ansen, fill-in-the-blanks like u are what has become the malaise of film critiques/ reviews these days. i love the way you write - viggo mortensen's award was the nomination - after having written that george clowney deserved it if he hadnt won before. have you seen the two performances you are comparing, and the one specially that you are dismissing? you are comparing a great actor with a great hairstyle. you and people like you have completely ignored mortensen's efforts because he doesnt schmooze other good-haired, hollywood-bred, producing-own-films types like clowney and Mr Rebecca Miller, doesnt date pubescent starlets, doesnt have paparazzi hounding his motor bike accidents.
if good hair, white teeth and green date are your criteria for judging best actors, i aint surprised by the verdict you pull here.
Where's Corliss? Get this hack off the rolls.









Discuss