The Obama Delusion

« Return to Article

Discuss

  • Posted By: hersheylemons @ 02/20/2008 1:00:16 PM

    all changes begin first with the idea, the the plan and we all know plans have to be modified. When you build a house its the idea, then the plan, then the reality of modification. However, the changes you make does not mean the idea totally reverses. if we look at an existing house we certainly know what we do not want . I think Hillary Clinton would make a good president based on her accomplishments and experience' but we will still have Bill Clinton's white house and somehow that does not excit me. No i do not know exactly what obama will do and yes I am sure he did not expect to ge this far therefore has no clear picture of his presidency if choosen. I also think that if he is the clear choice, there will be many, Hillary, Colin Powell, John Edwards, Al Gore, Sen. Kennedy, etc. that will be there to shape his presidency, it is not as if he will goven totally alone.

  • Posted By: GustoMaybe @ 02/20/2008 1:00:15 PM

    It's either "she voted for the Iraq war" lady or John "Bomb bomb bomb Iran" McCain... I choose the lesser of three evils, hope.

  • Posted By: lillea @ 02/20/2008 1:00:14 PM

    Obama is encouraging the youth of our country to forget the wonderful history we have. To see all of the great American heros as "old fogies." He is attempting to do away with American patriotism. BUT look at this web site. http://www.newsmax.com/kessler/Obama_Church_Racism/2008/01/07/62285.html?utm_source=crisscross&utm_medium=measuringtest1 His church dwells on African roots, African history, Aftrican customs, etc.
    Where is his patriotism???? It doesn't look like it is American patriotism.

  • Posted By: kw44 @ 02/20/2008 12:38:14 PM

    Whenever I hear Obama speak, I experience deja vu - it's Jimmy Carter all over again. He promised a different way of doing things, people bought into it and it was a disaster.

    • Posted By: carolync @ 02/20/2008 1:00:11 PM

      Jimmy Carter was chewed up by the establishment and entrenched special interests. Yes, that could happen to Obama, but I think he is less naive than Carter was. As long as he speaks honestly and directly to American citizens, and we citizens grit our teeth and take more responsibility for our own actions, I think the changes Obama promises can occur. I'm not holding my breath that we noble citizens can muster what is required of all of us.

  • Posted By: neil4 @ 02/20/2008 12:59:20 PM

    I find it rather amazing as I search through all of the posted messages, how many times the word "inspire" appears when describing Obama. I wonder what word that McCain and Clinton supportrers would use. Obviously they would have a positive word to describe their candidate of choice, but would it be "inspire"? I would rather a nation be inspired to act, than to be held to the false hope that the leader they elect will solve all their woes. Because it is going to take a nation, working together, and with willing shared sacrifice, to overcome the hurdles ahead of us. Obama is the right man for the times.

  • Posted By: PABluesMan @ 02/20/2008 12:11:40 PM

    I've been hearing a lot about the experience levels of each of the candidates, and a favorite trope of the Hillarians is that Obama doesn't ahve the experience and she does. Well, Abraham lincoln had less experience than Obama (he ahd only served a single two year term in the House of Representatives" and look at his accomplishments. Conversely, Richard Nixon had miles of experience and ... well, you know the rest.

    In my view, experience is only part of the picture. Would I like to hear more specifics from Obama? You betcha. But a candidate's ability to inspire -- and thus mobilize -- the electorate is also important. JFK was able to do that. So was Ronald Reagan. Hillary is just not able to get people excited about her candidacy.

    She is able to attract fellow policy wonks. This is not a bad thing; she's been very specific about most of her proposals. But policy details don't get people in the gut, they don't give them the urge to go cast a ballot.

    Just for the record, I'm still riding this fence ...

    • Posted By: miamiman @ 02/20/2008 12:23:02 PM

      why is JFK remembered so fondly? rampant idealism?hmmm....could be. actual performance? cuban missle crisis/womanizing in whitehouse/assination by...? not so good.

      Reagan? fall of Berlin wall, breakup of Soviet Union....substantial historic events

      You make the call

      • Posted By: PABluesMan @ 02/20/2008 12:58:29 PM

        Evidently the whole "we will land a man on the moon and bring him safely back home" thing has dropped under the radar ... NASA wouldn't have been operating even at the level it is today had it not been for Kennedy.

  • Posted By: hersheylemons @ 02/20/2008 12:58:24 PM

    all changes begin first with the idea, the the plan and we all know plans have to be modified. When you build a house its the idea, then the plan, then the reality of modification. However, the changes you make does not mean the idea totally reverses. if we look at an existing house we certainly know what we do not want . I think Hillary Clinton would make a good president based on her accomplishments and experience' but we will still have Bill Clinton's white house and somehow that does not excit me. No i do not know exactly what obama will do and yes I am sure he did not expect to ge this far therefore has no clear picture of his presidency if choosen. I also think that if he is the clear choice, there will be many, Hillary, Colin Powell, John Edwards, Al Gore, Sen. Kennedy, etc. that will be there to shape his presidency, it is not as if he will goven totally alone.

  • Posted By: alfredchrist @ 02/20/2008 12:58:23 PM

    I think this is the first time a journalist has been bold to bring this point out. The media and public at large have aloud his charisma and rhetoric to cloud their better judgement to explore WHAT he actually believes in. Even though he has been successful in doing this in the primary, because of Clinton's own baggage and ineptitudes, I hope McCain and his campaign don't allow him "smooth" and "flatter" his way into the Whitehouse. By the way, I am African-American, and proud for how far he has gone; however, issues on morality and security still matter to me, and I believe McCain is tried enough to handle the job.

  • Posted By: justjake @ 02/20/2008 12:57:57 PM

    It never ceases to amaze me when a candidate is criticized for running a campaign within the narrow confines dictated by the media. When anyone dares to seek elective office following the wishes of this commentator, they are at best labeled an idealist, at worst considered detached from reality, and always very quickly regulated to the ???fringe??? faction of the campaign cadre. This country has no patience for detail and reality from politicians in part because the news organizations have no interest in delivering it. Sound bites and conveniently generalized concepts make the frenetic pace of news reporting so much easier. The sad fact is that the game must be played by these miscreant rules to have any chance of success of winning the office. Once there the real work can begin and it would be nice to have an inspirational leader with obvious intelligence doing that work for a change. The commentator would do better giving Obama some credit for crafting a campaign that recognized the potential for a long, drawn-out process and seems to have planned brilliantly. Doesn???t that same something about his ability to lead this country

  • Posted By: teeda155 @ 02/20/2008 12:57:37 PM

    Obama's rhetoric decribes my reality. Look at how he has run his campaign. Just like a an effective CEO.
    I will support him all the way to the White House.

  • Posted By: mbrull @ 02/20/2008 12:57:21 PM

    I thought it odd to hear Obama speak about students being able to have some of their student loans forgiven for public service. THAT idea was straight out of Bill Clinton's mouth when HE was President. For me, Obama doesn't have an original thought in his head. All hot air. GO HILLARY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Posted By: Wise_Guy @ 02/20/2008 12:55:59 PM

    I do not think that Sen. Obama is delusional at all and if he was why is Hillary Clinton always taking most (if not) all of his ideas? The Clintons (Bill) had 8 years to clear up this mess but they created more problems for the people of America. I would advise everyone to read article that was posted online (MSNBC regarding an article that was in the New York Times on 1/31/08 "An Ex-President, A Mining Deal, A Big Donor" by Jo Becker and Don Van Natta Jr. this is a MUST READ!!!

  • Posted By: Jaspermoon @ 02/20/2008 12:55:50 PM

    Finally someone with the voice of reason. Why is this not being picked up on and splashed all over the air waves? I can only hope that eventually these "truths" will come out. I think it might be too late for Clinton, but lets hope the media starts calling Barack out on this soon, and pointing out that his plans are strickingly similar to the ones Hillary has been espousing since the start of this campaign. If not I am sure McCain will try his best to fight the euphoric wave created by Obama's Oratory.

  • Posted By: dontbuyit @ 02/20/2008 12:55:46 PM

    Can we tear apart the Democratic Party..."Yes We Can"!

    Off the press: Bob the builder charges Obama with plagarism.

  • Posted By: Responsible2000 @ 02/20/2008 12:34:22 PM

    This author does not really understand what it means to be a leader. Barack Obama is an acoomplished man, no one can deny that. Few (including current serving supreme court justices) have been elected to head the Harvard Law Review, he has been a constituional Professor and has had 8 solid years of legislative experience in the Illionois senate (that happens to be more than number of years Hillary Clinton has been in the senate). Hillary claims to have had 35yrs of experience. That means his experience started when Barack was 11yrs old and yet what experience does she refer to, since she has only had 7 years of legislative experience. What the author fails to recognize is that the big problems of our time remain unsolved not for lack of experience, but for lack of leadership that cuts across the divisions that always makes our government not able to govern.
    Never forget, Barack is older than both JFK and Bill Clinton when they became president and yet he has shown more moral leadership than Bill Clinton specifically. To prod your mind.....think of the powerful parallels with all the young, innovative business leaders who have been engine of growth for our economy, beating the old experienced companies. Open your eyes!!!!!

    • Posted By: dewcooper @ 02/20/2008 12:55:45 PM

      "Few (including current serving supreme court justices) have been elected to head the Harvard Law Review, he has been a constituional Professor and has had 8 solid years of legislative experience in the Illionois senate"

      So what you are saying is that he is an elitest. How is that change\different?

  • Posted By: seattledon @ 02/20/2008 12:54:53 PM

    Seriously? I would expect to read this in some high school newspaper ... not Newsweek. How many Presidents follow through on their "detailed" plans for change, anyway? The President doesn't MAKE laws ... the Presidency is more about intangibles than it is about policy, and I think the change that Obama would bring is way more about intangibles than policy. Of course, the President can have an agenda, but he/she has to deal with political realities in getting anything done, and the fact that Obama recognizes that should be a credit to him. With all the lofty rhetoric, there's a realist in there. To me, that's part of the draw.

  • Posted By: reader_2 @ 02/20/2008 12:54:31 PM

    Mr. Samuelson, this is by far the most objective piece I have read on senator Obama and his candidacy. It would seem that anyone daring challenge his positions or statements is guilty of racism or worse. I agree with your assessment. I see the only change this man will bring to this nation (if he reaches the whitehouse) is the color of the man sitting in the oval office.

  • Posted By: lillea @ 02/20/2008 12:54:07 PM

    Folks, Obama DOES think we are stupid. We need to do our homework. This guy thinks he is going to smooth talk his way into our White House. RESEARCH, RESEARCH, RESEARCH.

  • Posted By: Tashe @ 02/20/2008 12:53:45 PM

    FINALLY!! Someone voices a SANE opinion. I think the news media and Oprah Winfrey are electing our President.

  • Posted By: OH.supportsHillary @ 02/20/2008 12:38:12 PM

    Finally, someone who see's Obama for what he is...a great speaker-with no ability to folloe through. It's a sorry shame it took until 2/ 20 for someone in the Media to finally wake up and smell the coffee. Is it too late? Maybe--maybe not-- I'm from Ohio and I guess I could use Obama's agruement -like he did about Sen Clinton and many, many, others who voted to give Bush authority for miltary use in Iraq..... I(like Obama) seen through this hoaxc from the beginning--fancy speeches don't get the job done--experience and skill does... that's why I support Sen Clinton---all you to do is ask yourself. If you owned a business and wanted to expand that business into another market--when you looked at your employees--would you pick the least experienced or someone with lots of experience to be the person to run it for you???? Obviously, you'd pick the one with the most experience--so why--WHY would anyone vote for Obama---I don't have a clue... Support Hillary Clinton--she can still pull it off... I'm telling folks--Obama can not win in Nov. the REP will mash him like a worm////

    • Posted By: JoshCrow @ 02/20/2008 12:53:27 PM

      With that line of reasoning, why wouldn't you vote for John McCain? He's got the most experience, after all.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse