The Obama Delusion

« Return to Article

Discuss

  • Posted By: Scopeless @ 02/20/2008 6:15:56 PM

    I'm kind of baffled by your criticisms. Would ending a war not free-up billions of dollars? How would there not be enough money to implement at least half of barak's proposals?

    The "change" message is valid. Hillary Clinton is a neoconservative in democrat clothing...like Dick Cheney. She was from the same groups that spawned this political philosophy of using the United States as a weapon for democracy and as military police across the globe. She wants a global war on "terror." She did vote for it after all. I DO NOT want someone in the white house who believes we should force our ideals on the rest of the world. Sorry for disagreeing, but it's my right.

  • Posted By: yanks5501 @ 02/20/2008 6:15:39 PM

    Bottom line to all the liberals out there: John McCain will win and all the Osama Barack and Bilary Clinton fanatics will have four years to cry.

    Granted, McCain is not my #1 choice and he is only going to be a one-term President..

    But God help this countrry if Barack or Clinton get in.

    God hlep us.

  • Posted By: awest93726 @ 02/20/2008 10:44:08 AM

    I agree with this report, I do not think he has enough experience and I am appalled that the media has taken him to there hearts and pushed him on to the general public as a messiah for the regrowth of the U.S.A
    As for his speeches shurley all can see he is not unique with his words but constantly quoting some one else.wake up America this man is not President potential. Do not be brainwashed by the media.

    • Posted By: ObamaBacker @ 02/20/2008 6:15:38 PM

      All of his accomplishments are on his website. How about reading his website for yourself instead of listening to others.

  • Posted By: Independent03 @ 02/20/2008 6:14:50 PM

    The author here misses the point entirely. Yes Obama's agenda is essentially democratic -- he's a democrat. Look, Hillary and his agenda are virtually identical. But it's not the policies that we take issue with, but the process by which these policies have been pursued in the past. The way Washington has gone about getting the People's work done has been based on divisive and partisan tactics. Obama's belief that "[g[reat impasses can be broken with sufficient goodwill, intelligence and energy" goes to process of getting things done and reaching compromise. It is clear that we need to bring people together to get things done, and he has proven that he can unite folks from all persuasions.

  • Posted By: Independent03 @ 02/20/2008 6:12:23 PM

    The author here misses the point entirely. Yes Obama's agenda is essentially democratic -- he's a democrat. Look, Hillary and his agenda are virtually identical. But it's not the policies that we take issue with, but the process by which these policies have been pursued in the past. The way Washington has gone about getting the People's work done has been based on divisive and partisan tactics. Obama's belief that "[g[reat impasses can be broken with sufficient goodwill, intelligence and energy" goes to process of getting things done and reaching compromise. It is clear that we need to bring people together to get things done, and he has proven that he can unite folks from all persuasions.

  • Posted By: Justice4All @ 02/20/2008 5:36:20 PM

    I think Senator Obama needs to be given a chance to prove himself as President of the United States and so far, he is the candidate that offers the best opportunity to uplift this country and bring about real change. America is tired of the same old politics; economic failures, war, poor health care. We want change we can believe in, as the saying goes. Senator Obama can and will bring these changes. YES HE CAN!

    • Posted By: snakebaby @ 02/20/2008 6:06:20 PM

      I can't believe and feels funny to see this "yes we can" slogan again after you already read this article. I don't think you have put in enough thoughts in this at all. Nothing matters at this stage if you got all the points this article is trying to make. No need to compare these two candidates. Just think! All politicians are the same, period! I'm here supporting Clinton, but at least I'm not biased on this and hallucinating about who she is. Feel free to support your candidate, but anyone, I say Anyone, who believes Obama is some sort of saint and will change the world are a bunch of the stupidest heads in this universe!

  • Posted By: Sebbydad @ 02/20/2008 5:46:40 PM

    let me get this straight, he has authored and passed easily 4 times the legislation in 2 years that Clinton has in 6, most from her not really relevant to the people, naming building and streets and what have you. He has a history of being able to get bipartisanship to work. As a reporter, you surely have access to his legislative record, though you choose not to note it here. You also fail to be correct in what you do note. Pickign and choosing what you will from the candidates platform in order to support your point shows yoru clear bias. Please find the speech or the statement where he stated he wanted to be the first African -american president. He's never said it, it his telling of the circumstances that brought him to where he is, he does not once mention his race as something he needed to overcome. If you are going to attack him, at least find somethign specific to attack him on. Others attack him for not having plans, you attack him for having plans that 4 points of which, apparently don't impress you.

    • Posted By: snakebaby @ 02/20/2008 6:03:53 PM

      Nothing matters at this stage if you got all the points this article is trying to make. No need to compare these two candidates. Just think! All politicians are the same, period! I'm here supporting Clinton, but at least I'm not biased on this and hallucinating about who she is. Feel free to support your candidate, but anyone, I say Anyone, who believes Obama is some sort of saint and will change the world are a bunch of the stupidest heads in this universe!

  • Posted By: dak100 @ 02/20/2008 1:52:15 PM

    I am a lifelong Democrat who has voted for only one Republican: Ronald Reagan. Our country is at a critical junction with regards to foreign interests that seeks us harm, a stagnant economy burdened with debt and entitlement, a health care system with runaway cost and too many people left out, and an energy policy that forces us to pay our money to countries who turn around and fund terrorists. We need a leader with experience and a plan, not just a talker. Two of the three major candidates remaining for President (Sorry, Gov. Huckabbee) have the qualities I look for in a President. The other needs to go on the motivational speaking circuit. When confronted with the charge that "talk is cheap", all Senator Obama could do is borrow (I am being kind) someone else's words. He also seems to be borrowing a lot of everyone else's ideas as well. I proudly voted for Senator Clinton in a recent primary. Looks like I, and many other Reagan Democrats that I have spoken with, will be voting for Senator McCain this November.

    • Posted By: Obamaisagoodtalker @ 02/20/2008 6:03:34 PM

      Enjoyed reading your post. America needs a leader, not a motivational speaker.

    • Posted By: Opinionated1 @ 02/20/2008 2:03:41 PM

      As one Democrat to another, and a Hillary supporter, you are exactly right.

  • Posted By: Reflecting_Pool @ 02/20/2008 6:02:08 PM

    Tolstoy wrote "A goal is like a star. The point is not that you must reach it, but that you use it as a guide." ... or something very close to this language (I don't want the petty anal-retentive U.S. Media spending another week beating another 'plagiarism' issue to death).

    For the literalists and the opaque one-dimensional dogmatists and ideologues, the Tolstoy statement probably needs further elaboration. A "Goal" ... a specific "Plan" serves both as a latitude-longitude coordinate for identifying where its author stands on the issues, AND ... it serves as a sextant for the planner and its supporters, to keep them "on the path" ... on the trajectory toward that goal.

    Properly understood in this way, it pretty much decimates the central point of the article this predisposed Newsweek writer (Robert J. Samuelson) wrote in this editorial (Predisposed with the pretense of an "on second thought" reconsideration objectivity that is NOT genuine).

  • Posted By: jetnet27 @ 02/20/2008 1:54:29 PM

    @ Kerwal
    Your words describe the majority of the Obama Supporters. Arrogant and Full of It. Everything against Obama is a Propaganda. You want the country back on track? STOP Stereotyping everything!

    OJbama = Paybacktime!

    • Posted By: Surelock Homes @ 02/20/2008 2:00:46 PM

      Obama is an empty suit. End of story.

      • Posted By: Obamaisagoodtalker @ 02/20/2008 6:01:40 PM

        Don't forget Obama is also one good talker too.

  • Posted By: cookiegramma @ 02/20/2008 6:01:20 PM

    Finally, a journalist not mesmerized by Obama's lyrical tones! How refreshing. I was relieved to hear about the question asked by Chris Mathews last night. Maybe it means that some real questions might be asked by the journalists in this country. Mr. Obama might talk a good talk, but he has failed to sign his name to some of the very legislation that he claims to support. His own campaign states that Obama support universal child health insurance, yet when s bil to provide this very thing was voted on in the Senate this year Mr. Obama failed to vote yea or nay. Before calling name, responders should think about going to Mr. Obama's Senate web site and researching the actual votes or lack thereof made by this candidate they support so vehemently. Going to the campaign web site is not going to give a real world picture of what this man has actually done while in Washington.

  • Posted By: sewaa1981 @ 02/20/2008 5:58:42 PM

    Regardless of whether they support Hillary OR Obama the Dems are going to have to pull together if they don't want McCain in the white house. I know a lot of supporters from both sides are planning on voting for McCain if their candidate of choice does not win the Democratic nomination. This would be suicidal for the Democratic party.

  • Posted By: educator1332 @ 02/20/2008 1:56:51 PM

    Finally, someone actually sees through this rhetoric and is calling this man on his obvious inconsistancies. How can others not see this? I'm positively stumped... I am an educator and my national unions all support Clinton for her 100% voting record on education. Obama is a new politician - what makes anyone think he can run the country after so little experience? Because he wants to? Because he wants change? I want change, like most Americans, but I'm not naive enough to believe that Obama is the man to finally bring bipartisan change to the table. Wake up America!

    • Posted By: Larry in Ga @ 02/20/2008 2:08:34 PM

      Was Jesus old enough and experienced enough?

      • Posted By: Xanthorpe @ 02/20/2008 2:32:01 PM

        Whoa, whoa, whoa! You're comparing Obama to Jesus?!?!?!

        Jesus is the Son of God and was teaching from the wisdom of the Creator. Obama is just a guy who was good in debate class. Please - let's keep it real here.

        • Posted By: Obamaisagoodtalker @ 02/20/2008 5:56:20 PM

          Obama can only attain Jesus like status with me if he goes toe-to-toe with a real man like Clint Eastwood and wins best two of three (like he could get up after round one). Obama is a good talker though--a tough Commander-in-Chief who leads with action instead of motivational speeches, well, that's another story. If he could whip Clint Eastwwod then he passes my litmus test of being much more than a talker. Talk is something Obama seems to comfortable with.

        • Posted By: Lorretta @ 02/20/2008 3:30:04 PM

          Hey, he is not even that good at debate.

      • Posted By: norpoul @ 02/20/2008 2:40:56 PM

        What a ridiculous comparison !

      • Posted By: papeets @ 02/20/2008 2:32:30 PM

        The debate will most likely prove who is wrong for the job.

      • Posted By: dewcooper @ 02/20/2008 2:25:54 PM

        As the Son of God and part of the Trinity, the Alpha and Omega, the Word, Who was there before creation, yes, Jesus is old enough and experienced enough. But I know Jesus, and no candidate, past or present, is Jesus...

  • Posted By: sewaa1981 @ 02/20/2008 5:56:04 PM

    Regardless of whether Dems are supporting Hillary OR Obama, they're going to have to pull together if they don't want McCain in the white house. A lot of supporters from both sides Hillary/Obama are pledging to vote for McCain if the nominee of their choice doesn't win. That would be suicidal for the Democratic party... voting out of spite...

  • Posted By: barefootboy @ 02/20/2008 1:57:21 PM

    Frankly, I don't like either of the three left in the race, but had rather have McCain or Clinton. I believe Obama will be elected, and think within a year the American people will wish they had never voted for him. Wouldn't surprise me if there is a movement to remove him from office by impeachment and the ones pushing this will be the ones that voted for him. He is not right for America.

  • Posted By: Tony2001 @ 02/20/2008 2:25:32 PM

    It seems as if Mr. Samuelson like Obama when he was just an impressive keynote speaker but now that he is within a whisper of the white house he no longer likes him. Obama does stand for something; in fact he stands for a lot of things.

    1. Obama is finally representing the voice of the people who have been frustrated for so long with Washington???s partisanship and gridlock politics while the nations needs go unheeded. This is how the roman senate started to crumble, when the senators got too full of themselves and forgot about the people. Many established Washington politicians are amazed at how Obama is drawing people from all walks of life what they have failed to realize all these years is that the nation is fed up with the decadent politics of the past two decades.
    2. The nation has been weary of the power of the lobbyists in Washington, the marginalization of the people???s voices just like the French people where just before the French revolution. The masses were struggling to make ends meet while the elite were living lavishly and the politicians were ignoring the wishes of the people. What Obama is doing is leading a revolution of the people who want a change in the way business is done in Washington.
    3. It???s obvious that the entrenched in Washington still don???t get it; McCain is using the same experience versus novice lines that has failed Hillary. What the republicans and democrat veterans don???t understand is that the experience they laud is the very experience the people have come to detest, what they think is there strong suit is really there weakness, the people want change from the dour business as usual Washington politics, the Clinton???s did not believe that certain demographics would not rally behind Obama and the republicans are assuming the same, what they don???t realize is that the whole nation across all demographics is sick of what Washington politics has denigrated into.

    This is a movement of the people by the people and for the people that is been led by Obama, perhaps the most unlikely choice of the people but the one who recognized the frustration the people have endured all these years.

    It seems as if Mr. SAmuelson is the one who is deluded, a revolution is taking place and he is telling us to "eat cake"

    • Posted By: whithay @ 02/20/2008 2:58:01 PM

      The voice of the people in Florida and Michigan are not being heard...

      • Posted By: Tony2001 @ 02/20/2008 5:50:33 PM

        Which goes to reinforce my point about politics in Washington

      • Posted By: sjpersonal @ 02/20/2008 3:54:56 PM

        Posted By: whithay @ 02/20/2008 14:58:01
        Comment: The voice of the people in Florida and Michigan are not being heard...

        My parents and brother live in Michigan, they told me that Senator Clinton was the only candidate on the ballot . My problem is this, it is unfortunate that the Florida and Michigan ballots are not being counted but that is the fault of those politicians who made the decision to change the primary date which was against party rules. This information was out last summer. the only way that I believe the votes should count is if they redo the primary and give all of the candidates permission to campaign there. Otherwise they should not be counted.

  • Posted By: darrowk @ 02/20/2008 1:57:57 PM

    Couldn't agree more. In their desperation for "change," people have ignored the fact that Obama's platform is devoid of substance.

    • Posted By: Obamaisagoodtalker @ 02/20/2008 5:50:00 PM

      Give Obama credit for not being specific, 'cause that may mean risking alienating the very people who thinks he walks on water. Change is a good thing, but changing policy in Iraq for the sake of change doesn't secure our nation from further attacks from the terrorist enemy. Maybe Obama can Change his speeches and talk less about change and be more specific about the changes he keeps promising.

  • Posted By: snakebaby @ 02/20/2008 5:49:18 PM

    Thank God! Finally someone wrote something that exactly reflects what I've been feeling all along, just that I couldn't put my words like this. Thank you, Robert J. Samuelson, you are a hero!

  • Posted By: jtemple04 @ 02/20/2008 4:00:07 PM

    i think that this is a legit question. Alot of people are scared to question Obama on his policies. I am an Obama supporter and so I think that if someone challenged him on the discrepencies of his rehetoric and what his policies, i believe that he can and will defend it. Everyone just speculates and talks about it "behind his back" i.e. on the news networks (Fox News, Glenn Beck) but i haven't really seen anyone ask him to his
    face. Stop speculating and just ask!!!! If he can't give a legit reason then call him out on it. tha's only fair...

    • Posted By: robsmimi @ 02/20/2008 5:44:26 PM

      You haven't heard them ask him because he won't accept their offers to appear on the show!

  • Posted By: dsfseattle @ 02/20/2008 5:44:17 PM

    How absurd, even now, after the great strides Obama has made in his campaign, that many in the media still do not understand the message that voters are sending. This election is not about a referendum, it is a reckoning. The constitution, our country???s foundation, is being undermined at its very roots from within ??? not by our enemies. The Bush administration has done more to damage our country than any administration previously and we will have to work very hard to repair the damage done by this administration.

    I voted for Bill Clinton in both of his presidential elections. This time around, I voted for Obama in my state of Washington in the caucus, but if Hillary Clinton wins the nomination I will support her and do what ever I can to help her run for president. But if Obama wins the democratic nomination I expect the democratic party to fully back his run for the presidency. And, as a voter, I fully expect that support to come from not only my states senators, but also Hillary and Bill Clinton. I don???t want another fiasco that we had in the last two elections. Frankly, if Obama wins, and the democratic party stumbles, it will take at least 8 years before they can make a comeback. The same goes if Clinton wins the democratic nomination. And if elected, I expect that support to continue.

    And, if real change does not come from this election, god help us.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse