Perfect Game

I agree that the media has been light on Obama; the Republican machine will not. I am not convinced that I would vote Obama should he win the nomination, and I have voted Democratic since I could in 1972. As the media is light on asking Obama the tough questions, Obama's rhetoric is light - where are the solutions. I do not get it.

i THINK OBAMA IS THE REAL THING, HE IS INTELLIGENT, ARTICULATE AND A REAL VISIONARY. WHEN EVERY ONE WAS GETTING SUCKED UP IN BUSH'S MACHO FOREIGN POLICY AND TRYING TO FLEX THEIR MUSCLE INDISCRIMINATELY TO COUNTRIES HE DIDNOT LIKE AND TURNING A BLIND EYE TO COUNTRIES WHOSE RULER WERE AS BAD AS SADDAM OR EVEN WORSE. OBAMA WAS ONE OF THE FEW WHO HAD WISDOM AND COURAGE TO OPPOSE THE POLICY. IT IS APPARENT THAT HE WAS VERY RIGHT AS AFTER 6 YEARS AND THOUSANDS OF AMERICAN LIVES AND SEVERAL HUNDRED BILLION OF DOLLARS SPENT,THERE IS NO RESULT IN SIGHT. THIS EXPENSIVE WAR IS RUINING OUR ECONOMY. MOST EFFECTED ARE THE POOR PEOPLE WHO ARE PAYING WITH THEIR CHILDREN'S BLOOD AND ECONOMIC HARDSHIP AT HOME. I THINK OBAMA IS RIGHT CANDIDATE WHO CAN BE TRUSTED TO MAKE CORRECT DECISION. FURTHERMORE HE SEEMS TO EMPHASIZE ON UNITING THE COUNTRY FOR THE GOOD OF ALL AMERICAN AND NOT JUST REPUBLICANS OR DEMOCRATS

I am worried about Senator Obama becoming president. Little to no experience and doing it on the color of his skin, which should have no bearing on things, but it does. The first black president or the first woman president, who cares! Enough!. We need a President that can bring the country back to the leader the US has always been. We have to mend fences with foreign heads of state and the people of other countries. Senator Clinton can do what this country needs to clean up our health care and bring the troops home from Iraq. The Presidency is larger than the color of ones skin. I do not take Senator Obama seriously and he will bring us into another war in Kenya and turn back the clock on civil rights.

If Obama won the presidency and bombed on lack of experience in the 1st term it could be the only thing that would revive the evangelicals and or republican party after Bush. I can't understand this get behind a new idea that really isn't new.. the only real thing that he could do after all the Pie in the Sky is be a huge flop or deemed less than successful.

I'm voting for Obama because I want the government to belong to ME (us, the citizens) and I feel that the Republicans have taken us in the wrong direction as a nation by pursuing a foreign policy that is based solely on the needs of individual politicians and financed by credit. In fact I will not be voting for any incumbent who was in office since September 11, 2001. Noone in Washington has been taking care of us the citizens as long as I can remember. For the most part they use us to get elected then follow their own agendas rather than representing the best interests of the residents of their districts/states. This is not what the founding fathers envisioned???people who want to cling to ???power??? at the expense of the citizens.
If you notice, Clinton is the only remaining candidate who is of her party establishment. None of the other candidates is really owned by their party, so other voters besides myself also feel that they would like a President that is not owned by a political party. The only chance we have of getting any real change in Washington is to vote for Obama. No, there is still no guarantee since 90-odd percent of the incumbents will win again, but there is absolutely no chance for a meaningful shift in attitude on the part of our government with any other candidate.

Even if Senator Obama wins more pledged delegates (so far he does), wins more states (so far he does), and gets more of the popular vote (so far he does), Clinton campaign will stomach a win through the votes of "super delegates" and will also try to change the rule after the game is over, trying to legitimize Florida and Michigan voting, where Senator Obama did not campaign. How similar to how George W. Bush won the 2000 Presidential Election. Legitimate? Seems to be. Pathetic? You bet. Senator Clinton had claimed that she "embodies the change". Would you believe her after this?

Let;s calm the Muslim rhetoric down! Not only is it probably not true, but those saying it are probably republican operatives hoping Hillary will be blamed and/or gearing up for the general. Gee I feel like reposting my previous to respond to the HillBilary Bashing.

You young people, you just woke up to somebody telling you there is a fire ,while there somebody else is in the process of putting the fire out . That is the case of Obama and Clinton . while Hillary is having a plan for the fire Obama is just telling you about it .Sorry he does not say how to fix things,even his best explained(his health care plan):if he lowers the cost of health care what is gonna happen to the quality(will be like a commenist health care). at least in Hillary's health care when mandate ,you force health care companies to compete in prices and quality.

No Obama has one very big thing going against him, his supporters feel that any Clinton supporters have forfeited their right to vote for anyone but Obama should she lose. A ridiculous assertion they consistently make when a Clinton supporter says just because she lost or might lose doesn't mean they suddenly believe in Obama. considering they do not feel the same way if the tables are turned. Don't expect support you yourself would not give.

Everyone is forgetting despite alot of bias against Clinton for anything but her record she still has at least half if not more then half of the dem base ( causcus numbers are skewered ) convinced Obama is the wrong canddiate, couple that with the republicans urging their supporters to vote for Obama in the early primaries where they could and Nov could be a very big surprise to everyone.