:34:05 PM

    Wait a minute: the Right gave us George W. Bush and Dick Cheney. As punishment for your sins, you have to sit out the next 100 elections. And, since apparently you don't think, no one cares what you "think". And why hasn't the New York Bar lifted Ann Coulter's license to practice for conduct that is clearly against all norms of civilized behavior?

  • Posted By: Teka10 @ 02/10/2008 12:26:46 PM

    Memories are short. Was it just six months ago that Kennedy/Martinez/Bush/McCain/ Graham/ and Co. were trying to sneak an Amnesty Bill through the USA Senate...which contained a 'Z" visas category which would have gone into effect on Bush's signature..and given legal status to EVERY illegal alien here? No one remembers that it was Sean and Rush and Laura and Co. reading that Bill...when they could get it and it was over 700 pages long..written by lobbyists and Amnesty Groups..written not to be understood with an exeption to exception..and those radio guys and gals brought in Lawyers from the Heritage Foundation and the Hudson Foundation and the Manhattan Institute to 'interpret' what McCain and Kennedy ahd written? And we discovered they had Social SEcurity in to the pot to be plundered...Do you people remember what they did for us? But for them.................Amnesty would be a done deal and you would be a lot worse off than you are now and you know it.
    McCain is many things. He is not a conservative. One of his promises as President is to form an International Fighting Force that will fight wars the UN won't..lead by the USA. Global World Govt. anyone? THAT is a conservative view?
    I would not vote for him for dog catcher.

    • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 02/10/2008 12:29:38 PM

      What ya gonna do? Vote for Hussein Obama? Islamic sympathizer for President. How far we have fallen.

      • Posted By: Terrils @ 02/11/2008 5:10:28 PM

        Indeed. Because we want a president who hates Muslims. And Hindus. And Catholics. And atheists. We want a president who hates EVERYONE who isn't just like you, HolyRoller, right? Because the president is only the president of the people you agree with. Everyone else can just go to the devil. Personally, I'd prefer a president who is sympathetic - to those like him (or her), and, more importantly, to those who differ. This country is not made up of only one kind of person, but we are all equally citizens, and the president should represent us all.

      • Posted By: thrasher32 @ 02/11/2008 12:39:41 PM

        Be quiet nazi.

      • Posted By: Time for Change @ 02/11/2008 10:59:04 AM

        Apparently HolyRoller, you have fallen quite far. If indeed, as your name might suggest, you are a Christian, you give the rest of us a bad name.

      • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 02/10/2008 12:57:51 PM

        If it pisss people like you off. That one benefit of Obama.If the christian right had their way we'd be living in our own theocratic state with our own version of the shariah...

  • Posted By: tiredofDEMSandREPUBS @ 02/11/2008 4:18:36 PM

    Nothing will ever get done unless pride is swallowed and our politicians meet in the middle, where the majority of Americans reside.

  • Posted By: paulte @ 02/11/2008 4:00:34 PM

    Sure McCain is not a true conservative but he is no liberal and on the Iraq war he is a fanatic with his 100 years comment. How much further right can you get than that? I think McCain's problem from the conservative perspective is that he is too willing to compromise with Democrats. He tells us that Ronald Reagan did that. Well, yes he did but only as a last resort and from a position of strength. If you can't get your whole program passed, then get what you can passed. I would say that McCain is center right, just slightly to the right of center.

    Both Hillary & Obama are left of center but not far left. In any event, doesn't it make more sense for conservatives to vote for the person furthest to the right? This is my policy when voting. I respect the views of the people who say that they cannot vote for McCain but I would ask them to reconsider. Do they really want to help Hillary win the White House? And for Christian conservatives like Dr Dobson, do they really want to help put Bill Clinton back into the White House?

    There is such a thing as strategic voting. You don't always have to vote for the person on the ballot. You can actually use your vote for another reason. In this election a Christian conservative could use his or her vote for McCain as an anti-hillary vote. That clears the conscience issue. Conservatives are fully 1/3 of the electorate. We can make a differerence; we can keep the Clintons both Hillary & Billary out of the White House. But in order to do that, we must all vote!

  • Posted By: mike35usmc @ 02/11/2008 3:27:25 PM

    The whole issue of John Mc Cain, to my mind, is fairly straightforward.
    As someone who's spent his entire adult life overseas, my knowledge and understanding or American politics is, admittedly, limited. My decisions tend to be very personal. A recent example would be the race between George Bush and John Kerry. While I did NOT like the idea of another "Bush" in the White House so soon after George senior, I despised John Kerry for his treacherous behavior during the Vietnam War. As a veteran of that conflict, I was determined to vote for anyone other than Kerry. He was, in my eyes, unfit to be Commander-in-Chief.
    In the present race for the White House, I find my self facing a similar predicament. I have been a Republican all my life but, if John Mc Cain becomes the Republican nominee, I will vote for his Democratic opponent, regardless of whom may be.
    My beef with Mc Cain is visceral. I believe, in my heart, that the Senator is a proven liar. I believe, in my heart, that Mc Cain betrayed American servicemen who were abandoned in South East Asia after the fall of Saigon. Further, it is my absolute belief that Mc Cain knew full well that POW's and MIA's were left behind and used his position on the Senate Committee to suppress evidence that would prove that point.
    I do not care a wit about the gaggle of questionable tin (medals) Mc Cain somehow bagged as a prisoner. Equally, I don't much care about the blatantly absurd suggestion that he is a "Great American Hero" , "A Hero of the Vietnam War" or "POW Hero." This is just overblown, sophomoric rhetoric with little connection to reality.
    The fact that a man, who served in the military, would knowing betray those who were left behind is all the reason I need to know he should not be in the White House. Vote for John Mc Cain? Not on your life!
    There's a reason why there are so many Vietnam Veterans Against Mc Cain.
    And for those who find my appraisal of the Senator outrageous or, unbelievable, I suggest reading Bill Hendon's book, An enormous crime, before making a judgement. If Hendon's book is too daunting, read Barbara Birchim's story, Is anybody listening, A true story about POW/MIA's in the Vietnam War.
    Mc Cain isn't the only one who betrayed his brotherhood and honor for political gain but, he's the one running for President. And he doesn't deserve to be Commander in Chief.

  • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 02/10/2008 11:58:18 AM

    I know what Rush's problem is. He's back on the "hillbilly heroin". And chances are he was promised some mormon gold.

    NO MORMONS!!! NO MOHAMMEDS!!!

    One down and one to go.

    JOHN McCAIN '08-Finally a voice of reason in a failing GOP.

    • Posted By: aad135 @ 02/11/2008 3:12:58 PM

      Roller - now you're on the McCain bandwagon..? A few months ago you were singing the praises of Guiliani, and bad mouthing McCain for his pandering to the greasy-Mexicans (I'm pretty sure that's the term you referred to quite often, much like Hussein Obama and Mormon Mitt in the recent past). You're are a sad, sad little man/woman (again, I state man/woman because Roller doesn't have the balls to answer any real questions, with intelligent answers..!)

    • Posted By: Cazador72 @ 02/10/2008 9:42:46 PM

      Hollyroller, you have no idea how funny it is to read "voice of reason" after your comments!

      God, I miss the times when most Christians were actually good people.

      • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 02/11/2008 9:21:42 AM

        Real Christians are. But we also know that mohammed doesn't negotiate or talk, he only converts or kills you. This Christian says lets see how many virgins Allah has. Soon there will be a shortage.

        MOHAMMED WAS A PEDOPHILE!!!

        • Posted By: thrasher32 @ 02/11/2008 12:42:01 PM

          Maybe you're the pedophile....

        • Posted By: thrasher32 @ 02/11/2008 12:41:36 PM

          HolyRoller, you are the liberals best friend, thank you for single-handedly exposing the ignorance of the so-called "conservative" movement through your inane babbling...

  • Posted By: have_a_cuddle @ 02/10/2008 1:00:10 PM

    McCain is a good guy. Even democrats like me would be okay with him, he's better than Bush by far and actually has experience with foreign policy. Just leave him alone.

    • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 02/10/2008 1:54:17 PM

      Thank You-I think that McCain will get the most crossover Dem. votes since Reagan. The DNC should be ashamed with its push for an Islamist sympathizer. How soon we forget.

      • Posted By: Cazador72 @ 02/10/2008 9:28:56 PM

        Islamic sympathizer? You mean Bush? Because he visits them in Saudi Arabia and holds hands with them and pays them good money for the oil which they then give to the extremists and the insurgency in Iraq. Bush also has proven really good at not catching Bin Laden, so he must like him too.
        Try reading something before you are done burning all the books, will ya? :-)

        • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 02/11/2008 9:23:16 AM

          Voting for Hussein, huh?

          • Posted By: angelus1967 @ 02/11/2008 12:28:19 PM

            Another typical "christian".....inflammatory rhetoric with no substance. I love the fact that you are trying to fan the flames of Obama being an Islamic sympathizer when that has been disproven time and again. And better yet, it seems to be the ONLY arguement you have! Someone says something you don't like and you throw them into the Obama camp.

            Again, typical christian......

            • Posted By: aad135 @ 02/11/2008 3:08:04 PM

              Angel - don't slap "Holy" with the christain lable; he/she is far from it. Read some posts and you'll see all he/she does is enflame anyone's point of view contrary to his/her position. Don't be offended, since he/she doesn't have the balls to answer any real questions with intelligent answers. Holy - the witless wonder..!

          • Posted By: thrasher32 @ 02/11/2008 12:38:57 PM

            Sure beats voting for mini-Hitler II...

      • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 02/10/2008 4:22:19 PM

        I agree with your first point.

  • Posted By: DanAli @ 02/09/2008 6:40:57 PM

    McCain loks old, feeble and testy. He will lose the fight for the center-left to Obama, and only tie it with Clinton. He would, if elected, govern as a Democrat. He has, since losing the primary to George Bush, essentially caucused with the Democrats on half of the important issues, and delighted until two years ago, in showing contempt for the conservative wing of the Republican party. He would go right back to that sneering as soon as elected, and would go right back to being a part of the Kennedy Feingold axis. The Democrats would get less of their agenda passsed with a Democratic president.

    • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 02/09/2008 10:11:19 PM

      America will never elect a mohammed. He is no more than a YouTube one hit wonder. The old man John McCain will get the most crossover Democrate votes since Reagan.

      • Posted By: Twister52 @ 02/10/2008 1:19:02 AM

        Hey, "HolyRoller", are you stumping for McCain now? Let's see, first, your man was Guliani, then it was Huckabee, and now McCain?! And yet all along you've viciously attacked Romney for "flip-flopping" and pandering. Give me a break, dude! You do know that all 3 of your "heros" do have DIFFERENT positions on multiple issues, right? Would you like me to send you some non-stick frying pans as you continue to flip-flop from candidate to candidate?.....

        At least I'm consistent, bro!

        Mitt 2012!

        Come on!, this is the part where you say something really intelligent like "I hate Mormons!"

        • Posted By: Braes @ 02/10/2008 2:55:04 AM

          Come on!, this is the part where you say something really intelligent like "I hate Mormons!"

          No, I like quite a few Mormons, but I dislike trust-fund Republicans who look like Bush, sound like Bush, promise me 4 more years of Bush, lie about their record, feign beliefs they do not hold, and lack any apparent conviction outside their obviously strong faith.

          • Posted By: thrasher32 @ 02/11/2008 1:44:01 PM

            I don't think anyone reallye HATES the mormons, although they're almost as annoying as the Jehovah's Witnesses or Hari Krishnas, rather I just want their cult to be outlawed and for all of them to be deprogrammed and re-admitted into society. Just like the Moonies.

          • Posted By: psalinas @ 02/11/2008 1:38:56 PM

            If we only voted for party leaders that don't lie we would not have any. So the question is which one lies the least and that is the candidate that we should vote for. I will be voting for Hillary she does not have to lie she can let Bill do it for her.

      • Posted By: thrasher32 @ 02/11/2008 12:31:36 PM

        Haha HolyRoller, I see you're still an idiot. See you in November, TRAITOR.

      • Posted By: Braes @ 02/10/2008 2:51:04 AM

        The Mohammed reference is sad at best. It is also Democratic votes. It is the Democratic Party. This is one election where that Democratic vote may not cross at all. You might want to look at the record Democratic turnouts in many states. You will also note upon even a cursory examination of the facts that America is very tired of what has happened. Obama, who is not my candidate is stomping my candidate who has a 20+ year machine.

    • Posted By: Braes @ 02/10/2008 3:15:59 AM

      John almost left the GOP to be independent after the Rove-Bush "Black-Love-Child" stunt in the South Carolina 2000 primary. Now if I and my wife had adopted a child from the 3rd world and had some political hack use it in such a filthy racist way against me, you might expect something beyond electoral dissonance. The Bush family going back to Prescott Walker has a sickening record in Politics, Jeb included. Look up the bankers/business plot against FDR. Look up the Bush Thyssen connections. 43's grand dad traded with the enemy and the Bush-Bin Laden connections are as solid.
      But hey, you guys did save some medical waste and prevent stem cell research. You got an Oil war, ask the chairman of Fed Ex who as a former military officer notes that 40% of our defense budget is protecting the oil trade. (And not capable now of defending us against emerging threats (Mike McConnell.))
      Yeah, McCain is sick of the neo-con whack jobs. Rove started that. What I hate seing is a man who stood up to torture crawl before the likes of the AIPAC/PNAC/CPAC crowd for support. Instead of telling folks in Michigan that they have been sold out and jobs aren't coming back, He should have told them that renewable energy sources and retooling will make American autos the world standard, and it will happen soon. Instead, the Democrats and Democratic Party, mine, is offering the path to the green collar job.
      John won't lose because the right wing isn't supporting him, it is because the right wing is vanishing and he is looking for votes in all the wrong places, and giving all the wrong messages in the right ones.
      As for my party getting less of it's agenda with a D in the White House, probably not. As far as John, Hero. The fact that you guys are sawing his legs off is just making you todays VC in your own party.

  • Posted By: newz4i @ 02/10/2008 10:13:11 AM

    If Americans walk away from evangelical Republicans, we will have an America that we can be proud of ... once again. Americans found and have proudly stood up for their faith. Evangelical Christians, having a disdain toward the faith of America, are still looking for a god. Vote more Republicans out of office, as was done in the 2006 election, and hopefully evangelicals will be forced to go back to their church and carry on with their endless search within THEIR closed doors.

    • Posted By: Zombiehero @ 02/10/2008 1:28:17 PM

      Something I can agree upon

      • Posted By: psalinas @ 02/11/2008 1:03:52 PM

        What country are you from, a better America for you might be Mexico get on the bus no one will miss you.

  • Posted By: Jack Rail @ 02/10/2008 4:43:22 PM

    "Coulter has a subspecialty all her own: uttering remarks so off the charts, so contrary to every norm of civil discourse, that they attract national news coverage." Yeah, when Julian Bond spoke of "the Taliban wing of the Republican Party," Newsweek didn't find that off the charts. When Pat Schroeder used to speak about the jack boots on the Right, Newsweek was silent about off-the-charts remarks. When Ted Kennedy lying accused Robert Bork of racism, the Left stood Mute. Only tconservatives can "utter remarks so congtrary to every norm of civil discourse" that they attract Newsweek coverage.

    Seems

    • Posted By: thrasher32 @ 02/11/2008 12:57:38 PM

      So let me get this straight, you don't think Ann Coulter is a blathering idiot???

  • Posted By: screaminginboise @ 02/10/2008 10:35:01 PM

    All this noise coming from the right-wingers about McCain is just absurd. Who are they going to vote for if not John... Hillary?

    • Posted By: thrasher32 @ 02/11/2008 12:55:43 PM

      Hopefully they won't vote at all, I think they've done enough to destroy this country...

  • Posted By: campbell.john.w @ 02/10/2008 10:16:59 PM

    I'd rather vote "None of the Above" come November! McCain's pandering to the illegals, and the Dems love affair with Mexico and illegals make me want to barf. Unless there is a candidate who will seriously enforce the current immigration laws, and shut down the Mexican border, I'm not voting for them.

  • Posted By: thrasher32 @ 02/11/2008 12:35:23 PM

    My my my, we are just wasting our breath and time here aren't we??

    Let me make something crystal clear for those of you who are in doubt: REGARDLESS OF THE CANDIDATE, THERE WILL BE NO REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT FOR AT LEAST THE NEXT 16 YEARS. YOUR HERO, GEORGE W BUSH HAS DESTROYED THE REPUBLICAN PARTY.

    Thank God for that. I suggest that all you Rush-puppets and so-called "conservatives" get used to the idea now.

  • Posted By: EditorJill @ 02/11/2008 4:26:47 AM

    Frankly, I don't care what these overrated, self-serving talk radio chatters say on the air. They're divisive individuals who should be shunned by all Americans across the nation.
    Right-wingnuts like Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh are now telling the American people who and who not to vote for. They may do that in Russia, but not here in the good ole??? U.S.A. McCain is right in shunning these talk radio conservative pundits. They are irrelevant. McCain is a ???Great American??? who served his country. Hannity and Limbaugh are nothing but self-serving media hacks spewing hot air over the airwaves.

    • Posted By: psalinas @ 02/11/2008 12:27:20 PM

      sounds like you are telling us who to vote for what makes you special

  • Posted By: cataylor465 @ 02/11/2008 12:17:11 PM

    This is all hogwash. The Republican'ts know that the only way they can get McCain in the white house is to claim that he is not one of them. The general populous is so discouraged by what the so called conservatives have done in congress and the white house for the last eight years, that they must paint McCain as being "too liberal". That is the only way they can garner the independant voter, and the independant voter is the one choosing our next president. What better way to gain independant support for your candidate than to have the right wing pundits say they hate him? Limbaugh, Hannity, and Coulter, are stumping for McCain by stumping against him. Picture Streisand railing against Hillary by saying that she isn't liberal enough, these guys aren't stupid, but they are crazy, like a fox.

  • Posted By: rockwellfan @ 02/11/2008 12:07:20 PM

    I think it is time that the hard core right wingers realize that true conservatives dont agree with them. They want to push thier idealism on everyone else. I used to vote Republican until they lost thier minds and gave the nomination to Bush 8 years ago.

    This story just goes to show you that the first victims of fundamentalism are always the ones that agree with the zealots, just not 100%.

    Have fun splintering your party dummies.

  • Posted By: democratic_reforms @ 02/11/2008 11:35:35 AM

    wante clean political leader as u s president 2008 if there be no injuntion of usd courts as petitioned by the rev dr kamal karna k roy a republican candidtate 2008 election if be held without injunction due to misconducts by many defendants who abuse democracy and tried to hijack leadership from have_nots viz dr kamal roy,former professor, ordined clergy on vow of poverty (i r s rule ),autho of books viz one "jungle democracy,cat and mouse doctrines of oppressions on weaker people/ entities/ nations by most powerful, even some with any poer, nations, superpower and allies (may not include usa as superpower nation or a political dictator president pervez musaref of pakistan, to avoid conflict of interests of defacto commentator o avoid conflict of interests, of defacto commentator as a us small time patriot with the power of superpower nation,
    11/2008 7:43:49 AM
    Comment: The Road To a GOP Minority
    A Florida project shows why Republicans will remain in the minority.
    - By George F. Will

    CommentsLISANROY wrote:
    please refer to"federal justia docket" find court cations commenced by the reverend dr kamal karna k roy aka joseph geronimo jr , a republican u s presidential candidate 2008; now dr roy moved to atleast three u district courts in california, new jersey and at new hampshire at concord nh, usa to postpone the us presidential elctoral competitions by 350+ defendants while dr roy filed complaints pro se for self as a u s born citizen of usa for birth in Guam, u s territory in pacific, and hi is a f e c registered candidate but all defendants including usa govt, states of usa, state boards of elections f e c all neglected status of the candidate to curb his chances to be elected u s president; us media in news and giant news conglomerates viz associated press, cnn news, news corp , gannet news , new yorks times co all just ignored a patriot to take leadership in the troubled and richest democratic republic viz usa. usa may fail democracy in iraq, in pakistan et al but it shall be largest deficits in entire world of democracies ,now suffererings of dysfunctions of jungle democracy, to
    fail the entire century old leadership scopes of usa. see websites to check vision of kamal karna roy, a newer voice in world of democrtacies in deficits those need to be replenished to save human conditions as human_animals, rev lisa n roy, executive officer, dr kamal k k roy election committee to settle one like kamal roy as us president 2008, although efforts could be zero sum game and may be an episode off loss but kamal told usa citizenry recently that efforts of a unit of "we the people" MAY NOT BE IGNOORED TO REVIVE DEMOCRACY, AND EVERY MEMBER OF "WE THE PEOPLE" IN usa, OTHERWISE,WE THE PEOPLE CONCEPT FAILS TOSTRIKE BLOW TO DEMOCRACY ITSELF LISA ROY ALSTON WITH CONSENT OF DR KAMAL ROY ON 2.11. 2008


  • Posted By: indy_in_va @ 02/11/2008 11:17:13 AM

    If McCain starts pandering to exremists like Coulter, conservative-leaning independents (like me) will drop him like a hot potato. He's walking a fine line.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse