HEALTH

Deadly Delay

Why are minorities with cancer getting diagnosed late?

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: azlizird @ 05/26/2008 12:08:00 AM

    Maybe Kennedy can share his excees treatment with the rest of us, Ya think!!!!!!!?????

  • Posted By: Naturalcenter @ 04/22/2008 12:35:54 PM

    Did you neglect the miracle of the vegetable used for our daily use.
    Vegetable soup can cure the cancer in the remote mauntainous town in China.
    They had used the natural_pure vegetable for the cure of the tumor in the body.
    The first is how to eliminate the pains.
    Best regards,
    Yoon Ki Lee

  • Posted By: Naturalcenter @ 04/22/2008 12:35:44 PM

    Did you neglect the miracle of the vegetable used for our daily use.
    Vegetable soup can cure the cancer in the remote mauntainous town in China.
    They had used the natural_pure vegetable for the cure of the tumor in the body.
    The first is how to eliminate the pains.
    Best regards,
    Yoon Ki Lee

  • Posted By: realityck @ 04/18/2008 10:39:29 PM

    Sad to say that cancer has become a huge economy, along with other diseases. It's no surprise that a cure hasn't been found, or has it been found but not made available due to the big money maker cancer has become. I laugh when I hear how the medical community ponders over "finding a cure for cancer". Here is a suggestion: Why not outlaw the poisonous sprays on our fruits and vegetables to begin with, cut out preservatives & other chemicals from canned and prepackaged foods, demand that pharmaceutical companies disclose all the damaging effects done to our bodies by over the counter meds and prescription meds, outlaw the use of growth hormones on farm animals that are then slaughtered and sold for food to the masses. Oh no, these suggestions wouldn???t work because it would affect the MONEY!! bottom line for doctors, farmers, food companies, pharmaceutical companies, and not to mention the heads of the FDA. Sarcasm? Absolutely!! I forgot to take my happy pills, which numb and cloud my brain from the stark reality.

  • Posted By: Be- Real @ 03/23/2008 6:16:57 AM

    The World Health Organisation has made it mandatory for children under the age of five to be mandatory monitored and vaccinated as they have a growing immune system and milestomes to achieve. With age the immune system declines, kidney function does the same and cancer comes more frequently. So why doesnt some form of legislative compulsion be inforced in our population of age to get checked up and screened for cancer. Wouldnt it make sense to for the landing to be just as smooth as the take off.

  • Posted By: Andyli861004 @ 03/23/2008 3:58:44 AM

    The health is the most important thing for one person. The site called pubspa also has much knowledge about the health care, skin protection.

  • Posted By: PING PONG BOB @ 02/18/2008 12:29:40 AM

    Of course blacks are going to be diagnosed late - they're ALWAYS late!

    • Posted By: baybluv @ 02/28/2008 3:57:28 PM

      Yes, black people are diagnosed late because that by design so the doctors can experiment on them.

  • Posted By: naej1 @ 02/18/2008 8:32:45 AM

    I can not believe all the racist and prejudice comments. The aricle was about medical care and late diagnoses. People need health care and good health care regardless of their race or econical level. I am my brothers keeper. This great country was build on people coming to this land for a better chance. Look back to Plymiouth Rock. This great country allow all the comments on the internet. So you do have a right to your opinion but try to respond to the articles content. Poverty is the root of poor service to anyone. Welfare to the poor or big corporations is the American way.
    the research on breat cancer has bee primarily on middle class white women. Therefore, research nees to be conducted by sociasl economical with the whole population then stratified for the other factors of class, acessibbility, geographical location and attitude, medical's community's attitude of care, profit bearing treatment, and patient experience with heath care, and of coure the fear factor of sickness and old age.
    i am an upper class African American living the gret city of NY. I am a retired principal and I have been frugal and have amassed money. Yet my money could have not saved my life. My life was saved because of the FREE medical plan that came with 40 years of employment with the City. My life was saved by dedicated doctors of an HMO who cared and treated me like a valued Chil of God! I was a type A and I had to reinvent myself so tht I could LIVE. I no longer controll things and realized that only
    god is in control. At first I was angry because I nerver drank,smoked, ofr drugged and I had cancer. I realised someone was going to have so I accepted my lot in life. I really believe all these hormones, pesstisides added to the food are responsible for the increase in cancer. As a result I have changed my priorities and i spend my money on truly organic food. I grow some of my own vegetables and herbs. I pray, treat other with the greatest of kindness and respect, and help people to empower themselvesto reach their fullest potenial when they interact with me. Since I know God is soverign I get out of the wy and allow God to do what is needed. Before my cancer I thought it was all about me. It is about the cosmos and human beings. All God's creatures are good. Let us find the answers for the good of the universe which includes all kinds os humans. Please coontinue to do the research because 20 years ago I would be writing this comment. Please cdontinue to find better ways humankind can exist.

    • Posted By: baybluv @ 02/28/2008 3:53:48 PM

      My goodness, where did you go to school. No wonder half our children can't read, spell and write. Looking at your response, I can see why. Your grammer is terrible.

  • Posted By: lux-veritas @ 02/17/2008 10:11:09 PM

    You sir or madam, trestles25, personify some of the reasons why black people lash out in anger. I will not sanction any racist over-generalizations about whites made by fellow African-Americans, but at the same time I REFUSE to tolerate the same coming in my direction from any one else. You know what's not right? How you claim to be upset are tired of being blamed for things "you" didn't do, yet your entire diatribe is laced with "facts" that are little more than sweeping stereotypes, gross over-generalizations, slanted characatures of the truth, and some outright falicies. You sir, in your fiery response have demonstrated and confirmed the type of thinking and attitude that spurs many African-Americans, whether tactfully or not, to still take issue with the socio-political identity of this country. You are tired? You have no clue what it means to be tired. I am tired of hypocrites like you who get upset when anyone mentions racism or discrimination, and then turn around spew the type of banter that personifies both. I am tired of being accused of getting a free ride or having things handed to me when, because of those perceptions, I have to work twice as hard as others to be seen as equal. I am tired of the ignorance( whether feigned or real) of how I am suppossed to "get over" 400 years of oppression, murder, and explotation because it's in the past. You need to understand the dynamics of history. The past is the foundation for the present and the future, how you expect 4 centuries to be undone in less than one is amazing, but that's for another conversation. You sir, are the epotimy of the modern day racist, masking the same old hatred in thin veils of pseudo-intellect and arm chair politi-speak.
    You keep of the work, and we'll continue to run in place as a country on these issues.

    • Posted By: pyramid116 @ 02/19/2008 7:40:47 PM

      I find it very interesting, but not surprising at all, that the comment above from the Black Panther-like "Nubian Moor" about "eradicating whites" didn't even phase you, but you've written this guy a couple of pages printed about why blacks are angry. Just giving you some perspective, if you happen to read it.

  • Posted By: jdoll123 @ 02/18/2008 10:40:53 PM

    As a person who was indeed diagnosed late. I can assure you it happens. I was treat ed 3 years for what I was told was an anal fissure.
    ------------
    hi,i am a beautiful 40+ woman yasou ..i am single and mature..

    I just want to find a mature gentleman for fun time here...

    i also uploaded my hot and sexy photos under the name yasou11 on SeniorWoo.com..

    come on to check them out.Waiting for you ~~~~~~

  • Posted By: pfd572 @ 02/17/2008 10:07:04 PM

    First of all, I pay taxes just like you do so it wouldn't be a free ride at your expense. Second, the tests I am referred to are not exotic, they are recommended screening for cancers-colon, breast-, blood tests, etc. And the programs you talk about are not that easy to obtain. If you understand that private ins. is out of reach for millions of working and retired people then you are finally getting the point. As I said my monthly premium is one quarter of my monthly income, ;lus all other expenses for testing, persriptions, etc. Its not affordable. And health care is a federal problem, you pay prevent now its la lot less expensive for the gov't later when they are paying for treatment of a preventable disease thru hosp. premiums for medicare patients higher to compensate.

    • Posted By: pyramid116 @ 02/17/2008 10:33:50 PM

      My main point was that it isn't a Federal issue, therefore the Federal Government should never have become involved. That includes Medicare, Medicaid, and every other Socialist FDR program invented to get people hooked on the gvernment. And I'm not some rich guy, preaching from high on a hill. These programs, which you just admitted are available are not EASY to obtain. Really? That tells me what I'm up against out there. People who don't want anything to be too difficult for them--let the US Nanny State take care of all of it for me. You need to increase your income if you can't afford health insurance. I pay it too, and I don't make much. You've got options. My car insurance is pretty hight, too: Gee, I think the government should help me with that. Oh yeah, my mortgate (wait they already are getting involved in that business, helping out people who sign bad documents, etc.).And my gas bill, electric bill---where does it end? I guarantee you I'm saving like a mongoose in heat and would opt of of Social Security and ALL government programs forever if they would let me. There's millions of us who just want to be left alone.

      • Posted By: Snarg @ 02/18/2008 9:06:47 PM

        And there's probably millions more who would like to have a few basic things, like their health coverage taken care of in such a way that they don't have to worry about being denied coverage or going broke for medical reasons, or dying in an epidemic that spirals out of control due to a spotty system that leads too many to avoid treatment; to have such worries minimized so as to better pursue other things like better jobs or paying their gas bills. It's not about having "government" pay for "everything," it's about pooling our resources to broaden care access AND lower the amount we already pay. Specifically for health care. Just because the free market works for many things doesn't mean it works for all things. I don't want the gov't paying for my auto insurance, but I would like it if my tax money was going to a system which ensured that both a pauper and rich tycoon had equal access to the best in health care. Seriously, check out the FAQs at PNHP.org. ( pnhp.org/facts/singlepayer_faq.php).

        Also: It's great that you yourself could increase your income. Many people either aren't as clever as you or are in situations where there may not be any real options for more money.

        • Posted By: pyramid116 @ 02/18/2008 9:48:15 PM

          Believe it or not, I actually like the idea. The problem, one of many actually, is that it won't stop there. I actually typed it out above. I liked Karl Marx when I read him too, but it's much different in reality. Just like rent controls in some countries are supposed to increase the availability of affordable housing for everyone, so we can all be in love. The problem in practice, for example, was that no one had any incentive to move or obtain housing that fit their needs, so others could not find housing and the waiting lists that were supposed to end actually increased! Taking away the economic incentive that founded this country is a recipe for disaster; who cares if it works elsewhere? Does our system of government work elsewhere? No, not like it used to here. The United States has been unique since its founding, and I don't think that is a bad thing at all, inspite of all of our problems.

  • Posted By: IslandNation @ 02/18/2008 12:22:41 AM

    I am American living overseas. Here we have National health Insurance, which also applies to any foreigners resident (working/studying/married to a local) here. While no medical diagnosis is infalible as I'm sure many posts will document, overall nobody who who needs treatment is denied it nor has to worry about being uninsured and suffering delays in treatment or the risk of being bankrupted by the cost.

    If the theory is that having no National Health Insurance in the USA gives the US the best medical care in thw world, than why:

    1) Do so many Americans lack access to proper health care?
    2) Does medical tourism exist and many insurance plans in the US now encourage and fund overseas treatment?
    3) Do many locals from here return here FROM THE USA to seek medical treatment of all sorts (and it's not a language issue either)?!?

    I have no comment on the race issue; it's one I find too sad and complex that it should ever be an issue. Instead I note only that if Americans really do care about each other in the way that they should then they should stand up and demand universal national health care.

    Maybe it's relevant to point out that the funcing of this is a progressive effective tax. Higher earners not only pay a greater amount in absolute terms, but also a higher percentage of their income into the programme. As a relatively higher earner I sometimes look at that line and object slightly in my mind to the sum of money that I pay in for the rare times I actually see a doctor. Then in the rare instance when I do go to a hospital and/or pass by one and see the people receiving treatment I see no other way. It's not communism nor even socialism. It's not against any capitalist system as most hospitals are for profit and so encouraged to provide the best service (treatment) possible in order to attract customers (patients) to their facilities. It's simply good government and one of the best representations of good government, family values or anything else one would like to sum it up as. Nothing is perfect nor will it ever be, but that should not stop anyone from trying to make it as good as it can be!

    • Posted By: pyramid116 @ 02/18/2008 8:23:23 PM

      I do hope you stay wherever you are...
      That's one less hysterical Democrat/Socialist vote to worry about.

      • Posted By: Snarg @ 02/18/2008 9:12:06 PM

        Look, if you want to not be "coddled" by what you deem a nanny-state, then just stay inside and don't participate. Please leave the rest of us, who would like to pool our desires, resources, and talents alone, so that we can further attempt to continue the collaborative endeavor that is civilization. :-)

        • Posted By: pyramid116 @ 02/18/2008 9:38:03 PM

          That would be fine with me. The problem is, they won't let me or any other person who doesn't want to join the Socialist Revolution stay our, opt out, or anything else along those lines. That's my issue.

  • Posted By: pfd572 @ 02/17/2008 9:46:27 PM

    I am a white, anglo-saxon, middle-class woman who worked for the Fire Dept. for 25 years and recently had to retire on disability, yet I am paying a huge monthly premium for insurance, have a large co-pay and deductible, and I have to pay 20% of the total bill. I can't afford to have all the tests that are recommended and have to pick and choose which are most important. The only thing that will keep me healthy is affordable health care and that means universal insurance. I am no the only one. There working poor, retired elderly, etc. don't havequalify for hree ins. so what do we do?

    • Posted By: pyramid116 @ 02/17/2008 9:58:25 PM

      Well, first of all, you likely don't need all of those test that you claim they told you that you need. The medical industry in this country is BIG business, as any hospital administrator will tell you. They want you on medication, hooked, and believing that all M.D.'s are the smartest people in the world. Oh, and attorneys, too. If you're disabled, there are a variety of programs already at the state level anywhere that will assist you with your conditions. Working poor, retired, and all others have the option of accepting the private insurance offered by their employers for a payroll premium, or Medicare/Medicaid. Nothing is free with the goverment: someone, usually like me, has to pay for it. And that runs contrary to everything a Union of States is supposed to be about. Health Care is not a Federal Issue any more than what you had for dinner tonight. It's up to the states, like everything else should be. Civil Wars have been fought over such things.

      • Posted By: Snarg @ 02/18/2008 9:29:51 PM

        "The medical industry in this country is BIG business, as any hospital administrator will tell you. They want you on medication, hooked, and believing that all M.D.'s are the smartest people in the world."

        Okay, you've finally said something we more-or less agree on -- the influence of big money on medicine. The rest of your post, I differ with, but here you are largely right-on. Though you and I would probably be on opposite sides, maybe we DO need another Civil War...

    • Posted By: pfd572 @ 02/17/2008 9:53:39 PM

      The last couple sentences should read: I am not the only one with this problem. There are the working poor who make too much to qualify for gov't insurance but don't make enough to pay for private ins., the elderly on fixed incomes who have to choose between eating, paying living expenses or having medical tests, etc.. What do we do? Regardless of what you, who have insurance that you can afford, think, most people who need help with insurance are not dead beats.

  • Posted By: bARCLAY @ 02/17/2008 11:40:22 PM

    As a person who was indeed diagnosed late. I can assure you it happens. I was treat ed 3 years for what I was told was an anal fissure. I was given medication and was never told how to use it. Not by my doctor, nurse, or pharmacist. During a colonoscopy it was learned that I didn't have an anal fissure. What I had was stage 4 colon cancer. and I had insurance. Now does it matter if I'm black or white. Had I received the proper treatment, I could have been spared the painful radiation treatments, the botched surgery by a intern, a second surgery to correct what the intern did, and a third surgery a year later. Folks while you're getting all bent out of shape over this and that race. People of all races, colors and creeds are dying. Right now while you batter back and forth, some elderly person is trying to decide whether and how to pay their heating bill, purchase needed medicine, or put food on the table. A mother is trying her best to get her sick child to the hospital. There people right now in trouble. People who are lost, afraid, and alone. And all we can do is sit at our computers and play the my race is better than your race game?

    • Posted By: Snarg @ 02/18/2008 9:17:35 PM

      The experience you describe sounds rotten and I do truly wish I had some kind of "magic power" or super-science at my disposal that could spontaneously heal you. You're right, though; we not only have to constantly strive for improved access to care, but better care over all.

      I'm surprised that pyramid116 hasn't chimed in yet to tell you how the people you describe at the end of your well-written comment are all leeches who just haven't tried hard enough to take proper care of themselves or their families. Seems to be how he'd describe it anyway...

  • Posted By: Snarg @ 02/18/2008 8:23:23 PM

    Okay, technically, 495.5-billion dollars, so far. That's still allot of money that could have been better spent, especially in the midst of a health-care crisis that predates the ill-conceived invasion and has probably caused much more death and sorrow than 9/11 (which Iraq had nothing to do with, anyway).

    • Posted By: pyramid116 @ 02/18/2008 8:28:29 PM

      Where, my friend, do you think that money would have been spent instead? On some bridge you would never see, or some grant to study the effects of sunlight on milla turtles....you get the idea.
      It's not for or against war, it's just that it would have been spent elsewhere anyway.

      • Posted By: Snarg @ 02/18/2008 8:49:43 PM

        You're right, the money, were it to have "existed" outside of the Iraq situation, may well have been misspent in some other way (though a half-trillion dollar bridge sure would be something to see). I am essentially saying that it would have been nice if we put such a priority on health matters that we would have spent a similar sum between 2003 and now, as a better health-care system is far more important than any of the stated goals or likely outcomes in Iraq.

  • Posted By: Cincinnati Rick @ 02/17/2008 11:04:47 PM

    Posted By: pyramid116 @ 02/17/2008 10:46:01 PM Comment: I don't like paying Health Insurance premiums any more than you do. But that's far better than some general universal health coverage idea that has been proven a failure in every country in which it's ever been tried. Long lines, and a general decline in the quality of care. Try getting some simple medical procedure done in Britain today, or anywhere else in
    Europe when they were having this debate, and tell me how that goes.
    ---------------------
    While I share your skepticism about socialized medecine, I thing that the relatively simple procedures are not the issue. Those seem to get handled rather well, if you make allowance for the delays in getting service due to the fact that care is no loger rationed. The real problem lies with the more difficult procedures and therapies. They tend to disappear when the economic incentive is removed. Medical research and innovation suffers too insofar as the incentive is greatly diminished. The talent tends to flow to those areas and disciplines that are rewarded.




    • Posted By: IslandNation @ 02/18/2008 2:46:23 AM

      I do live with universal health care, albeit not in Britain - in Taiwan. It works. It's expensive as a part of my pay check, but it works. In fact, I get access to a doctor faster and more easily than I used to in the US.

      • Posted By: pyramid116 @ 02/18/2008 8:32:25 PM

        You know, I am payroll deducted for health insurance premiums, and I get to the doctor pretty quick, too. . Why not just hope for China to annex Taiwan like they've always wanted to, and get everything completely free, while you worship Mao's tomb? Sounds like a better idea to me.

      • Posted By: pyramid116 @ 02/18/2008 8:19:37 PM

        Comparing tiny Taiwan to the medical establishment behemoth in the U.S. is ludicrous...but go ahead.
        I for one would hope that the leading economic, military, medical, and everything else power the world has ever seen would not suffer from an inferiority complex by copying Taiwan in anything.

    • Posted By: IslandNation @ 02/18/2008 2:53:00 AM

      Oh, and I might add that Europeans (Dutch) have replaced Americans as the tallest in the world, even adjusted for racial bias. Those countries that you mentioned have substantially lower incidences of infant mortality than Americans. Those countries have lower death rates for cancer and other diseases as they are generally treated earlier. ALL the evidence supports universal health care. We all pay for it, but more money goes for early treatment and prevention through care instead of the bigger bills passed along for the high cost of treatment for serious conditions - which by that point are also often resistent to treatment so the money sadly is spent on somebody who dies without ever having a chance to return to society as a contributing member - not to mention the loss of their own life and the loss to their family and friends.

  • Posted By: Snarg @ 02/18/2008 8:16:38 PM

    I agree with Lemon8R -- this is yet one more reason this country needs an intelligently designed and compassionately administered national single-payer health care system. Such a thing, combined with improvements in public education, greater emphasis on preventive health, and environmental clean-up in poorer regions, could quickly and decisively effect major improvements in the health and well-being of millions. Certainly a better set of goals to throw 5---billion dollars at than Iraq has been, so far. PHNP.org

  • Posted By: LEMON8R @ 02/18/2008 6:08:00 PM

    As a medical oncologist I am able to see the devastation that occurs in the lives of the people their family that are diagnosed with late stage cancer. When cancer is diagnosed early, it is often cured. When it is diagnosed late, we treat it with very expensive drugs and the patients often die anyway. Universal access to care is not only the ethical choice, it is also the fiscally responsible choice. I think that everyone, conservative and liberals, should be able to agree on that. All religions teach that we are our brother (and sisters) keeper.

  • Posted By: phiomalibumalibu @ 02/18/2008 2:30:03 PM

    True...early diagnosis is key. Take a look at some of the ideas at Cancer-Survivors.Info
    All of this is key!!!

  • Posted By: naej1 @ 02/18/2008 8:36:51 AM

    What does "REPORT ABUSE" MEAN?

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse