Memo to President Obama

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: ThoughtfulLiz-E @ 02/22/2008 2:21:06 PM

    Wow, that was a racist comment if I ever saw one. I am really sorry that Obama didn't get a nice Christian name from his caucasian master like us African Americans who were enslaved. Get over yourselves! Obama is no more of a terrorist than George W. Bush or Hillary Cilnton. Let's debate the real issues and stick to using both sides of our brains.

    • Posted By: wakeuppeople @ 02/22/2008 3:57:32 PM

      Thoughtful Liz-E, I think it's time that ignoratn race-baiters like you, racist anti-semite Farrakhan and Jesse Jackass all shut your mouths. YOU WERE NEVER A SLAVE AND NEITHER WERE EITHER OF YOUR PARENTS!!! So shut up about it! The Jews have been enslaved for thousands of years longing than SOME African's were, and i don't see THEM bitching and moaning! Get over it, move on, and stop race-baiting!!!

  • Posted By: Voice_Of_Reason @ 02/22/2008 3:34:57 PM

    I love how this column is used as a platform from which someone can launch their own personal views into the public eye, with the intent to shape public opinion rather than reflect it - just another in the life of the drive-by media. The fact is, 9/11 wasn't one lucky day of mass murder by ragged America-haters, but rather the result of an entire era where America was the object of hate. Obviously since something of that scale hasn't occurred since then, we are doing something right. Do you honestly think that the reason we haven't had another attack on American soil since 9/11 is coincidence? I mean, let's be real here.
    Global warming? Please. Even if this myth had some credible evidence to support it, there is nothing man can do to stop it. The fact is, it's all one big meteorological cycle, and considering most of the temperatures this year are lower than the ones last year, I'd venture to say the cycle is on it's way back to "normal".
    Please, if you're going to make accusations about our intentions, at least try to put your evidence in perspective.

  • Posted By: Ken_e_p @ 02/22/2008 3:21:14 PM

    Why does every viewpoint have to be made in reference to some less distasteful process ie "annihilation" of a group of people "like" killing an insect. If you take what your talking about into your belly indiscriminately killing EVERY member, ie annihilating, of a group who ill grant you are themselves extremist dont you become a little like them. I eat my words now by alluding to your metaphor but I never admired a guy who lost his cool because an insect stung him and reacted by deciding all bees where killer bees ie the natural consequence of being stung too many times and that a process of annihilation was the only or most judicious answer
    by a US friendly European

  • Posted By: monkeyview @ 02/22/2008 2:47:17 PM


    9/11 is like a bad bee sting to a mighty giant. If the
    giant jumps up and out of the 7th story window ... the bad bee succeeded.
    If the giant has the sense to kill the bee and then call the exterminatorsI must say that I totally agree with this article.
    We must not overreact to events and we must proceed on an even
    keel as a country.

    9/11 is like a bad bee sting to a mighty giant. If the
    giant jumps up and out of the 7th story window ... the bad bee succeeded.
    If the giant has the sense to kill the bee and then call the exterminators
    to remove the bee hive then the problem is solved.

    Only America can badly hurt itself by overreacting.
    And I believe that is what the bad guys are counting on.

    Paul

    to remove the bee hive then the problem is solved.

    Only A

  • Posted By: monkeyview @ 02/22/2008 2:45:44 PM

    I must say that I totally agree with this article. We must not over react to events and
    we must proceed on an even keel. 9/11 is like a bad bee sting to a mighty giant. If the
    giant jumps up and out of the 7th story window ... the bad bee succeeded. If the giant
    kills the bee and then calls the exterminators to root out the hive then the problem is solved. Only America can badly hurt itself by over reacting.
    9/11 type events can never bring America down.

    Paul

  • Posted By: LesMatheson0 @ 02/22/2008 2:45:13 PM

    The "war on terror" is and always has been a convenient Maypole on which our "leaders" can hang their rally banners. It's colorful and frightening, and spins in ways which enthrall our attention -- that way we won't notice the near bankruptcy of leadership on all other topics. Fearmongering is the 2nd-down punt of small-minded politicians. Your remarks are right on target.

  • Posted By: SeventhSon @ 02/22/2008 2:30:36 PM

    Following prostate cancer radiation I changed my underwear from tighty-whities to colored boxers. If you give me Sentator Obama's address, I can send him the whites so he doesn't have to go to the expense of buying a surrender flag. If you believe that the radical Islamists agenda is not to either convert the West to Islam or kill them, then you might want to have your Kool Aid handy if there is a President Obama or Clinton.

  • Posted By: keepyourname @ 02/22/2008 2:09:59 PM

    Yeah, sounds like a great idea. Lets put Barack Hussein Obama in charge of our foreighn affairs and middle east relations. Right now the vast majority of his supporters are acting like he's on American Idol. Maybe by November we will all be able to text our presdential vote in. WAKE UP

  • Posted By: Simonsez99 @ 02/22/2008 1:55:31 PM

    You had better saddle up Mr. Hirsh, we have barely seen the openning shot in the War on Terror. And that is the crux of theproblem. We have been treating it for so long as a policing action, that we left ourselves open for 9/11 to happen (and are still doing so in a myriad of ways). As other commentors have stated, how do you explain attacks in Argentina, Malaysia, India, Yemen, Kenya, Germany, Spain and the UK to just name a few? The Radical Islamists are treating this as a world wide war and we had better treat is as such too or we will just be added to ash heap of history when the next 9/11 happens. Thanks for your pontificating, lousy advice from up on high, but you can keep it. I'd rather have them worrying about the next airstrike or special forces raid than plotting the next 9/11.

    • Posted By: jaymiller @ 02/22/2008 2:02:03 PM

      Simon, I am a hard core Democrat and I could not agree with you more.

  • Posted By: Simonsez99 @ 02/22/2008 1:43:01 PM

    Name one other world wide movement that we need to fear? (crickets chirping..) That's right, there aren't any except for radical islam. From the US, to Argentina, to Malaysia, to India, to Israel, to Kenya, to Yemen, to Germany, to Spain, to England, they are the one group responsible for terror attrocities on a worldwide scale. Safe havens need to be removed, moderate muslims need to be engaged and we need to stay focused on the fact that this is not just a simple retaliation for 9/11. 9/11 simply focused our attention to the fact that treating radical islam as a policing action was no longer a working solution.

    This 'autor' is an apologist and self-flagilator willing live in a world where you don't know if you will be safe going to the mall this weekend. I'd much rather have them worried more about when the next airstrike will drop or when the next Army, Marine, or SF unit is going to ruin their day than planning another terror mission in my backyard.

  • Posted By: rdbrenneman @ 02/22/2008 1:30:37 PM

    By giving a title of "war" to a group of criminals we have elevated their importance in the psyche of average americans. The act perpetrated on 9/11 was an act of cowardice which should have been treated as a police action with our full attention devoted to capturing and destroying those who perpetrated the act. We have undermined the stability of an entire region incumbered ourselves and our children with a huge debt and sent our enconomy into tail spin from the huberias of a doctrine that is impossible to acheive.

  • Posted By: cooglewitz @ 02/22/2008 1:27:30 PM

    One lucky day? Hirsh did you Forget about, Twin Towers in 93, The Cole, Beirut, Spain, England, Bali, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, The Embassies, Lockerbie, Chechnia, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq. Thats like saying the Nazi's had one lucky run of genocide , but it won't happen again somewhere else. You need to go back and study history, but more important journalism.

  • Posted By: piinalu @ 02/22/2008 1:07:10 PM

    "Let's think about this for a moment. A small group of ragged America-haters, who had one lucky day of mass murder nearly seven years ago, will continue to define the foreign policy of the lone superpower for years, possibly decades to come."

    I have little respect for President Bush's performance in foreign policy, but that statement seems even more off base. As does the implication that we can't do more than one thing at the time. The other issues listed are all legitimate, but they don't require us to do them one at a time in a linear sequence.

    Sorry, but the premise of this piece is weak.

  • Posted By: owlish @ 02/22/2008 12:51:33 PM

    Terror is what happens within each one of us when faced with unexpected violence and fear. Hitler and the Nazis would appropriately be called terrorists, and they were Christians. The Third Reich was vanquished by a targeted and unified approach, not by calling them Christianofascists. The Japanese Empire created terrorists, but that war wasn???t won by denigrating their religion or their race. Our country brought shame on ourselves by the internment camps that lumped all Japanese together. The ???terrorists??? who attacked our country on 9/11 were Saudis, not Afghanis or Iraqis. There are still many unresolved mysteries about 9/11 that have yet to be brought to journalistic light. This is a war for power and resources, like nearly every other war. Will a war on mental illness stop future Virginia Tech tragedies? The war on drugs hasn???t stopped drug trafficking. We need a new approach.
    I agree, Buckeye Scott: GO OBAMA!!!

  • Posted By: a simpleton high school teacher @ 02/22/2008 12:51:12 PM

    Filipinos, Central Americans, Vietnamese, and countless others might ask if we ever consistently stood for self determination.

  • Posted By: Buckeye State Scott @ 02/22/2008 12:35:15 PM

    I agree we will always be threatened by a few, but have no need to declare an endless war.

    Buckeye Scott

    Go OBAMA

  • Posted By: dentoy @ 02/22/2008 11:53:13 AM

    I have always felt that the "War on Terror" is a ridiculous description of what should rightly be called the "War on Islamic extremism". "Terror" is a tactic, much like airial bombing or trench warfare. There are plenty of people, including our own home grown fanatics who use terror as a tactic.

    • Posted By: miamiman @ 02/22/2008 11:56:38 AM

      9/11 wasnt terror sir? the bombing of the uss cole or the embassy in kenya also? the attack on the marine barracks in Lebanon? the taking of hostages for 400+ days in Iran? What is terror to you? a universal studios thrill ride?

  • Posted By: SandyJordan @ 02/21/2008 5:28:58 PM

    Mr. Hirsch,

    I think your argument is compelling and very thoughtful. I do not know if Senator Obama is up to redefining our foreign policy and making new alliances against the true international terrorists. However, I do believe that he is open-minded and intelligent enough to try. I believe he, and only he, of all the candidates, has the will to change the discourse, reframe the question of "national security" and what it means for America to be safe in the 21rst century.

    I do not think we are safer because of the war in IRAQ. I do not think we are safer because we have refused to even talk to our "enemies." I do not think we are safer because we have played a passive role in the Israeli-Palestinian war of attrition.

    I will be voting for Barack Obama, because I believe he is our best hope for America to become a "beacon of hope" for the rest of the world.

    Sandy

    • Posted By: PoliticalRealityOnline @ 02/21/2008 6:46:52 PM

      Sandy:

      I see your MoveOn.org spawned misperceptions all over the place, but that does not make them valid. Iraq made us safer in the sense that Saddam and his psycho sons are no longer a threat to convey WMD's to Al Qaeda, or harm our vital interests in the Middle East. You can argue about the magnitude of that threat, but Hillary, Edwards. Kerry and Reid all agreed with going to war in Iraq along with 68 other senators, the President and70% of the American people. We are a republic, and the vast majority rules. Get over it.

      Now that we are in Iraq, the issue is not whether it was a good idea to be there in the first place, or whether we are "safer" than we were with Saddam and his psycho sons were in power, but whether we will be economically "safer" if we abandon Iraq to chaos that would cause 1) genocide in Iraq 2) Iraqi oil exports to end, 3) oil prices to skyrocket and wreck our economy, 4) position Iran to control Iraq and 20%+ of the world's oil reserves while threatening access to another 40%+ of the earth's oil reserves, 5) launch Al Qaeda from geo-strategic irrelevance to a major threat by leaving a huge security void in Iraq that would position Al Qeada on the border with Kuwait and Saudi where they could position themselves to join forces with their extremist Wahabi brethren in Saudi to threaten the weak Arab Gulf States and push western civilization into a major economic catastrophe.

      I know that rational thought and economic reality are of no concern to you and your political neophyte soul mates, but some of us care about facts and reality and the future of our children so we will be rejecting Obama's clarion call of economic and national security idiocy to support someone who understands the reality of radical Islam and who is determined to defend our nation from real threats rather than to indulge in the mind bending wishful thinking of a completely unqualified and grotesquely naive, but creepy, charismatic charlatan like Obama who is nothing more than the hyper dangerous "Pied Piper" of the 21st century!!.

      Obama is not a "beacon of hope". He is a written invitation for every terrorist and tyrant in the world to believe that America has lost its resolve to defend its most vital interests, and therefore a candidate for even more determined, and deadly challenges to our resolve

      Wake up and get a clue about the substance of the issues at www.politicalrealityonline.com before you consign the future of America's kids to a phony, social and charismatic image package like Obama,

      • Posted By: SandyJordan @ 02/22/2008 11:43:28 AM

        I just read your reply.

        You write very well. I, sir, I assume you are a sir, have never even visited moveon.org. I find the political left just as incomprehensively angry and paranoid as I find the political right.

        The difference between you and I is a world view. The great thing about this country is what you have pointed out: the majority rules.

        I will continue to work for Senator Obama's nomination and election. I assume you will also continue to elect the Republican nominee. After the democratic election, we will see which one of our world views is actually validated by history.

      • Posted By: geoff2112 @ 02/21/2008 6:59:40 PM

        lolol, that was quite a good retort! and well worded, sry, i can't help myself

        • Posted By: marketingtruth @ 02/21/2008 7:23:45 PM

          Comment: Comment: Comment: Comment: Judge Him by His Laws
          COMMENT
          washingtonpost.com
          By Charles Peters
          People who complain that Barack Obama lacks experience must be unaware of his legislative achievements. One reason these accomplishments are unfamiliar is that the media have not devoted enough attention to Obama's bills and the effort required to pass them, ignoring impressive, hard evidence of his character and ability.
          Since most of Obama's legislation was enacted in Illinois, most of the evidence is found there -- and it has been largely ignored by the media in a kind of Washington snobbery that assumes state legislatures are not to be taken seriously. (Another factor is reporters' fascination with the horse race at the expense of substance that they assume is boring, a fascination that despite being ridiculed for years continues to dominate political journalism.)

    • Posted By: geoff2112 @ 02/21/2008 5:39:00 PM

      oh! you said the magic word! change!

      you can't start a discussion with a group who's starting point is your death,
      and making new alliances against the terrorists can lead to appeasement and further chaos.

      an

      • Posted By: Dave in NM @ 02/21/2008 5:47:46 PM

        Like everyone else here who is pretending Sen. Obama will not resume the hunt for Al Qaeda, do you have any evidence aside from your own preconceptions? Or is evidence not required in the Temples of Syrinx?

        • Posted By: geoff2112 @ 02/21/2008 5:54:20 PM

          lol, i loved your Rush comment...that lightens the mood

          i never said he wouldn't resume the hunt, i'm just saying it is HOW he hunts for them that is important

          • Posted By: Dave in NM @ 02/21/2008 6:40:59 PM

            Like Al Gore and the Internet, Sen. Obama's statement that we need to communicate with other nations has been latched upon and expanded to ludicrous extremes, to imply that he will be unwilling to use force when necessary. There's just no evidence for that position.

            • Posted By: geoff2112 @ 02/21/2008 6:48:14 PM

              i guess i mean that as long as he makes alliances that don't make us more vulnerable, i'd be ok with him

  • Posted By: BeanGuy @ 02/21/2008 10:17:23 PM

    This may just be the most idiotic thought ever uttered. Your kidding right? You think that the terrorists are just a couple of rag tag idiots? Do you not remember the USS Cole, embassies in Africa, the Marine quarters in Lebenon? Good Lord ,sir. How can someone as naive as you earn a living as a "deep thinker?" If anything, this war against us ought to be expanded to include the entire cult of Islam. After all, in case you haven't noticed, they've already declared war on us.

    • Posted By: Dave in NM @ 02/22/2008 11:06:42 AM

      As long as you can't distinguish between Islam and terrorism, you can't propose a course of action that will do anything but weaken this country further. Unfortunately, it appears we'll be mired in this situation until the "cult of Christianity" gets the flick over itself. Stop trying to convert the world to your religion, and you'll see a sharp reduction in the world's wanting to convert us to cinders.

    • Posted By: PROUDOFUSA @ 02/22/2008 9:46:52 AM

      YOU ARE SIR, 100% CORRECT

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse