My only qualm with this article is the relationship the author construes with porn and the idea of loveless sex. Both porn and sex with no strings attached have been a commonplace occurence since people began to both write and notice each other. Monogamy is a commonplace cultural ideal in our society, and sex w/out love, while portrayed as what "everyone is doing" in the media, is generally not accepted as a way to live one's life--so I think this article is a bit dramatic and overreaching. I also don't see how pornography contributes or has contributed to this decline--what is the significant relationship between these two variables? The author never says, just points out how both are "bad." And trust me, porn has nothing to do with teenagers "hooking up"--they've been doing that for quite a long time, I guarantee you, long before the internet made porn accessible. There is no better way to promote healthy, loving relationships than being an example with your mate, and teaching your child to value themselves. I'm sorry, I believe porn does not harm those who don't already have an addictive personality to things such as these and an already unhealthy attitude towards sex--it's hard for me to see it as the dynamic that destroys families and contributes towards the decline of society. That's just grasping for an easy blame. I just wish the author had thought through this a little bit--it sounds more like a rant about pornography to me. If you don't like it, don't watch it, and express your feelings to your children as they reach an appropriate age. Either way, the decline of the nuclear family is not caused by dirty websites and magazines. And there's nothing wrong with "scratching an itch"--every once in a while, providing it's not compulsive or a replacement for healthy, loving monogamous relationships. You'll have a hard time convincing young, virile adults and teenagers that they only way they can enjoy a sexual experience is through a long term committed relationship, but good luck trying. This article is filled with blanket statements and personal biases, and should be taken with a grain of salt.









Discuss