Perfect Game

« Return to Article

Discuss

  • Posted By: Cliff n WA @ 02/14/2008 2:06:55 PM

    We all lose when votes are against someone rather than for something. I believe in debating issues and ideas, not identity and personality. An informed electorate is said to be the foundation of democracy; the press does us a disservice by focusing on the horse race (I think actually promoting it for ratings). Obama has pushed the issue his followers will not vote for Clinton, that is such a rookie move! It has obviously angered Clinton supporters, but all democrats have to wonder how committed these people are to party principles. If they believe republican smears about Hillary, will they not also abandon Obama?
    Also remember this is supposed to be a party nomination. I have caught republicans dishing dirt about Obama and Clinton hoping some will believe it and others will blame the other democrat for dirty politics. I think this may include stirring up the race and religion issues.
    Look for a re-post of my repost about my experience at the WA. caucus and republican attempts to influence the nomination. They know who the strongest candidate is and are desperately trying to conceal their fear of losing.

  • Posted By: Demo2008 @ 02/14/2008 1:44:19 PM

    Comment: The scenario is: Clinton/Obama=win/win, making history with a real change; Obama/Not Clinton=lose/lose without making history, or change. If Senator Obama wins the nomination, most likely, he will not choose Hillary Clinton as his running-mate. He will be advised not to do so because of the Clinton???s past reputation of personal baggage that would otherwise be no one else???s concern. They lead the country well, despite the negative publicity about their personal life, which has nothing to do with the other. The Clintons are brilliant people and I don???t remember our African-American communities complaining then, especially when the economy was so much better. Now some of us are turning on them simply because Obama is running for the presidency, knowing they would more than happily vote for her otherwise. I don???t understand why a lot of the African-American community has turn there backs on the Clintons. They were not our enemies then, and they shouldn???t be now. I can say with confidence that if Hillary Clinton gets the nomination, she will chose Obama as her running-mate, and they will be unstoppable against the republicans, and will win in the end, for sure. There are also four unofficial groups of people voting for Mrs Clinton:
    1. Those people wanting to vote for the first female Commander-in-Chief.
    2. The people that have been loyal voters for the Clintons
    3. The people that want a Democrat, but not Obama or any minority for president..
    4. The people that want real change (Clinton/Obama 2008)
    Keep in mind that Hillary Clinton, will get the White, Black, and Hispanic votes, without agendas, or conspiracies. Without a Democrat in the country???s top job, our country will be in even worse shape to come.While I am hope that you pass this on, the ultimate history to be made is in the making for our country to have the first woman/former first lady for President of the United States, and the first African-American Vice President. Why not? After all, television and radio stations are contributing influence on what people will decide in November 08.


  • Posted By: willette36 @ 02/14/2008 1:30:40 PM

    Clinton needs to forget it and sit down or go make a meal or has she forgotten how to be a submissive woman?

  • Posted By: userJustice @ 02/14/2008 12:49:23 AM

    I am far from being an Obama hater or a racist but I am old enough to be practical. I live in Illinois and have yet to see anything he has actually changed. I admire his speaking skills but also know from experience many politicians will say anything to get elected. I think anyone who writes an autobiography in their 20's should have done somehting spectacualr right? Even the law firm he worked for has him listed as handling 0 cases. When I compare his resume with Hillary Clintons there is simply no contest. We need the most qualified individual to handle the mess created by what the experts are calling the worst President in History.
    Forget about race or gender and vote on qualifications - leave the personal stuff out of it. I know Hillary will make him Vice President if he will accept it. Then, he can get the experience he needs without trying to learn on the job and he can use his awesome oratory skills to become the next president. For everyone who has a daughter or grand daughter - show them by your vote that they can get the job if they are the most qualified. People who truly accomplish great things usually do not find it necessary to talk about it.

    • Posted By: akatz @ 02/14/2008 12:58:28 PM

      Vote on competence, right!
      Let's see:
      Hilary's health-care proposal - born dea
      Hilary's vote for Iraq war and her early and persistent defense of it
      Billary's NAFTA that shipped millions of jobs offshore
      Hilary's promise that she can fight the repubs dirtier than Barack can and continue the insane politics of hate and devision for another four years.

      I voted for her twice as Senator, precisely because she's a manipulator who can bring the bacon home. Which she did - except for Upstate New York, where I live - which voted for her against tradition in honor of her promises to restore the economy of Upstate. It's now worse than ever.

      So, tell me, what marvelous qualifications or experience does she have such that I should support her for President.

      In fact, name ONE thing she did as First Lady (scant qualification) or Senator that made the country better?
      One thing and I might be willing to moderate my opposition.

  • Posted By: rr038544 @ 02/13/2008 11:21:42 PM

    I am convinced that the majority of you Obama haters are nothing but White Anglo Saxons Protestant RACIST'S. All are so cought up with his name, his religion, what he will or will not do. If you were a Catholic living in India for the last 40 years and decided to run for president, would you worship Budda? Probably not. Would you be less commited to your job and your position to make that country a better place just because of your hillbilly name? Probably not. So what makes anyone think BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA will be less dedicated to his position. He's got a freaking Kennedy in his corner, enough said. Dont tell me White America forgot about that. Fear drives you all. Racist's. What are you all threatened by? I cant wait to see Barack Obama as our next president.
    -your fellow white American.

    • Posted By: lamm01 @ 02/14/2008 12:50:54 PM

      I happen to be a White Non-Anglo Saxon Catholic (since birth, not politically adopted) and as being labeled a racist, let's see how you feel when there is an adoption of even further affirmative action programs and reparation for the suppression of blacks going back to the Civil War. When middle americans who are union workers, firefighters, police and other are losing their jobs not based on merit or not being hired because of their skin color, we'll see who's racist. Also, I would exactly claiming Ted Kennedy as an political ally a glowing recommendation. At least those of us in Massachusetts had the sense to do the right thing, vote for Hillary. Sorry, your argument doesn't hold any merit. Try again.

    • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 02/13/2008 11:26:34 PM

      Since you mentioned Teddy, I have a question. Has he learned how to swim yet?

  • Posted By: geniepocket2 @ 02/14/2008 11:25:21 AM

    I think the leaders of the Islamic world are not our enemies, they are not the terrorists. It is small pockets within their domain that is our enemy. Obama will have an advantage dealing with the world leaders, not a disadvantage due to his mixed race, his eclectic childhood, and most importantly because of his inspirational and charasmatic personality.

    • Posted By: vince.stewart @ 02/14/2008 12:44:44 PM

      'Islamic Extremists' These guys are totally different.

  • Posted By: geniepocket2 @ 02/14/2008 12:28:47 PM

    Falconer2: Obama, although wanting to set a date for withdrawel also wants to get out as carefully as Hillary does. They actually listen to the same advisors on this point. He reserves the right to change the withdrawel date if it means an imminent blood bath. I don't believe that their different strategies on this issue merit enough difference to make an opinon that Hillary would be better at withdrawel. I've said this before, but Clinton and Obama strategies are very similar. My opinion is that Obama can win, while I feel Clinton has a mark against her due to prior bias. (47% of the country say they would never vote for her). I appreciate your ability to discuss this sanely, however, as so many Clinton vs. Obama discussions seem to become ridiculous name-calling debates, especially when you consider how close their views really are.

  • Posted By: brock8182 @ 02/14/2008 11:44:08 AM

    Hillary is a fraud. I believe she purposely sat back while Obama destroyed her. She's hoping she acan come back and take the huge deligate state. In my opinion a commander in chief should fight for every state. She's lazy. In her mind she is saying Ohio and PA will get me out of this hole. I think she a fraud and the people and these states should keep that in mind. All the non-Hillary supporters should send her a box of Kleenex, she;ll be crying again real soon. What a joke ( President Clinton).

    • Posted By: emmarcee @ 02/14/2008 12:26:23 PM

      No end to hating Hill. Now losing those states seem to be a "Clinton Agenda". Wakie Wakie

  • Posted By: ihaveavoice @ 02/13/2008 7:13:29 PM

    I think this race has passed the point of who will win, it will not be decided by the voter's that was clear when Fla and Mich were silenced b Dean and the DNC.

    Clinton asa front runner for months in polls and delegates could not get one positive press story printed about her in thelast 60 days. Obama who has benefitted from a media honeymoon, a huge surge in support in the caucases and even help from the DNC who punished Floridian for what the REPUBLICAN controlled state goverment did is now the front runner. In the lead less then a week with delegates the press is already implicating Clinton's campaign over despite the fact with all those positives on his side Obama needed the sweeps and still leads her by less the ten delegates overall.

    Right now the democrats are in huge jam, Hillary supporters angered over the lopsided press coverage, the DNC interfering and statements by both Obama and Michelle are abandoning the party in droves. Despite Obama's claims his supporters won't support Hilary but hers will support him, seems to have backfired. Many will no vote at all or will vote for McCain.

    As for Obama supporters, thanks largely to the press and systemactic wins in caucuses which we all know skewer results, most of Obama supporters will never believe Clinton won, should she win throuh rebound in Texs and Ohio and since Obama has already spoken for his supporters, basically telling them not to vote if he's not the candidate, the dem paty might as well concede the race. Neither base is going to support the other candidate, not anywhere near the numbers you would usually see once the primary is over.

    I have already joined McCain's site in the evet Obama- wins. I stll believe either Edwards, Clnton, McCain or Guilani are much more qualiied to handle the issues we face then Obama and as time will tell Obama has been less then honest about his voting records and his stances, swift boatlike ads will attack him from many directions should he seal the primary. And with good reason.

    Its a no win situation for either candidate ad the bggest loser is the Dem party.


    • Posted By: shelby2289 @ 02/13/2008 7:22:19 PM

      Very well said. I agree completely. The media coverage has been absolutely biased against Hilary. I am a life long democrat and i can guarantee you if Obama gets the nomination I will 100% vote republican. Obama talks about change you can believe in. I want to know what change. He never specifies any plans he has. Maybe it doesn't matter, he can just be Ted Kennedy's puppet on a string.

      • Posted By: dusav @ 02/13/2008 8:18:49 PM

        One more in agreement with this comment. Obama is a puppet for the democratic party and people like Mr. Kennedy to have their way. They are scared that Hillary will actually make decisions. If Obama wins, I am voting McCain.

        • Posted By: lamm01 @ 02/14/2008 11:54:51 AM

          I am in total agreement. Where are all these so called independents who will vote for Obama if Hillary is not the nominee. Not anywhere I can see. As an ardent Clinton supporter, I too will vote for McCain in November. My motto is "anyone but Obama".

    • Posted By: shelby2289 @ 02/13/2008 7:40:11 PM

      Well said! The media has been so biased against Clinton. She is the most qualified person to be President of the United States. I just cannot figure out everyone wanting to jump on the Obama band wagon. He talks about "Change we can believe in". Exactly what is his change. He never talks about solutions. He has admitted to using cocaine in his youth, he has said he doesn't have to place his hand on his heart when the National Anthem is played( sometimes he does sometimes he doesn't is the response from his camp). I have real issues with this. We are Americans and we want someone in the oval office who is devoted to mother Africa? Check out his church web site. Those are the exact words. Does he really have the best interest of Americans in his plans?
      I am a life long Democrat and if Obama gets the nomination I will 100% vote Republican!

  • Posted By: Jack3213 @ 02/14/2008 11:51:51 AM

    Here are some realities that neither group wants to face: Both candidates are establishment insiders
    Both are corporate-state politicians. Large sources of Obama money are law firms, investment houses, and real estate companies, and 80 percent of his donors are affiliated with business, compared to 85 percent for Clinton.Neither are true progressives or populists, like Kucinich and Edwards.
    Both Clinton the fighter and Obama the talker will sell out once they confront presidential realities. Why? Because plutocracies know how to retain power AFTER elections. After two years it will be clear that the new president will have failed to extract the US from Iraq, will have failed to deliver universal health care, will have failed to address illegal immigration, will have done nothing to get a new and serious 9/11 investigation, will have done nothing to stop middle-class-killing globalization, and will have utterly disappointed the vast majority of Americans.
    Finally, for those seeking serious political system reforms, it is troubling that neither Clinton nor, especially, Obama have the courage to advocate needed constitutional amendments, such as replacing the Electoral College with the popular vote for president, getting all private money out of politics, making universal health care a right, and preventing presidential signing statements that undermine laws.

  • Posted By: Jack3213 @ 02/14/2008 11:51:35 AM

    Here are some realities that neither group wants to face: Both candidates are establishment insiders
    Both are corporate-state politicians. Large sources of Obama money are law firms, investment houses, and real estate companies, and 80 percent of his donors are affiliated with business, compared to 85 percent for Clinton.Neither are true progressives or populists, like Kucinich and Edwards.
    Both Clinton the fighter and Obama the talker will sell out once they confront presidential realities. Why? Because plutocracies know how to retain power AFTER elections. After two years it will be clear that the new president will have failed to extract the US from Iraq, will have failed to deliver universal health care, will have failed to address illegal immigration, will have done nothing to get a new and serious 9/11 investigation, will have done nothing to stop middle-class-killing globalization, and will have utterly disappointed the vast majority of Americans.
    Finally, for those seeking serious political system reforms, it is troubling that neither Clinton nor, especially, Obama have the courage to advocate needed constitutional amendments, such as replacing the Electoral College with the popular vote for president, getting all private money out of politics, making universal health care a right, and preventing presidential signing statements that undermine laws.

  • Posted By: falconer2 @ 02/14/2008 11:46:06 AM

    Genie you point out how the Repulicans will attack Clinton just for spite. Of course the Democrats are doing that to Bush now as the Republicans did to Bill Clinton before Bush. Unfortunately this IS the petty world in DC.
    As for now though I personally would prefer to get it out now and solved before the Republicans get into it (and you know they will) If it IS in fact a liability as I said... Then I'd prefer to have an electable candidate running wouldn't you? Hillary can win against McCain.
    She will keep us in the war until the area is stable... we can't just "run away" and get out now as Obama is saying and McCain will keep us tied up there too long.
    All in All I agree with Grandfather ... and THAT is the problem in the Middle East ...there they believe in revenge and hold on to problems of the past, rather than strive for peace now.

  • Posted By: falconer2 @ 02/14/2008 7:01:14 AM

    How is it that no one seems to be addressing the fact that Obama as president is a liability to this country.
    It's not a point of "loving him", "Believeing in his vision of hope", "being the first Black president"... or "hating him" etc.
    Rather he was a practicing Muslim as a child, and now claiming to be christian. This in itself, by Islamic law, condemns him to death. We in America, and most likely Muslims here and everywhere would not approve of this "law". It is in fact archaic. However we all know that radical Islamic Fundamentalists will grab hold of anything they can to attack the US.
    How can Obama expect to be able to negotiate with Islamic Leaders who must return to their countries and face these radicals. Consider that they "by law" are not even allowed to speak to him. Rather they should be attacking him and condemning him as well.
    So if you like him or hate him isn't the point... He IS a liability He IS condemned by Islamic Law. The only solution is that he return to islam, or is it that he admit to being Muslim. This brings up another question... is he a liability or is he lying and intends to come out of the Islamic closet... AFTER the election.
    Either way do you want him as president under these conditions...

    • Posted By: emmarcee @ 02/14/2008 11:28:56 AM

      you are correct than as per Islam law, since he rejected the faith, if he was in Indonesia they would have stoned him. Sorry, that is the truth.

  • Posted By: emmarcee @ 02/14/2008 11:26:56 AM

    Olufemi the Nigerian is gloating that Obama has "african origin". Does it matter to rest of us? Yes, it will help to win him primary by sweeping up all Afr american votes. All obamites are out here. somebody asks why don't we talk about issues. When did Oabama campaign really talk about issues , other than 'change' ?

  • Posted By: falconer2 @ 02/14/2008 11:20:08 AM

    When asked in the book Saddam???s Revenge ??? ???How can we have peace in the world????

    Grandfather responded??? ???Leave behind you the baggage of yesterday and the fears for tomorrow. Strive for peace within you today and it will come to you, and as everyone joins you ??? to the world.???

  • Posted By: falconer2 @ 02/14/2008 11:17:01 AM

    Thank you Genie for listening and responding without the name calling and trying to quell it...

    Welll again my point doesn't include moderates... The problem is that there are MANY readicals making a lot of noise (the most noise as is typical) in the Islamic world. They will attack using any info including false info. If Obama did or did not infact go to a Muslim School, won't matter to them. They will tell their people he did and they will still order a Fatwah against him. This will cause the Muslim people (highly uneducated people... and the uneducated tend to believe and follow those that they belive ..."in the know") to be against Obama as well.
    So now with this the more Liberal Leaders will have a dilemma ... Do they stand up aganst their people and try to quell disconsent... or do they stay away from Obama an appear to be ONE with their people ...
    My fear is that they don't rock the boat... (OK maybe that's a bad concept for a sandy world)

  • Posted By: geniepocket2 @ 02/14/2008 11:13:13 AM

    I'm not sure who Olufemi's comment was addressed to, but I agree with the fact that Obama has the best shot to make a new administration vibrant for everyone. Hillary is lacking in many ways. I feel almost sorry for her after seeing the 60 minutes show last week. Pathetic and delusioned is how she appeared to me.

  • Posted By: lashelle @ 02/13/2008 7:22:39 PM

    Okay I am an African American voter who is anti Barrack. Sorry when Katrina hit where was he? when Jena 6 was happening ,where was he? 911 - Barrack who?If you want to get to the heart of the matter, he is not black. As an African American, I am disappointment in a support of a man who hides his muslim faith. I have nothing againt an African American running for office, but he will never understand what it is to be "black" in this country. It offends me, my race will support someone who cannot even relate to what slavery is. Please Barrack who?
    If he makes the final vote, I will go independant.
    It amazes me, when Bill Clinton was in office, everyone was pro Clintion. ooooh weee, Barrack can speak well, they teach you that in law school and he has a great speech writer.Find an educated Afro-American, to speak and we got a puppet. Please he will never understand and relate to what African American people have undergone in this country.
    He needs to take his 3 years Senate experience , go sit down somewhere.

    Barrack has yet to address the issues of Katrina, or how he really plans to end the war, health care . Please, I would not waste my vote on such.
    Like hwaddles said, "Just the fact that she is not giving up is indicative of the strong, passionate, dedicated person Hillary is and what a great leader she will be. It's easier to coast along when the numbers are on your side, but when the going gets tough it's the real leaders who perservere and endure till the end. Only a person who has a great love of this country,"

    If I had a choice between a former cocain addict, not born in this country, none experienced person to a woman who stood by her husband side when he ran this country, been in the Senate for years, a civil rights activist? humm seems like a easy choce for me. As much as I would love to see African Americans excell, having a former cocaine addict making important decisions is not a choice I am willing to gamble on.

    • Posted By: Olufemi @ 02/14/2008 11:04:50 AM

      Looks like you just can't stand the fact that the first black person to achieve what he has is of African heritage and not "pure" African Amercian. Really sad - same "crab in a barrel" mentality as the latinos and asians and even women, who don't seem to appreciate the fact that whenever blacks work reaaaalllly hard to open a new "door" in this country, that door gets opened even wider for the latinos, asians, and definitely white women. We all have something to be proud of here - even white men who can look at this possobility and know that by thsi one act, they can wash themselves of a collective guilt. But, most important, because the man is just the best leader in the field today to make a new adn more vibrant America happen for everyone. . . .

    • Posted By: NewLeadership08 @ 02/13/2008 8:04:11 PM

      Wow, this post is so ignorant and incoherent. No, I'm not saying that you should vote for Obama because he is black, but as a black person, you need to get rid of your "crab mentality". Obama has accomplished many things that I'm sure a person of your caliber couldn't dream of accomplishing. Instead of downing the brother, why not say that you simply disagree with his politics and move on? I'll be praying for you because you are truly ignorant.

    • Posted By: jegarcia @ 02/13/2008 7:51:34 PM

      It???s sad to hear you have such a tough time being an Africa-American in the United States of America, but maybe you should put your personal feeling aside and look outside your small world and embrace change! I???m a Mexican-American that has struggled with some of the same ridicule you may have, but I remain positive and have succeeded to become a successful young man. It???s not about race or faith it???s about who can change the picture of our great Nation.

    • Posted By: jegarcia @ 02/13/2008 7:49:09 PM

      It???s sad to hear you have such a tough time being an Africa-American in the United States of America, but maybe you should put your personal feeling aside and look outside your small world and embrace change! I???m a Mexican-American that has struggled with some of the same ridicule you may have, but I remain positive and have succeeded to become a successful young man. It???s not about race or faith it???s about who can change the picture of our great Nation.

    • Posted By: Rinnovato @ 02/13/2008 7:48:42 PM

      And you are an embarrassment to African-Americans in this nation. OBAMA was born in Hawaii, and in case you didnt learn that in school, IT IS A STATE! OBAMA has MORE experience in legislation than Hillary. Dont you read up on things, or do you let other people tell you what the truth is? RULE: The first thing you sacrifice when joining any group is the Truth. Visit www.BarackObama.com. Study to show thy ownself approved.

    • Posted By: Rinnovato @ 02/13/2008 7:43:07 PM

      Let's talk about Katrina and Jena... OBAMA, like the rest of the Congress and Senate, couldnt do much about Katrina. That was George Bush, FEMA and the Louisiana State Government. The Congress adn Senator, including Obama, verbally condemned the Bush Administration. OBAMA has been the New Orleans and walked with people in the lower 9th Ward and has stated that even if he does not become President, he will work to ensure the Louisiana and Mississippi have the resources they need to rebuild after Katrina and Rita (I see you forgot about that one in your comment). And you failed to mention that Hillary Clinton didnt even step one foot in Louisiana during her Presidential Campaign. She never went to Lousiana because she knew she wouldnt win... she focused in the white State of Maine, which she ended up losing anyways. So much for Hillary caring about all Americans. Don't kid yourself; the Clintons care about themselves, and no one else.

  • Posted By: geniepocket2 @ 02/14/2008 11:04:37 AM

    Thanks Darkenight, I was hoping that was true. I hadn't read about the muslim school, but I had heard it through these types of misleading forums. Okay, to Quitthe preaching... his present vote was what the abortion rights activists wanted him to use. He did it to further the causes, not because he was afraid to make a stand. I think it's insane that the dems are fighting within our party. Hillary and Barack are very similar in their positions, I am voting for Obama because he is the better person for the job. Hillary will be stonewalled, and she "owes" favors to lobbyists and such for their $ support.

  • Posted By: tired and old @ 02/14/2008 11:01:49 AM

    clinton will do whatever it takes to win ( lie, cheat, steal,etc.); witch hillary comes from the corrupt past .
    she wants blacks to think she can take care of them, they cant take care of themselves. i trust obama.
    i will never vote for her not even for veep.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse