he is the supreme example of a politician. in the response posted by Tony2001; he again spouts gross generalities about future actions with built in excuses for not accomplishing goals. it only PROVES Mr. Samuelson's point. His senate voting record speaks for itself. He is of course totally and completly lefty liberal in his support for legislation. He cannot claim to be moderate in any way. He will never get the mainstream republican vote or a portion thereof as he represents everything that is contrary to the majority of Americans. He will definitely be soft on foreign policy due to his inexperience there. he has already demonstrated this by his comments regarding unconditional talks initiated by us with those nations opposed to us. any strategist/tactician knows that this kind of approach signals a weakness on the part of the initiator thereby lowering your standing even before the talks can begin. We have a position of strength on the world stage regardless of what the sheep-like populus' believes. we do not lack respect on the world stage they actually fear us. we are the target because of our social status and lifestyle. I for one do not believe that we should relinquish our position due to pleasing others who envy and wish to see us fall in stature or even cease to exist. Why give those who
His position of initiation of talks with rogue nations disqualifies him from being an effective leader who can protect us and utilize the tools which we have. This position is indeed delusional. Iran/N. Korea/alqueda/iraq will have a banquet with him and us as the main course. Those of you who feel dissconnected from this reality need to consider this aspect of the candidate before installing him in the most powerful position on planet earth.









Discuss