GUEST COMMENTARY
Sumit Ganguly
Seize the Day
The United States now has an opportunity to make good on its commitment to democracy in Pakistan. It can start by severing its ties with Musharraf.
America's fears of an Islamist victory in Pakistan have turned out to be unfounded. Despite widespread concerns about compromised balloting, electoral violence and low voter turnout in Monday's elections, Pakistan is now enjoying a moment of democracy and optimism-an exceedingly rare event in its troubled history. Of the 191 seats open in Pakistan's 272-seat parliament, the Pakistan People's Party (the party of Benazir Bhutto) won 87 and the Pakistan Muslim League (the party of opposition leader Nawaz Sharif) won 66. General Pervez Musharraf's party, the Pakistan Muslim League, captured only 38 seats. The principal Islamist party, Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam, which had fared well in the last election, has taken a severe battering. It is now all but inevitable that sometime in the next few weeks Pakistan will be governed by a coalition regime with the People's Party as the senior partner.
If the country is to tackle its myriad problems of social injustice, political and religious terror and economic inequity, any coalition regime will have to eschew partisan political bickering, set aside any desire, however understandable, to seek revenge against Musharraf and move with dispatch to the tasks of governance. A failure to act in this fashion will leave the country vulnerable to the machinations of the Islamic zealots. It will dissipate the good will of the citizenry, dash their hopes for democracy and contribute to Pakistan's continued political turmoil.
The United States is in a unique position to help Pakistan accomplish these goals. It should, at the outset, sever its lingering ties to Musharraf, who through arrogance, authoritarianism and incompetence, brought his country to its present pass. It needs to distance itself forthrightly from a failed dictator. Any last attempts to bolster Musharraf out of a misplaced sense of loyalty would be both morally flawed and politically imprudent. It would be morally wrong because he stands discredited before the Pakistani electorate. It would be politically inexpedient because a lingering embrace of Musharraf would provide fodder to the forces of anti-Americanism in Pakistan.
Consequently, if Musharraf wishes to avoid further embarrassment and humiliation, it is time for him to quietly step away from the political fray. His political future was looking murky in the run-up to the elections; it is now effectively at an end. Despite the Bush administration's long and uncritical support for him, he has abjectly failed to promote internal order and security, he has flouted the most basic tenets of democracy, and he has been at best a fitful ally in the "war on terror." The Bush administration now has an important opportunity to genuinely make good on its long-professed commitment to democracy in the Muslim world.
The task that lies ahead for American policymakers is still daunting. Once the euphoria of the electoral surprise passes, the difficult task of governing a land riven with conflict will loom large. To ensure that the new regime does not lose its drive to deal with the many rifts in the political landscape, the Bush administration needs to assist it in setting critical priorities and pursuing them with vigor. Perhaps the most important of these is to reduce the overweening role of the Pakistani military.
Fortunately, the United States may have a viable partner in this endeavor. Gen. Ashfaq Pervez Kiyani, the current chief of staff, seems interested in refocusing the military's attention to its core task, the maintenance of the country's security. To that end the administration needs to work with him to restore the independence of the judiciary, allow the free functioning of political parties, lift the remaining curbs on the press, end the militarization of civil administration and devote greater resources to addressing critical social needs such as health and education.
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »


Loading Menu
Member Comments
Posted By: wazdan @ 02/26/2008 12:00:19 PM
Comment: Irealise the eneleces you had are totaly differ from the ground reality in pakistan, Musharaf has killed pakistani to give protection to Americans,which is a treagy for Pakistanies, Is it thinkable that Americans will start war on hih own people for the sake of Pakistan,that is what the west specialy USA want and support Dictators, Now the World has changed, Now the American has to abonden the policies of the Past, will not get what was USA getting from pakistani dectators.
Posted By: saeedahmad63 @ 02/23/2008 10:59:48 AM
Comment: That indeed is a brilliant article. However you seem to be a rather neive individual who is simply ignoring some other realities.USA is least interested in strengthening the democracy in Pakistan. It is only pursuing and pushing it's own agenda of balkanization of Pakistan in a manner that I shall term as "controlled demilition". That remains a part of it's long term plan of altering the map of this region in line with it's long term policy goals. That is the reason, it will openly or covertly continue supporting any and all individuals and forces that remain hostile to democracy in Pakistan. Irony is that enthusiasts in USA seem to ignore some realities by underestimating the resultant effects of it's interventions in this part of the world. Pakistan (especially NWFP) is neither vietnam nor Iraq. A perpetuation of US' interference will eventually burst the bubble leaving no winners from this to that end. We still appreciate the saner voices like yours who seem to support the opinion that US should leave Pakistan on it's own so that it's internal troubles (actually caused by following US' dictates) are taken care of by the elected government... Saeed Ahmad, Lahore, Pakistan.
Posted By: Muhammed Amin @ 02/23/2008 9:14:37 AM
Comment: Pakistan was termed "The world's most dangerous place". It can now be termed as "The world's most resilient nation". Despite years of western supported dictatorship, doses of jihadism, drugs and weapons during fight against Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan, whenever Pakistanis given opportunity to chose their destiny, it followed relative peace, tranquilty and ecnomic growth. Again, on February 18, 2008 when Pakistanis got the chance they rose to the occassion. They rejected religious parties, wiped out parties allied with dictator and chose parties whose agenda is democratic, rule of law and moderation. Again Pakistanis are jubialiant, going about the business lookinf forward towards a better future. Truly, its " The World's Most Resilient Nation". I feel proud being a Pakistani.
Muhammed Amin