ROYALS

A Conspiracy Against Diana?

Dodi's father tells the official inquest what—and who—he believes killed the princess and his son.

 
Discuss
 
Member Comments
  • Posted By: Kami @ 02/28/2008 2:34:18 AM

    Comment: How ridiculous to waste good reporting space on stories like this. Why doesn't the media ever get a fresh look on any new things happening in the universe. It is always rehash the same old stuff and it never gets any better, just further into the dirt and grime. Diana wasn't that cool, media people. Neither is Brittany or any of those losers. Good grief. Report on the stuff that makes our lives better, not on the dirt that just drags us down.

  • Posted By: jdoll123 @ 02/26/2008 12:19:22 AM

    Comment: By the way, i recently signed up on S e n i o r Woo.com in hope to meet friends or more on Internet. Is it easy? I am 40+ mature woman. There are some hot pictures under the name KeightyKat there.

  • Posted By: observer101 @ 02/22/2008 12:43:09 PM

    Comment: Conspiracy?...More like MONOTONY...This story is so old and outdated. She died in a car wreck after getting sloppy drunk with Prince babaganoosh and driver. All this isnt bringing her or anyone back. And its true shes not a royal if she is divorced from the Prince. She was born a commoner and she died as one...The media made her royal. And now all this is a royal bore. Come up with something more interesting like Prince Babaganoosh was really a lover of bin Laden or something....this sux

  • Posted By: irekandi @ 02/21/2008 9:32:15 PM

    Comment: "Ladies and Gentlemen, Please rise for His Royal Majesty King Williams V, of the United Kingdoms of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and.... and Supreme governor and Head of the Church of England... and his brothers, Prince Harry of Wales, and prince Ibrahim of Alexander, and prince Mustafa of whatever....HA....I'LL DOOOOGGONE

  • Posted By: irekandi @ 02/21/2008 9:16:06 PM

    Comment: The Diana-Dodi conspiracy revisited. Marylouise, I don't think Al-Fayed is all of that names you called him. he lost his son too you know and besides, Princess D had a great raport with Al-Fayed. We know that for a fact. So, he is not out to ruin what little( and it is by no means little, Princess D,s reputation even in death is legendary) reputation she has left.

    Few points to ponder though, Fact: Diana was her happiest with Dodi and she was going to marry him. Also fact : The accident did not happen on British soil but on French soil where all suspicion would be away from the monarch, the MI5/MI6, and the government, Fact: the statements of the bodyguard after his recovery and subsequently afterwards, Marylouise are you seeing a trend here? The royal family never did like the Al-fayeds. they tried to block the sale of harrods and the house of Fraziers to them, then they wount even grant mohamed citizenship despite his huge investment in britain, how much more allow him to contest in the parliamentry elections. Need to hear more marylouise? The royal family could not keep D on a leash. She was too fiercely independent and outgoing for their ilks, which is why they moved her from the Buckingham palace to the Kensington palace.

    And the joker Marylouise..." Ladies and gentlemen, Please rise for His Royal Majesty King Williams of the United Kingdom of Great Britain, and Northern ireland and....and his brothers, Prince Harry, and Prince Ibrahim, and prince Mustafa...HA! I'LL BE DOOOGGONE.

  • Posted By: phiomalibumalibu @ 02/21/2008 6:25:40 PM

    Comment: Now that was a royal mistake, in a way I believe him. Why do we let race come between so much. We miss you Diane. I have donated my car to charity in your name at AutoGiver.com

    • Posted By: suelee000 @ 02/21/2008 9:44:46 PM

      Comment: Prince Ibrahim??? Where did you get that??? That's the one really bizarre thing about all of these conspiracy theories. That somehow Diana's children from a second marriage would be part of the Royal Family and possibly in line to inherit the monarchy. What a crock.

      Some of the Queen's own grandchildren don't even have a Prince of Princess in front of their names (Anne's and Edward's children and they are in line (however distant) to the throne.

      Diana lost her title "Her Royal Highness" in the divorce. She wasn't a Royal and any children that she had would be plain Mr and Miss.

  • Posted By: Houlbelat @ 02/21/2008 11:05:58 AM

    Comment: Every one close to Diana has been invited to give views about the tragedy but strangely, Surgeon Hasnat has not been consulted about anything he knows. Why such a neglect? He must be having intimate knowledge about any Royal conspiracy, if it really existed and Dodi's father claims to have been confided about by Diana.

  • Posted By: Marylouise @ 02/21/2008 10:52:16 AM

    Comment: I find Al Fayed to be a stupid, bigoted and evil=spreading mongerer. There is nothing worse I can say of anyone - what an idiot he is making of himself as well as doing his best to ruin what little reputation Diana had left. She was too wily to get pregnant outside of marriage, especially with her "two boys" around - she absolutely adored them and wouldn't contemplate either marriage or pregnancy which was likely to hurt or taint her beloved "Wills". Mary Louise Mason, Canada

  • Posted By: Karenn1 @ 02/21/2008 8:20:14 AM

    Comment: Didn't know the nazi were alive and killig. She was wanted dead and dead she is. So philip could marry the wrinkle dog. Sounds good for a movie nazi,dogsand beauty.

    • Posted By: peartree @ 02/21/2008 3:42:43 PM

      Comment: learn how to spell, and maybe you'll make more sense.

  • Posted By: McGroo @ 02/21/2008 7:54:38 AM

    Comment: I love conspiracy theories! Not that they reveal much truth but they are concoctions of of fragmented half truths glued together with tangled fictions. They seem to make a story which is semi believable, like a Frederick Forsythe novel except written extremely badly. Something as huge as Diana, former princess of Wales and global celebrity being killed in a car accident by a drunk driver is too mundane to believe - it <i>had<i> to be an assassination by Prince Philip, but to make that fit it needed MI6 involvement which means the prime minister must have known, and oh but how does that fit together without the french police and and and of course Henri Paul wasn't an alcoholic on antidepressants so the pathologist must have fudged the blood test, but to make that fit together and then who drove the white Fiat Uno? That was the Queen Mum! With a blinding flashgun... Sadly she's taken her secret to the grave...
    Cor with the amount of taxpayer's money spent on this we could have an extra mile of motorway. I think this farcical entertainment alone from is worth that 9p per taxpayer...

  • Posted By: McGroo @ 02/21/2008 7:54:07 AM

    Comment: I love conspiracy theories! Not that they reveal much truth but they are concoctions of of fragmented half truths glued together with tangled fictions. They seem to make a story which is semi believable, like a Frederick Forsythe novel except written extremely badly. Something as huge as Diana, former princess of Wales and global celebrity being killed in a car accident by a drunk driver is too mundane to believe - it <i>had<i> to be an assassination by Prince Philip, but to make that fit it needed MI6 involvement which means the prime minister must have known, and oh but how does that fit together without the french police and and and of course Henri Paul wasn't an alcoholic on antidepressants so the pathologist must have fudged the blood test, but to make that fit together and then who drove the white Fiat Uno? That was the Queen Mum! With a blinding flashgun... Sadly she's taken her secret to the grave...
    Cor with the amount of taxpayer's money spent on this we could have an extra mile of motorway. I think this farcical entertainment alone from is worth that 9p per taxpayer...

  • Posted By: darciesdaddy @ 02/21/2008 3:06:50 AM

    Comment: And the nuts are out in full force in this story.

  • Posted By: CHRISTIEJESS @ 02/21/2008 2:57:05 AM

    Comment: I think some of you are vry rgiht and dead on - the ones we should mostly focus on are princes William and Harry. It is not to say that justice can never be done and to be a littler quieter in the pursuit , Of course the dilemma is we are dealing with accusations of the royal family so that is high press, But imagine the feeling of the two young who ae having more trouble of just letting their mom rest in peace and coming terms to what happened themselves when the papers, the websites, the tv are filled with stories of their mom and something even years later like an inqest makes the news andevokes the feelings over again. I just hope that if Al Fayad is onto something real, that the two young men can be cared for in the process of finding out truth.

  • Posted By: sixmontri @ 02/21/2008 1:07:07 AM

    Comment: I actually do believe that the Windsors,....definitely wanted Diana out of the picture.

    I also believe,..that they were more than capable of conspiring to murder someone that they thought was an "emarrassment" to the Windsor Family,...the so called "royals".

    Diana was extremely outspoken, and independent. She said what was on her mind, with not too much
    regard for consequence.
    Something I personally,.....truly admired in her character. She was a modern woman,...
    She was a round peg, that time, and again, was forced to be driven into a square hole.

    The word that I would LIKE to use, to describe Charles,....I just can't use. It woudn't be proper.

    The ones that I truly feel for in this whole disgusting situation, are Princes Harry, and William.
    To be caught up in this situation,....to possibly wonder if a Family member, whether Father,
    Grandmother,...whomever,.........
    Just to have to THINK for a minute that someone was truly responsible for their Mothers death is horrible.

    Losing Diana was a tragedy,...in every sense of the word, but,.....
    Wether it was an accident, or not,.....those young men still have to live with the loss of theit Mother,.....
    That is a major tragedy,......the worst one imaginable.

    Either way,.....it has to be an Agony for both of them.

  • Posted By: Bill Jax @ 02/21/2008 1:00:32 AM

    Comment: What a load of tendentious claptrap!
    Evidence is what should educate opinion, not emotion.
    "...they (the royals) stopped at nothing to get what they wanted..."
    True... that was in the medieval past. Today, it is not royals who stop at nothing, but those who seek power. Sometimes today, they are royal, such as the absolute monarchies of the Middle East, but more usually they are politicians.
    "Has time really changed anything?"
    Of course it has, Bella, you clown.
    Today, the royal family in UK has almost no actual power.
    They already have ALL that they want in terms of wealth and prestige.
    If Diana had married Dodi and if she was pregnant, what harm would that have done Prince Charles...in the eyes of the largely white British people?
    The last thing Prince Phillip, or Charles or anybody in the royal family wanted was for this world icon, this people's princess to die a sudden, tragic death and thus immortalise her status and beauty. Had Diana lived, her beauty inevitably would have faded...and so would her prestige, based as it was upon her self proclaimed victim status, her beauty and her rather vacuuous causes. The contrast with the rather quiet, self effacing and dogged efforts of Prince Charles would become ever more apparent.

    Perhaps you do not know what 'efforts' Charles makes?
    Precisely my point. You do not know...how many ill educated, young no hopers have been helped to find work and start small businesses by the trust that Charles set up with his own money. Nor of his work to promote organic farming on his land, nor of gardening. The liist of rather ordinary, not very glamourous, but far more worthy causes goes on and on.

    Just look at this socalled murder plot.

    The bodyguard survived by the simple mechanism of putting on his seat belt.

    Not a very good murder plot then was it?

    Just read through the testimony in court...it is obvious and compelling...to anyone that actually reads it rather than relying on pre formed emotions...that Al Fayed is a ridiculous figure.

    Look at his past. He is a totally incredible witness to anything. He lied about a government minister, was sued, and lied in court during the trial for libel.

    Although the minister proved he had not accepted bribes from Al Fayed, he was exposed as seeking payment from oil companies. Hence the minister lost his case. BOTH the minister and Al Fayed were LIARS and BOTH were shown to be so.

    He is reported in Private Eye magazine, and has failed to sue the publishers, that he routinely stuffs wads of cash into the cleavage of female staff at Harrods in order to encourage them to engage in what he delicately terms "fuggin".

    The source of his wealth?

    He ripped off Papa and Baby Doc Duvalier and then the Sultan of Brunei.

    And you believe him. Yes and the world is flat also. It is all a conspiracy. Elvis...and even Diana probably...are still with us..but in the mystical continent 'over there' .

  • Posted By: jchastn @ 02/21/2008 12:55:39 AM

    Comment: Mr Fayed is speaking from tremendous pain and some guilt on his part as well. Henri Paul was Mr. Fayed's personal employee and he had been warned on more than one occasion that Henri had a drinking problem. In fact, Diana's security was comprimised by Fayed's employees on more than one occasion, but never more than on the night that she was killed.

  • Posted By: sixmontri @ 02/21/2008 12:55:37 AM

    Comment: I actually do believe that the Windsors,....definitely wanted Diana out of the picture.
    I also believe,..that they were more than capable of conspiring to murder, someone that they thought was an "emarrassment" to the Windsor Family,...the so called "royals".
    Diana was extremely outspoken, and independent. She said what was on her mind, with not too much regard for consequence.
    Something I personally,.....truly admired in her character. She was a modern woman,...
    She was a round peg, that time, and again, was to be driven into a square hole.
    The word that I would LIKE to use, to describe Charles,....I just can't use. It woudn't be proper.
    The ones that I truly feel for in this whole disgusting situation, are Princes Harry, and William.
    To be caught up in this situation,....to possibly wonder if a Family member, whether Father, Grandmother,...whomever,.........
    Just to have to THINK for a minute that someone was truly responsible for their Mothers death is horrible.
    Wether it was an accident, or not,.....those young men still have to live with the loss of theit Mother,.....
    Either way,.....it has to be an Agony for both of them.

  • Posted By: tlj00 @ 02/21/2008 12:48:55 AM

    Comment: Very Biased

  • Posted By: Bella 1 @ 02/21/2008 12:26:03 AM

    Comment: If you research royal history you will see that they stopped at nothing to get what the wanted. The royals over the ages have murdered relatives to gain a crown, a wife or even to dispose of a present wife in order to wed a new one. Has time really changed anything??? I think not. You decide.

  • Posted By: enicarma @ 02/21/2008 12:20:11 AM

    Comment: I agree that the Royal family would not want or should I say allow a "half breed " to be a half brother to their 2 Princes of English upbringing. HOWEVER I would sure like to see with my own eyes a D.N.A test done on Prince Harry because he certainly is the image of his dear Daddy and it sure isn't Prince Charles. He couldn't look like a certain Major Diana was seeing and confiding in during the time Prince Phillip and his tramp were ruining Diana's family. As she herself said there was always 3 people in her marriage and unlike the other women in the Royal family from years gone by she refused to sit at home and have this carrying on done as if behind her back. The Queen took it for years from Phillip as that was how she was raised. But Fergie refused as did Diana. Let's see..4 children raised by the Royal family and only 1 still married. 3 divorced. Not to mention the Queens own sister Margaret. These Royals wouldn't even be in power if it wasn't for the Queens Uncle stepping down from the throne for his divorced love. He was TOLD he was unable to have the throne and a divorcee too. Prince Charles has done the same thing. Even worse so if he is allowed to take the throne after his Mother then they are all hipocrites!! Prince William is the only one that should be allowed near the throne, unless he follows in his Father's ideals. How disgusting to actually believe there is no merit to Al Fayad's story... I truly think there is truth in this story. Cover up is the Royals middle name for centuries.

  • Posted By: jamerz58 @ 02/21/2008 12:16:50 AM

    Comment: ...i meant Dodi's father... not Dodi...

    ...but there's one thing i dont understand... after reading over many of the comments, i dont understand what "america" or the concept of "americanism" has anything to do with this whole subject. if the paparazzi is guilty, then EVERYONE is also to blame as she was the people's princess and we encouraged the hysteria by purchasing the magazines that had the latest pictures of her on them, if we want to blame the royal family then THEY are exclusively to blame...

    i dont think its fair to call "americans guilty" or "muslims racist"... neither has anything to do with the actual argument

  • Posted By: CHRISTIEJESS @ 02/21/2008 12:15:12 AM

    Comment: I THINK THAT AL FAYAD IS A GRIEVING FATHER, POSSIBLE A NUT AS THEY SAY. ITHINK HE WAS CLOSE TO HIS SON AND THE PRINCESS AND FINDING IT HARD TO OME TO TERS WITH THEIR DEATH. MAYBE THE BRTISH FAMILY IS CVERING SOMETHING UP BUT I DON'T HAVE ENOUGH INFO TO THINK THAT WAY AND I THINK IT WOULD BE HARD TO POVE ANYWAYS

  • Posted By: In Perspective @ 02/21/2008 12:13:08 AM

    Comment: As a mom who also lost a child to an automobile accident or was it a premeditated plan by a negligent husband who 3 times tried to take me off her military life insurance? Or was it her internal wish to never get a divorce and be in a better place than what she could admit to was really happening in her adult life? I truly have done the work of trying to understand my daughter's fate and relate it to Diana's life. Princess Diana, my daughter and so many of us are do gooders in this life and it seems like the best of them are done away with by those who are envious, need to take from others to have power, or any myriad of reasons.
    911 was also a conspiracy, and Diana's former husband was keeping the company of a very dysfunctional alcoholic. Look at Camilla now, the truth is coming to the forefront.
    Like every mystery it will take years before the owner of the real information will come to. The world is becoming more scattered everyday.

  • Posted By: CHRISTIEJESS @ 02/21/2008 12:13:01 AM

    Comment: i THINK THAT aL fAYED IS A GRIEVING FATHER AND IS MOURNING HEAVILY AND IN PAIN AND CANNOT COME TO GRIPS WITH HIS LOSS. I SUPPOSE IT IS A LITTLE POSSIBLE THAT THE BRITISH ROYAL FAMILY CAN BE HIDING THINGS BUTIF THEY ARE AND THAT IS A BIG IF, IT WILL BE HARD TO PROVE

  • Posted By: jamerz58 @ 02/21/2008 12:04:46 AM

    Comment: i was in london during the 10 year anniversary of diana... i heard the pleas of the princes asking them to finally let their "mum" rest in peace... i saw the mounds of people still aching and grieving over her death...i felt their pain...

    no, i do not believe that diana's death was a simple accident, neither do i think that she was pregnant or that the motive for her supposed "murder" can be summed up by saying that the royal family didn't want a Muslim to be included in the lineage (even tho she was already divorvced). ...HOWEVER i do think we should obey the prince's wishes for respect of their mother's death... enough is enough... grieving father or not, I think Dodi is taking it all way too far.

  • Posted By: johnrupert @ 02/21/2008 12:03:42 AM

    Comment: Interesting in reading the American and Muslim comments. The Americans are as guilty as the paparazzi for their deaths.
    The Muslims more racist than the Windsor's could ever be.

  • Posted By: johnrupert @ 02/20/2008 11:52:35 PM

    Comment: The paparazzi are responsible for the death of Princess Diana and Mr. Al Fayed is responsible for the disintegration of British society he is a fraud, a charlatan and unflappably duplicitous.

  • Posted By: vendetta @ 02/20/2008 11:50:29 PM

    Comment: Prince Philip I have one question for you.......

    what is the "way ahead group" and why such discussion with them is highly secretive and private?

  • Posted By: Felicity_X @ 02/20/2008 11:42:27 PM

    Comment: Anybody who imagines either the royal family or MI5 would even think about murdering Diana knows very little about the British political system. Any royal, including the Queen, who attempted to coerce MI5 in such a manner would be laughed out of court. They do not answer in any way, shape, or form to the Royal Family. Also, Diana was only royal by her marriage. She never posed any threat whatever to the Crown, or to the British constitution, and after her divorce was famous in the same way as Elton John, the Beckhams or Sarah Ferguson, but no longer royal. Nor was she guilty, nor did she intend to be guilty of any treasonable activity which could have made her of interest to MI5. As far as marrying a Moslem was concerned, she was free to marry whoever she chose after her divorce. The law of Protestant Succession applies only to the reigning monarch and spouse, and also to any royal and spouse who wish to remain in the line of succession to the throne. It does not, and would never, apply to the divorced mother of either a reigning monarch or a crown prince, and also excludes Roman Catholics as well as Moslems, by the way. In the event of a monarch or heir wishing to convert to another religion, all that would happen is that they would have to abdicate and hand over to the next royal in line. it might cause a bit of a kerfuffle at the time, as per Edward VIII's abdication in 1936, but the machinery to carry on is there. No threat, no sweat! And note that no-one ever attempted to murder Edward, even though some of his actions may have been bordering on treasonable. Mohammed Al Fayed is basically a grieving father looking for a third party to blame for his son's death. He is making a total nuisance of himself to the British government and spending a hugh amount of British taxpayers' money for no real reason. Any royal family capable of desiring and having the power to enforce the murder of the mother of two of their most important members would certainly have had Mr Al Fayed extradited by now and confiscated his considerable personal fortune for good measure. If such persons exist, they are certainly not to be found within the British royal family! No, they will let Mr Al Fayed carry on in his own, not so sweet way, just as they would have let Diana carry on in her own sweet way, had she lived.

  • Posted By: Lady "O" @ 02/20/2008 11:40:50 PM

    Comment: I love UR comment ....MidWestWitch...He is a Toad.....So this 1 for U DODIES DAD....Fight 4 UR right, & UR son right, & for ever PRINCESS DIANNA we will miss U....& i see UR point skd500, i would like to have seen all records. This was not just an unfortunate accident !!! G-d be with U DODIES DAD....USA, Fl, Lady "O"

  • Posted By: Lady "O" @ 02/20/2008 11:24:39 PM

    Comment: I am with U on that 1 !!! Rose of England......Go Dodie's dad, go fight 4 UR son, fight 4 UR right.....GOOD LUCK from th USA, Fl.....ODETTE....ps, I love UR comment ....MidwestWitch

  • Posted By: Rose of England @ 02/20/2008 11:24:18 PM

    Comment: Diana, was the best, she showed the royals up, she showed them how to dress, she loved everybody even the lepers, she wasnt afraid to touch them,the Queen wont take her gloves off,Charles ran around with his whore,Diana was too good for him,Phillip propositoned Diana, the letters are missing,Dodis father is right on the ball,the royals are guilty,I believe Dodis father,did you see the flowers Diana got, the Queen will never get what Diana had, we loved her, & we still Love her,the Queen had to be shamed into making an apperance.the Royals are cold as ice.The only ones i care about are William & Harry.I am English & my cousin keeps me up on what happens in England, do you know Dianas Photos are in the papers everyday,to us she is still alive, Godbless you Princess Diana, we will never forget you, you were too precious.

  • Posted By: Rose of England @ 02/20/2008 11:07:28 PM

    Comment: Diana was the best, she put the royals to shame, she showed them how to dress,old frog face can never compete with Diana,Charles was cheating all of his life with that whore of a wife he has now, now they are married, they dont like eachother.they have their just desserts, the English people dont like him, i should know, im English. i get the news from England, ever day.Diana, you are the best.

  • Posted By: MidWestWitch @ 02/20/2008 11:03:28 PM

    Comment: From the MidWestWtch : I totally agree with Dodi's Father ! It WAS the Queen's husband, Phillip, and The Toad. I KNEW this within hours of the news of the crash & her death. I would like to see the ER & Surgery reports. The current Royals are two-faced and cruel. The rottweiller can't hold a candle to The WORLDS PRINCESS. The toads wife should NEVER be allowed to take a title IF he becomes King. The Queen's Grandmother had the power to save the Czar of Russia and his family, her own relation, no less !!! She did NOTHING. Oh, I'm sure she had as good excuse as Prince Phillip, but their hearts are really cold as stone. Rest in Peace Di & Dodi, & God Bless

  • Posted By: unforgetable357 @ 02/20/2008 10:49:46 PM

    Comment: THE HOSPITAL SO CLOSE AND IT TOOK THEM OVER AN HOWER TO GET THERE AND DIANA WAS STILL ALIVE SO THEY STOPED TWICE BULL GO DODIES DAD FIGHT YOUR RIGHT

  • Posted By: unforgetable357 @ 02/20/2008 10:45:19 PM

    Comment: BE WAITING TO HEAR MORE ON OUR BEAUTIFULL PRINCESS

  • Posted By: unforgetable357 @ 02/20/2008 10:40:33 PM

    Comment: HE IS SO RIGHT DIANA SAID SHED NEVER BE PRINCESS SHE WOULD DIE EARLY BUT WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND SKI NOSE CHARLES CALLED THE GOPHER CAMILLIA WHILE THEY WAS ON THEIR HONEY MOON. HES NOTHING AND HIS WIFE IS WORSE

  • Posted By: unforgetable357 @ 02/20/2008 10:31:50 PM

    Comment: i beleive princess diana was murdered and i beleive dodies father is right if she was pregnant so be it but the royals did;nt want her children to have dodi for a father so they had them killed. our beautifull princess is gone but it cost them money for a facelift for frogies wife carmilla. thenk GOD WILLIAM LOOKS LIKE HIS MOM AND HARRY LIKE HER BROTHER. LONG LIVE QUEEN DIANA

  • Posted By: michaelwel.com @ 02/20/2008 10:27:45 PM

    Comment: Diana? Diana who?

  • Posted By: michaelwel.com @ 02/20/2008 10:27:13 PM

    Comment: Diana? Diana who?

  • Posted By: skd500 @ 02/20/2008 7:55:40 PM

    Comment: I would not discount Mr. Fayed's theories. Records can be faked, when someone needs someone high in power to be protected. I don't know if I believe everything that he is saying, but some of his statements might have some truth to them........I do not believe the death of the Princess was an "unfortunate accident", but I don't know all of the facts to make a deduction.......skd500













  • Posted By: skd500 @ 02/20/2008 7:52:03 PM

    Comment: Who stood to gain from Diana's death???? That is exactly where you should look...........it is a terrible shame..........skd500

  • Posted By: TakushKanSHkan @ 02/20/2008 7:44:22 PM

    Comment: Wow annie..what the hell did you just say?
    more to the point ,there was no conspiracy ...and yes, the Windsors sometimes appear to be a truely disfunctional family,..but they are after all royal

    • Posted By: MidWestWitch @ 02/20/2008 11:07:12 PM

      Comment: Royal my Aunt Fannie !! The ROYAL Grandmother to Queen Liz turned her back on the Czar of Russia & his family (during the Revolution) and they were Alexandra was her relation. Royal means NOTHING

  • Posted By: TakushKanSHkan @ 02/20/2008 7:37:29 PM

    Comment: Wow annie!! What the hell did you just say?

  • Posted By: suelee000 @ 02/20/2008 4:13:27 PM

    Comment: Diana died because she got into a car driven by a man who was over the limit. She died because she didn't wear a seat belt. She lived by the photographer and she died being chased by them.

    No one conspired to kill her. Mr Al Fayad wants to believe in a huge conspiracy to ease his guilt and his liability. The bodyguards were his employees, so was the driver. His son came up with the stupid plan to get away from the photographers.

    As for the moronic reasons given for the conspiracy? Why would the Royals be so upset if Diana married a Muslim? He was rich and he could keep her in the style to which she was accustomed. Diana had lost her royal title and Dodi wouldn't get a title for marrying Diana. Since both her sons were in boarding school, it's not like there would have been a custody fight with them.

    The Royals wouldn't be to upset if Diana got bad press and my guess is that by marrying Dodi, Diana would have gotten bad press. Would Dodi have supported her in her many charitable efforts? Probably not, he liked to play not work.

    • Posted By: MidWestWitch @ 02/20/2008 11:10:22 PM

      Comment: Is your head in the SAND or the CLOUDS ??

  • Posted By: benzluva @ 02/20/2008 3:53:37 PM

    Comment: I have been a student of the british royal family ever since Diana married into that horrid family.I have read almost every book regarding the Windsors and the Spencers of Althorp( Diana's family).Mr. Fayed is right on some accounts but misguided on others.First Diana was not pregnant with Dodi's baby and she was not going to marry him.Diana was in love with Hasnat Khan the heart surgeon, but he did not want to be involved publicly with her for he was a very private person.Diana was not going to marry Dodi because she knew that he was a user of cocaine, and quite frankly he was not man enough for Diana.That ring Dodi was going to give Diana was a friendship ring.I do believe that she and Dodi were murdered by MI5, Prince Phillip and Prince Charles because they THOUGHT she was going to marry a muslim making him the stepfather to William the future king of England.I do believe that the Windsors are racist, especially Phillip.A muslim in the midst of the "firm".. NEVER!! Secondly Mr fayed has been trying to ingraciate on to the royal family ever since he came to engalnd, but they rejected his bid for a knighthood.So to a degree he has gotten a few things twisted reagarding Diana marrying, and having his son's baby.The thing is IF THEY THOUGHT SHE WAS GOING TO MARRY HIM WHY WOULD THEY NOT TRY TO STOP IT BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY?. In one of the many, many, books I read about Diana, she mentioned more than once that she felt her car brakes would be tampered with and she would possibly be killed, so that Charles would be free to marry that whore Camilla Parker Bowles.Lastly they were murdered by mi5, the british establishment, Phillip and Charles,because Diana knew too much about their indiscretions and she would have spilled the beans on those undercover Germans and they knew it. I do believe that Camilla and Charles will get exactly what is coming to them, and I hope and pray that HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS PRINCE PHILLIP WILL REALLY GET IT IN THE END..HE IS SCUM, AND SO ARE THOSE WHO ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MURDER OF Diana,who was the most influential member of that ridiculously assbackwards mess of a dysfunctional familiy.

    • Posted By: MidWestWitch @ 02/20/2008 11:17:17 PM

      Comment: I wish I could have said it as well as you ! I agree 150%. I knew within hours of the accident & her death that everyone you mentioned were guilty of a conspiracy to murder. Thank you for saying it so perfectly.

      • Posted By: benzluva @ 02/21/2008 8:26:20 AM

        Comment: Thank you Mid West Witch for your kind words.

  • Posted By: anniekapn @ 02/20/2008 2:09:32 PM

    Comment: To Mr. Al Fayed, I would say that the USA and England are truly insane, at least since 1993. I do believe it started with Camilla Parker-Bowles' power trip and the USA satanically pursuing placing a citizen/mother in an abstract position and imploding The Horrible Thing-I, am I in that position in USA because of selection that I am a Christian. Both countries are currently speaking in "forked tongues/USA Bewitched English" and, placing logic balances only serves to heighten the hysteria. If you are interested in harming the USA, I am with you; what goes around comes around. I was told by a stranger, in 1999/2000, that the USA State of Minnesota and the entire country of England were going to be bombed down to limestone basins and the Country of Israel would be blamed. In the film footage of 1996/1997 from news interviews, it is obvious to me that Camilla Parker-Bowles murdered Princess Diana, Dodi Fayed and Henri Paul. The cruelty of the Windsor Firm towards Princess Diana compounded what Camilla did. I am as well aware that both countries are in a rush to "Rule Earth", USA as Pickelocracy and One Civilization (encroachment on other countries of Earth) and England as Camillaocracy including a sect in participation with USA: Barbara Michael Sect, the largest link is USA's The Heaven's Gate Cult-BA Sect and Religion of POC Army, both satanical with empowered Information Services/Information Technology/Information Movies and other technical accesses. In USA currently, noise pollution and distortions are frequent. Annie

  • Posted By: bratgal @ 02/20/2008 12:54:09 PM

    Comment: I don't know if his assessment of who or what is accurate, but I have always felt there was reason to doubt the official ruling of their deaths. I have always felt they were murdered - too many contradictions and so forth I believe have led to a cover up of the truth. Someday maybe we will know.

  • Posted By: bratgal @ 02/20/2008 12:54:02 PM

    Comment: I don't know if his assessment of who or what is accurate, but I have always felt there was reason to doubt the official ruling of their deaths. I have always felt they were murdered - too many contradictions and so forth I believe have led to a cover up of the truth. Someday maybe we will know.

  • Posted By: bratgal @ 02/20/2008 12:50:57 PM

    Comment: I don't know if his assessment of who or what is accurate, but I have always felt there was reason to doubt the official ruling of their deaths. I have always felt they were murdered - too many contradictions and so forth I believe have led to a cover up of the truth. Someday maybe we will know.

  • Posted By: tom joad @ 02/20/2008 12:30:31 PM

    Comment: This guys nutty as a pet squirl

  • Posted By: Pkiel @ 02/20/2008 9:30:50 AM

    Comment: What a nut case! He may have come to believe that nonsense himself because the truth may be that Fayed knew the driver he employed had a drinking problem and now he needs to shift the blame to someone else. His alternative is to believe that he himself is ultimately responsible for killing his son by allowing a drunkard employee to chauffeur his son around. The mind sure plays funny tricks!

  • Posted By: LAWriterGuy @ 02/20/2008 1:53:49 AM

    Comment: What a disgusting piece of stilted, yellow journalism was this 'news piece'. Instead of making Mr. Fayed out to be a grandstanding idiot, which was clearly your intention, what you have done, Ms. Kantrowitz, is to have destroyed any credibility you might have gained from reporting on this tragic matter. I've come to expect more objective pieces from People Magazine than this apparent bilge. Shame on you.

    • Posted By: summer4077 @ 02/20/2008 10:13:01 AM

      Comment: I agree. Very one-sided view in this piece. I think Fayed is still heartbroken over his son's death and grasping at a conspiracy theory to make sense of a senseless death. I do think there was some kind of lowballing going on by the royal family, but I don't think they conspired to kill Diana. It was a tragic example of what money hungry paparazzi can do.

  • Posted By: clarksonrollins@sbcglobal.net @ 02/20/2008 1:28:06 AM

    Comment: Sombody needs to call Oliver Stone. He'll get some mileage outta this and a few hundred miiiion in his pocket.

    We'll never know what happened to the Romanov's, JFK or Diana. Who wants too? It's to much fun to wonder and imagine a conspiracy anyway...

  • Posted By: baldeagle7777 @ 02/20/2008 12:37:49 AM

    Comment: As in the case of OJ , money talks.

  • Posted By: kikinyc @ 02/19/2008 10:15:58 PM

    Comment: Mr. Fayed is destroyed that his son has died. He has fabricated a ridiculous story and sounds like a nut. If I were British I would be annoyed that so much money has gone into this investigation.

  • Posted By: JuliusXXII @ 02/19/2008 8:56:03 PM

    Comment: I understand Mr Fayed, but don't worry soon the Royal Englnd and EEUU will desapear, JesusChrist and the Kingdom of God is coming and He will destroy all the goverments of the earth..All the politicians, the crooks, the comunist, fascist, Nazis will desapear for ever, So Mr Fayed, hold the horses don't get mad because of this bastards, they will be destroy soo, not by you, not by me, by Jesus King of the Kingdom of Jehovah God.

  • Posted By: Cherubim @ 02/19/2008 7:50:56 PM

    Comment: By the way Diana's Butler, Burrell, has just been secretly video taped admitting he lied, lied, lied at the Inquest. Most likely all the British officials, and the few French officials who showed up lied, lied, lied.
    Yes, I believe Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed were murdered by the
    ruling elite of England.

  • Posted By: Cherubim @ 02/19/2008 7:46:28 PM

    Comment: By the way Diana's Butler has just admitted he lied, lied, lied.
    All the British officials probably lied, lied, lied.
    Yes I believe Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed were murdered.

  • Posted By: Eleonora @ 02/19/2008 6:51:08 PM

    Comment: My God, this man is a moron. A vast, international conspiracy, by his account -- and mounted in only one hour! -- and it could have been derailed by the simple use of a seatbelt. Why hasn't the U.K. deported him? He's not a citizen, and he was involved in a Parliamentary bribery scandal. The fact that we're all so tired of the ridiculous Diana is more than reason enough to force him to peddle his conspiracy theories somewhere where they're traditionally more receptive to them.

  • Posted By: MEGOMAN @ 02/19/2008 5:45:48 PM

    Comment: NO ONE'S FAULT BUT HER BODYGUARD. WHO CARES IF THE PRESS GOT MORE PICTURES IT WASN'T WORTH IT. TREVOR REESE JONES (BODYGUARD) SHOULD HAVE NEVER LET SOMEONE ELSE INTO HIS INNER PROTECTION CIRCLE. AL FAYED'S DRUNKEN PILL HEAD AMATURE SECURITY DRIVER TOO BOOT. (BODYGUARD) JONES SHOULD HAVE MADE SURE THAT SHE HAD HER SEAT BELT ON. (BODYGUARD JONES SHOULD HAVE PUT HUS 45CAL INTO PILL HEAD DRIVERS EAR AND SAID SLOW THE *** DOUN OR I'LL SPLATTER YOUR BRAINS ALL OVER THE WINDOW. AT THE NEXT STOP HE SHOULD HAVE PUNCHED HIM IN THE MOUTH. AND NEVER LET HIM BACK INTO THE DETAIL

  • Posted By: sjbrock80 @ 02/19/2008 4:35:25 PM

    Comment: Time to figure out who killed JFK - 1 hour, 20 minutes.

    Time to figure out who killed Princess Dianna - 10 1/2 years and counting...

 
 
Reply
Cancel
 
 
Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse

Cancel
 
The Peek
 
 
STRATEGIES

Isn't it ironic: Xerox is hoping it can profit by teaching companies how to reduce their printing.

Sponsored by
 
 
 
 
NATIONAL SECURITY
Sponsored by
 
 
 
loadingLoading Menu