Good for the Jews?

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: blessedone @ 02/24/2008 10:41:59 PM

    one day just one day in my life time not my parents, but mines. can we forget the old hands of tomb stone that reach out to hold onto us with the death of the past, while refusing to let us go into the future with a clean slate

    • Posted By: InTheSouth @ 02/25/2008 2:59:35 AM

      I'm not sure if I understand exactly what you mean by this, but I do like the way it sounds. Kind of poetic, especially with the hands of tomb stone. Nice :)

    • Posted By: getzel @ 02/24/2008 10:54:42 PM

      Whatever it is that holds you back is in your own mind and is a self fulfilling prophecy on your part.
      No one and nothing can hold you back except yourself. White people are not responsible for your troubles . Shame on white people for not treating Black people in America with complete respect. At the end of the day it is still content of character; at the end of the day you must be responsible for you; so make sure that regardless of how others act, and that reflects on them not you, that you act respectable. And if you follow that formula you will make it just fine and you will no longer be disrespected.

      • Posted By: InTheSouth @ 02/24/2008 11:01:10 PM

        Wow I feel so inspired and all. Do you mean respectable in the way that you called me a moron, and then immediately afterwards accused me of name calling, thereby engaging in hypocrisy? Is that the kind of respectable you mean?

  • Posted By: eddiewhere @ 02/24/2008 11:38:20 PM

    LET's CONFRONT THE SOURCE OF THE THREAT. THE OWNERS AND DISTRIBUTORS OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS. OR DO WE JUST LIKE TO FIGHT?

    • Posted By: getzel @ 02/25/2008 12:55:47 AM

      eddiiiewhere are you? The army is waiting for you to go fight. Or you can switvh to ethanol and stop funding the burqa salesmen. Either way: If you prefer the army and you go fight that is OK. If you want the USA to run there cars on ethanol that is OK; but then you do not have anyone to fight

  • Posted By: getzel @ 02/25/2008 12:49:17 AM

    With all the cars running on ethanol; the price of oil will collapse and the Moslem hordes will no longer have the funds we used to give them from gasoline sales to finance the war against us. Soon the world will care as much about the Arabian sand as they do Rwanda.

  • Posted By: getzel @ 02/25/2008 12:48:41 AM

    Comment: .. War ends We win: when we pass a law that makes the minimum price of gasoline at the pumps: $1.75/gallon; billion dollar/million barrel per day ethanol stills will not be built without protection from OPEC monopoly pricing rusting out our new stills. This war is only a phony weapons deal:

    My view is that Osama B L and Mughniyeh et al should be refered to as "mercenary marketing directors for various government owned weapons manufacturers parading as a religious persons";( my description fits better than theirs & who would believe them if we did not promote them as religious?) no English definition of "religious person" includes flying planes into buildings. true not true, who cares; follow this strategy: War Ends We Win.

    The ethanol investors do not build ethanol distilleries because monopoly OPEC would lower the price to rust out their billion dollar million barrel a day ethanol still. Brazil is energy independent: ethanol; All their cars come built running on ethanol; Archer Daniel Midland made millions on $1.00 gallon ethanol in the 1990s; that trumps any canard/invalid objection to ethanol. Use Cellulose ethanol, not corn ethanol.

    Dollars to Arabs for oil, then the weapons manufactures take most of the dollars from Arabs for weapons; KGB and intelligence services then engage in manipulating ethnic masses. The KGB is the marketing team for the Comuless Moscow Weapons Company,,,see KGB handbook on manipulating ethnic masses by Getzel. The old KGB: Kick up trouble, Go sell weapons , Be in a nice long war; sell lots of weapons...

    It was the Comuless Moscow Weapons Company then (1918-1991: promise communism; deliver slavery of a military industrial complex, 2 eggs and a piece of bread is the minimum you can eat and show for work not communist equal sharing) and it is the Comuless Moscow Weapons Company now. The Song Remains The Same

  • Posted By: getzel @ 02/24/2008 6:54:05 PM

    .. War ends We win: when we pass a law that makes the minimum price of gasoline at the pumps: $1.75/gallon; billion dollar/million barrel per day ethanol stills will not be built without protection from OPEC monopoly pricing rusting out our new stills. This war is only a phony weapons deal:

    My view is that Osama B L and Mughniyeh et al should be refered to as "mercenary marketing directors for various government owned weapons manufacturers parading as a religious persons";( my description fits better than theirs & who would believe them if we did not promote them as religious?) no English definition of "religious person" includes flying planes into buildings. true not true, who cares; follow this strategy: War Ends We Win.

    The ethanol investors do not build ethanol distilleries because monopoly OPEC would lower the price to rust out their billion dollar million barrel a day ethanol still. Brazil is energy independent: ethanol; All their cars come built running on ethanol; Archer Daniel Midland made millions on $1.00 gallon ethanol in the 1990s; that trumps any canard/invalid objection to ethanol. Use Cellulose ethanol, not corn ethanol.

    Dollars to Arabs for oil, then the weapons manufactures take most of the dollars from Arabs for weapons; KGB and intelligence services then engage in manipulating ethnic masses. The KGB is the marketing team for the Comuless Moscow Weapons Company,,,see KGB handbook on manipulating ethnic masses by Getzel. The old KGB: Kick up trouble, Go sell weapons , Be in a nice long war; sell lots of weapons...

    It was the Comuless Moscow Weapons Company then (1918-1991: promise communism; deliver slavery of a military industrial complex, 2 eggs and a piece of bread is the minimum you can eat and show for work not communist equal sharing) and it is the Comuless Moscow Weapons Company now. The Song Remains The Same (Led Zepplin)

    • Posted By: blessedone @ 02/24/2008 10:51:54 PM

      the Iragi war didn't benefit the Iraqi people nor the American people, so who did it benefit. follow the money like in any criminal investigation and the answer would be self explanatory. we can't never be that stupid, they're raping that country for its natural resources

  • Posted By: getzel @ 02/24/2008 8:12:17 PM

    With all the cars running on ethanol; the price of oil will collapse and the Moslem hordes will no longer have the funds we used to give them from gasoline sales to finance the war against us. Soon the world will care as much about the Arabian sand as they do Rwanda.

  • Posted By: Andi54 @ 02/24/2008 6:49:26 PM

    IN RESPONSE TO THE LAST COMMENT. INDEED, GO ON WHITEHOUSE DOT COM AND YOU'LL SEE THE RESULTS OF BOTH TESTS(ONE REGARDING THE SEXUAL AND ONE REGARDING THE DRUG ACCUSATIONS. LARRY SINCLAIR WAS FOUND TO HAVE LIED IN BOTH. TRYING TO KEEP ONE OF TWO FAMILY DYNASTYS IN POWER, FOR THE LAST 20YRS, IS NOT A GREAT EXAMPLE TO SHOW THE WORLD OF A

    • Posted By: InTheSouth @ 02/24/2008 7:06:42 PM

      lol yeah I saw that myself. Hilarious.

  • Posted By: Andi54 @ 02/24/2008 6:50:49 PM

    IN RESPONSE TO THE LAST COMMENT. INDEED, GO ON WHITEHOUSE DOT COM AND YOU'LL SEE THE RESULTS OF BOTH TESTS(ONE REGARDING THE SEXUAL AND ONE REGARDING THE DRUG ACCUSATIONS. LARRY SINCLAIR WAS FOUND TO HAVE LIED IN BOTH. TRYING TO KEEP ONE OF TWO FAMILY DYNASTYS IN POWER, FOR THE LAST 20YRS, IS NOT A GREAT EXAMPLE TO SHOW THE WORLD OF A

  • Posted By: chupacabra @ 02/24/2008 4:57:41 PM

    Obama smoked crack cocaine and had gay sex in Chicago in the back of a limo with Larry Sinclair in 1999, when Obama was a state representative in the Illinois legislature. Sinclair filed suit on Obama and the Democratic National Committee to compel release of this information to the public on 2/11/08. Sinclair took a polygraph test on 2/22/08 and the results will be released to the national media early next week. (He passed with flying colors.) Check out WHITEHOUSE DOT COM for the details. Bill O"Reilly has stated that he will run with the story next week once he reviews the polygraph.

  • Posted By: iringelheim @ 02/24/2008 4:36:21 PM

    I´m Jew and I live in Argentina. I wrote to my friends, one or two weeks ago, that Hillary position against Iran just now, had to do with the elections and the Jewish Community. Now, this article confirms my point of view.
    Dr Isidoro Ringelheim

  • Posted By: midnight05 @ 02/23/2008 7:31:38 PM

    George Bush's Christian Zionist friends are far worse for Israel than anything Barack Obama could do even if he was not a friend of Israel. The Christian Zionists are willing to sacrifice the lives of millions of Jews to bring on the expected return of Jesus because they feel Jesus will slaughter those who don't convert anyway. That's like having someone plant a cobra in your chicken coop.

    • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 02/24/2008 4:53:56 AM

      You are quite silly. The mohammed messiah is the one who only appears when the streets are full of blood. JESUS saves, not kills.

      NOBAMA!!!

      • Posted By: InTheSouth @ 02/24/2008 10:21:35 AM

        You mean the way Jesus saved the countless victims of the Spanish Inquisition who were tortured and killed for not being Christian? Or the way He saved all those so called witches who were burned alive simply becuase they were also non Christian? Or the way he saves those little boys that have been raped by Catholic priests? Or the way he saved the countless Native Americans who were slaughtered by European colonists in the name of God? You are truly delusional if you can't recognize that Christians have been just as guilty, if not more so, of unecessary violence and killing in the name of God.

        • Posted By: HolyRoller @ 02/24/2008 11:19:37 AM

          You have a good point. However, these incidents were not caused by followers of the Risen Christ, but by devils hiding behind the shadow of the cross. Even then they don't come close to the attrocities created by the mohammedians-which by the way continue today.

          Point of reference-Hussein Obama's continued ethnic cleansing efforts in Kenya. Tens of thousands of Christians have been slaughtered. Where is your candidates rhetoric on this. Surely, he could make a call to his own COUSIN and discuss ways to bring some bi-partisan healing to mohammedville.

          NOBAMA!!! MOHAMMED WAS A PEDOPHILE!!!

          • Posted By: InTheSouth @ 02/24/2008 12:04:42 PM

            So you claim that all the horrible things done by Christians in the name of Christ, all those countless Christians throughout history, were not actually Christians? Were only pretending to be Christians? And so at the same time suggesting that all atrocities committed by Muslims are committed by true Muslims and not devils pretending to be Muslims? And you actually expect anyone to believe this? There is absolutely no proof for this claim. It's obviously a lame defense that you just cooked up for lack of any legitimate argument. And you think that Christians today are innocent of atrocities? What about the Christians who say abortion is murder then go bomb an abortion clinic and committ murder themselves? I'm sure I can find other examples too just by doing a little research. The fact is people of all religions commit violence and atrocities in the name of their religion, including Christians. You actually expect anyone to believe that Christians are the only exceptions? That they are the only ones infiltrated by devils. How incredibly absurd.

            • Posted By: getzel @ 02/24/2008 2:47:44 PM

              Christians leadership today is no longer forcibly converting. Moslem leadership is actively engaged in forced conversions: at the point of a gun. It is the arrogant atheist they both dislike the most; at least the agnostic says he does no know. The atheist, who just got here a few years ago, he knows???Atheist and agnostics hate religious; they say it is the religious who cause wars.

              • Posted By: InTheSouth @ 02/24/2008 3:53:34 PM

                I don't know about Christians forcibly converting anyone since I don't have all the info on all the Christian groups in the world and their activities, but far as Muslims go again you are lumping Islamist extremists in with all other Muslims. Are you saying that all Muslim leaders everywhere are forcibly converting at the poinht of a gun? I bet there's a whole lot of Muslim leaders that would disagree with that. Far as your comments about atheists go, it's so garbled I'm not even sure what all your points are. But religion has often been responsible for war in the past and now. Al Qaeda are religious extremists acting on their interpretation of Islam, how is this not religious cause of war? Religion has also inspired great works of art, architecture, and charity. But one only has to look at history or the world today to see that it also causes war, conflict, and violence. There are so many examples of religiously inspired war and violence that one would have to be completely ignorant(and I mean that literally, not as an insult) not to see the truth of this. The Crusades? The Spanish Inquisition? Are you actually saying that religion had nothing to do with these? And I'm sure I can find many other examples if I bother looking.

    • Posted By: getzel @ 02/23/2008 7:56:45 PM

      If someone had a time machine and went back to the year 2 BC and fetched Jesus and brought him to a America 2008; I think Jesus would find himself most at home in a Jewish place of worship in a Jewish area; and would not even recognize a church...Mr. Obama is not to be trusted.
      r

  • Posted By: efisher76 @ 02/24/2008 2:31:40 PM

    As a Jew, I am concerned -- not by Obama (I am a tremendous Obama supporter) -- but rather by the mindset that Israel (or US policy in support of Israel) is infallible. One can still respect and defend Israel's right to exist while acknowledging that 1) the Iraq war and is a disaster, 2) an Iran war would be a bigger disaster, and 3) recent US/Israeli policies have only strengthened Hamas and Hezbollah. It's only when we can view the region with an unbiased eye that we will be able to make real strides toward the peace that Israel (and the rest of the Middle East) deserves.

    • Posted By: getzel @ 02/24/2008 3:33:13 PM

      Bush/Rice (Google: ???supertanker Rice??? for a picture of her oil supertanker; renamed when she went in politics) support creating a terror state on the West Bank and Gaza and are trying to get a terror state in Pakistan and Iraq and elsewhere. Clinton succeeded in creating a terrorist Islamic state in Kosovo, where it did not previously exist: as a State.
      It is not in the USA interest to create an Islamic terror state on the West Bank and in Gaza or anywhere else.
      Israel/Arab (you call palesteinians) is only an excuse for Islamic terror; as we see that wherever the Mohammedans bump against another culture the Mohammedans say the same thing they say about Israel. In India: same thing???in Kosovo: same thing???In Israel:same thing. In Darfor: same thing. In Thailand: same thing??? Wherever the Moslems are contiguous with another people: The Moslems say the same thing they say about Israel.

      The Mohammedans only view ???lets sit down and talk as a sign of weakness and an indication Moslems should attack. So as well intentioned as you may be; your suggestion is only viewed as surrender by the Moslems.

    • Posted By: getzel @ 02/24/2008 3:18:00 PM

      Efisher76: The basic premises you hold as fact in your post are keeping you from that unbiased look/understanding you seem to yearn for.

      A. You seem in denial or oblivious that Iran has been at war with the USA since Jimmy Carter brought the Khomeini back from our beloved Paris in 1979. The fact that you do not understand that Iran is at open, continuous and hostile war with the USA and has been since 1979 is really hurting your reasoning ability. Hizbully is Iran???s privately funded mercenary army.

      B. If Israel "falls" America is right behind it. The Mohammidans would be unstoppable. It is real irony that Jew haters have only Israel in the way of America being targeted and taken over by Muhammidans; Resulting in a burqa on all American women including (EFISHER76). Mohammidans would bring honor killing, women as chattel, public hangings of gays, public stoning of women if their husband feels suspicious, and many other fine customs; including loss of free speech: what we have left of the right to criticize Islam. Yes, real irony how bad Jew haters, Jew lovers, self hating Jews, atheist, agnostics, and Christians need a strong and successful Israel.

      C. read my other post on this blog if you want an objective unbiased assessment of the current market conditions.

      D. USA policy of creating terror states on the West Bank, Gaza, Kosovo, Iraq, Iran, and attempts at creating them in Pakistan and elsewhere is not Israeli policy and are explained further down the page. Bush and Clinton both engage in that activity; but Obama is worse as explained below.

  • Posted By: marketingtruth @ 02/23/2008 10:18:30 PM

    "Senator Obama has a strong record on issues of importance to the pro-Israel community from his time in the Senate," Block added.


    A pro-Israel activist in Washington, who wished to remain anonymous, said that Barack's address "was very good."

    Josh Block

    • Posted By: getzel @ 02/24/2008 2:34:39 PM

      No record, yes we are aware. Misses all crucial, telling, votes. HOPES you vote for him & do you have any spare $CHANGE$. Yes his message comes in loud and clear. Do You Hear?

    • Posted By: getzel @ 02/24/2008 2:27:43 PM

      No record, yes we are aware. Misses all crucial, telling, votes. HOPES you vote for him & do you have any spare $CHANGE$. Yes his message comes in loud and clear. Do You Hear? or maybe you are just hearing things...

    • Posted By: Martin123 @ 02/24/2008 12:57:38 AM

      Very cryptic. But what does it mean?

  • Posted By: J0nblaz @ 02/23/2008 10:18:29 PM

    Newsweek factual correction: Farrakhan criticized the state of Israel's political and military pratices against Palestinians, NOT the religion of Judaism. Newsweek, Michael Hirsh and Dan Ephron already know this.

    • Posted By: getzel @ 02/24/2008 2:29:44 PM

      What planet do you live on? Did you hear farra-con converted to be a Jew. Yes it is true; Newsweek knows about it.

  • Posted By: marketingtruth @ 02/23/2008 10:20:27 PM

    People who complain that Barack Obama lacks experience must be unaware of his legislative achievements. One reason these accomplishments are unfamiliar is that the media have not devoted enough attention to Obama's bills and the effort required to pass them, ignoring impressive, hard evidence of his character and ability.

    Since most of Obama's legislation was enacted in Illinois, most of the evidence is found there -- and it has been largely ignored by the media in a kind of Washington snobbery that assumes state legislatures are not to be taken seriously. (Another factor is reporters' fascination with the horse race at the expense of substance that they assume is boring, a fascination that despite being ridiculed for years continues to dominate political journalism.)

    By Charles Peters

    • Posted By: getzel @ 02/24/2008 2:25:52 PM

      No record, yes we are aware. Misses all crucial, telling, votes. HOPES you vote for him & do you have any spare $CHANGE$. Yes we hear his message. Do You?

  • Posted By: Centrist Voter @ 02/24/2008 1:49:34 PM

    ZBig was one of the worst and most anti Israel National Security Advisor. Let us also not forget that while bombs on buses were killing innocents in Tel Aviv, then First Lady Hillary Clinton was kissing Arafat's wife.

    • Posted By: getzel @ 02/24/2008 2:17:42 PM

      Try it like this: You suggest I marry on a blind date; to someone I can not even see or know anything of substance about. Hillary looks like a fantasy girl in comparison.

    • Posted By: getzel @ 02/24/2008 2:13:59 PM

      But Obama is still worse, because he is a nieve upstart at best. And since he is not saying and the record we do have is not good for America, Obama is a real bad bet.

  • Posted By: eddiewhere @ 02/24/2008 12:16:35 PM

    IT is a two faced relationship because the CLINTON's have close ties with DUBAI. THE ARABS own more than twelve PER CENT of our economy. AND WE ARE heavily IN DEBT TO ARAB Financiers.

    IT IS OBVIOUS THAT voting for the IRAQ WAR has STRENGTHENED IRAN a hundred times over.
    IS THIS IN ISRAEL's BEST INTEREST?
    OBAMA IS very CONCERNED WITH THE RISE OF IRAN AND IS EAGER TO DIFFUSE the situation> Hillary WOULD JUST IGNITE THE FLAMES. WE NEED A NEW Approach.

    "TO SOLVE PROBLEMS we must CONFRONT THE SOURCE AND DEFEAT IT". eddiewhere 2008
    A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO RUSSIA DELIVERED THE LAST OF IT's NUCLEAR SHIPMENT TO IRAN.
    WE SHOULD HAVE STOPPED THAT SHIPMENT by confronting RUSSIA and making it clear that they cannot provide IRAN with nuclear materials. THE ex SOVIET UNION, EASTERN EUROPEAN nations and the five breakaway REPUBLICS in CENTRAL ASIA are the source OF THE WORLD's INSECURE NUCLEAR MATERIALS. BUT WE NEVER GO TO THE SOURCE and CONFRONT IT.
    THIS IS WHy WE NEED A CHANGE. THE SOLUTIONS ARE THERE WE ARE JUST FOLLOWING THE INCORRECT Protocol..





    THE Israeli/ Palestinian CONFLICT is what dictates political relations in the MIDDLE EAST..
    OBAMA WILL LEAD an ARAB/ISRAELI MOVEMENT FOR pEACE. AFTER ALL, THEY ARE THE ONE's THAT MUST CONQUER THE OBSTACLES that obstruct the PATH TO PEACE.
    WHAT IS BEST FOR AMERICA IS TO GET THESE TWO adversaries in the same room TOGETHER AS "MUCH" AS possible. WE NEED young JEWISH AND ARAB groups TO COME TOGHETHER AT ALL LEVELS. OBAMA SHOULD SIT DOWN WITH THE TWO FACTIONS AND CHALLENGE THEM to build organizations that encourage interaction between the two groups. THIS IS THE type OF PARADIGM WE NEED TO FOLLOW if we wish to solve the challenges that face our COUNRy.

    • Posted By: getzel @ 02/24/2008 2:03:18 PM

      Let me try it this way. Just go and sit down with Achmatjihad and talk: The strategy you & Obama suggest, in the language of the middle east, is like a new nerdy kid going to a new mean bully high school the first day of class with a sign someone stuck on his back that says kick me hard. That you are likely in your 20s and new to politics and thankful to see a smart black man that may finally get black people treated with all due respect is not enough to outdo that the things he says and experience he has will likely blunder the USA into a war that you can not imagine. Talk to Achmatjihad as you suggest = kick me as hard as you can; and unfortunately that is true even if you do not understand it; I am afraid that you, in the language of the middle east, invited him to kick, he will miss you and hit me.

    • Posted By: getzel @ 02/24/2008 1:32:17 PM

      I strongly recommend you read about the results from the previous attempts of Israel/ Palestein/USA talks at Camp David in 1993 and 2000. Which part of we only want a terror state dedicated to Israel???s destruction do you not understand. It is the same thing in India, Thailand, Darfur, Kosovo, Chechnya: wherever Islam meets another culture: Hindu, Buddhist, Christian, Jew, African tribal villages, secular, religious; Islamic terror is the only response the Mohammedans use: convert or die. If Israel goes America will be on the Mohammedans front line of attack: your wife and daughter in burqas or dead.

    • Posted By: getzel @ 02/24/2008 12:57:54 PM

      Yes. The executive branch of the USA has had overwhelming numbers of high cabinet members representing oil interest and weapons manufacturers continuously since President Nixon and before. President Eisenhower warned against that when leaving office. Yes, those same cabinet members and some Presidents go on to officially represent other governments in trade matters.

      Bush/Rice (Google: ???supertanker Rice??? for a picture of her oil supertanker; renamed when she went in politics) support creating a terror state on the West Bank and Gaza and are trying to get a terror state in Pakistan and Iraq and elsewhere. Clinton succeeded in creating a terrorist Islamic state in Kosovo, where it did not previously exist: as a State.
      It is not in the USA interest to create an Islamic terror state on the West Bank and in Gaza or anywhere else.
      Israel/Arab (you call palesteinians) is only an excuse for Islamic terror; as we see that wherever the Mohammedans bump against another culture the Mohammedans say the same thing they say about Israel. In India: same thing???in Kosovo: same thing???In Israel:same thing. In Darfor: same thing. In Thailand: same thing??? Wherever the Moslems are contiguous with another people: The Moslems say the same thing they say about Israel.

      The Mohammedans only view ???lets sit down and talk as a sign of weakness and an indication Moslems should attack. So as well intentioned as you may be; your suggestion is only viewed as surrender by the Moslems.

  • Posted By: Centrist Voter @ 02/24/2008 1:46:06 PM

    ZBig was one of the most anti Israel National Security Advisors. G-d help Israel if Zbig is in again with either Obama or Hillary. Also, let us not forget that while bus bombs were killing innocents in Tel Avivi, Hillary was kissing Arafat's wife.

  • Posted By: eddiewhere @ 02/24/2008 11:59:30 AM

    IT is a two faced relationship because the CLINTON's have close ties with DUBAI. THE ARABS own more than twelve PER CENT of our economy. AND WE ARE heavily IN DEBT TO ARAB Financiers.

    IT IS OBVIOUS THAT voting for the IRAQ WAR has STRENGTHENED IRAN a hundred times over.
    IS THIS IN ISRAEL's BEST INTEREST?
    OBAMA IS very CONCERNED WITH THE RISE OF IRAN AND IS EAGER TO DIFFUSE the situation> Hillary WOULD JUST IGNITE THE FLAMES. WE NEED A NEW Approach.

    "TO SOLVE PROBLEMS we must CONFRONT THE SOURCE AND DEFEAT IT". eddiewhere 2008
    A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO RUSSIA DELIVERED THE LAST OF IT's NUCLEAR SHIPMENT TO IRAN.
    WE SHOULD HAVE STOPPED THAT SHIPMENT by confronting RUSSIA and making it clear that they cannot provide IRAN with nuclear materials. THE ex SOVIET UNION, EASTERN EUROPEAN nations and the five breakaway REPUBLICS in CENTRAL ASIA are the source OF THE WORLD's INSECURE NUCLEAR MATERIALS. BUT WE NEVER GO TO THE SOURCE and CONFRONT IT.
    THIS IS WHy WE NEED A CHANGE. THE SOLUTIONS ARE THERE WE ARE JUST FOLLOWING THE INCORRECT Protocol..





    THE Israeli Palestinians RELATIONSHIiP is what dictates political relations in the MIDDLE EAST..
    OBAMA WILL LEAD An ARAB/ISRAELI MOVEMENT FOR pEACE.
    WHAT IS BEST FOR AMERICA IS TO GET THESE TWO adversaries in the same room TOGETHER AS "MUCH" AS possible. WE NEED young JEWISH AND ARAB groups TO COME TOGHETHER AT ALL LEVELS. OBAMA SHOULD SIT DOWN WITH THE TWO FACTIONS AND CHALLENGE THEM to build organizations that encourage interaction between the two groups THIS IS THE t ype OF PARADIGM WE NEED TO FOLLOW if we wish to solve the challenges that face our COUNRy.

    • Posted By: getzel @ 02/24/2008 1:31:39 PM

      I strongly recommend you read about the results from the previous attempts of Israel/ Palestein/USA talks at Camp David in 1993 and 2000. Which part of we only want a terror state dedicated to Israel???s destruction do you not understand. It is the same thing in India, Thailand, Darfur, Kosovo, Chechnya: wherever Islam meets another culture: Hindu, Buddhist, Christian, Jew, African tribal villages, secular, religious; Islamic terror is the only response the Mohammedans use: convert or die. If Israel goes America will be on the Mohammedans front line of attack: your wife and daughter in burqas or dead.

    • Posted By: getzel @ 02/24/2008 12:58:23 PM

      Yes. The executive branch of the USA has had overwhelming numbers of high cabinet members representing oil interest and weapons manufacturers continuously since President Nixon and before. President Eisenhower warned against that when leaving office. Yes, those same cabinet members and some Presidents go on to officially represent other governments in trade matters.

      Bush/Rice (Google: ???supertanker Rice??? for a picture of her oil supertanker; renamed when she went in politics) support creating a terror state on the West Bank and Gaza and are trying to get a terror state in Pakistan and Iraq and elsewhere. Clinton succeeded in creating a terrorist Islamic state in Kosovo, where it did not previously exist: as a State.
      It is not in the USA interest to create an Islamic terror state on the West Bank and in Gaza or anywhere else.
      Israel/Arab (you call palesteinians) is only an excuse for Islamic terror; as we see that wherever the Mohammedans bump against another culture the Mohammedans say the same thing they say about Israel. In India: same thing???in Kosovo: same thing???In Israel:same thing. In Darfor: same thing. In Thailand: same thing??? Wherever the Moslems are contiguous with another people: The Moslems say the same thing they say about Israel.

      The Mohammedans only view ???lets sit down and talk as a sign of weakness and an indication Moslems should attack. So as well intentioned as you may be; your suggestion is only viewed as surrender by the Moslems.

  • Posted By: J Druid @ 02/24/2008 8:56:14 AM

    Clinton and Obama make me want to puke. McCain is a Clinton wannabe who basically is more Pro-War. All three of these fools who keep talking about how much they care about the American people, voted YEA (Yes) to authorize the Patriot Act, which undermines all of our civil liberties (urban, rural, whatever). If the average American knew what these crack pot politicians were doing to our basic rights as American citizens, I think they would be outraged (well, may be I am wrong on that point, but they really should be in my opinion).
    Please, please, please. I hope a Third Party is going to emerge that will call for the Repeal of the Patriot Act, as well as oppose the McClinObama train wreck policies of bigger government, more subsidies, less civil rights, and higher taxes.
    Frankly, the most important country in any dialogue is the United States of America and its own interests. We should stop subsidizing Isreal (and for that matter, the other Arab Peninsula countries like Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, etc.). The sooner the U.S. stops trying to broker a peace agreement in the middle east, the faster peace will come to the middle east. Stop the U.S. interference! We need to concentrate on our problems here at home and let other countries exert their sovereignty free of U.S. interference.

    • Posted By: getzel @ 02/24/2008 11:23:37 AM

      If Israel "falls" America is right behind it. The Mohammidans would be unstoppable. It is real irony that Jew haters have only Israel in the way of America being targeted and taken over by Muhammidans; Resulting in a burqa on all American women. Mohammidans would bring honor killing, women as chattel, public hangings of gays, public stoning of women if their husband feels suspicious, and many other fine customs; including loss of free speech: what we have left of the right to criticize Islam. Yes, real irony how bad Jew haters, Jew lovers, atheist, agnostics, and Christians need a strong and successful Israel.

      If my sense that your lack of fondness for Jews is correct; the joke would be on you if this were not so real and dangerous. Without Israel you get a burqa; Hitchcock would love the irony.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse