How Deep In the Hearts of Texas?

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: wyl5326 @ 02/16/2008 6:02:26 PM

    Hill's campaign have taunted Barack's message of Hope and Change by calling
    it as False Hope, then tried to hijack Change as her own. I don't hear her
    ridiculing Hope nowadays when it is her campaign that seems to be out of hope.
    Then she tried to sell herself as the vetted candidate, but when asked to
    release her Tax returns, she stops using the word Vetted and replaced it now
    with Tested. I wonder if Tested will be replaced again in light of the fact
    that her campaign's turmoil challenged her claim to Tested, as it is more like
    wrong decisions repeated over and over. Her claim of "35 years experience"
    proves to be the biggest Fairy Tale ever concocted as seen from how incompetent
    she handled her campaign. Her economic expertise was a fantasy bubble that got
    burst by her empty campaign war chest. She focused on running against W when he
    is not a candidate and makes herself looks like a Don Quixote fighting against
    a ghost. The race have become like the race of the turtle and the hare, because
    the hare decided to take her attention away from the race and took a nap while
    the turtle slips by. Isn't this all enough proof that she is incompetent and
    not a smart woman at all ? How much more proof you need to prove that her
    intelligence is just an exaggeration from sycophants ?

  • Posted By: TXLonghorn @ 02/16/2008 4:09:11 PM

    Here's your proof right here: http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-02-03-campaign-roundup_N.htm?loc=interstitialskip

  • Posted By: rdelumpa @ 02/16/2008 1:52:49 PM

    I totally agree. I'm also tired of this word movement of Change. What movement? What change? Yes we can? Last time I know, a movement is not about a person. It is about the cause, civil rights, equal justice, civil liberties. The millions are being duped into believing that a candidate that wants your votes is the movement. You don't need to be president to lead a movement as it will be a liability. Too dangerous.
    Poor souls, after a "movement" candidate is out of office or loses, what are you going to do? It is flawed because you are rallying behind a person prepped by the campaign managers. Remember Rove?
    So I will vote for Hillary, not because she is the perfect president. I don't like some of her platform but she is the Hillary i know.
    We are facing a very difficult times we can't take any more mistakes. With so huge a task at hand, putting experienced advisers instead of an experienced elected president is a no brainer.
    America, WAKE UP, the argument about Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton is non-sense. Don't look at the last names. Look at the person behind it.

  • Posted By: Paresh_Puhan @ 02/16/2008 1:29:19 PM

    I wish voters would look deeper into the issues rather than being influenced by the promises without substance. There has been a cult like following behind Obama and I do not see any substance or reason as why.

    On health care, although both Hilary and Obama say they have plans, Hilary's plan is way ahead. While Clinton proposes on universal coverage, Obama talks about making it affordable. May I ask what is the definition of affordable? The 49 million people or more who are without insurance are living pay-check to pay-check, barely make their ends meet, making it affordable is not enough and just would not work.



    When I compare the issues that are at stake, I do not see any reason as why to support Obama. Just momentum is not a reason enough for me.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse