SPONSORED BY:
Capital Sources

For McCain, the 'Right' Friends

Grover Norquist on how to win the conservatives' trust.

Scott J. Ferrell / Getty Images (left); Don Emmert / Getty Images
Norquist with bust of Reagan (left), and McCain
 

Email To A Friend

Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.

Separate multiple addresses with commas

SPONSORED BY
 

Despite his primary losses over the weekend, John McCain is still the GOP's presumptive presidential nominee. But as the candidacy of Mike Huckabee lingers, so too does the perception among some conservatives that the senator from Arizona can't be trusted to carry the banner for their issues. Prominent conservative tax activist Grover Norquist has had his share of fights with McCain, mostly visibly over the senator's past reluctance to make the Bush tax cuts permanent. But Norquist has been one of the first high-profile activists to say he would support McCain against any Democrat in the fall. He spoke to NEWSWEEK's Seth Colter Walls about why their relationship has improved (despite McCain's failure to take Norquist's "taxpayer protection pledge") and how the senator can mend relationships with the rest of the conservative movement. Excerpts:

NEWSWEEK: So if you can support John McCain …
Norquist:
Wait, I haven't endorsed John McCain. I haven't endorsed anybody. I will endorse the Republican nominee, who I expect to be McCain.

OK, but in a climate of unease on the right, you're making what amounts to positive noises on his behalf. Just a couple years ago the two of you were at odds. When did that start to change?
About a year ago Sen. McCain and I ran into each other, and he talked about wanting to abolish the AMT [Alternative Minimum Tax]. I said, "You're not going to be able to," but I gave him a series of suggestions of how to go about doing that halfway. He asked for a memo on the subject, which I gave him. As a senator he has taken our taxpayer protection pledge.

But not as a presidential candidate.
He did in 2000.

Though not this year.
Right. I mean, the question … one could argue that when you pledge not to raise taxes that's not a "sometimes" project. But he has not taken the pledge a second time as a presidential candidate. We would like him to take it again.

So what gives you confidence that his recent positions on taxes can be depended on over the long term?
Well, in 2005 he endorsed the Bush tax cuts. As I said on [former Massachusetts governor Mitt] Romney's behalf, I want to know if people are moving in my direction. I'm not interested in long discussions about where they were five years ago. The Roman Catholic Church wants converts. They don't say, "Hey, 10 years ago …" you know? … When McCain put out his 25 percent corporate tax rate, his full expensing for business investment—which would be about a trillion dollar tax cut over 10 years—and he called for abolishing the AMT, and making the Bush tax cuts permanent, we put out statements [on his behalf]. So on the tax issue he has moved very hard and far, and I believe convincingly, because he's picked the [tax cuts] most likely to move, even with Democrats running one or both houses [of Congress]. He has twice on TV now said, "I will veto any tax increase." This was his "read my lips" moment.

Label

Newsweek Top Stories
Visions of a Decade
Visions of a Decade

From 2000-2009, one photo per month.

The Failure of Copenhagen
The Failure of Copenhagen

Why there could be a silver lining in a failed climate treaty.

Sex Scandals of the 2000s
Sex Scandals of the 2000s

From John Edwards to Mark Sanford, the decade's memorable affairs.

118 Days in Hell
118 Days in Hell

A NEWSWEEK journalist recounts his captivity in Iran.

Discuss

Sponsored by

Member Comments

  • Posted By: Talagand1960 @ 02/20/2008 7:54:43 PM

    You may be onto something. Bush and his cronies have bled away oceans of red ink in Iraq; its hard to believe that there will be anything left for infrastructure, energy bills, health care or any of the accoutrements of a civilized society in the post-Bush years. Still, it rankles ... this "conservative" President has launched a war that is costing 18 million dollars every hour we're there, and anyone has the nerve to say that the Dems are spendthrifts? (Once again proving that all comedy is tragedy.)

  • Posted By: powerUSA @ 02/19/2008 5:49:28 PM

    Enter Your Comment
    HEY GUY DAH!!!! THEY ALL LIE THE CLINTONS PERFEECTED THE ART OF LYING......... AND OBAMA IS JUST A SMILE SAYING WONDERFUL WORDS...... BUT JUST WORDS .
    HAVE YOU ASKED YOURSELF HOW ARE WE GOING TO PAY FOR ALL THESE WONDERFUL PROGRAMS THAT HILLARY AND OBAMA ARE SUGGESTING..... AT A TIME OF WAR WHEN THE EMEMY
    THAT WE ARE FIGHTING WOULD DESTROY US REGARDLESS WHO THE PRESIDENT IS DO WE
    WANT TO TRUST THE USE OF OUR MILITARY TO HILLARY OR OBAMA....
    YOU KNOW ITS ONE THING TO TALK CHANGE BUT WILL IT BE GOOD CHANGE DON'T TAKE
    ALL THESE WONDERFULL OFFERINGS OF MULTIPLE SOCIAL PROGRAMS AT FACE VALUE
    ASK AT WHAT COST? DO WE NEED BIGGER CENTRALIZED GOVERNMENT? BIG BROTHER
    WATCHING OVER YOU. THE FED GOVT TELLING YOU AND YOUR FAMILY HOW TO LIVE......
    THERE IS A BAD ODOR BEING MASKED BY THE TALK OF CHANGE. IT SMELLS LIKE SOCIALISM.......
    MC CAIN AT LEAST HAS HIS ROOTS IN CONSERVITIVE VALUES HE CAN AND HAS WORKED WITH THE OTHER SIDE OF THE POLITICAL ISLE ISN'T THIS WHAT WE REALLY NEED TO HAPPEN i FEAR WITH HILLARY OR OBAMA THERE WILL BE JUST 4 MORE YEARS OF FINGER POINTING AND BICKERING.OR WORSE IF THE DEMS TAKE COMPLETE CONTROL.

  • Posted By: powerUSA @ 02/19/2008 5:31:59 PM

    Enter Your Comment
    hey here is a news flash for you they hate our government,our society
    our religous tolerance,womans rights,our personal freedoms it really has little to do with Bush
    and everything to do with Muslim World Domination. Islam to the islamic extremists is the only
    religon and it must be followed how they say.......or else you die, anyway else of believing must be destroyed ........no tolerance no questions
    I don't know who the next President is going to be but we are at war with a enemy more dangerous
    than nazi germany or imperial japan and we had better Win because if we don't and they win the World
    will be ruled by those that will make HITLER LOOK LIKE CHILD PLAY.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

My Take

Customize the NEWSWEEK homepage
to feature your favorite columnists.

Customize Now