To Ohmstede: Yes, many people live beyond their measn. They are not necessarily stupid. Inflation has outpaced salary for a significant number of occupations over the last decade. The financial institutions are among the most aggressive sale forces that exist, Way back in the 70's when telemarketing was big, banks did more telemarketing than any other business--selling loans to consumers, farmers and small businesses. Look at the ads on tv, the junk mail and spam. The offers for loans and credit cards are outrageous. My parents generation had repeated and strong message that acceptable consumer debt was home mortgage. My generation had mixed messages. The generation below me (I am 55) has an overwhelming message that debt is normal. Did you notice that as soon as the recent tax rebate/credit was passed that financial institutions immediately began advertising cards to spend the money without having to wait for the credit?
Some people are stupid and/or greedy but many are not. The sad part is that the people who got sucked in are getting help, the lending institutions continue to pay bonuses in excess of a million dollars to executives and often several hundred thousand to people on the board of directors while the people who are saving and investing for retirement with a 100 shares of their companies or in mutual funds that own the companies are getting shafted as the stock prices plummet.
- 1
- 2
The Specter of Stagflation
Email To A Friend
Please fill in the following information and we'll email this link.
For the past six months, the Fed has been under enormous pressure to ease money and credit. It has. The overnight Fed funds rate has fallen from 5.25 percent in early September to 3 percent at the end of January. Politicians are clamoring for the Fed to prevent a recession and cushion the effects of the housing collapse. Banks, investment banks and other financial institutions want cheaper credit to enable them to offset losses on subprime mortgages. There is fear of a wider economic crisis if large losses erode confidence and, by depleting the capital of banks and other financial institutions, undermine their ability and willingness to lend and invest.
Unfortunately, the Fed shows signs of overreacting to these pressures and repeating the great blunder of the 1970s. Underestimating inflation then, the Fed repeatedly shoved out too much money and credit in a vain effort to keep the economy near "full employment." Inflationary psychology became widespread, and the resulting wage-price spiral fed on itself. Now, switch to the present. Again, the Fed has underestimated inflation. It expected the economic slowdown to suppress inflation spontaneously. This belief helped rationalize the dramatic easing of credit through the five rate cuts since mid-September. But so far, the lower inflation hasn't materialized in part because, outside of housing, there hasn't been much of an economic slowdown.
It's true that the Fed is treading the proverbial tight rope. No one wants a financial crisis; but no one should want the return of stagflation either. The trick is to provide enough credit to prevent the former and not so much as to cause the later. In judging what that balance should be, the Fed needs to be less intimidated by present problems and more concerned with long-term consequences. The American economy—a marvelous but flawed engine of wealth—periodically goes to speculative or inflationary excesses. If most of those excesses aren't given the time to self-correct, we may be trading modest pain today for much greater pain tomorrow. Trying to prevent a recession at all costs is a fool's errand that could ultimately backfire on us all.
© 2008
- 1
- 2
My Take
Each Newsweek reader is different—and now your Newsweek can be, too. Use this page to create a experience that's personalized for you and your interests. My Take: it makes Newsweek whatever you want it to be.
Discuss