POINT OF VIEW

Playing Games With Kosovo

Moscow sees Serbia as its final bulwark in the Balkans against the steady advance of the West.

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: giltedged @ 07/19/2008 11:56:09 PM

    This is a typical example of why Americans are so hated in much of the world be it Europe, South America or the Middle East. Russia is interested in Serbia because of its Slavic Christian soul. It also knows that the Americans bombed the Serbian factories, television stations and schools because it wanted to build another base . It also is aware that after the American bombing the Islamists destroyed hundreds of medieval Christian churches and monuments.

  • Posted By: bjkosind @ 05/26/2008 9:32:37 PM

    go clark.You were the greatest commander NATO ever had.

  • Posted By: sen_sdi @ 03/04/2008 1:12:50 PM

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/mar/04/kosovo.serbia

    great academic discussions as well. for all participants that are not aware of Yu-constitutions and the serbian myths

    • Posted By: sen_sdi @ 03/10/2008 5:53:14 PM

      OK, so according to your recommendations, US together with the EU civilized states should have backed up and tolerate the serbian barbaric regime to continue massive murdering of innocent civilians in an attempt to cleanse the whole region of Ex-Yugoslavia of non-serbs?

      Kosovo is a small area and has no significant importance to the world, but it does however show that the civilized world can make a difference and assist the innocent people in need of protection from territory hungry barbaric regimes.

      • Posted By: streetwise @ 03/26/2008 4:26:25 PM

        Do "innocent civilians" have the right to burn out houses and churches of other "innocent civilians", forcing them to run, AND THEN declare themselves independent ?
        What is the difference (besides firepower) between THIS ethnic cleans and Milosevic's ?

  • Posted By: historian2008 @ 03/06/2008 12:18:18 AM

    The article is extremely biased. Politicians and ordinary people know that the declaration of so-called "Kosovo's independence" declares in the first place the US and NATO huge interests in keeping their military presence in Kosovo. Kosovo has the biggest US military base in Europe "Bond-steel". Here is "Bond-steel"' website: http://kosova.org/kfor/bondsteel/index.asp
    (Camp Bondsteel is quite large: 955 acres or 360,000 square meters. If you were to run the outer perimeter, it is about 7 miles.
    Bondsteel is located on rolling hills and farmland near the city of Ferizaj/Urosevac.
    There are about 250 SEA Huts for living quarters and offices.)
    The hypocrisy and cynicism of the US government's international policy have reached the limits of tolerance in the world. The US government destroys international peace and instigates the Cold War atmosphere in the world which is being divided by the US aggression into spheres of interests again.

  • Posted By: rastalaw @ 03/03/2008 3:32:29 PM

    sen-sdi has finally revealed himself. That is some kind of Kosovo Shiptar Albanian! Check his contributions to this site as Shiptar Albanian.

    • Posted By: sen_sdi @ 03/04/2008 1:11:22 PM

      please clarify what you mean? if you know of course

  • Posted By: rastalaw @ 03/03/2008 6:34:29 PM

    In every country you have some sort of authority. Press is the press, but in every country you have the academics. Professors of law, history...There is a great American school called the Tufts School of Law and Diplomacy...Check what the professor Gary Leupp of the Tufts thinks and documents about the whole situation at the site: http://www.counterpunch.org/leupp02192008.html

    Peace and love to all

  • Posted By: slavicsoul @ 02/28/2008 4:37:39 PM

    Kosovo was , is and WILL be part of Serbia. Serbs will never EVER give up on Kosovo.There's way too much of SERBIAN history on Kosovo.
    USA should just close their Bondsteel base, pack their precious troops and start minding their own problems, because they have plenty. Live and let others live USA!

    • Posted By: sen_sdi @ 03/03/2008 11:25:43 AM

      Kosova never was and never will be part of serbia. it was occupied by Yugoslavian federal state, which serbs, known as territory hungry nation, self-claimed it to be part of serbia which was never true.

  • Posted By: FactFinder @ 03/01/2008 10:20:40 AM

    If bad treatment of the local population were to disqualify a state from exercising sovereignty over part of its territory, then an awful lot of countries would be eligible for enforced amputation: Turkey would have to be stripped of Turkish Kurdistan; Israel would long ago have been given the boot from the West Bank and other occupied territories; Indonesia would be denied Aceh and Papua; Pakistan would lose Waziristan.Moreover, Kosovo has hardly made an even remotely plausible case for its having earned independence. First, for all the talk of "Kosovars" and "Kosovans," the residents of Kosovo identify themselves as either Serb or as Albanian; the languages they speak is either Serbian or Albanian. Creating a second Albanian state in Europe makes no sense whatsoever. It doesn't govern itself. It is a ward of various international bodies. Economically, it is a basket case, and lives off vast handouts. Kosovo is an example of an ethnic minority grabbing a piece of territory, permitting unrestricted immigration by its co-nationals from a neighboring state, ethnically cleansing the territory of all other groups and thereby creating an artificial overwhelming ethnic majority, and then demanding that these actions be rewarded by the bestowal of independent statehood


  • Posted By: rastalaw @ 03/01/2008 7:49:24 AM

    Moderator, please: I know that there are discussions that you dislike, but publish them still. Let us be fair and democratic at these dramatic times for the world order. I also discovored some triple question marks in my comment on the Guardian article. I never put in those, so please would you remove them? Thank you.

  • Posted By: rastalaw @ 03/01/2008 7:45:29 AM

    Truth is a constant value; it does not depend on an individual's approach to it. But truth actively distorts the minds of those who distort it.

    Gen. Clarke speaks of the Battle at the Field of Blackbirds in 1389. Serbs lost that battle straight, argues the General. It seems that the General himself was overseeing the battle from one of his NATO planes, when his country, as ancient as Serbian, was populated by the Indians?

    The truth as to the number of victims in Kosovo war in 1999 can easily be found in the Hague Tribunal transcript , the Milosevic case, pages 2225-2227. There were no more than 4,400 victims and according to the ICTY's "expert" Patrik Ball only 1,912 Albanian victims were identified by name. At the end of the day, Gen. Clark testified before the Tribunal in that case: big chunk of his testimony was closed for the public. This was because the General was to "testify" together with his NATO colleague Klaus Naumann that it was Slobodan Milosevic himself who allegedly told them in the meeting in October 1988 "that he would shoot all the Albanians". At the very same time, Clark and Naumann were in Belgrade to threaten him with bombardment!? Look, you can think about Milosevic whatever you like, but he is not that crazy. And when the bombradment begun in March 1999 after the Racak set-up, the Generals unsuccessfully tried to kill Milosevic hitting his residence.When that failed, they went to The Hague to provide a false mens rea. Very honourable, indeed. By the way, I beleieved that according to the US doctrine it was illegal to try to assassinate a Head of State.

    Remember the ourageous press conferences during the NATO bombardment? Remember what Gen. Clark, Jamie Shea and their masters were telling us? That at least 100,000 Albanians were dead or missing!? The truth about the NATO bombardment is given by mseen on this thread @ 02/23/2008 ,8.31 PM. Gen. Clark and his colleagues bombed the civilian targets, but the Yugoslav army remained nearly intact. General, please tell us, how many wooden tanks - decoys have your planes hit in Kosovo, while you claimed that great many of the real ones were destroyed? While bringing destruction to Serbia, have you not, in fact, been out-manouvred by your Serbian counter-parts Generals Pavkovic and Lazarevic?

    Serbia and Iraq were bombarded without the approval of the UN Security Council, now the US push for the independence of Kosovo is made without approval of the SC. This is the dismantlement of the international law and order. What all the fuss is about, asks. Gen. Clark? "We only want to get "closer" to Russia,???we want to advance". You also want to appease al-Qaeda at the Serbian expense, I would add. That is exactly what all the fuss is about. General, truth has a healing properties. Try it.

  • Posted By: FakeName @ 02/29/2008 8:22:33 PM

    I don't understand why is this discussion Re: Kosovo's unilateral declaration of secession constantly being derailed by mostly irrelevant arguments, some try to "rationalize" and offer "historical" and "humanitarian" contexts.
    Why is our attention being diverted from the main issue?
    Here are the relevant facts:
    The International Law is very clear, so is UN's resolution 1244. Acting against the International Law and UN's resolutions is illegal. Both Kosovo's declaration of secession and all subsequent statements of "recognition" are illegal.

    It also sets a dangerous precedent, never mind thos who claim that Kosovo's case is "special", because it isn't.

    The world needs to decide -- de we want the rule of Law, do we need the UN as a regulatory body?
    Or do we want to establish some new rules -- the rule of "biggest gun" comes to mind?
    We can't have both, as they contradict each other.

  • Posted By: sen_sdi @ 02/29/2008 12:45:44 PM

    Is Kosovo Serbia? We ask a historian
    Noel Malcolm
    Tuesday February 26 2008
    The Guardian


    "Kosovo is Serbia", "Ask any historian" read the unlikely placards, waved by angry Serb demonstrators in Brussels on Sunday. This is rather flattering for historians: we don't often get asked to adjudicate. It does not, however, follow that any historian would agree, not least because historians do not use this sort of eternal present tense.

    History, for the Serbs, started in the early 7th century, when they settled in the Balkans. Their power base was outside Kosovo, which they fully conquered in the early 13th, so the claim that Kosovo was the "cradle" of the Serbs is untrue.

    What is true is that they ruled Kosovo for about 250 years, until the final Ottoman takeover in the mid-15th century. Churches and monasteries remain from that period, but there is no more continuity between the medieval Serbian state and today's Serbia than there is between the Byzantine Empire and Greece.

    Kosovo remained Ottoman territory until it was conquered by Serbian forces in 1912. Serbs would say "liberated"; but even their own estimates put the Orthodox Serb population at less than 25%. The majority population was Albanian, and did not welcome Serb rule, so "conquered" seems the right word.

    But legally, Kosovo was not incorporated into the Serbian kingdom in 1912; it remained occupied territory until some time after 1918. Then, finally, it was incorporated, not into a Serbian state, but into a Yugoslav one. And with one big interruption (the second world war) it remained part of some sort of Yugoslav state until June 2006.

    Until the destruction of the old federal Yugoslavia by Milosevic, Kosovo had a dual status. It was called a part of Serbia; but it was also called a unit of the federation. In all practical ways, the latter sense prevailed: Kosovo had its own parliament and government, and was directly represented at the federal level, alongside Serbia. It was, in fact, one of the eight units of the federal system.

    Almost all the other units have now become independent states. Historically, the independence of Kosovo just completes that process. Therefore, Kosovo has become an ex-Yugoslav state, as any historian could tell you.

    · Noel Malcolm is a senior research fellow at All Souls College, Oxford. He is the author of Kosovo: A Short History

    Copyright Guardian Newspapers Limited 2008

    If you have any questions about this email, please contact the guardian.co.uk

    • Posted By: FakeName @ 02/29/2008 7:41:54 PM

      There are several fallacies in this comment.

      I'll start with the percentage of non-Albanian population in Kosovo. While most people will agree that Kosovo's population is roughly 90% Albanian today, back around 1910-1912 they were represented by roghly 35-40%, according to a number of independent sources.

      Secondly, Milosevic didn't destruct the old federal Yugoslavia. In fact, Milosevic and his government were the only ones trying to preserve Yugoslavia, as it was against the interests of Serbian population if all breakaway Republics to all of a sudden become "national minority". The last former Republic to declare independence was Montenegro, and this took place years after Milosevic.

      Thirdly, although Kosovo and Vojvodina were represented at the federal level, alongside Serbia and all other Republics, their status was (is) not the same. Vohvodina and Kosovo were (are) Autonomous Regions (provinces), not Republics, and Albanians (same as Hungarians) are not one of the constitutive peoples, they are national minorities.

      I'm not sure axctly what kind of historian Mr. Malcolm is, but his lack of basic understanding of what he writes about in this article is nothing short of appaling. I'm tempted to call this article "fake history of events surrounding the fake "state" of Kosovo"

      I would also like to comment on a commonly used and generally accepted reference to a "genocide" in Kosovo.
      Between 1998 and 1999, the number of casulties in Kosovo (on all sides, including Serbian civilians and security forces) was around 2000. Reports are available (I believe the most detailed one was prepared by a German NGO) which document these findings, and it is quite clear that there was no campaign of ethnic cleansing, let alone genocide in Kosovo. When all hell broke loose in 1999 because of NATO's "humanitarian bombing campaign", people of all nationalities were basically fleeing from NATO bombs (many documented cases of Albanian civilians seeking and finding refuge in Serbia), although the media was doing it's very best to blame the Serb forces for the humanitarian crisis. An interesting detail: according to a recent testimony in the Hague (ICTY), a CNN reporter was forcing and intimidating a fleeing Albanian woman to state how Serbian Forces are responsible for her family's exhodus, she was beaten and yelled at as she maintained that they were fleeing from NATO bombs.

  • Posted By: rastalaw @ 02/29/2008 4:32:23 PM

    I think that Gen. Clark would like to hear one of his colleagues. General Lewis MacKenzie wrote the following on April 6th 2004 in the article for the Canadian National Post entitled "We Bombed the Wrong Side": " The Kosovo-Albanians have played us like a Stradivarius. We have subsidized and indirectly supported their violent campaign for an ethnically pure and independent Kosovo.We have never blamed them for being the perpetrators of the violence in the early '90s and we continue to portray them as the designated victim today in spite of evidence to the contrary. When they achieve independence with the help of our tax dollars combined with those of bin Laden and al-Qaeda, just consider the message of encouragement this sends to other terrorist-supported independence movements around the world. Funny how we just keep digging the hole deeper! "

    Maj-Gen. Lewis MacKenzie, now retired, commanded UN troops during the Bosnian civil war of 1992.

    Gen. Clark would also like to hear this about his bombardment of Serbia. Mr. Walter J. Rockler wrote in 1999: " We have engaged in a flagrant military aggression, ceaselessly attacking a small country primarily to demonstrate that we run the world...As a primary source of international law, the judgment of the Nuremberg Tribunal in the 1945-1946 case of the major Nazi war criminals is plain and clear. Our leaders often invoke and praise that judgment, but obviously have not read it. The International Court declared:
    "To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime, it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole."

    (Walter J. Rockler was a prosecutor at the Nuremberg War Crimes Trial. This essay originally appeared in the Chicago Tribune.)




  • Posted By: rastalaw @ 02/29/2008 3:53:42 PM

    Commentator sen_sdi was "clever" enough to publish Noel Malcolm's historical forgeries. The answer to this article was given by historian William Dorich to the Guardian. It is also published on the following site: http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=515#more-515. See comment no. 183. The taster: "
    February 26, 2008

    The Guardian
    Letter to the Editor

    Dear Editor:

    "The ugliest form of racism is to demean an ethnic group???s religion, history or culture. This has not stopped Malcolm from revealing his closeted bigotry. He manipulates his access to the media knowing full well that most readers and editors are ignorant of Balkan history. People of Malcolm???s ilk have found it easy to paint Serbs with collective guilt by demeaning them in this alleged ???historical??? context. What we see at play here is the Goebbles concept of ???Tell a lie a hundred times and it becomes the truth.???

    Kosovo independence is not about history, it is about equal human rights, and the absurd violation of UN Resolution 1244, the amputation of sovereign territory and in the process the violation of the UN Charter, the Helsinki Final Act, and the Geneva Conventions...Equally disgraceful, the Guardian grants little to no access to your pages to any Serbian historian or journalists to give opposing views. This is hardly freedom of the press, the press is being used in this case to bludgeon Serbia???s cultural aspirations.

    William Dorich

    The writer is the author of 5 books on Balkan history.




  • Posted By: rastalaw @ 02/29/2008 12:43:26 PM

    Gen. Clarke should note that the illegal declaration of independence of Kosovo and illegal recognition of it leads to the total break-down of international law the world order as we know it. Proof? Costa Rica regognized Palestine yesterday. Costa Rica Recognizes "State of Palestine"
    According to the AP, Israeli diplomat has postponed a planned meeting with Costa Rican officials over the Central American nation's decision to formally recognize a Palestinian state.

    "We would like to express our disappointment over this regretful decision of the government of Costa Rica to establish full diplomatic relations with the 'state of Palestine,'" Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman Arye Mekel said. "This act of Costa Rica totally contradicts the traditional friendship that characterized its relations with Israel since its establishment."

    "

  • Posted By: sen_sdi @ 02/26/2008 5:05:31 PM

    Talik is obviously under the influence of serb-slavic mythological history. All non-turks fought against ottoman empire in the field of blackbirds, serbs were part of it as well, together with bulgarians, hungarians, albanians, croats, bosniacs etc...

    • Posted By: vbnw @ 02/28/2008 6:53:17 PM

      There were no "Bosniacs" at the time of Kosovo battle, just Serbs or Croats from Bosnia. The term was adopted by Slavic Muslims in former Yugoslavia after its breakup in the 90's, in an attempt to monopolize Bosnian heritage. Until then, they were known simply as "Muslims" (written with capital "M" in Serbian/Croatian, as opposed to orthography for Muslims generally, which was the first sign of their emancipation as a separate, religion-based nation in former Yugoslavia). Nowadays all Slavic Muslims of former Yugoslav countries call themselves Bosniaks regardless of whether they actually have something to do geographically with Bosnia or not, but that is yet another story.

  • Posted By: mouselion @ 02/26/2008 8:07:05 AM

    Had Russia been more progressive after the fall of the Cold War curtain, perhaps seeing ethnic Albanians, Kosovars and Serbs working together as one nation, there, would be more palatable to Western eyes. What does this implicate especially for the political boundaries in Iraq, where similar ancient roots of division are combined with present moment, real-time war between US and Iraq troops and insurgents of multi allegiances? It doesn't look like young little democratic upstarts are looked upon with any great affection by the vestments of power in that neck of the woods.

    • Posted By: vbnw @ 02/28/2008 6:30:28 PM

      I wonder what you mean by "ethnic Albanians, Kosovars and Serbs"? It's either ???Albanians and Serbs??? or ???Kosovars???. Apart from that, the way Albanians "work together" with anyone on other people's territories is always a recognizable pattern of threats, methodical peace-time ethnic cleansing and secession. Now it's turn for other neighboring countries, Macedonia and Greece, to satisfy megalomaniac Albanian appetite for Great Albania.

  • Posted By: hejduk @ 02/28/2008 3:30:40 PM

    the name is KOSOVO as in KOSOVO IS SERBIA

    kosova is a bastardization of the term

  • Posted By: cuni @ 02/28/2008 3:58:34 AM

    Never serbian regime in KOSOVA.The Kosova now is Independent that is all for serbs and russian.Serbian regime finish of in Kosova since 1999.Thank you, USA,KLINTON,Olbright,CLARK,TONI BLER ,never komunism ond pan slavism in Kosova.

  • Posted By: vincentlynch @ 02/27/2008 10:54:55 AM

    Likewise, the West is also taking Kosovo as their slice, isn't it?

    Btw, "Westerners didn't hold triumphal parades at the end of the cold war...", is that true?

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse