The Obama Delusion

« Return to Article

Discuss

  • Posted By: miamiman @ 02/22/2008 10:12:36 AM

    he is the supreme example of a politician. in the response posted by Tony2001; he again spouts gross generalities about future actions with built in excuses for not accomplishing goals. it only PROVES Mr. Samuelson's point. His senate voting record speaks for itself. He is of course totally and completly lefty liberal in his support for legislation. He cannot claim to be moderate in any way. He will never get the mainstream republican vote or a portion thereof as he represents everything that is contrary to the majority of Americans. He will definitely be soft on foreign policy due to his inexperience there. he has already demonstrated this by his comments regarding unconditional talks initiated by us with those nations opposed to us. any strategist/tactician knows that this kind of approach signals a weakness on the part of the initiator thereby lowering your standing even before the talks can begin. We have a position of strength on the world stage regardless of what the sheep-like populus' believes. we do not lack respect on the world stage they actually fear us. we are the target because of our social status and lifestyle. I for one do not believe that we should relinquish our position due to pleasing others who envy and wish to see us fall in stature or even cease to exist. Why give those who

    His position of initiation of talks with rogue nations disqualifies him from being an effective leader who can protect us and utilize the tools which we have. This position is indeed delusional. Iran/N. Korea/alqueda/iraq will have a banquet with him and us as the main course. Those of you who feel dissconnected from this reality need to consider this aspect of the candidate before installing him in the most powerful position on planet earth.

  • Posted By: swimfast @ 02/22/2008 9:53:25 AM

    Finally. a dead on analysis of Obama. Thank you.

  • Posted By: Tony2001 @ 02/22/2008 8:39:06 AM

    OK Mr. Samuelson, here is Mr. Obama's response to your Delusion. What say you?

    "Now, I think that Senator Clinton has a fine record and I don't want to denigrate that record. I do think there is a fundamental difference between us in terms of how change comes about. Senator Clinton of late has said: Let's get real. The implication is that the people who've been voting for me or involved in my campaign are somehow delusional. And that, you know, the 20 million people who've been paying attention to 19 debates and the editorial boards all across the country at newspapers who have given me endorsements, including every major newspaper here in the state of Texas. You know, the thinking is that somehow, they're being duped, and eventually they're going to see the reality of things. Well, I think they perceive reality of what's going on in Washington very clearly. What they see is that if we don't bring the country together, stop the endless bickering, actually focus on solutions and reduce the special interests that have dominated Washington, then we will not get anything done. And the reason that this campaign has done so well.. The reason that this campaign has done so well is because people understand that it is not just a matter of putting forward policy positions. Senator Clinton and I share a lot of policy positions. But if we can't inspire the American people to get involved in their government and if we can't inspire them to go beyond the racial divisions and the religious divisions and the regional divisions that have plagued our politics for so long, then we will continue to see the kind of gridlock and nonperformance in Washington that is resulting in families suffering in very real ways. I'm running for president to start doing something about that suffering, and so are the people who are behind my campaign."

    • Posted By: dewcooper @ 02/22/2008 9:33:38 AM

      "But if we can't inspire the American people to get involved in their government and if we can't inspire them to go beyond the racial divisions and the religious divisions and the regional divisions that have plagued our politics for so long, then we will continue to see the kind of gridlock and nonperformance in Washington that is resulting in families suffering in very real ways. I'm running for president to start doing something about that suffering, and so are the people who are behind my campaign."

      Nice words if you are going to make decisions based upon popularity polls, but completely inaccurate for the government of the United States. We are not a democracy, where the American people vote on every policy and program. Instead, we are a rebublic, where the people who were elected 4 yrs ago write and vote on policies and programs based upon their own interests (hence, all the 'pork'). Obama can play Tony Robbins all he wants, but the people who marvel over him blowing his nose are worthless if he is elected.

  • Posted By: marketingtruth @ 02/21/2008 7:05:28 PM

    Comment: Comment: Comment: Judge Him by His Laws
    COMMENT
    washingtonpost.com
    By Charles Peters
    People who complain that Barack Obama lacks experience must be unaware of his legislative achievements. One reason these accomplishments are unfamiliar is that the media have not devoted enough attention to Obama's bills and the effort required to pass them, ignoring impressive, hard evidence of his character and ability.
    Since most of Obama's legislation was enacted in Illinois, most of the evidence is found there -- and it has been largely ignored by the media in a kind of Washington snobbery that assumes state legislatures are not to be taken seriously. (Another factor is reporters' fascination with the horse race at the expense of substance that they assume is boring, a fascination that despite being ridiculed for years continues to dominate political journalism.)

    • Posted By: dewcooper @ 02/22/2008 9:25:44 AM

      Well, if you look at what Obama ACTUALLY did in Illinois, he made their government BIGGER by giving it more control of business and personal interests. So, if we are to believe that he will do the same as president, we can look forward to an even BIGGER federal government with even more control over our lives (taxes, worthless programs, etc.).

  • Posted By: nikkik @ 02/21/2008 6:50:02 PM

    Imagine, Obama as president, with the organization he has developed as an ongoing grassroots lobby who will support him and lobby our reps and senators, instead of delegating that to pro politicians and lobbyists and spacing out. Obama is offering us an antidote to Washington insiderism empowered by the ignorance of narcicisstic or apathetic "citizens." Citizenship under Obama is what will change Washington! We are the rightful lobby.

    • Posted By: dewcooper @ 02/22/2008 9:18:59 AM

      All I hear Obama (andHillary for that matter) say is that he will make Washington BIGGER by giving them even more control over everyone's life. He will tax the rich, keeping them from starting more businesses; he will tax businesses, forcing more to go overseas where taxes will be less; he will increase the taxes of the middle class; and he will tax EVERYONE in order to pay for his programs and policies, including socialised medicine. Taxes make Washington bigger, not smaller.

  • Posted By: paulheise @ 02/21/2008 5:20:26 PM

    in the "Freedom from Fear" speech by Aung San Suu Kyi, the Myanmar (Burmese) peace activist who was elected prime minister and then imprisoned by the military. She says:

    "The quintessential revolution is that of the spirit, born of an intellectual conviction of the need for change in those mental attitudes and values which shape the course of a nation's development. A revolution which aims merely at changing the official policies and institutions with a view to an improvement in material conditions has little chance of genuine success. Without a revolution of the spirit the forces which produced the inequities of the old order would continue to be operative, posing a constant threat to the process of reform and regeneration." This is Lincolnesque.

    • Posted By: dewcooper @ 02/22/2008 9:13:23 AM

      Lincon used military force the 'change the spirit' of those who didn't agree with him. Is that what you are suggesting Obama or Hillary will do?

  • Posted By: phoenixbix45 @ 02/22/2008 9:06:51 AM

    You know, a year ago (or so), I told everyone around me that I just could not trust Hillary--to me, she seemed to embody the "say anything, promise anything, no matter what" kind of politician that I so loathe. I felt it was absolutely obvious that she would do whatever she had to do in order to become president. And I still feel that way. However, I knew precisely what I was getting with her--to (mis)quote our favorite Bushy-at least she was a Known Known. Obama is a different story. He is a Known Unknown. I know his voting record is almost a mirror image of Hill's, but aside from a few platitude laden speeches and that, what do I really know about this guy? Not much. What makes him tick? I do not know. And that concerns me. I do know he wants to increase the size of the military, which I find surprising and it certainly goes against the image he's projecting, imo. I'm all for bi-partisan politics and although it's long overdue, he seems maybe a bit too willing to get chummy with the despotic Right. And this Cult of Personality fervor troubles me. He's creating a palpable mania on both sides of the aisle as well as both sides of the pond. I find that to be more than a little alarming. The majority of the MSM are gushing over him to an embarrassing degree. Very strange. Who is this guy to be causing such a huge outpouring of unbridled adoration, anyway?

  • Posted By: Norasusan @ 02/22/2008 8:40:11 AM

    I've never been dazzled by Obama. He's glib and speaks only in platitudes. He tells Americans what they want to hear instead of the realities of the enormous problems America faces. We are electing a President of the United States, not the new American Idol.

  • Posted By: jfwaltonii @ 02/22/2008 8:23:29 AM

    Finally, someone to step back and look at the depth of the man and his proposed programs. Thank you for the insight

  • Posted By: Nazarite-Judah @ 02/22/2008 7:46:24 AM

    If God be for Barack Obama, who dare stands against him?

  • Posted By: zidek666 @ 02/22/2008 7:42:15 AM

    Comment: I totally agree with your insight. Thanks for the guts, bravado, and journalistic objectivity you've shown in this article!

  • Posted By: zidek666 @ 02/22/2008 7:40:00 AM

    Comment: I totally agree! thanks for having the guts and bravado for pointing this out!

  • Posted By: dema @ 02/22/2008 7:22:10 AM

    Sir, I disagree with your views because of the following points. First of all to assume that because Obama has a good rhetoric (a gift he should not aplogise about) he can´t put things into action is simply wrong. This is what Senator Clinton has been trying to preach all over again, and it´s just not fair. My second point is, to suggest that masses who have voted for him thus far are delusioned is a slap on their faces. You may take note that some of his core supporters who have been constant in this primaries are inteligent, well educated people.

  • Posted By: chyke1 @ 02/20/2008 8:31:00 PM

    Another round table discussion for Obama haters!!

    • Posted By: prognlin @ 02/22/2008 5:25:12 AM

      No, we don;t hate the guy. In fact, I think he is a decent, well-intentioned fellow. But those are not qualifications for the job of the presidency. If there were ANY evidence that he is capable of forming concensus in Congress the way he excites college crowds, he would be a formidable leader indeed. But his senatorial voting record reveals him to be a very typical partisan politician- he voted with the Democrat block 97% in his first year, 96% in his second year, and 97% in his third. In over a thousand Senate votes, he strayed from his party only about 3% of the time. That's not "reaching across the aisle," and you can be sure every Republican in Congress will remember that.

  • Posted By: feduo @ 02/21/2008 11:59:19 PM

    Msn is running a video that states Obama blows nose and gets applause at the debate. Just think if he farted he would probably got a standing ovation. By the way I am a racist as we all are and I would love know of any successfull country in the world or even city in the US with black leadership where the murder rate or corruption of government isn't through the roof. Who do morons for Obama think the cabinet would be for the graffitti inscripted black house?

    • Posted By: eklimes @ 02/22/2008 5:25:11 AM

      First of all Obama's bi-racial. As far as your other comments are concerned, there are many variables that contribute to a failed government. However, to rebut your previous point, this county has will have a 1/2 billion dollar budget deficit this year. In addition, we have move from a 1/2 billion dollar surplus 7 years ago to a 6-7 trillion dollar deficit. Do you consider this successful? I do not believe Bush is black. Incompetent leadership transcends race as well as gender and over the last few years, we have seen more than our share.

  • Posted By: eklimes @ 02/22/2008 5:13:06 AM

    Comment: Both Hillary and Obama are both qualified. However, Hillary is a microcosm of what is wrong with Washington. In addition, I find her actions at times completely polarizing. For the last fifteen years, Washington is becoming more and more divided. This should be concerning to everyone especially during the current times.
    Obama offers a clear alternative to the status-quo. I initially supported McCain because of his willingness to push back against his own Party and do the right thing. However, he is now pandering to the Republican base. In addition, I do not support his views on Iraq. To that end, we need to move in a completely different direction.

  • Posted By: prognlin @ 02/22/2008 5:07:40 AM

    Well, it's nice to see the media begin to take a look at Obama. Unfortunately, it is too late to vet Mr. Obama for the primary campaign; that's a done deal. Mr. Samuelson's decision to finally share his insights only increases the likelihood that the inevitable implosion of the Obama balloon will occur before November, ensuring a McCain inauguration next January. If that was your objective, Mr. Samuelson, kudos to you- well done. If you think you're somehow fulfilling your journalistic responsibility to fully and equally vet all the candidates, it's a little too late to redeem yourself on that one. Shame on you and Newsweek.

    The ultimate loser in this campaign is the American people, as the abdication of a fair, objective, critical press is a handicap we can never overcome.

  • Posted By: prognlin @ 02/22/2008 5:07:10 AM

    Well, it's nice to see the media begin to take a look at Obama. Unfortunately, it is too late to vet Mr. Obama for the primary campaign; that's a done deal. Mr. Samuelson's decision to finally share his insights only increases the likelihood that the inevitable implosion of the Obama balloon will occur before November, ensuring a McCain inauguration next January. If that was your objective, Mr. Samuelson, kudos to you- well done. If you think you're somehow fulfilling your journalistic responsibility to fully and equally vet all the candidates, it's a little too late to redeem yourself on that one. Shame on you and Newsweek.

    The ultimate loser in this campaign is the American people, as the abdication of a fair, objective, critical press is a handicap we can never overcome.

  • Posted By: ns2411 @ 02/22/2008 3:32:36 AM

    This is the first "real" evaluation of B.Obama's political rhetoric I've read. In general, the press and pundants are way too soft on B. Obama, and at the same time seem to nitpick at H. Clinton. Sure, Obama is impressive; we want him to succeed; we, like the "Obama Girl" on You-Tube, have fallen in love with the image. Obama represents what we would like to see valued--the American Dream in action. But, talk is not performance. Promise is not results. Politicians must deliver; to do so, they must know the system, not just talk about how they can go around it. Jimmy Carter tried to make a difference in Washington--with all good intentions--but failed more often than not to bring about his promised "change." Obama, too, will ultimately fail to deliver on the promises he's glibly making to all of us.

    • Posted By: left of center @ 02/22/2008 4:49:24 AM

      Obama is 180 degrees from the current administration's position and way of doing business. Even if he is not able to effect all of the change that he promises, it is indeed the direction this country needs to go. Clinton would be my second choice. Capitalistic war mongers have had their chance. It's now time for a new direction.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse