I think the issue of enhanced interrogation is complicated. Those that were waterboarded were "enemy combatants" and not POWs. The Geneva Convention therefore did not apply to these individuals. That said, the question of whether waterboarding is legal (by U.S. and/or U.N. standards) is a fair one and should be looked into by the attorney general. What should also be examined is whether or not these techniques saved lives. Is it worth causing physical discomfort to a known terrorist to save the lives of thousands? If one answers no, then how many people would have to be sacrificed in order for one to permit waterboarding? Suppose the fate of Mecca and Medina depended on getting information from a rogue Mossad agent who refused to talk? Would one just ask politely and then just give up?<a href="http://anunturi-gratuite.prahova-online.com/"> anunturi</a>









Discuss