Good for the Jews?

NEWSWEEK

« Return to Article

Discuss

Member Comments

  • Posted By: getzel @ 02/26/2008 9:24:21 AM

    War ends We win: when we pass a law that makes the minimum price of gasoline at the pumps: $1.75/gallon; billion dollar/million barrel per day ethanol stills will not be built without protection from OPEC monopoly pricing rusting out our new stills. This war is only a phony weapons deal:

    My view is that Osama B L and Mughniyeh et al should be refered to as "mercenary marketing directors for various government owned weapons manufacturers parading as a religious persons";( my description fits better than theirs & who would believe them if we did not promote them as religious?) no English definition of "religious person" includes flying planes into buildings. true not true, who cares; follow this strategy: War Ends We Win.

    The ethanol investors do not build ethanol distilleries because monopoly OPEC would lower the price to rust out their billion dollar million barrel a day ethanol still. Brazil is energy independent: ethanol; All their cars come built running on ethanol; Archer Daniel Midland made millions on $1.00 gallon ethanol in the 1990s; that trumps any canard/invalid objection to ethanol. Use Cellulose ethanol, not corn ethanol.

    Dollars to Arabs for oil, then the weapons manufactures take most of the dollars from Arabs for weapons; KGB and intelligence services then engage in manipulating ethnic masses. The KGB is the marketing team for the Comuless Moscow Weapons Company,,,see KGB handbook on manipulating ethnic masses by Getzel. The old KGB: Kick up trouble, Go sell weapons , Be in a nice long war; sell lots of weapons...

    It was the Comuless Moscow Weapons Company then (1918-1991: promise communism; deliver slavery of a military industrial complex, 2 eggs and a piece of bread is the minimum you can eat and show for work not communist equal sharing) and it is the Comuless Moscow Weapons Company now. The Song Remains The Same

  • Posted By: linajor @ 02/26/2008 2:52:39 AM

    Shame on Americans and their politicians from Hillary Clinton to Obama to McCain.

    what about American democracy and justice?? I read most of your posts and I found that most Americans are prejudice and discriminating against Arabs an Muslims. I will be ashamed to adulate American Jewish lobby and Israelis as you do. where is your pride, or you really believe the lies of zionists and neoconservatives about linking all evil to Islam, by making average naive Americans believe that : If Israel "falls" America is right behind it....what a big lie....wake up naive Americans...it is a fact that a percentage of any religion (not just Islam) followers are fanatics...muslim fanatics are the creation of the incorrect American foriegn policy...remeber Afghani war against Russians... America created Al-qaeda... and now you blame muslims of their terrorism even that you know that muslims and Arabs were the first victims of Al-Qaeda.

    I found that Americans and westerners are hypocrites and self-centerd...the proof...Germans slaughtered jews in Europe and now Palestenians are suffering because you preferred to solve the jewish problem by forcing palestenians and Arabs to become a scapegoat...shame on your low tactics...and above that every 4 years American great politicians compete to paraise Israeli atrocities and crimes in Palestine, and they don't feel ashamed to show thier humilation to the world.

    Posted By: getzel @ 02/25/2008 23:45:09
    Comment: Old Larde: Liar.

    If Israel "falls" America is right behind it. The Mohammidans would be unstoppable. It is real irony that Jew haters have only Israel in the way of America being targeted and taken over by Muhammidans; Resulting in a burqa on all American women. Mohammidans would bring honor killing, women as chattel, public hangings of gays, public stoning of women if their husband feels suspicious, and many other fine customs; including loss of free speech: what we have left of the right to criticize Islam. Yes, real irony how bad Jew haters, Jew lovers, atheist, agnostics, and Christians need a strong and successful Israel.

    If my sense that your lack of fondness for Jews is correct; the joke would be on you if this were not so real and dangerous. Without Israel you get a burqa; Hitchcock would love the irony.

    • Posted By: getzel @ 02/26/2008 8:25:18 AM

      Comment: Linajor: Al Qaedas rep comes with holier than thou psych-babble. Shame on you for supporting flying planes into buildings, beheadings, hanging gays, honour killing, and loath for critics of the religion that promotes that stuff. Since you did not disavow those practices, only criticize those that criticize those practices; we are left to understand you support those practices: Linajor is an Al Qaeda rep; thanks for presenting the Al Qaeda
      propagangster.

    • Posted By: getzel @ 02/26/2008 8:23:15 AM

      Linajor: Al Qaedas rep comes with holier than thou psych-babble. Shame on you for supporting flying planes into buildings, beheadings, hanging gays, honour killing, and loath for critics of the religion that promotes that stuff. Since you did not disavow those practices, only criticize those that criticize those practices; we are left to understand you support those practices: Linajor is an Al Qaeda rep; thanks for presenting the Al Qaeda
      propagangster.

  • Posted By: eddiewhere @ 02/26/2008 7:07:59 AM

    : TO EZTEL. how can you state ARAB/ ISRAELI RELATIONS DO NOT DICTATE OUR foreign pOLICy IN THE MIDDLE EAST.
    OBAMA IS JUST encouraging COMMUNITy BASED GROUpS FROM BOTH SIDES to sit down and begin a dialouge.. SOMETHING LIKE AN NGO type ORGANIZATION. WHERE ANyoNE CAN CONTRIBUTE TO THE CAUSE. THESE ORGANIZATIONS WILL INFLUENCE THEIR OWN GOVERNMENTS. "THAT WAy THEy" CAN SOLVE THEIR OWN DISpUTES.
    THEy NEED A push in the right direction. BUSH HAS SOFTENED THE ARAB/MUSLIM WORLD Up . THEy WILL WELCOME AND NEW AppROACH. THEy know the consquences of not solving their differences. WAR.

    UNFORTUNATELy THAT IS WHAT THE ESTABLISHMENT ON ON BOTH SIDES WANTS> WAR
    ENCOURAGING OUR ADVERSARIES TO INTERACT WITH EACHOTHER is the best thing FOR AMERICA. ATTACKING SOMEONE yOU KNOW IS MORE DIFFICULT THAN SOMEONE you DO NOT.
    HOW ON EARTH IS ORGANIZING yOUNG pEOLE FOR pEACE a SIGN of WEAKNESS> THAT IS WHAT IRAN FEARS and the establishment on both sides FEAR THE MOST.
    IF THEy DO NOT HAVE AN ENEMy THE pEOpLE WILL TURN ON THEM and ESTABLISH A DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT. THESE Ty pES OF GRASS ROOT ORGANIZATIONS CAN influence REFORM FROM WITHIN IRAN. yOU HAVE BEEN INDOCTRINATED and FEEL THERE IS NO SOLUTION. THOSE WHO BENEFIT FROM THESE TENSIONS HAVE SUCCESSFULLy BLOCKED THE advancement of the peace process since ninety four..
    IT is a two faced relationship because the CLINTON's have close ties with DUBAI. THE ARABS own more than twelve PER CENT of our economy. AND WE ARE heavily IN DEBT TO ARAB Financiers.

    IT IS OBVIOUS THAT voting for the IRAQ WAR has STRENGTHENED IRAN a hundred times over.
    IS THIS IN ISRAEL's BEST INTEREST?
    OBAMA IS very CONCERNED WITH THE RISE OF IRAN AND IS EAGER TO DIFFUSE the situation> Hillary WOULD JUST IGNITE THE FLAMES. WE NEED A NEW Approach.

    "TO SOLVE PROBLEMS we must CONFRONT THE SOURCE AND DEFEAT IT". eddiewhere 2008
    A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO RUSSIA DELIVERED THE LAST OF IT's NUCLEAR SHIPMENT TO IRAN.
    WE SHOULD HAVE STOPPED THAT SHIPMENT by confronting RUSSIA and making it clear that they cannot provide IRAN with nuclear materials. THE ex SOVIET UNION, EASTERN EUROPEAN nations and the five breakaway REPUBLICS in CENTRAL ASIA are the source OF THE WORLD's INSECURE NUCLEAR MATERIALS. BUT WE NEVER GO TO THE SOURCE and CONFRONT IT.
    THIS IS WHy WE NEED A CHANGE. THE SOLUTIONS ARE THERE WE ARE JUST FOLLOWING THE INCORRECT Protocol..





    THE Israeli/ Palestinian CONFLICT is what dictates political relations in the MIDDLE EAST..
    OBAMA WILL LEAD an ARAB/ISRAELI MOVEMENT FOR pEACE. AFTER ALL, THEY ARE THE ONE's THAT MUST CONQUER THE OBSTACLES that obstruct the PATH TO PEACE.
    WHAT IS BEST FOR AMERICA IS TO GET THESE TWO adversaries in the same room TOGETHER AS "MUCH" AS possible.

  • Posted By: Florida 34787 @ 02/26/2008 2:08:17 AM

    Stop the fear-mongering, it is a terrorists number one trait.

  • Posted By: burritobros @ 02/26/2008 1:43:50 AM

    Obama has deliberately chosen Foreign Policy advisers who are viciously anti-Israel. Newsweek, being Liberal, will pooh-pooh the Brezinzski ties. But it can't pooh-pooh Robert Malley, an Arafat apologist who blamed Israel for the breakdown in the Clinton-Barak-Arafat talks at Camp David, nor can it pooh-pooh or whitewash Samatha Power, a senior adviser to Obama, who mused aloud that all U.S. military aid to Israel should cease, and that the proceeds be transferred to those nice benevolent guys in Hamas and Fatah instead. Also note how Obama "disagreed" with his pal Rev. Wright's giving Farrakhan an award. When the KKK endorsed Ronald Reagan in 1980, he not only repudiated them, but blasted them. Obama's reluctance to stand up to Black Racists and Anti-Semites speaks volumes about his own lack of character.

    Also - who would want a shyster jerk lawyer like Gregory Craig handling Foreign Policy? Unless of course you're planning to bring the Dem's and MoveOn.Org's favorite Big Oil Republican, James F The Jews Baker on board the Obama camp. After all, he'd be right at home with the likes of Brezinzski, Lake, Power and Malley.

  • Posted By: Blusuitking @ 02/25/2008 10:12:17 PM

    The economy is f*ck*d, healthcare is unaffordable, the rich keep getting richer (FACT), the middle class is slowly disappearing (FACT) and the American dream is slowly slipping away for many, many people. Why don't we just stay on the same path? Or how about we elect Billary, maybe they will reinvent the internet and technology boom of the mid 90's that made us love them so much. haha. We need a change, not more war, not the same old B.S. that we keep falling for, and if voting for a promising unknown is wrong compared to voting for the same old evils, then I don't want to be right.

    • Posted By: getzel @ 02/26/2008 12:46:25 AM

      Blusuitking: Are you describing Germany 1933 or USA? Your description is Hitler speeches; it is, look it up. OBUMER will put in the draft and you will yearn for the good ole days with Bush.. Just cause you do not see it does not mean it is not so. WAKE UP. Strongly suggest you read my other posts this blog.

  • Posted By: DaveEngland @ 02/26/2008 12:28:55 AM

    Clinton, - stay in thr race for sure - we need a change from these male crooks !!!!!!!

  • Posted By: Old Sarge @ 02/25/2008 11:11:37 PM

    from a REAL AMERICAN - Israel now is trying to force all its citizens of Arabic descent into their own province. We've been made a sucker by them for decades. - And I have great respect for my Jewish friends. It is just that I have no allegiance to any nation but my own!

    • Posted By: getzel @ 02/25/2008 11:45:09 PM

      Old Larde: Liar.

      If Israel "falls" America is right behind it. The Mohammidans would be unstoppable. It is real irony that Jew haters have only Israel in the way of America being targeted and taken over by Muhammidans; Resulting in a burqa on all American women. Mohammidans would bring honor killing, women as chattel, public hangings of gays, public stoning of women if their husband feels suspicious, and many other fine customs; including loss of free speech: what we have left of the right to criticize Islam. Yes, real irony how bad Jew haters, Jew lovers, atheist, agnostics, and Christians need a strong and successful Israel.

      If my sense that your lack of fondness for Jews is correct; the joke would be on you if this were not so real and dangerous. Without Israel you get a burqa; Hitchcock would love the irony.

  • Posted By: manofallah @ 02/25/2008 10:58:07 PM

    After I read some of these blogs, it surely shows that racism is alive and knocking at the door. Why can't we have a clean election without race, gender, and religion playing a part. History is in the past, but the history of america is very ugly and its past shows unhumane things or events that have accured to people of color. So when Obama is being attack by people because of his name, its no surpise to me. Some Americans can't stand to see this brother of color (Obama) run with the best of them. Obama has something good for all of us and that's including people of different race (blacks, whites, hispanics etc) and religion (Muslims, Christians, Jews etc.) This is a very critical period in American history where it can show its true colors of the ugly past (that will never be forgiven) or it can show a future where we can truley be one nation under god. It's time for people of America to stop taking cheap shot at Obama and its issue at hand of him being good for the Jews, or not. Because if he's good for the peopleof America, then he's good enough for the question at hand.

    • Posted By: getzel @ 02/25/2008 11:33:47 PM

      Man of all hate: Manof allhate: thank you for presenting the Al Qaeda perspective. Your support for PINKObumer is telling, ..curse your mustache. You and your daddy Achmatjihad. How many people you murdered lately oh cursed... manof allhate. When do you get marta and go visit devil who has 70 men waiting for to have you???go oh hated one; ???curse your mustache

  • Posted By: Blusuitking @ 02/25/2008 10:35:38 PM

    haha, as if overnight we are going to sever ties with israel, be realistic.

  • Posted By: mfenwick @ 02/25/2008 10:17:33 PM

    Two words if Osama, I mean Obama, is elected: Achtung Juden!

  • Posted By: MEDICAL LDF @ 02/25/2008 9:42:39 PM

    OMG PEOPLE THINK THE NUMBER 1 ISSUE IS HEALTHCARE THINK. ALL OF THIS IS JUST THE SO CALLED SILLY SEASON SO EVERYTHING IS POPPING UP GOOD, BAD, AND THINGS TO CLOUD YOUR BRAIN TAKE 1 TOPIC AT A TIME...........
    JUST PAY ATTENTION TO ONE OF THE DIFFRENCES BETWEEN THE TWO. HAVE YOU EVER BEEN FORCED TO BUY SOMETHING YOU MAY NOT PARTICULARLY BE ABLE TO AFFORD? IT DOESNT FEEL SO GOOD. I AM ALL FOR HEALTHCARE FOR EVERYONE HOWEVER LETS MAKE IT AFFORDABLE AND THEN LET IT BE AN OPTION. IT SHOULD NOT EVER BE MANDATORY AFFORDABLE YES BUT NOT MADATED. LOOK AT THIS POINT YOU WILL PAY A FINE IF YOU DONT HAVE HEALTH INSURANCE UNDER CLINTONS PLAN AFTER 3 TIMES OF NOT HAVING IT YOU WILL THEN GO TO JAIL. SO IF YOU CANT AFFORD HEALTH INSURANCE YOU THEN GET AN ADDITIONAL BILL TO PAY GREAT! THEN YOU MAY LOSE YOUR JOB BECAUSE YOUR IN JAIL THEN WHAT ITS A DOMINIO EFFECT YOU CANT FORCE AMERICAN TO DO THAT. JUST MAKE IT AVAILABLE LIKE UNDER OBAMA HE SAID HE WILL LOWER THE COST THERE FOR IF YOU WANT IT ITS AVAILABLE FOR YOU............ THINK ...

  • Posted By: chgobear @ 02/25/2008 8:57:08 PM

    Getzel....what an idiot you are. And you show it every time your post. Shut up and vote. If you don't like Obama...then don't vote for him. Otherwise shut the H@#L up.

    • Posted By: getzel @ 02/25/2008 9:25:49 PM

      chugabeer: is a #2 & #3: he hates free speech and his UDOPIAN fantasy of HOPE & CHANGE is that PINKObumer also hates free speech; that is why he fanaticizes about PINKObama.


      Research indicates there are 3, maybe 4 if you include congressmen, specific types of people that support PINKObumer.

      1. Hate themselves, and of course proclaim it is others that hate.
      2. Hate others, and of course proclaim it is others that hate.
      3. Most prevalent group: UDOPIANS: Characterized by bizarre manifestations of HOPE and CHANGE according to each individuals individual fantasy of utopia. UDOPIANS have the same side effects, not unlike alcoholics or drug addicts, they are in denial as to reality: that HOPE and CHANGE mean nothing; and yet those with UDOPIA feel HOPE & CHANGE means whatever they fanaticize it means. Each has the same basic politically correct response to those who try and point out they have UDOPIAN simplex: you are a neo-con or you hate or other similar politically correct accusations of the day. Someone points out: OBUMER you have UDOPIAN simplex: I see all the red flags of UDOPIA; same delusional HOPE for CHANGE answer every time.
      4. Congressmen, & their workers, who think PINKObumer is their: 4 more years of pork barrel: free meal ticket for their districts; no leadership with a clue to control congressional out of control spending.= easy re-election.

      • Posted By: InTheSouth @ 02/25/2008 9:33:44 PM

        Reasearch indicates that:

        A good working definition of fanaticism is that you are so convinced of your own views and policies that you are sure anyone who opposes them must either be stupid and deceived or have some ulterior motive.

        This obviously describes getzels view perfectly. He/She is then a fanatic, and like any other fanatic his/her comments are too absurd and ridiculous to be taken seriously by anyone of sober or rational thought.

    • Posted By: getzel @ 02/25/2008 9:16:01 PM

      chugabeer: is a #2 & #3: he hates free speech and his UDOPIAN fantasy of HOPE & CHANGE is that PINKObumer also hates free speech; that is why he fanaticizes about PINKObama.


      Research indicates there are 3, maybe 4 if you include congressmen, specific types of people that support PINKObumer.

      1. Hate themselves, and of course proclaim it is others that hate.
      2. Hate others, and of course proclaim it is others that hate.
      3. Most prevalent group: UDOPIANS: Characterized by bizarre manifestations of HOPE and CHANGE according to each individuals individual fantasy of utopia. UDOPIANS have the same side effects, not unlike alcoholics or drug addicts, they are in denial as to reality: that HOPE and CHANGE mean nothing; and yet those with UDOPIA feel HOPE & CHANGE means whatever they fanaticize it means. Each has the same basic politically correct response to those who try and point out they have UDOPIAN simplex: you are a neo-con or you hate or other similar politically correct accusations of the day. Someone points out: OBUMER you have UDOPIAN simplex: I see all the red flags of UDOPIA; same delusional HOPE for CHANGE answer every time.
      4. Congressmen, & their workers, who think PINKObumer is their: 4 more years of pork barrel: free meal ticket for their districts; no leadership with a clue to control congressional out of control spending.= easy re-election.

      • Posted By: InTheSouth @ 02/25/2008 9:29:48 PM

        Reasearch indicates that:

        A good working definition of fanaticism is that you are so convinced of your own views and policies that you are sure anyone who opposes them must either be stupid and deceived or have some ulterior motive.

        This obviously describes getzels view perfectly. He/She is then a fanatic, and like any other fanatic his/her comments are too absurd and ridiculous to be taken seriously by anyone of sober or rational thought.

  • Posted By: chgobear @ 02/25/2008 8:55:55 PM

    Getzel....what an idiot you are. And you show it every time your post. Shut up and vote. If you don't like Obama...then don't vote for him. Otherwise shut the H@#L up.

    • Posted By: getzel @ 02/25/2008 9:16:28 PM

      chugabeer: is a #2 & #3: he hates free speech and his UDOPIAN fantasy of HOPE & CHANGE is that PINKObumer also hates free speech; that is why he fanaticizes about PINKObama.


      Research indicates there are 3, maybe 4 if you include congressmen, specific types of people that support PINKObumer.

      1. Hate themselves, and of course proclaim it is others that hate.
      2. Hate others, and of course proclaim it is others that hate.
      3. Most prevalent group: UDOPIANS: Characterized by bizarre manifestations of HOPE and CHANGE according to each individuals individual fantasy of utopia. UDOPIANS have the same side effects, not unlike alcoholics or drug addicts, they are in denial as to reality: that HOPE and CHANGE mean nothing; and yet those with UDOPIA feel HOPE & CHANGE means whatever they fanaticize it means. Each has the same basic politically correct response to those who try and point out they have UDOPIAN simplex: you are a neo-con or you hate or other similar politically correct accusations of the day. Someone points out: OBUMER you have UDOPIAN simplex: I see all the red flags of UDOPIA; same delusional HOPE for CHANGE answer every time.
      4. Congressmen, & their workers, who think PINKObumer is their: 4 more years of pork barrel: free meal ticket for their districts; no leadership with a clue to control congressional out of control spending.= easy re-election.

      • Posted By: InTheSouth @ 02/25/2008 9:19:35 PM

        Reasearch indicates that:

        A good working definition of fanaticism is that you are so convinced of your own views and policies that you are sure anyone who opposes them must either be stupid and deceived or have some ulterior motive.

        This obviously describes getzels view perfectly. He/She is then a fanatic, and like any other fanatic his/her comments are too absurd and ridiculous to be taken seriously by anyone of sober or rational thought.

  • Posted By: meltho @ 02/25/2008 8:22:29 PM

    I don't think this issue has been discussed openly enough. And I think that can be a very dangerous thing. This, I think, is at the core of the tension between the West and the Islamic world. It needs to be brought out from under the shadows so that the gullible out there don't end up making misinformed choices out of fear. Obama, of all the candidates, is best-suited to tackle this tough issue by negotiating openly, not secretively.

    • Posted By: getzel @ 02/25/2008 8:34:03 PM

      Meltho: Naive and dangerous at best.

      • Posted By: InTheSouth @ 02/25/2008 9:10:36 PM

        A good working definition of fanaticism is that you are so convinced of your own views and policies that you are sure anyone who opposes them must either be stupid and deceived or have some ulterior motive.

        This obviously describes getzels view perfectly. He/She is then a fanatic, and like any other fanatic his/her comments are too absurd and ridiculous to be taken seriously by anyone of sober or rational thought.

    • Posted By: getzel @ 02/25/2008 8:58:38 PM

      melthos first 3 words in his post some him up perfect.

      • Posted By: InTheSouth @ 02/25/2008 9:10:03 PM

        A good working definition of fanaticism is that you are so convinced of your own views and policies that you are sure anyone who opposes them must either be stupid and deceived or have some ulterior motive.

        This obviously describes getzels view perfectly. He/She is then a fanatic, and like any other fanatic his/her comments are too absurd and ridiculous to be taken seriously by anyone of sober or rational thought.

    • Posted By: getzel @ 02/25/2008 8:38:35 PM

      There are lack people who suggest ???if only black people would had sat down for tea with the KKK I am sure they would have come together and settle their differences??? and become next door neighbors and bosom buddies. These same delusional lack people feel that the same black people to tea with the KKK in 50s would of course continue to be a good idea for bringing peace in Israel; These lack people also ignore reality and write like they woke up today without a clue about yesterdays and the actual reality of the world; These are Neville Chamberlainmaid morons that blunder countries into wars.

      We are left to assume who would strip search the young Arabs for belt bombs before the tea; hosted by the KKK of course.

  • Posted By: voice_of_sanity @ 02/25/2008 4:41:44 PM

    I strongly disagree with getzel. Many Muslims do not want to topple America or Israel. Many Muslims actually support a two-state solution in the Middle East. What many Muslims, as well as many non-Muslims, oppose is the Israeli occupation of and human rights violations in the Palestinian territories.
    Just for your information, many Muslims are not fundamentalist Islamists. Finally, rest assured that I would not hesitate to fight against a fundamentalist Islamist takeover of America in the almost-zero chance that it happens.

    • Posted By: Evax @ 02/25/2008 4:50:15 PM

      True, there are good Muslims and bad Muslims. Burning question: Are Americans ready electing a quasi-Muslim as our Commander-in-Chief?

      • Posted By: InTheSouth @ 02/25/2008 5:17:28 PM

        I'm just curious, maybe there are some experts out there that might be able to enlighten me. But just say Obama actually was an undercover Al-Qaeda( someting I find ludicrous) but just for the sake of argument say he is. He gets elected President. What could he actually get away with before he was found out? The President isn't an all powerful King or dictator, he couldn't issue any irrational or extreme orders or demands and expect to be obeyed, such actions would only expose him. How much damage could he actually do constantly in the public eye and under government scrutiny? All while having to do all the routine tasks and work of his office to keep up the ruse? Just doesn't seem very likely to me, but then again I'm no security expert or anything. Seems to me a better strategy would be to get someone in a less conspicous position, but still close enough to have access to certain information: such as the President's daily routine and such. Very possible I'm wrong as i said I'm no expert, but if anyone can tell me how in an intelligent and specific way please do so. I'd really like to know.

        • Posted By: getzel @ 02/25/2008 6:18:01 PM

          an ounce of prevention...stupid

          • Posted By: InTheSouth @ 02/25/2008 7:17:26 PM

            Apparently you missed the part where I said "intelligent." That automatically disqualifies anything you have to say. And I see you are still engaging in hypocrisy by calling me names.

            • Posted By: InTheSouth @ 02/25/2008 7:32:49 PM

              And you also missed the whole point of my post. Your answer was neither intelligent nor specific. All you did was give me your opinion on why he should'nt be elected. I'm describing a hpothetical situation where he has already been elected and is in a position to do possible harm. Your response does'nt even answer the question. And you call me stupid? You can't even understand what I'm asking for.

              • Posted By: getzel @ 02/25/2008 8:50:03 PM

                shoe fits, youmust admit!

                • Posted By: InTheSouth @ 02/25/2008 9:09:02 PM

                  Again another typical juvenile getzel response in an attempt to ignore the truth.

      • Posted By: getzel @ 02/25/2008 6:23:54 PM

        I doubt they would figure it out...Americans still do not know that Condi Rice has an OIL supertanker transporting oil from the mid-east with her name on it...OK they erased her name before making her Bushs Secretary for wrecking the State...google it for picture

    • Posted By: getzel @ 02/25/2008 6:11:29 PM

      Liar

  • Posted By: MChieco @ 02/25/2008 4:49:59 PM

    Tony Resko , is a major Obama campaign contributor , and is being held in jail on bail pending trial so he does not flee to Syria.. These are not opinions , these are facts.

    • Posted By: eyesus34 @ 02/25/2008 5:25:35 PM

      Can't HRC's supporters come up with new talking points instead of the same ones that have been refuted time and again? For the upmteenth time, Obama has returned all of the money donated by Rezko and has stated that if more money is identified, he'd return that too. Furthermore, unlike HRC, Obama has shown true financial transparency by releasing his tax return. Got anymore mistruths that need debunking?

      • Posted By: dipconsult @ 02/25/2008 6:20:33 PM

        Yes. And Obama has set out his policy on Israel in foreign policy stratement in Foreign Affairs for July/August 2007. Speaking of negotiations ot end the Isreal Palestinian conflict he says "Our strarting point must always be a clearv and strong commitment to the security of Israel.... There is no reason to doubt this. Unfortunatleyt the 'Israel lobby is over-sensitive to any criticism however justified of Israel harcd line policies.

        • Posted By: getzel @ 02/25/2008 8:43:07 PM

          insultingdip: If there is no reason then why do so many reasonable and intelligent people doubt. And the posts of UDOPIAN PINKObamas believe but post nothing of reasoned positions; just hope and change...what morons.

      • Posted By: getzel @ 02/25/2008 6:15:33 PM

        eyesus4qaeda...

      • Posted By: dipconsult @ 02/25/2008 6:15:19 PM

        Yes, and moreover Obama has set out his foreign policy proposals in some detail in 'Foreign Policy' for July/August 2007. On Israel/Palestine, e says: 'Our starting point must always be a clearv and strong commitment to the security of Israel, our strongest aly in the region.....
        There is no reason to doubt his sincerity. Unfortiunately the 'Israel' lobyy' is over-sensitive.to any criticism of even the hardest lines taken bu by Israel even when not in its inyterests of either Isreal of the US.


  • Posted By: readysf @ 02/25/2008 7:48:02 PM

    Obama would be great for Israel. He would push for a true fix to the problems in the region, which include removing the "moral hazard" Israel faces, of being supported by us irrespective of what it does. He has my vote!

    • Posted By: getzel @ 02/25/2008 8:26:06 PM

      If Israel "falls" America is right behind it. The Mohammidans would be unstoppable. It is real irony that Jew haters have only Israel in the way of America being targeted and taken over by Muhammidans; Resulting in a burqa on all American women. Mohammidans would bring honor killing, women as chattel, public hangings of gays, public stoning of women if their husband feels suspicious, and many other fine customs; including loss of free speech: what we have left of the right to criticize Islam. Yes, real irony how bad Jew haters, Jew lovers, atheist, agnostics, and Christians need a strong and successful Israel.

      If my sense that your lack of fondness for Jews is correct; the joke would be on you if this were not so real and dangerous. Without Israel you get a burqa; Hitchcock would love the irony.

  • Posted By: steveabn @ 02/25/2008 8:07:23 PM

    You can't spell the word difference; the question should be what do they have in common and your use of grammatical syntax is amazing.

  • Posted By: getzel @ 02/23/2008 7:00:02 PM

    If Israel "falls" America is right behind it. The Mohammidans would be unstoppable. It is real irony that Jew haters have only Israel in the way of America being targeted and taken over by Muhammidans; Resulting in a burqa on all American women. Mohammidans would bring honor killing, women as chattel, public hangings of gays, public stoning of women if their husband feels suspicious, and many other fine customs; including loss of free speech: what we have left of the right to criticize Islam. Yes, real irony how bad Jew haters, Jew lovers, atheist, agnostics, and Christians need a strong and successful Israel.

    • Posted By: Martin123 @ 02/24/2008 1:53:05 AM

      Israel is a failed state. It has been in a state of upheaval since is misguided inception. It has failed even to achieve peace. Failed to serve the members of it's community equally and without prejudics, has engaged in torture in Lebanon and elsewhere. It has engaged in illegal assasinations in other countries. It litters other countries with cluster bombs and munitions, and failed to resolve the Palestinian territories. Why be friends with losers?

      • Posted By: Healthymind @ 02/25/2008 7:54:00 PM

        Congratulation Martin ,I wish many people think like you , special our race ,we see they start with they mind to made big mistakes in our choice for the new president , I consider this people not more a TRASH because they not made any diference betwin our ancestors who come first time in America and put the monkey on the some level ,sorry like to say Hybrids monkey ,like happen in Kansas .

      • Posted By: getzel @ 02/24/2008 9:39:15 AM

        Now you misguided points one by one: Martin123 says

        1. ???misguided inception??????
        one may argue all the countries creation were misguided; but that is through the lenses of hindsight.
        A. I suspect you are trying to say, the erroneous point, that Jews do not belong in this area. Jews lived in this area for 1800 years before Mohammed was born; Jews are documented in this area dating to +/- 1313 BC.
        B. Jews had a capital in Jerusalem +/_ 1000 years before Mohammed was born. There is written documentation to prove it and 20th and 21st century ( and previous centuries) archeology to prove Jewish presence and verify the written documentation.
        C. Since the Jewish presents predates the Moslem presence and has been open and continuous for +/- 2300 years and includes deeds; it is bazaar to claim the Jews have no claim to the land; and such a statement could only be made by one who has ones mind made up and is not interested in facts.

        2. ???failed even to achieve peace??????
        A. is not a claim to the land
        B. is an acknowledgement that Israel wants peace but its neighbors, in the new states cut out of Ottoman Turkey, are the ones who do not want peace: not a claim to the land.

        3. Failed to serve the members of it's community equally and without prejudics ( assume MARTIN123 meant: prejudices) engaged in torture in Lebanon and elsewhere.
        A. Interesting that you hold yourself out as judge and jury, can any man afford such arrogance)
        B. you seem to infer that Syria, Iraq, Saudi et al are bastions of: freedom of speech, religion, free elections, women???s full and equal rights, no torture, et al.
        C. Not a claim to the land.

        4. illegal assasinations (assume martin123 meant: assassinations)
        A. Interesting that you hold yourself out as judge and jury, can any man afford such arrogance)
        B. B. you seem to infer that Syria, Iraq, Saudi et al are bastions of: freedom of speech, religion, free elections, women???s full and equal rights, no torture, et al.
        C. Not a claim to the land.

        5. litters other countries with cluster bombs and munitions, and failed to resolve the Palestinian territories.
        A. Martin123 acknowledges that surrounding areas are hostile and initiate hostility;
        He who fights and runs away???gets littered
        B. Stop being hostile and maybe those planning to blow up pizza stores will cease having work accidents
        C. Not a claim to the land.
        D. Interesting that you hold yourself out as judge and jury, can any man afford such arrogance.
        6. Why be friends with losers???
        A. Israel is still there after being attacked by losers for 60 years.
        B. Res Ipsa Loquitur as to who is therefore friends with loser
        C. Not a claim to the land
        C. We see that only Israel has a claim to the land according to the Authoritative Judge and jury: martin123


      • Posted By: getzel @ 02/24/2008 9:38:18 AM

        The Ottoman Turks were the government in the middle east until 1917-8. France and England were given Mandates of these areas of the middle east after the demise of Ottoman Turkey . All of the counties of the middle east were drawn by lines in the sand; including Syria, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Lebanon et al. So that these countries were all created from the old Ottoman empire in the 20th century. It may be helpful for you to read Lawrence of Arabia.

Reply

Report Abuse

Enter comments if any for reporting abuse