The Secret Haters

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: atticus11 @ 02/15/2008 2:20:01 AM

    Thats funny that I found this article on Yahoo because I swear I tell my wife everyday that every time I look up Yahoo political articals I see Barack Obama frowning and Hillary Clinton smiling.Its pretty easy to see who Yahoo is supporting.

    • Posted By: ulsgr1 @ 02/15/2008 2:30:42 AM

      Hey Dumbass, they don't even mention the Republican(White)candidates, so who do you think they're supporting? Welcome to America. Open your eyes dipshit, it isn't about race it's about liberal media controlling the elections. Did you happen to notice that the media is always talking about black vs. white voters and women vs. men voters, but as soon as a politician mentions race and gender and how they vote, that politician becomes a racist and a sexist.

  • Posted By: lukentucher @ 02/15/2008 2:29:47 AM

    Has it ever ocurred to anyone that people may simply prefer to be with those who have something in common, be it sport, hobby, cultural expressions suchh as type of music and dance, race, ethnicity, gender, political ideology, religious faith, etc, etc, etc, and this has nothing to do with hating or being prejudicd against others who may not share the same common agendas? If I am a classical music fanatic, I tend to listen to classival music, but it doesn't mran that I hate hip-hop, or viceversa. Please stop putting negative attitudes in the media where in reality there are none. Any activity or state of being is a positive for those who are engaged in it, and those who are not, cannot be presupposed to hate others who do not share their engagements.

    Luke

  • Posted By: BillCrickey @ 02/15/2008 2:27:41 AM

    talk about prejudce....the person you choose to represent as a prejudiced individual is a blonde haired woman.Why don't u feature a picture of Colin Ferguson, the guy who picked out white people to shoot on the Long Island Railray? White people are in the minority in the world. You should be promoting the rights of white people who are the minority world wide.

  • Posted By: Ninevite28 @ 02/15/2008 1:42:27 AM

    Funny how the politically correct never bother to include "anti-Catholic," or "anti-male," or "anti-Caucasian," or "anti-heterosexual." I guess so-called Modern Psychology isn't even aware of its own biases it's been working to foist on us.

    • Posted By: ms_svelte @ 02/15/2008 2:23:36 AM

      I think that it may have something to do with the hundreds of years of forced affirmation action for whites-for white males in particular. You know what I'm speaking of - the 99% social-economic set-asides for whites. Yeah-those. Suggestion: I think you may garner more sympathy if you join a history revisionist's group.

    • Posted By: jeremy_becker1 @ 02/15/2008 1:51:35 AM

      I agree completely. Its double standards like these that create divisions amongst people.

  • Posted By: jimhenry @ 02/15/2008 2:23:19 AM

    if you look at this article carefully, you will realize he didn't say anything

  • Posted By: frankjoe @ 02/15/2008 2:23:12 AM

    I would hate to live in a world where my thoughts have more say than my actions. Being robed of my self and the freedom that makes me, me. There many reasons not to like a person. To not like anything. I judge people by there actions ,attudes, lazyness. Most of all common respect! If I didn't than I am a empty shell. There are the values that I hold true. Do I not stand true to them. Its erelivant to me but I fear the seakers of power will be drawn toward it. Would be a sad day!

  • Posted By: atticus11 @ 02/15/2008 2:22:39 AM

    Thats funny that I found this article on Yahoo because I swear I tell my wife everyday that every time I look up Yahoo political articals I see Barack Obama frowning and Hillary Clinton smiling.Its pretty easy to see who Yahoo is supporting.

  • Posted By: ErikLandross @ 02/15/2008 2:21:32 AM

    This is some sort of revelation? Everyone makes generalizations. If we didn't, we wouldn't be very intelligent or very human. It's hard wired into our psyche, and to slap a layer of denial over it because of the need to be a submissive, politically correct little cog in the machine of an oligarchic, corporate controlled society is simply pathetic..

  • Posted By: ErikLandross @ 02/15/2008 2:21:00 AM

    This is some sort of revelation? Everyone makes generalizations. If we didn't, we wouldn't be very intelligent or very human. It's hard wired into our psyche, and to slap a layer of denial over it because of the need to be a submissive, politically correct little cog in the machine of an oligarchic, corporate controlled society is simply pathetic..

  • Posted By: gokarte @ 02/15/2008 1:58:59 AM

    I love how people talk about race but fail to mention the class oppression and gender oppression within every race. Some mention Obama, but should you not also talk about how he is winning the male vote over Hilary. And let us think for a minute about class oppression within certain races. Within every race there are levels of class where the upper class still dominates with their ideology and uses their language to oppress members of their own race or gender. Wow I need sleep???but if you are familiar with feminist theorists or perhaps study semiotics then you may know what I am talking about.

    • Posted By: AnarchyA @ 02/15/2008 2:18:11 AM

      I agree "gokarte" I feel like with non-white non-hetero non-male non-men it has to do with internalized oppression which makes their injustices towards their own people more grave in the context of their so called "higher" class status. Such ppl have forgotten their roots in a long line of revolutionary people's history. It's hard to call them out on their sh* when u know they are struggling in different ways against the same system they adore with such status endowments.

  • Posted By: RWSimpson @ 02/12/2008 6:21:36 PM

    There are two great ironies in this political race. The first is that the Democratic party, which prides itself as having evolved beyond racial issues, is dividing along racial lines in the primary elections. The second and even greater irony is that white Caucasians, who in decades past were (justly) accused of being the most racist, have been the most color-blind in the election, while minority groups (African-Americans, Latinos and Asians), have been the most race-conscious, with African-Americans overwhelmingly voting in favor of Barack Obama and Latinos and Asians overwhelmingly voting in favor of Hillary Clinton.

    That is not to say that I blame African-Americans for giving preferential treatment to a black candidate. One can certainly understand their desire of having one of ???their own??? elected as President for the first time in history, particularly when the substantive differences between the ???white candidate??? and the ???black candidate??? seem so small. (As a white male Democrat, I am very proud that the 2008 Democratic candidate will either be female or African-American.) However, it truly is an amazing reflection of the modern ???race issue??? that, to the extent racial discrimination can be said to be influencing the Democratic primaries, it is overwhelmingly being practiced by minority groups, not by the so-called ???white majority.???

    • Posted By: ms_svelte @ 02/15/2008 2:17:54 AM

      RW I take issue with your logic on this point. How is it racial discrimination for blacks to vote for a black candidate? The inverse of that would be that EVERY time a white person votes for a white person they are being racially discriminating. The premise of that statement implies that the blacks (or whites in the parallel example) are ALL not voting based on the candidate's platform.

      I counter your statement with these question of curiosity:
      If Hillary was a white male and not a white woman, would Obama be the leading candidate?
      Based on your logic, for the last 200+ or so years are you saying that whites been racially discriminating in elections?

  • Posted By: joecool @ 02/15/2008 2:17:24 AM

    I'm always surprised at the amount of time and money science spends to point out what any living breathing human being already knows. None of us are perfect, and I personally believe it is perfectly normal, maybe even a sign of a health mind or soul to NOT LIKE everyone. As much as we may try, we all are different to a certain degree and we tend to feel uncomfortable around what is different to us (in this case, other people and their cultures or habit in daily living, be they cultural or not. We all come from different background and different personal experiences. This is not the garden of eden where everything is perfect and everyone is the same. This is life, full of pain suffering and the unfairness we pour on each other. And we all know that, and even though in the long run it may not be our intention to ruin each other, we often end up doing it. But that's just the way we are. It doesn't make us good or bad, it makes us human, mortal an un-almighty. No one here is supposed to be God, we can only try, but we are the makers of our own pain, however we are also the healers of such too. But perfection is not part of a human being. Until the Lord make it different, perfection for us actually lies in imperfection. As for Bais and our new "Politcally Correct World" (or at least "America"), to me this is a big mistake. If we don't like each other, lets get it out in the open and stop "acting" like we do when we don't. There's nothing wrong with that, show me someone who truly loves everybody unprejudiced and I'll show you Jesus Christ, not a sinner who needs saving. I believe the moment we let it out it's open and on the table and THEN we can actually improve without hipocrisy. I don't expect you to like me or agree with me, because you don't HAVE too, we may be different, and in some cases VERY different, but the mistake lies in pretending we are not or my FORCING you to like me. We try humans, we try hard, I believe in us, doesn't mean where perfect or are gonna stop having wars, but God know, with all the crazy stuff we do to each other...we still around.

  • Posted By: Anti-Social @ 02/15/2008 2:17:24 AM

    Only selective breeding will do away the perception of bias and prejudice. The concept that you can legislate to overcome a persons DNA never works. Better to recognize that people don't have to like each other for whatever reason. It's the acting on that dislike that we should be concerned about. Not the thought.

  • Posted By: ezwriter @ 02/15/2008 2:16:38 AM

    I haven't taken this test but wonder if there were any alternatives to good/bad. My first thoughts when I read the words black/white were "how can colors be anything but neutral?" It would be like hot/cold, day/night. These things are neither good nor bad--they are what they are. I would not be able to categorize them because, for me, they don't fit into the categories given.

  • Posted By: Sweeneywords @ 02/15/2008 2:14:06 AM

    Prejudice in my experience is part of who we are as human beings, it can take many form and is not always as clear as black and white. It can be directed against fat people, thin people, short people, uggly people, spotty people, etc. etc. etc. I think we always try and find the weakness or faults in others to boost our own position in life. Equally we are all the victims of prejudice in one form or another, somebody out there is going to dislike you, maybe because: you are poor, you are rich, you are not from the right class, you did not have the proper background, whatever we are all vistims and we must learn to shrug this off and just get on with our lives instead of wallowing in self pity. This in no way diminishes the wrong of mass prejudice aimed against the black communities of America or any other ethnic hate campaign but as individuals we must learn that prejudice is part of life and at some stage it will touch all of us.

  • Posted By: scar1661 @ 02/15/2008 2:13:42 AM

    white men? yeah, but you are a minority with a VOICE heard throughout the society! go to asia! everyone worships white men there.

  • Posted By: wangfuzhou @ 02/15/2008 2:13:11 AM

    Any societies at any time has the so-called unconscious attitudes or behavior to different sorts of people. If we put too much attention to such things, it would be like a little fussy. Treating everything in an equal manner is so hard. Taking a little bit of time to consider yourself upon the biases you ever had, you would find that it is an ubiquitous phenomenon.

  • Posted By: wangfuzhou @ 02/15/2008 2:12:55 AM

    Any societies at any time has the so-called unconscious attitudes or behavior to different sorts of people. If we put too much attention to such things, it would be like a little fussy. Treating everything in an equal manner is so hard. Taking a little bit of time to consider yourself upon the biases you ever had, you would find that it is an ubiquitous phenomenon.

  • Posted By: christy21 @ 02/15/2008 2:12:38 AM

    It's definitely not okay to be racist, yet our culture has EMBRACED misogynists like Howard Stern. He's incredibly popular. And it's not okay to make fun of people of color, but women are an okay target. Especially white women. It's ok to attack white women. I think race isn't nearly the issue some people try to make it out to be. If America elects Obama, will that be evidence enough racism is dead? But no one mentions that Hillary might not be elected because she is a woman.

  • Posted By: ghghghg @ 02/15/2008 2:12:28 AM

    that was wrong to say because of skin color because of their behavior because whites can be twice as worse than blacks. ok, u sound racist if u ask me. its because they feel how can they trust a black man after all the things society has become of us... we too have bias with others yes, but who is to judge who has the most bias, ppl raised to hate blacks, or blacks raised to love all. . .Think About It?

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse