Memo to President Obama

Never mind Iraq. Just end the 'war on terror.'

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: emma25 @ 04/22/2009 2:49:14 PM

    I think the issue of enhanced interrogation is complicated. Those that were waterboarded were "enemy combatants" and not POWs. The Geneva Convention therefore did not apply to these individuals. That said, the question of whether waterboarding is legal (by U.S. and/or U.N. standards) is a fair one and should be looked into by the attorney general. What should also be examined is whether or not these techniques saved lives. Is it worth causing physical discomfort to a known terrorist to save the lives of thousands? If one answers no, then how many people would have to be sacrificed in order for one to permit waterboarding? Suppose the fate of Mecca and Medina depended on getting information from a rogue Mossad agent who refused to talk? Would one just ask politely and then just give up?<a href="http://anunturi-gratuite.prahova-online.com/"> anunturi</a>

  • Posted By: James Dietz @ 02/02/2009 1:58:23 PM

    Yup we have had 7 years of safety without bombs going off in our streets and people beheaded. Lets all get nice and warm with those who want to do us harm, be nice and maybe they kill us in a humane manner. Great idea.

  • Posted By: maz1960 @ 03/12/2008 11:12:19 AM

    The author can make his point but keep "Global Warming" out of the conversation if you want to be considered somewhat intelligent. The polar icecaps (both poles)have grown tremendously this past winter season at each pole, we are having one of the coldest winters ina few decades, scientists are beginning to de-bunk Al Gore's "feel-good, emotional scientists"....Wake up and smell the coffee. The sun and sun spots has so much more to do about the temperature of the earth than green house gases.

  • Posted By: sjones_1 @ 02/25/2008 2:24:55 PM

    Brilliant Harvard lawyers don't do this: A British-Iraqi billionaire lent millions of dollars to Barack Obama's fundraiser just weeks before an imprudent land deal that has returned to haunt the presidential contender, an investigation by The Times discloses.

    • Posted By: beaker87 @ 02/28/2008 8:00:54 PM

      You seriously think the media will even cover the issue!?! This is Obama remember, the media doesn't give him negative coverage. He could recieve money from Al-Queda and it would barely make a ripple in the media.

  • Posted By: bill4truth @ 02/21/2008 5:04:43 PM

    Boy, you hit one point on the nose: a small bunch of desparate cave-dwelling fundamentalist fanatics is now defining US policy (under the Bush cabal) ad infinitim. We the People certainly deserve some intelligent leadership. School-yard politics just ain't gonna cut if for the good Ol' US of A.

    • Posted By: GrogInOhio @ 02/28/2008 4:40:56 PM

      Unfortunately, it's not only foreign policy. Don't forget 'extraordinary rendition', warrantless wiretaps, detention without charge or access to counsel and torture in our names. We've had 7 years of being grossly un-American while criticizing those that questioned it as them being un-American.

      327 days till the end of the Bush administration.

  • Posted By: coll.env @ 02/28/2008 12:54:13 PM

    Why make something difficult !!!
    Sen. McCain-Business as usual.
    Sen.Hillary Clinron-To close to the Bush Family.
    Sen Barack Obama- Turn the page so the American, citenzry can finally SPEAK .

  • Posted By: Tyler Durden @ 02/23/2008 4:59:54 PM

    I.
    I remember Tuesday, September 9. 2001, and I remember the days after. My community, Staten Island, was very hard hit. We lost about 270 people. But in the days after 9/11, the shock and grief were met by a tremendous positive community spirit of help, healing, cooperation, and rebuilding. Over the weekend, churches and community groups held special services and gatherings where this spirit was palpable. It really seemed that a greater good was going to come out of the evil that had been done to us. And if Staten Island could bring good out of this evil, so could all of New York City, and the nation.
    Then, on Thursday September 20th, President Bush went on TV and addressed the nation with a speech that changed everything. He began by saying that ???the state of the union is strong,??? and immediately followed that by calling us a country ???awakened to danger and called to defend freedom.??? ???Our grief,??? he said, ???has turned to anger.??? Not healing, but anger. Anger at our enemies. Then he said ???Whether we bring our enemies to justice, or bring justice to our enemies, justice will be done.???

    • Posted By: cece.borjeson @ 02/28/2008 12:46:39 PM

      Tyler - are you also an obsessiver talker when you can't find a key-board? Anyone that needs a dozen posts to make their point is beyond help. PS: Hillary was spoofing Obama's stump-speech style. It had nothing to do with blasphemy. You need to work on two parts of your anatomy: zip your lip, and develop a funny-bone. Sheesh !!!!!

  • Posted By: Topple Government @ 02/27/2008 4:38:08 AM

    Excellent points. I really enjoyed this article!

  • Posted By: xjerseygirl @ 02/26/2008 5:43:31 PM

    When it is all said and done, this is becoming by far one of the most interesting races to the White House we have seen in years. McCain, Clinton or Obama? It will still be politics as usual. I just hope that which ever of those three is #44, he or she will be able to make things better. Right now everything is such a hugh mess. I don't count Clinton out, because as we all know, anything can happen in politics in America. We got Buch 43 didn't we? The most important thing is that the American people get out and vote. And, hopfully #44 can fix some of the mess we are in.

  • Posted By: Jack3213 @ 02/22/2008 4:40:52 PM

    ATLEAST THE MCCAIN'S CAN BE CONSIDERED PATRIOTIC IN THE FULLEST SENSE OF THE WORD, ATLEAST THEY SALUTE THE FLAG WITH HANDS OVER THEIR HEARTS- AND HAVE ALWAYS BEEN PROUD OF THE USA.THE CLINTONS ARE NOTHING BUT TWO BIT LIARS, ALWAYS WERE, ALWAYS WILL BE.

    • Posted By: lamm01 @ 02/26/2008 5:11:10 PM

      Excuse me but isn't it Obama who will not hold his hand over his heart during the national athem. Have they not always been proud of America? I think that you have your candidates and their spouses mixed up. It must be because Obama tries to hard to be white....

  • Posted By: aintwegotfun @ 02/23/2008 11:52:59 AM

    Someone please answer this question. O'Bama's mother was a white woman from Kansas. She married a black man that was an islamist. He deserted her and her son. She then married another black man that was also an islamist. This is all we know. The second husband also left her and her son. She then raised him alone with his grandmother. She is now deceased. Why do we not know more about O'Bama's mother? Plainly she must have been the most influential person in his life & in his formative years. But she remains a mystery. O'Bama says nothing about her & the media does not either. Why do we know so much about both Clinton's families and their up bringing and nearly none about his? Wouldn"t this help us know him better?

    • Posted By: lamm01 @ 02/26/2008 5:08:27 PM

      Because if he speak sof his mother he has to reiterate how he hates "his mother's people" and we can't have white voters knowing that, can we? It would ruin the illusion of the uniter not divider.

  • Posted By: aintwegotfun @ 02/23/2008 10:15:09 AM

    Someone please answer this question. O'Bama's mother was a white woman from Kansas. She married a black man that was an islamist. He deserted her and her son. She then married another black man that was also an islamist. This is all we know. The second husband also left her and her son. She then raised him alone with his grandmother. She is now deceased. Why do we not know more about O'Bama's mother? Plainly she must have been the most influential person in his life & in his formative years. But she remains a mystery. O'Bama says nothing about her & the media does not either. Why do we know so much about both Clinton's families and their up bringing and nearly none about his? Wouldn"t this help us know him better?

    • Posted By: bwlib @ 02/26/2008 1:47:53 PM

      Obama's mother died at the age of 53 from cancer and struggled with medical expenses to cover her treatment. She had only two children, Barack and his sister. She earned a PhD and still managed to educate both her children in top schools. Her first husband, Barack's father, was born a moslem as many Kenyans in his part of Kenya are born but he attended Catholic school and converted to Catholism. I do not know why this never reaches the mainstream media. His African tradition allowed him to have more than one wife (remember Africa has 54 countries and thousands of traditions so not every town/country practices the same form of Christianity, Islam nor ethnic tradition). 1950's-60's Islam in Eastern Africa isn't necessarily today's Middle Eastern/Arabic nor East Asian radical Islam per se. His father got a scholarship to U. of Hawaii and met and married Barack's mother in undergrad. He left her to go to Harvard to get his PhD in economics then went back to make a name for himself in Kenya and continued a life with an informal Kenyan wife (as I understand it). Arguably, in the 1970's, he saw his future as a black foreign man as being better in Kenya (his home) than in the U.S. Barack'ss mother married not another black man but an Indonesian (Asian) man and went to Indonesia at one point to follow her husband. When that marriage dissolved, she returned to Hawaii with Barack who was still a boy and with her daughter from that second marriage. Today that sister, who looks South Pacific Asian, lives in Hawaii and is married with a child or so and campaigns for Barack. His father died around the mid-1980's in a car accident and he'd only spent time with Barack from Barack's birth until he was two yrs old and then for one month when Barack was 10 yrs old. The father spent that vacation living with Barack, his mother and both grandparents before returning to Kenya. There was a recent documentary on Barack's life on CNN and MSNBC covering all this and more printed articles (google it). Barack always mentions how difficult it was to be a young man watching his mother try to negotiate bills while dealing with cancer at age 53. She apparently used to wake him up at about 4am most school mornings to eat breakfast, read and do add'l school work; he has her to thank for his education, discipline, diction, eloquence and ability to communicate articulately.

  • Posted By: n_ksi_1970@hotmail.com @ 02/26/2008 9:27:47 AM

    This comment refers to your article, "Memo to President Obama", where you mention the right of a people to "dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another" in the U.S. Declaration of Independence. What no American or foreign reporter ever mentions is that the U.S. almost one century after independence, fought a much bloodier, yet successful, struggle in order to deny the right of secession to territories that were not just provinces but at least nominally separate states participating in a federation or union. If not understood already I am talking about the Civil War.

    So the U.S. when invoking their principles in international relationships should make more clear what they stand for if possible. Because in the case of Yugoslavia for example the central federal government was not allowed to apply the same right that the U.S. central government used during the Civil War: to impose its will on the states participating in the Union. After that was achieved and Yugoslavia was finally dissolved, the same "principle" was extended to provinces like Kosovo. It would be nice of the U.S. government to let us know what would be the reaction if one or more states were to secede from the Union today. Wouldn't they invoke the precedent set by the victory in the Civil War? Or would this precedent be voided wrt Kosovo?

    Best regards,
    Nicholas Ksi

  • Posted By: Chapalody @ 02/26/2008 7:21:11 AM

    If Hillary was in the lead, would you give the same advice to Hillary. I think not. Except for the way Hillary voted on the war, you and Hillary seem to be equal in your liberalism. It's Obama's new tone which bothers you and most liberals like you. It seems your doing the same thing Hillary is doing. Reminding Obama of his core Democrat principles. Why does Obama rhetoric about hope and change bother you so much. It's comes across so clearly in what you have written. Your scared to death Obama won't continue on the doom and gloom ideology of the Democrat party. Obama doesn't need to be told how to attack President Bush on the war in Iraq or foreign policy. He just needs to win the Presidency first. I can see it's hard to break out of the intense and upset all the time which the voters have picked up on with Hillary. Just because Obama isn't negative all the time, doesn't mean he has abandoned his core Democrat principles.

  • Posted By: Trenton Sims @ 02/25/2008 7:18:36 PM

    On SUNDAY??
    OH No She Didn't.??

    SHAME ON YOU HOLLARY !!!
    For Todays (SUNDAY) Sacrelege, blasphemy, and Atheism..
    Mocking the Christian belief in Salvation.
    Poking fun and Sarcasm at Believing that Heaven can Open up the sky to those who believe. Laughing at the notion that there are Celestial Angelic Choirs in the Heavens, Hurling sarcasm at those who would believe they can hear. Laughing at Hope.. Laughing at GOD..!!!
    Hillary..Can you say Moses?
    Did he not part the Red Sea and free his people from the Pharoh?
    Who are you Hillary Rodham to tell us all not to believe that all things are possible through our Lord Our God?
    It is dillusional to Hope The Lord God would ever extend his ever redeeming, ever forgiving ever everlasting Love to Our Nation? To America and her United States Citizens??
    Its dillusional On SUNDAY to think this could be possible ?? 2/24/08
    One thing is certain..It won't be possible under your leadership. You are a non-believer.
    I suppose that deceased Dallas Police Officers family should abandon any HOPE for his Salvation. His life was lost performing a difficult and demanding job too. There aint NO GOD coming for him either. Right Hillary??
    May God have mercy on your immortal soul Hillary Rodham.
    SHAME ON YOU HILLARY RODHAM
    The Lord works in mysterious ways....
    And today God exposed your true dark soul to the world. And In so doing, the Nation and the World will be better served.

  • Posted By: dswenk @ 02/25/2008 6:24:40 PM

    Oh please, Christian fundamentalism is no way similar to the blood thirsty track record of Islamic Fundamentalism. We dont see Chirstian children strapping bombs to themselves to blow up innocent civilians, Christians firing rockets into Israel and hiding behind civilians, hacking off arms and legs for minor violations of laws, killing female relatives for honor killings, executing women for talking to men, etc., Chiriants immigrating in large numbers to foreign contries and trying to impose their laws on the indigents, the list goes on and on. Terrorism is rooted into Islam and they come hand in hand. Sooner or later we will be forced to see them as one and the same, the question will be if America will not relize it until it is on every street in our towns.

  • Posted By: miamiman @ 02/22/2008 11:50:00 AM

    the posters have it wrong. Christianity attempts peaceful conversion whereas the islamic extremist seek to force conversion to their religion as their religion is to them all encompassing. remember it is us non islamics that are considered "infidels" . This will not change as it has not througout the history of both religions. There is no denying that Christianity is based on peaceful ways and extremist Islam is based on ANY means including violence which doesnt shy away from purposeful killing of innocents.

    Get over it people we didnt start this "war on terror". people forget easily the horror of 9/11 and the feeling of insecurity it created. a feeling that persists to this very day. you cannot end this age old conflict of beliefs with a wave of your hand and anyone who believes this is naive at best.

    • Posted By: cleareyed @ 02/25/2008 5:18:11 PM

      Yes, Christianity is based on peaceful ways but the most vocal "so called evangelical christians"or right wing republicans are some of the most blood thirsty, nasty, mean people I have ever seen who represent themselves as Christian.

    • Posted By: manny_23 @ 02/22/2008 1:45:16 PM

      how wrong you are!!!! the U.S. started the war. they always try to make it look like they are thevictims when in reality they are the ones that kill and manipilate other goverments so that they can get what they want. Or do you still believe that teh war on Iraq was actually to defend the iraqui from Saddam. It was for the oil!!!!

      • Posted By: sawmetal @ 02/22/2008 3:39:33 PM

        YES it was about oil!!! The money oil brings to buy weapons!!! which was what Saddam was using it for and would have used it for on an international scale!!1 DO YOU THINK A COUNTRY WITHOUT MONEY COULD BE AGGERSIVE TOWARDS ITS NEIGHBORS WITHOUT THE OIL INCOME!!

  • Posted By: platterpile @ 02/25/2008 2:10:31 PM

    Hello,
    This is a request that the Clinton - Obama press coverage be actually "fair and even". As a regular watcher of your political news programs I find that there is an overt Obama slant to most every story. The news readers take every liberty they are able to when the Clinton name comes up. There is NEVER a positive regarding Senator Clinton. This is stoutly unfair and heavy handed; it's obvious where the editorial stand in the sand has been taken: Obama.
    MSNBC has the responsibility to report the truth and NOT ATTEMPT TO SUBMARINE the Clinton Presidency. This is VERY FAR FROM OVER. Come to Ohio and find out the truth.
    Thank you and Best Regards,

  • Posted By: Londoner @ 02/25/2008 1:26:33 PM

    Obama said in 2002 "Im not against war in all circumstances, Im against dumb wars." Obama knows we really have to get the war on terror back on track after the "dumb" Iraq policy. Its incredibly stupid to say that since 9/11 nothing comparable has happened. They have attempted many horrendous attacks in London which were thwarted by British intelligence, attacks which would have even surpassed 9/11.

  • Posted By: Takhli @ 02/25/2008 7:26:28 AM

    Senator Obama's comment that the war in Iraq is a distraction is half right. Actually the war on terror is a distraction that is destroying the United States both economically and socially, as well as affecting its relations with other countries. I don't live in the United States, but I am an American who served in the Marine Corps in Vietnam. I returned for 50 weeks to the US from July 2005 to July 2006 after having lived outside it for over 20 years. I had been on short trips to the US, but what I saw and experienced during my 50 week stay, compared to earlier trips before 9/11 to the US, was a country suffering from malaise, a socially dysfunctiuonal society unable to focus on resolving it's internal problems ranging from inadequate health care, to failing public schools, to a country that has spent itself broke. The BBC last Friday had an article on its web "Fading mobility troubles Americans". THe Brookings Institution released a report that summarized social mobility in the US being similar to Mexico, Brazil, and Pakistan. Of the War on Terror, an Obama administration, will need to focus on the problem cited by the Brookings Institution, or the United States will have a real war on terror within its own borders between its own citizens, not too unlike the former Yugoslavia.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse